3 total
Human rights application against union, insurer, and pension plan summarily dismissed for no reasonable prospect of success.
The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment and services on the basis of disability against her employer, union, benefits insurer, and pension plan.
The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine whether parts of the application should be dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success or for delay.
The Tribunal dismissed the application against the union, insurer, and pension plan, finding no reasonable prospect of success as their actions were not based on discriminatory factors but on plan definitions and available information.
The Tribunal also dismissed allegations against the employer relating to events prior to October 2010 due to delay, as they were filed outside the one-year limitation period without a good faith explanation.
Applicant directed to advise if proceeding with human rights application following grievance settlement.
The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability against her employer and union.
The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer pending a grievance.
The employer responded that the grievance had been settled and requested dismissal.
The applicant and union failed to respond.
The Tribunal declined to defer the application and directed the applicant to advise within 7 days whether she intends to proceed, failing which the application will be dismissed as abandoned.
Two human rights applications alleging disability discrimination in employment consolidated to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
The applicant filed two human rights applications alleging employment discrimination on the basis of disability against the Toronto Police Services Board and related respondents.
The applicant requested that the applications be consolidated.
The respondents did not oppose consolidation but raised an issue regarding disclosure of the applicant's medical files, which was subsequently resolved.
The Tribunal ordered the applications consolidated to avoid a multiplicity of proceedings, expense, and the risk of inconsistent results.
