In supplementary reasons settling the order of a previous appeal, the Court of Appeal fixed the judgment awarded to the respondent franchisee at $208,632.26 and the appellant franchisor's counterclaim at $94,200, along with respective prejudgment interest.
Because the respondent ultimately recovered less than its trial settlement offer, the court varied the trial costs award from a solicitor and client basis to a party and party basis, reaffirming that distributive costs awards should be avoided.
