The appellant appealed the dismissal of her action against the respondents.
The motion judge had dismissed the action as an abuse of process and found no genuine issue for trial, as the underlying issue of forged guarantees had already been adjudicated in a previous action.
The appellant argued she was denied natural justice because the motion judge proceeded in her absence after she left the courtroom.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no apprehension of bias, agreeing that the action was an abuse of process, and upholding the substantial indemnity costs awarded by the motion judge due to the serious allegations of dishonesty.