18 total
The court approved unprecedented class counsel fees totaling over $900 million in the tobacco insolvency proceedings.
This decision concerns three motions to approve class counsel fees in the context of insolvency proceedings under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act involving three major tobacco companies.
The court approved the Quebec Class Action Plaintiffs' counsel fee request of approximately $901 million (representing 22% of the $4.119 billion allocated to the Quebec class members), the Knight Class Counsel fee request of $5 million plus disbursements, and the Tobacco Producers' counsel fee request of $3.75 million.
The court found that the fees were fair and reasonable given the exceptional risks assumed, the unprecedented outcome achieved, and the unique circumstances of the case.
A $50 million reserve was established from the Quebec counsel fees to protect against any pro-rata reduction in class member compensation due to actual take-up rates or other factors.
The court sanctioned the CCAA plans of major tobacco companies to effect a global settlement.
This decision sanctions the CCAA Plans of Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, JTI-Macdonald Corp., and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., effecting a global settlement of all tobacco-related claims in Canada.
The court reviews the structure, allocation, and fairness of the plans, including the creation of a $1 billion Cy-près Foundation, and addresses objections from social stakeholders.
The court finds the plans fair, reasonable, and in the public interest, and grants the requested relief, including third-party releases and the appointment of plan administrators.
The court granted an unopposed motion to approve a notice protocol order for class action plaintiffs.
This endorsement concerns ongoing insolvency proceedings under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) involving JTI-Macdonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. The specific motion, brought by the applicants, sought a Quebec Class Action Plaintiffs Notice Protocol Order.
The motion was unopposed and was granted by the court, with the requested order signed.
The court granted an unopposed motion for a Sanction Protocol Order in ongoing CCAA proceedings.
This endorsement concerns a joint motion brought by the court-appointed Monitors for JTI-Macdonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. in their ongoing Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings.
The Monitors sought a Sanction Protocol Order to establish the date for the Sanction Hearing, ratify the litigation timetable, approve the dissemination of the Agenda and Sanction Hearing procedure, approve the Omnibus Sanction Hearing Notice, and set the deadline for Sanction Hearing Objection Notices.
The motion was unopposed and was granted by the court, with three orders signed.
The court confirmed that notice elements in the Claims Procedure Orders were reasonable.
This supplementary endorsement addresses a request from JTI-Macdonald Corp. regarding the adequacy of notice elements in the Claims Procedure Order within the ongoing Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings.
The court confirmed its satisfaction that the notice elements in the Claims Procedure Orders are reasonable in the circumstances, addressing an oversight from previous submissions.
The court granted Meeting Orders and Claims Procedure Orders to advance a $32.5 billion global settlement of tobacco claims under the CCAA.
The Superior Court of Justice addressed multiple motions within the complex Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings of JTI-Macdonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. The court granted a stay extension until January 31, 2025, and approved Meeting Orders and Claims Procedure Orders.
These orders facilitate the advancement of comprehensive Plans of Arrangement, developed by the court-appointed Mediator and Monitors, aiming for a Pan-Canadian global settlement of tobacco claims totaling $32.5 billion.
The court found the plans were not "doomed to fail" despite outstanding issues regarding financial allocation among the Tobacco Companies and the creditor status of JTI-Macdonald TM Corp.
The court granted unopposed motions extending the CCAA stay period and authorizing ancillary operational relief for the applicant tobacco companies.
This endorsement concerns three tobacco companies (JTI-MacDonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc.) operating under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).
Each applicant sought an extension of their stay period until September 30, 2024, to continue formulating plans of arrangement.
Imperial also requested authorization to terminate a retirement plan and post security for a vaping product license.
RBH sought a procedural amendment for employee grievances.
The court, finding no opposition and satisfied with the applicants' good faith, diligence, and sufficient resources, granted all requested relief, noting significant progress in ongoing mediation.
The court dismissed a motion to appoint a representative for Canadian opioid claimants in a recognized foreign insolvency proceeding, deferring to the foreign court.
The Québec Plaintiff, Jean-François Bourassa, brought a motion seeking a CCAA Representation Order to represent Canadian Personal Injury Claimants in foreign recognition proceedings and related Chapter 11 proceedings, including the appointment of specific counsel and an order for their fees to be borne by the Canadian Debtors.
The motion was opposed by the Canadian Debtors and other stakeholders.
The court dismissed the motion, finding that the interests of the Canadian Personal Injury Claimants were already adequately represented by the Official Committee of Opioid Claimants (OCC) in the U.S. Chapter 11 cases, which had been recognized as the foreign main proceeding in Canada.
The court emphasized the principle of cooperation with the foreign court and noted the Québec Plaintiff's lack of timely objection to previous orders in both the U.S. and Canadian proceedings.
The court granted an unopposed stay extension in complex CCAA proceedings and directed the Monitors and Mediator to collaboratively develop plans of arrangement.
This endorsement concerns the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings for JTI-MacDonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. The court granted an unopposed motion to extend the stay period until March 29, 2024.
Recognizing the complexity and the four-and-a-half-year duration of negotiations, the court directed the three court-appointed Monitors, in conjunction with the court-appointed Mediator, to collaborate and develop comprehensive Plans of Compromise or Arrangement.
The objective is to finalize plans that are fair and reasonable to all applicants and creditors, moving from observable activity to meaningful action.
The Ontario Superior Court lacks jurisdiction to approve a non-party discovery agreement for use in a Québec class action.
This motion concerned the approval of a Memorandum of Agreement between the receiver of the Norshield entities, appointed by the Ontario Superior Court, and the class representative of a Québec class action.
The agreement sought to facilitate the production of information from the receiver to the class representative for use in the Québec class action.
The Royal Bank of Canada (RBC), a defendant in the Québec class action, opposed the motion, arguing that the Ontario court lacked jurisdiction to approve what amounted to a non-party discovery in a Québec proceeding.
The court found that RBC had standing to oppose the motion and dismissed the class representative's request, ruling that the Superior Court of Québec, as the class action judge, was the appropriate forum to determine the relevance and necessity of the information sought.
The court stayed Canadian opioid litigation to support a U.S. Chapter 11 global settlement.
The Foreign Representative of Purdue Pharma L.P. and 23 other Chapter 11 Debtors sought recognition and enforcement of a U.S. Preliminary Injunction Order in Canada, and a stay of proceedings against certain related parties in Canada.
The motion aimed to pause extensive opioid-related litigation to facilitate a global settlement.
The Quebec Class Action Plaintiff, Riccardo Camarda, opposed the stay for a proposed class action against Canadian Purdue entities, arguing it was outside the U.S. proceedings' parameters.
The court granted the stay, emphasizing principles of comity and cooperation with foreign courts under the CCAA, finding the stay necessary for a global resolution and to prevent an uneven playing field among stakeholders.
The court dismissed Ontario's motion to lift the CCAA stay on its $330 billion health care cost recovery action against tobacco companies.
Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario sought to lift a stay on its $330 billion health care cost recovery action against three tobacco companies (JTI-Macdonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc.) and eleven co-defendants, which was imposed under CCAA proceedings.
Ontario proposed to temporarily stay the effects of any judgment.
The court dismissed the motion, emphasizing the need to preserve the status quo in CCAA proceedings to facilitate a global resolution of significant claims.
Allowing Ontario's action to proceed would alter the level playing field, distract from restructuring efforts, and impose significant costs, prejudicing other stakeholders.
The court affirmed its broad jurisdiction under the CCAA to impose a blanket stay on all proceedings.
The applicants, JTI-Macdonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., sought protection under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) following a $13.5 billion judgment from the Quebec Court of Appeal and other ongoing litigation.
JTI-Macdonald Corp. and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. moved for orders to file Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) leave applications but suspend further proceedings.
Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited and Imperial Tobacco Company Limited sought a blanket stay of all proceedings and limitation periods.
The Quebec class action plaintiffs opposed the motions and sought to partially lift the stay.
The court affirmed its broad jurisdiction under CCAA s. 11 to stay all actions, including appellate proceedings and limitation periods.
The court dismissed the motion by JTI-Macdonald Corp. and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., and granted Imperial Tobacco's motion, finding that a blanket stay best preserved the status quo and facilitated a global resolution for all stakeholders.
Tax Case dismissed
This endorsement addresses the costs arising from a prior motion where Fishman Flanz Meland Paquin LLP (FFMP) was successful against FCA Canada Inc. (Chrysler).
FFMP claimed costs of $138,923.68, while Chrysler argued for no more than $50,000.
The court considered the complexity of the motion, the importance of the matter to FFMP, and Chrysler's unreasonable position.
The court assessed FFMP's fees at $85,000 and disbursements at $2,698.47, plus applicable taxes, to be paid by Chrysler within thirty days.
Negligence Motion allowed
Fishman Flanz Meland Paquin LLP (FFMP), counsel to the Creditors' Committee in a CCAA proceeding, brought a motion to compel FCA Canada Inc. (Chrysler) to sign an indemnity against potential tax liabilities arising from the distribution of Cost Award Funds from prior Quebec litigation.
FFMP also sought payment of Chrysler's share of tax advice costs and FFMP's motion expenses.
Chrysler opposed, arguing FFMP breached an undertaking to pay without conditions and had no right to deduct costs.
The court found FFMP's requests for indemnity and cost deductions reasonable and consistent with the Plan's intent and the court's broad discretion under section 11 of the CCAA.
The court allowed FFMP's motion and dismissed Chrysler's cross-motion, ordering Chrysler to comply with FFMP's demands before receiving its pro rata share of the Cost Award Funds.
Motion to approve insurance liquidation settlements denied because the WURA does not bind provincial Crowns.
The liquidator of an insolvent insurance company brought a motion to approve settlement agreements with two tobacco companies.
The settlements included a condition requiring court approval of releases that would bar third-party claims against the insurer.
Several provincial Crowns and class action representatives opposed the settlements, arguing they had direct statutory claims against the insurer and were not bound by the Winding-Up and Restructuring Act (WURA).
The court held that the WURA does not expressly or implicitly bind the Crown, nor did the Crowns waive immunity under the benefit/burden doctrine as they had not yet made claims in the liquidation.
The motion to approve the settlements was dismissed.
CCAA plan approved despite objections to third‑party releases and claims process.
The applicant sought court sanction of a plan of compromise and arrangement under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act to resolve extensive litigation arising from the audit of Castor Holdings Ltd. The plan involved contributions from partners, insurers, and related entities totaling approximately $220 million and included third‑party releases.
A creditor group opposed the sanction, arguing that the releases violated Quebec civil law and that the claims process was unfair.
The court rejected these objections, finding the expert evidence unreliable, confirming that federal insolvency law permits third‑party releases notwithstanding provincial law, and concluding the plan was fair and reasonable given overwhelming creditor approval.
The plan was sanctioned.
Directors owe their fiduciary duty to the corporation, not to specific stakeholders like debentureholders.
The Supreme Court of Canada considered a proposed plan of arrangement for a leveraged buyout of BCE Inc. that would add substantial debt to Bell Canada, reducing the trading value of its debentures.
The debentureholders opposed the arrangement, claiming oppression under s. 241 of the CBCA and arguing the arrangement was not fair and reasonable under s. 192.
The Court held that the directors' fiduciary duty is owed to the corporation, not to specific stakeholders, though directors may consider stakeholder interests.
The debentureholders failed to establish a reasonable expectation that their investment grade rating would be maintained.
The Court affirmed the trial judge's approval of the arrangement, finding it had a valid business purpose and resolved objections in a fair and balanced way.