Mark Hart is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 623 decisions on record from 2007 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Mark Hart sit on?

Mark Hart sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Mark Hart decide?

Mark Hart's most common areas include Human Rights (623 decisions), Administrative Law (299 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (150 decisions). Mark Hart has handled 623 decisions across 9 areas.

How many decisions has Mark Hart made?

Mark Hart has 623 decisions on record from 2007 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Mark Hart?

Representatives who frequently appear before Mark Hart include Prabhu Rajan, John Bell, Self-represented.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Mark Hart — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Health Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Workers' Compensation

Mark Hart

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2007

623

cases · 11 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 364Adjudicator· 92Vice-chair· 83Vice-Chair· 42Adjudicator· 23Vice-Chair· 11Vice-chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Grace Vaccarelli

33 cases2009–2018

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 7, 2014

Refusal to pay retention bonus to employee on maternity leave constituted discrimination on the basis of sex.

The applicant alleged discrimination on the basis of sex (pregnancy) after the respondent refused to pay her an $8,500 retention bonus because she was on maternity leave on the payout date.

The Tribunal found that the applicant had fulfilled the requirement of 'employment continuance' by using accrued vacation and personal days to remain on paid leave through the required date.

The respondent's refusal to pay the bonus because the applicant could not produce a payslip for the specific date, which was directly attributable to her maternity leave, constituted direct discrimination with respect to employment.

The Tribunal rejected the respondent's bona fide occupational requirement defence and ordered payment of the bonus plus $5,000 for injury to dignity, feelings, and self-respect.

Ifrah v. National Income Protection Plan Inc., 2014 HRTO 1637

Tribunal strikes allegations of enticement and non-Code-related workplace violence from human rights application.

The respondent requested an order dismissing parts of a human rights application that alleged the applicant was enticed away from his former employer and subjected to non-Code-related workplace violence and harassment.

The Tribunal held that allegations of enticement and reliance on employer representations are not relevant to a Code violation or remedy.

Similarly, the cause of a disability, including non-Code-related workplace violence, is not relevant unless the conduct itself violates the Code.

The Tribunal ordered that evidence regarding these allegations will not be received at the hearing.

Costanza v. Cap-Thin Molds, 2014 HRTO 1542

Stephanie Ramsay

1 case2014–2014

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 14, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as an impermissible collateral attack on a prior arbitration decision.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability, age, and reprisal against his employer and union.

The allegations stemmed from the employer's reliance on permanent medical restrictions identified by the WSIB, which the applicant disputed, and the union's handling of his grievances.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing and dismissed the application.

It found that the issues regarding the applicant's medical restrictions and ability to perform the job had already been determined in a prior grievance arbitration, barring them under section 45.1 of the Code.

The remaining allegations against both the employer and the union were dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

Norman v. Mahle Filter Systems Canada ULC, 2014 HRTO 1532

Lia Preyde

4 cases2012–2015

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 10, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abuse of process due to binding full and final release.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of race and colour.

The respondents raised a preliminary objection, arguing the application was an abuse of process because the applicant had signed a full and final release upon termination of his employment in exchange for an enhanced severance package.

The applicant argued he signed the release under economic duress due to his wife's medical condition and financial obligations.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's circumstances did not meet the high threshold for duress, as he did not establish that he had no other option but to sign the agreement.

The application was dismissed as an abuse of process.

Fidelis Ogbue v. Sears Canada Inc. and Lisa Kerr, 2014 HRTO 1519

Glenn Christie

25 cases1998–2017

Corinne Muccilli

6 cases2012–2023

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 9, 2014

Tribunal restricts evidence to specific alleged discriminatory comment, excluding general work environment allegations.

In an interim decision, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario addressed the scope of evidence admissible in a hearing regarding allegations of racial discrimination in employment.

The Tribunal ruled that the applicant's proposed evidence concerning general work environment allegations was inadmissible, as those allegations had not been permitted to proceed following a prior summary hearing.

The hearing was restricted to the specific 'slave for a day' comment and a subsequent email, along with relevant contextual evidence regarding human rights policies and training.

Jean-Pierre v. Office of the Ontario Ombudsman, 2014 HRTO 1512

Monty Verlint

2 cases2014–2016

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 7, 2014

Tribunal finds inadvertent breach of settlement for delayed reference letter but declines to award compensation.

The applicant filed a Contravention of Settlement Application alleging the respondent breached a settlement agreement by delaying the payment of settlement funds and failing to provide a letter of reference.

The Tribunal found that the delay in payment, caused by an incorrect address, did not constitute a breach.

However, the Tribunal held that the failure to provide the letter of reference until after the application was filed breached an implied term to deliver it within a reasonable time.

Despite finding a breach, the Tribunal declined to award the requested $10,000 in compensation, noting the breach was inadvertent, the applicant had not previously followed up on the letter, and no specific impact was demonstrated.

Pipiska v. Superior Workforce Solutions, Corp., 2014 HRTO 1489

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 1, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend scheduled summary hearing.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

A summary hearing was scheduled by teleconference, and notice was properly delivered to the applicant.

The applicant failed to attend the hearing and did not communicate with the Tribunal to explain her absence.

Consequently, the application was dismissed as abandoned.

Melo v. Hornblower Canada Co., 2014 HRTO 1462

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 1, 2014

Reconsideration request denied due to unexplained delay and failure to update contact information while incarcerated.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a decision that dismissed his human rights application as abandoned due to his failure to comply with disclosure obligations.

The applicant argued he was incarcerated at the time and did not receive the Tribunal's directions or the final decision.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the applicant failed to notify the Tribunal of his change in contact information upon his incarceration, and that his reconsideration request was filed almost 10 months late without a reasonable explanation for the delay following his release.

Rosario v. FORM Architecture Engineering, 2014 HRTO 1466

Shaheen Hirani

Suspended Administratively14 cases1997–2022

Daniel McDonald

35 cases2009–2024

Bay Ryley

41 cases2005–2025

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 1, 2014

Untimely human rights allegations dismissed for delay; claim against union representative dismissed for no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability, age, and association.

The Tribunal held a preliminary hearing to address issues of delay, whether the matter was appropriately dealt with in a grievance settlement (s. 45.1), and whether there was a reasonable prospect of success against the union representative.

The Tribunal dismissed the untimely allegations for delay, finding no good faith explanation for the delay and that the incidents did not form a series.

The Tribunal declined to dismiss the remaining timely allegation under s. 45.1, finding the applicant had not agreed to the grievance settlement.

The application against the union representative was dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant was directed to file a fresh application detailing the single remaining timely allegation.

Raywatie Baldeo v. Securitas Canada Limited and Sean Logan, 2014 HRTO 1453

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 1, 2014

Request for reconsideration of decision dismissing applications for delay denied as no new determinative facts presented.

The applicant filed a request for reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights applications for delay.

The applicant argued that his incarceration in solitary confinement, his HIV/AIDS disability, and his fear of disclosing his HIV status prevented him from filing earlier.

The Tribunal found that the applicant was merely repeating submissions already considered in the original decision and failed to present new determinative facts, establish a conflict with jurisprudence, or show other factors outweighing the public interest in finality.

The request for reconsideration was denied.

Aziga v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2014 HRTO 1465

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 26, 2014

Request for reconsideration denied as applicant failed to show original decision conflicted with established jurisprudence.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights applications against his landlord and the City of Ottawa following a summary hearing.

The applicant alleged discrimination based on disability and reprisal, arguing that the adjudicator erred in finding no link between his disability and the condition of the walkway, and in finding no reprisal regarding his eviction.

The Tribunal denied the request for reconsideration, finding that the applicant failed to establish that the original decision was in conflict with established jurisprudence or Tribunal procedure, as he did not provide a sufficient basis to connect the respondents' actions to his disability or the assertion of his Code rights.

Arsenault v. Sunter, 2014 HRTO 1447

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 26, 2014

Human rights application dismissed for lack of estate trustee and no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicants filed a human rights application on behalf of their deceased daughter's estate, alleging the respondent hospital discriminated against her based on creed by failing to provide Anglican chaplaincy services prior to her death.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing and dismissed the application on two grounds.

First, the applicants lacked standing as they had not been appointed as estate trustees, which is legally required to initiate a proceeding on behalf of a deceased person.

Second, the application had no reasonable prospect of success because the applicants could not point to any evidence suggesting the hospital denied chaplaincy services specifically because of the deceased's Anglican faith, as opposed to a general failure of service.

Estate of Crystal Rose v. Humber River Regional Hospital, 2014 HRTO 1449

Lior Samfiru

In Private Practice24 cases2006–2024

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 24, 2014

Request to re-activate transitional application granted despite 35-day delay due to lack of prejudice.

The applicant sought to re-activate his transitional human rights application following a decision by the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (WSIAT).

The request was filed 35 days after the 60-day deadline set out in the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The Tribunal found that the applicant provided a reasonable explanation for the delay, having attempted to contact his former representative within the deadline.

Given the short length of the delay and the lack of prejudice to the respondents, the Tribunal granted the request to re-activate the application and ordered a hearing to determine whether the matter had been appropriately dealt with by the WSIAT.

Faizool Shaffick v. The Oakville Club Ltd., 2014 HRTO 1424

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 22, 2014

Human rights applications alleging family status discrimination for taking summer leave to visit father allowed to proceed.

The applicants, two young siblings, were employed at the respondent's restaurant.

They took a summer leave of absence to visit their father, who lived in another city.

Upon returning, they were told they would not be given work hours and had to re-apply the following spring.

They filed human rights applications alleging discrimination in employment based on family status.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the applications had a reasonable prospect of success.

Given the developing state of the law regarding family status and the unique factual matrix, the Tribunal declined to dismiss the applications and directed them to proceed to a full hearing.

Rongits v. Perry, 2014 HRTO 1404

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 18, 2014

Respondent's request to adjourn hearing due to venue change to applicant's detention centre denied.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on creed.

Prior to the hearing, the applicant was incarcerated.

To facilitate the hearing, the Tribunal arranged to hold the hearing at the detention centre.

The respondent objected to the change in venue and the applicant's late filing of documents, and requested a three to four month adjournment.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment request, finding the security protocols and venue change were not significantly onerous, and ruled that issues regarding late disclosure could be addressed at the hearing.

Clipperton-Boyer v. RedFlagDeals.com, a division of Yellow Pages Group Inc., 2014 HRTO 1392

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 17, 2014

Request to withdraw human rights application granted despite respondents' objection.

The applicant filed a request to withdraw her human rights application days before the scheduled hearing.

The respondents objected, arguing the withdrawal was an abuse of process and that the applicant should be compelled to proceed so the personal respondent could clear his name.

The Tribunal granted permission to withdraw, noting it cannot compel a party to appear and that the withdrawal achieves essentially the same result as a dismissal for abandonment, leaving the allegations unproven.

Sharma v. Securitas Canada Ltd., 2014 HRTO 1386

Christopher White

5 cases1990–2014

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 3, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as an abuse of process due to a prior binding settlement agreement.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed as an abuse of process because the parties had previously signed a Memorandum of Agreement settling all outstanding grievances and issues, which included a full and final release.

The applicant argued she signed the agreement under duress, fearing police involvement regarding alleged improper retention of funds.

The Tribunal found insufficient evidence of duress, noting the applicant had union representation and received the full benefit of the settlement.

The application was dismissed as an abuse of process.

Zehr v. London District Catholic School Board, 2014 HRTO 1300

Michael Cooper

3 cases2013–2014

Louis Strezos

1 case2014–2014

Jay Rajagopalan

4 cases2012–2015

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 29, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as barred by s. 34(11) due to concurrent civil action.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging sex discrimination and sexual solicitation.

She subsequently commenced a civil action in the Superior Court of Justice encompassing the same allegations and seeking damages under the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal held a preliminary hearing to determine if the application was barred by section 34(11) of the Code.

The Tribunal found that section 34(11) applies even when the civil action is commenced after the Tribunal application, and that the Tribunal has no discretion to stay rather than dismiss the application in these circumstances.

The application was dismissed.

Vittoria Fera v. Arista Homes Limited and Joe Ramos, 2014 HRTO 1285

Chantel Goldsmith

8 cases2014–2016

Brenda Culbert

32 cases2011–2017

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 26, 2014

Tribunal orders respondent to provide document list and permits applicant's doctor to testify by teleconference.

The applicant in a human rights proceeding requested an order requiring the respondent to provide a list of documents it intended to rely upon at the hearing, and an order permitting his family doctor to testify by teleconference.

The Tribunal granted both requests.

The Tribunal emphasized that Rule 16.2(a) requires parties to identify specific documents to be relied upon to ensure efficient case management.

The Tribunal also noted that medical professionals frequently testify by teleconference in disability discrimination cases, as credibility assessments of such witnesses are rarely required.

Cann v. AS 4Finance Ltd., 2014 HRTO 1260

Tina Earl

7 cases2014–2016

Marco Visentini

Practising Law - Employed7 cases2007–2014

Jean-Frédéric Hübsch

1 case2014–2014

Fred Tranquilli

8 cases2011–2019

Byrdena MacNeil

5 cases2010–2015

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 18, 2014

Tribunal orders former counsel and Ombudsman to produce inmate's own documents for human rights application.

The applicant, an inmate, filed a human rights application alleging discrimination with respect to services.

In this interim decision, the Tribunal addressed the applicant's requests for consolidation, amendment, an extension of time, and production of documents.

The Tribunal denied consolidation with previously dismissed applications and denied the amendment request.

The Tribunal granted a brief extension of time for the applicant to file materials for an upcoming preliminary hearing.

The Tribunal ordered the applicant's former criminal counsel and the Ombudsman Ontario to produce specific documents and correspondence that the applicant had previously provided to them or received from them, to assist the applicant in providing particulars of his allegations.

The Tribunal denied the request for broader documentary production from the respondents at this preliminary stage.

Aziga v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2014 HRTO 1227

Page 8 of 32 (623 cases)

Applicant

Philton MooreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jenny DeGoeySelf-represented
1 appearance
Derek FranciscoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark RobertsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Viktoriya StepanovaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Raywatie BaldeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bright (Zeguo) QiuSelf-represented
1 appearance

assisted the Applicant

Michael CraigAgent
1 appearance

Counsel

Michelle WongCounsel
1 appearance
E.C. Carla ZabekCounsel
1 appearance
Jayson RiderCounsel
1 appearance
Kelly HarbridgeCounsel
1 appearance
Darrell KloezeCounsel
1 appearance
William McDowellCounsel
1 appearance
Woodward McCaigCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance
Fateh SalimCounsel
1 appearance
Sheryl JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance
Timothy LawsonCounsel
1 appearance
Woodward McKaigCounsel
1 appearance
Roger MillsCounsel
1 appearance
Leslie McIntoshCounsel
1 appearance
Michael M. MillerCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi LoewithCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Dr. Erik Paidra

Anne PosnoCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Lakeridge Health Corporation

Shane SmithCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Novopharm Limited, Gail Lucyk and Halima Khan

Angela RaeCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Cynthia MackenzieCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Intervener

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for the respondents

Mark EllisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Clarisa WaldmanCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Niki LunquistCounsel
1 appearance

for 2117392 Ontario Inc., William Farmer and Brandon Farmer

Tanya WalkerCounsel
1 appearance

for A.A. Property Management & Associates Inc.

Edmond PriftiAgent
1 appearance

for A.C.

P.S.-C.Self-represented
1 appearance

for Andy Carson

Paula Soares-CarsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Anthony Piazza and Maria Perry

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for Arista Homes Limited

Michael CooperCounsel
1 appearance

for Bata Limited (Canada Corporation No. 678234-5)

Leslie TennenbaumCounsel
2 appearances

for Bata Limited (now known as Athletes World Limited)

Connie ReeveCounsel
1 appearance

for Brian Edwards

Grace SkowronskiAgent
1 appearance
Aaron WudrickCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Auto Workers Local 199

Keith OsborneUnion representative
1 appearance

for Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 997 and Lynn Raback

Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance

for Centennial College

Nancy FisherAgent
1 appearance

for Communications, Energy & Paperworkers Union, Local 324 and George Smith

Denis EllicksonCounsel
2 appearances

for Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

Colin OsterbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Anita Grewal

Fred TranquilliCounsel
1 appearance

for D.S.

L.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board, Herman Viloria and John Lezon

Nadya TymochenkoCounsel
2 appearances

for Dylan Sigrist

Lori SigristSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Gary Clarke, Jeff Gillies, Joseph Rapai, Terry Grand, Anne Kavelaars, Evelyn Paparella, Tamare Nugent, Des Desalaiz

Melanie A. WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for General Motors of Canada Limited

David BannonCounsel
1 appearance

for Georgina Watts

Victoria ShenCounsel
1 appearance

for Halton Condominium Corporation #77, J & W Condominium Management Ltd., and Don Rowatt

Karen KisielCounsel
1 appearance

for Hamilton Police Service and Troy Ashbaugh

Marco VisentiniCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services and Toula Bezas

Chris DonszelmannCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Education

Karen InselbacherCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, Theren Beecroft and Kent Milligan

Christina DonszelmannCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as Represented by the Ministry of Education and Training, Intervenor

Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Paul SharmaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dean de LottinvilleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael BradtSelf-represented
1 appearance
Douglas MooreSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Joe Ramos

Louis StrezosCounsel
1 appearance

for Jose Pratas

Greg McGivernCounsel
1 appearance
Laura JoyCounsel
1 appearance

for Justicia for Migrant Workers

Grace VaccarelliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kevin Cote, David Lenchuk and Stan Belza

Joanne MulcahyCounsel
2 appearances

for London District Catholic School Board

Eric M. RoherCounsel
1 appearance

for March of Dimes Canada

Lee HardingAgent
1 appearance

for McMaster Association of Part-Time Students

Suzan FraserCounsel
1 appearance

for McMaster Students Union Inc.

Derek CollinsCounsel
1 appearance

for McMaster University

George AvraamCounsel
1 appearance
Dina MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Lisa StamCounsel
1 appearance

for Metro Ontario Inc. and Rick Crean

Charles RobertsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Nigel Thomas

Joanne MulcahyCounsel
1 appearance

for Olymel S.E.C. / L.P. and Michel Boudreault

Stephen BernardoCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Human Rights Commission

Tony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Step

Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Peel Regional Police Services Board and Jeff Duffield

Patricia MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Lauri WallCounsel
1 appearance

for Presteve Foods Ltd.

Gino MorgaCounsel
1 appearance

for Shelley Kiewning

Theodore ScollieCounsel
2 appearances

for Sonja Bata

Ronald J. McCloskeyCounsel
1 appearance

for Special Education Tribunal, Intervenor

Lucy McSweeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Parties Hamilton Police Service and Troy Ashbaugh

Marco VisentiniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Parties The City of Hamilton and Linda Blake-Evans

Byrdena MacNeilCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

W. Gordon SteinbergCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Brian HumphreyUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Davies Bagambiire

Davies BagambiireSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Kevin Robinson

Kevin RobinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Affected Party The Ontario Ombudsman

Jean-Frédéric HübschCounsel
1 appearance

for The AIDS Network

Kevin RobinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
5 appearances
Philton MooreSelf-represented
5 appearances
Johnson AzigaSelf-represented
5 appearances
Glen MorrisonAgent
4 appearances
Mathew BlakelySelf-represented
4 appearances
Robert LeeSelf-represented
4 appearances
Sandra BartonCounsel
4 appearances
Allison TaylorCounsel
4 appearances
Wade PoziomkaCounsel
3 appearances
Osborne BarnwellCounsel
3 appearances
C.R.E.Self-represented
3 appearances
Hugh ScherCounsel
3 appearances
Edelgard MahantSelf-represented
3 appearances
Rosario BoncoriSelf-represented
3 appearances
Julie WilsonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Sharmaine HallCounsel
3 appearances
Roshika WilliamsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersCounsel
3 appearances
Randy KingSelf-represented
3 appearances

for the Applicants

Mary Ellen McIntyreCounsel
1 appearance
Glen MorrisonAgent
1 appearance
Oksana LevkivskaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bradley ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
Niki LundquistCounsel
1 appearance
Elita McAdamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brenda CulbertCounsel
1 appearance
Yuriy GrygorchukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Debbie DraganitsCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ayoob KhanAgent
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants Durrell Claybourn and Dave Ferguson

Bruce BestCounsel
1 appearance

for The City of Hamilton and Linda Blake-Evans

Dennis PerlinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Prabhu RajanCounsel
8 appearances
Monmi GoswamiCounsel
4 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Christine ElwellCounsel
2 appearances
Sheena ScottCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Tony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Anthony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Tamara JosephCounsel
3 appearances
Roger RoweCounsel
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersCounsel
2 appearances
Brian KampeSelf-represented
2 appearances
Martha MacKinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Avvy Yao-Yao GoCounsel
1 appearance
Lee Ann ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance
Barbara Boldt-MacPhersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Greg GoodridgeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randy KingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug LundySelf-represented
1 appearance
Megan Evans-MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant A.C.

P.S-C.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Complainant Andy Carson

Paula Soares-CarsonAgent
1 appearance

for the Complainant D.S.

L.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Complainant Dylan Sigrist

Lori SigristAgent
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for The Corporation of the County of Lambton

David CribbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Financial Services Commission of Ontario

Reesha HoseinCounsel
1 appearance
Padraic RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Independent Electricity System Operator

Pamela HofmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Alanna MihaljCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew ReynoldsCounsel
1 appearance
Nini JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Denise CooneyCounsel
1 appearance
Monica MulvahillUnion representative
1 appearance
Tina LieCounsel
1 appearance
Debra McKennaCounsel
1 appearance
Roberto HenriquezCounsel
1 appearance
Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebUnion representative
1 appearance
Rana ArbabianCounsel
1 appearance
Bill ColeAgent
1 appearance
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Independent Police Review Director

Jean IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Justicia for Migrant Workers

Grace VaccarelliCounsel
2 appearances

for the Intervenor Ontario Human Rights Commission

Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenors African Canadian Legal Clinic, Metro Toronto Chinese & Southeast Asian Legal Clinic and South Asian Legal Clinic of Ontario

Avvy Yao-Yao GoCounsel
1 appearance
Virginia NelderCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Toronto Civic Employees’ Union, Local 416 (CUPE)

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Christine ElwellCounsel
2 appearances
Tony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Raj DhirCounsel
1 appearance
Sheena ScottCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers Federation

Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Non-Party Intervenor

Caroline V. (Nini)_ JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the proposed Respondents

Bruce EllisCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Robin BasuCounsel
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Matthew Ma and Reynaldo Corpuz

Sharon DuffyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Patricia MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
John W. WoonCounsel
4 appearances
Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
3 appearances
Andrea RiskCounsel
3 appearances
Richard CharneyCounsel
3 appearances
Brenda BowlbyCounsel
3 appearances
Michael FailesCounsel
3 appearances
Paula RusakCounsel
3 appearances
Rachel SilverCounsel
3 appearances
Elizabeth Ann MartensSelf-represented
2 appearances
Gaynor RogerCounsel
2 appearances
Arthur TarasukCounsel
2 appearances
Sheila MacKinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Vilija YcasAgent
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
2 appearances
Matthew CurtisCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel ChodosCounsel
2 appearances
Glenn ChristieCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent, Acclaim Ability Management Inc.

Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
1 appearance
Peter StraszynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Party

Frances R. GallopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bata Limited (now known as Athletes World Limited)

Connie ReeveCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Auto Workers, Local 199

Keith OsborneUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Business College

Syed Ali Mazher JafferyAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 416

Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Michael MazzucaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dr. Anita Grewal

Fred TranquilliCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dr. Sameer D’Souza

Matthew SammonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Durham Catholic District School Board

Dolores BarbiniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Durham Children’s Aid Society

Helen MurphyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Durham Regional Police Services Board

Ian JohnstoneCounsel
1 appearance
Angela KhouryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario

Christine DaviesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Engel and Associates Professional Corporation

Bruce EngelCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance
Carli GutmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent General Motors of Canada Limited

David BannonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gravel Charest Fisher Law Firm

Allan O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services (Ontario Provincial Police)

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance
Marnie CorboldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Finance (Financial Services Commission of Ontario)

Larissa EassonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Community and Social Services (Family Responsibility Office)

Kristen KizoffCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

William GeorgasCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hospital for Sick Children

Melanie WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Humber College Institute of Technology & Advanced Learning

Catherine PetersCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Huronia Area Aboriginal Assistance Corporation o/a Huronia Area Aboriginal Management Board

Kent ElsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joseph Brant Hospital

Dolores BarbiniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joyce Phillips

Colin YoungmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 183

Virginia NelderCounsel
1 appearance
Robert GibsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Legal Aid Ontario

Carolyn PadgettCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea DanonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO)

S. Jodi Gallagher-HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mahle Filter Systems Canada ULC

Stephanie RamsayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mazerolle & Lemay Law Firm

Denis CadieuxCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Provincial Police

Amal ChaudryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Presteve Foods Ltd.

Gino MorgaCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Royal LePage Partners Realty Inc.

Al KrochAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents

John BellCounsel
7 appearances
Catherine PetersCounsel
5 appearances
Stacey BallCounsel
5 appearances
Sheila MacKinnonCounsel
5 appearances
Andrea RiskCounsel
3 appearances
Robert BaldwinCounsel
3 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
3 appearances
Lior SamfiruCounsel
3 appearances
Harry KopytoAgent
2 appearances
Daniel LublinCounsel
2 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Patty MurrayCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher RiggsCounsel
2 appearances
Firdaus WaleleCounsel
2 appearances
Soma Ray-EllisCounsel
2 appearances
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
2 appearances
David StrashinCounsel
2 appearances
Glorie AlfredCounsel
2 appearances
Barry BrownCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Alliance Youth Services Inc., Steve Catney and Ed Barron

Robert FernandesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Children’s Aid Society of Toronto, Carol Manak and Pam Dawe

Ryan ConlinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents City of Toronto and Sandra Cuff

Darragh MeagherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents David Hurst and Maggie Lalande

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Dr. Michael Weinstein and Dr. Christopher Parshuram

Kasia CzajkowskiCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah CormanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Durham Regional Police Services Board and Sara Foote

David CowlingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sean Logan

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Securitas Canada Limited

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sheridan College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning

Patricia MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, Theren Beecroft and Kent Milligan

Tina EarlCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ministry of Community and Social Services, Hazel Romaine and Jermyne Graham

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Olivieri Foods Inc. and Cathy Martin

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sonja Bata

Ronald J. McCloskeyCounsel
1 appearance
Sara BeheshtiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ontario Public Service Employees Union, Susan Quinn, Natalie Lachapelle, Anita Fulford, Marian Chipchase and Dan Dean

Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Service and Toronto Police Services Board

Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Work Able Centres Inc. and Louise Korhonen

Thomas StefanikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Windsor

Patrick BrodeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patty MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Regional Municipality of Waterloo Police Services Board

Don JarvisCounsel
1 appearance
Daina SearchCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Young Women’s Christian Association of Hamilton

Timothy DugganCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Tony Dionisio

Tony DionisioSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Community Housing Corporation

William LeMayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Trillium Lakelands District School Board

Carolyn KayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Trish Meekins

Andrew DruryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor (formerly CAW), Local 1941

Mike ByrneUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of New Brunswick

Clarence BennettCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Waterloo Regional Police Association

Nini JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Osler Health Centre o/a Etobicoke General Hospital

Michele WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Windsor Police Services Board

Mark NazarewichCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent York Regional Police Services Board

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent YWCA Toronto

Frances GallopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Special Education Tribunal

Lucy McSweeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for The TDL Group Corp.

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Waterloo Region District School Board

Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board

Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance
David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for Trillium Lakelands District School Board

Nadine ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Local Unions 175 & 633

Michael HancockCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, B. Steed, M. Nunno, and M. Powell

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Damian HornichAgent
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police for the City of Toronto

Jerome Wiley, Q.C.Counsel
2 appearances
George H. CowleyCounsel
1 appearance

for Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Greg BullenCounsel
1 appearance

for York Condominium Corporation No. 365

Ashley WinbergCounsel
1 appearance

Litigation Guardian for Andy Carson

Paula Soares-CarsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Litigation Guardian for Dylan Sigrist

Lori SigristSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of the Respondent

Keith OsborneUnion representative
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Janet CoatesSelf-represented
2 appearances

On her own behalf

Svetlana WhiteSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cathy O’ReganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Charmaine MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance
H. G.Self-represented
1 appearance
Farideh GhafourianSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara Boldt-MacPhersonSelf-represented
1 appearance

on her own behalf and as litigation guardian for L.M.

E.M.Self-represented
1 appearance

on his own behalf

Craig BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Kuralraj KulasingamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stacy SweezeySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jerzy NatalukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Keith RamoutarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kam Chong LiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gary AtamanykSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy StevensSelf-represented
1 appearance
Guy BabineauSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajoo MakhiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul ChukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Oscar MedranoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lebert AlladiceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Greg GoodridgeSelf-represented
1 appearance

on their own behalf

J. B.Self-represented
1 appearance
E. B.Self-represented
1 appearance

Representative

Henry FreitagAgent
1 appearance

Respondents

Gail NeilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Douglas MooreSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents Ellen Helden and 1312788 Ontario Limited

Erin HallockCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Henry FreitagSelf-represented
1 appearance

623

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.1

cases/mo

HRTO623(100%)

Decision types

motion

511

trial

112

Page 8 of 32 (623 cases)

Grace Vaccarelli

Mark Hart

Ifrah v. National Income Protection Plan Inc., 2014 HRTO 1637

Kyle Burgis

André Nowakowski

Mark Hart

Costanza v. Cap-Thin Molds, 2014 HRTO 1542

Stephanie Ramsay

Mark Hart

Norman v. Mahle Filter Systems Canada ULC, 2014 HRTO 1532

Lia Preyde

Mark Hart

Fidelis Ogbue v. Sears Canada Inc. and Lisa Kerr, 2014 HRTO 1519

Glenn Christie

Corinne Muccilli

Mark Hart

Jean-Pierre v. Office of the Ontario Ombudsman, 2014 HRTO 1512

Monty Verlint

Mark Hart

Pipiska v. Superior Workforce Solutions, Corp., 2014 HRTO 1489

Mark Hart

Melo v. Hornblower Canada Co., 2014 HRTO 1462

Mark Hart

Rosario v. FORM Architecture Engineering, 2014 HRTO 1466

Shaheen Hirani

Daniel McDonald

Bay Ryley

Mark Hart

Raywatie Baldeo v. Securitas Canada Limited and Sean Logan, 2014 HRTO 1453

Mark Hart

Aziga v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2014 HRTO 1465

Mark Hart

Arsenault v. Sunter, 2014 HRTO 1447

Mark Hart

Estate of Crystal Rose v. Humber River Regional Hospital, 2014 HRTO 1449

Lior Samfiru

Mark Hart

Faizool Shaffick v. The Oakville Club Ltd., 2014 HRTO 1424

Mark Hart

Rongits v. Perry, 2014 HRTO 1404

Mark Hart

Clipperton-Boyer v. RedFlagDeals.com, a division of Yellow Pages Group Inc., 2014 HRTO 1392

Mark Hart

Sharma v. Securitas Canada Ltd., 2014 HRTO 1386

Christopher White

Mark Hart

Zehr v. London District Catholic School Board, 2014 HRTO 1300

Michael Cooper

Louis Strezos

Jay Rajagopalan

Mark Hart

Vittoria Fera v. Arista Homes Limited and Joe Ramos, 2014 HRTO 1285

Chantel Goldsmith

Brenda Culbert

Mark Hart

Cann v. AS 4Finance Ltd., 2014 HRTO 1260

Tina Earl

Marco Visentini

Jean-Frédéric Hübsch

Fred Tranquilli

Byrdena MacNeil

Mark Hart

Aziga v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2014 HRTO 1227

Applicant

assisted the Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Dr. Erik Paidra

Counsel for Lakeridge Health Corporation

Counsel for Novopharm Limited, Gail Lucyk and Halima Khan

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the Intervener

Counsel for the Respondent

counsel for the respondents

Counsel for the Respondents

for 2117392 Ontario Inc., William Farmer and Brandon Farmer

for A.A. Property Management & Associates Inc.

for A.C.

for Andy Carson

for Anthony Piazza and Maria Perry

for Arista Homes Limited