The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, claiming entitlement to income replacement, medical, transportation, and housekeeping benefits.
The insurer had terminated income replacement benefits and denied the other claims.
The arbitrator dismissed the application, finding the applicant's evidence regarding his inability to work due to pain to be vague and unpersuasive, particularly given his continued employment for months post-accident and significant unexplained bank deposits.
The claims for medical, transportation, and housekeeping benefits were also dismissed due to a lack of supporting evidence.
