The Crown appealed a sentence imposed following guilty pleas to multiple offences arising from prolonged domestic harassment, break and enter, threats, and related misconduct.
The Court of Appeal held that the sentencing judge erred in principle by underemphasizing denunciation and deterrence and by relying on an inaccurate understanding of the respondent's prior record.
Applying the sentencing principles emphasized in harassment jurisprudence, the court held that the absence of physical violence was not a mitigating factor for criminal harassment.
Leave to appeal sentence was granted, the appeal allowed, and the total sentence increased to four years.