Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond.
The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.
The applicant failed to attend a scheduled mediation session and did not respond to subsequent correspondence from the Tribunal regarding her intentions.
The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.
Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent grievance arbitration raising the same issues.
The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability and association.
The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application pending the conclusion of a concurrent grievance arbitration.
The applicant opposed deferral because the arbitration hearing was not scheduled to begin until January 2016.
The Tribunal found that the facts and issues in both proceedings were largely the same, particularly regarding the applicant's termination.
Applying its usual approach to defer to concurrent grievance proceedings to avoid inconsistent findings, the Tribunal deferred the application pending the completion of the grievance process.
Application for contravention of settlement dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to comply with Tribunal orders.
The applicant filed an application alleging contravention of a settlement agreement by the respondent.
The respondent had previously been ordered into receivership, and the Tribunal had stayed the application pending leave of the Superior Court or consent of the Receiver.
The Tribunal ordered the applicant to advise of his intentions regarding the application by a specified date.
The applicant failed to comply with this order.
Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.
Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to notices.
The Tribunal issued two Notices of Intent to Dismiss, noting the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction, and directed the applicant to provide written submissions.
The applicant failed to respond to either notice.
As a result, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.
Request for reconsideration dismissed as the underlying case assessment direction was not a final decision.
The applicant filed a Request for Reconsideration of a Case Assessment Direction (CAD) regarding the production of documents.
The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the CAD was an interlocutory order and not a final decision that disposed of any central issues in the application, and therefore could not be the subject of a reconsideration request under Rule 26.1.
Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent grievance arbitration raising identical issues.
The applicant filed a human rights application alleging employment discrimination.
Although the applicant initially requested the deferral, he later opposed it because the respondent would only deal with the union's counsel regarding the grievance.
The Tribunal found that the facts and issues in both proceedings were identical and deferred the application to avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent findings, noting that grievance arbitrators have the authority to enforce human rights obligations.
Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.
The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.
The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.
Despite multiple notices and extensions, the applicant failed to provide written submissions in response to the NOID.
Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.
Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after the applicant failed to attend the summary hearing.
The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code alleging discrimination in contracts on the basis of race.
The Tribunal scheduled a summary hearing to determine whether the application should be dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.
The applicant failed to attend the scheduled telephone conference hearing.
The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the matter appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.
Despite multiple reminders and extensions, the applicant failed to provide written submissions in response to the NOID.
The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.
The applicant failed to provide written submissions in response to the Notice by the required deadline.
Request to amend human rights application to add facts regarding mental health disability granted.
The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to amend her human rights application to add facts regarding her mental health disability.
The respondent did not respond to the request.
The Tribunal granted the request, noting that while the amendments were substantial, they made explicit an alleged connection to the Code that was previously unclear, and there was sufficient time before the scheduled hearing to ensure a fair adjudication.
Application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.
The applicant failed to respond to the Notice by the extended deadline.
Request to remove individual respondent granted as actions were taken in the course of employment.
The corporate respondent, Chrysler Canada Inc., brought a Request for Order During Proceeding to remove an individual respondent from the human rights application.
The applicant opposed the request, arguing the individual took a personal interest in her circumstances.
The Tribunal applied the principles from Sigrist and Carson, finding no compelling reason to keep the individual as a party since his actions were taken in the course of employment and there was no issue regarding the corporate respondent's vicarious liability.
The request was granted and the individual respondent was removed.
Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to early dismissal request.
The respondent sought early dismissal, arguing the issues were within exclusive federal jurisdiction.
The Tribunal directed the applicant to respond to the respondent's request, warning that failure to do so could result in the application being deemed abandoned.
The applicant did not respond by the deadline.
Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent grievance arbitration raising overlapping issues.
The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application under s. 45 of the Human Rights Code pending the conclusion of a concurrent grievance arbitration.
The applicant opposed deferral, arguing that not all issues were duplicated and that employer policy allowed concurrent proceedings.
The Tribunal found substantial overlap between the facts and issues in both proceedings and deferred the application to avoid different conclusions about the facts, noting that grievance arbitrators have the authority to enforce human rights statutes.
Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.
The respondents filed a Response, a Request for Order During Proceeding, and a Request for Summary Hearing.
The applicant failed to respond to these materials or to a subsequent Case Assessment Direction.
Human rights application dismissed under s. 34(11) due to duplicative Small Claims Court proceeding.
The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on age, disability, and reprisal regarding his expulsion from a baseball league.
The respondent sought early dismissal under section 34(11) of the Human Rights Code.
The Tribunal found that the applicant had commenced a civil proceeding in Small Claims Court seeking damages for the same alleged Code violations, which was dismissed after he refused to pay a costs order.
As the requirements of section 34(11) were met, the application was dismissed.
Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond to correspondence.
The applicant failed to attend a scheduled mediation session and did not communicate with the Tribunal to explain her absence.
The Tribunal subsequently directed the applicant to advise of her intentions regarding the application, warning that failure to respond could result in the application being deemed abandoned.
The applicant did not respond.
The Tribunal had previously deferred the application pending the conclusion of another proceeding.
The Tribunal directed the applicant to provide an update on the other proceeding by a specified date, warning that failure to do so might result in the application being dismissed as abandoned.
The applicant failed to respond or communicate with the Tribunal.
Request for document production denied as overbroad and amounting to a fishing expedition.
The applicant in a human rights complaint alleging housing discrimination based on disability filed a Request for Order During Proceeding seeking production of all internal communications pertaining to his transfer request, himself, and marijuana.
The Tribunal denied the request, finding it overbroad, non-specific, and amounting to a fishing expedition, as the applicant provided no basis to believe relevant unproduced documents existed.