The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondent hospital.
The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application pending the conclusion of an ongoing grievance proceeding.
The applicant opposed deferral, arguing that the grievance did not capture all issues and could be held in abeyance.
The Tribunal found that the issues in the grievance were largely identical to those in the application and deferred the application to avoid concurrent legal proceedings and duplicative use of resources.
