The appellant, Oliver Ritchie, appealed his convictions for luring a child under 16 and communicating for the purpose of obtaining sexual services of a minor, and sought leave to appeal his 16-month sentence.
The convictions stemmed from an online police sting operation where a detective impersonated a 14-year-old girl.
The appellant denied sending the texts, claiming a stranger used his phone.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal from conviction, finding no errors in the trial judge's application of the law regarding age presumption, evidence assessment, or the W.(D.) analysis.
Leave to appeal sentence was granted but the appeal was also dismissed, as the sentence was not demonstrably unfit and aligned with the Supreme Court's directive in Friesen for increased sentences in child sexual offense cases.