The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in housing and services based on disability and age against March of Dimes Canada, Chatham-Kent, and the County of Lambton.
The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.
The Tribunal found that the applicant's denial of supportive housing by March of Dimes was based on her own admission that she did not currently require personal care assistance, not her disability.
Claims against Chatham-Kent regarding handrails were deemed premature and unsupported by medical evidence, and age discrimination claims regarding a seniors' building failed to show substantive discrimination.
Claims against Lambton for relying on the March of Dimes decision were also dismissed.
The application was dismissed in its entirety.