27 total
The court appointed a receiver over a commercial real estate joint venture to preserve stakeholder value.
This endorsement grants an unopposed application by RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust and related entities for the appointment of FTI Consulting Canada Inc. as receiver over the assets of the RioCan-HBC joint venture entities.
The court reviews the legal test for appointing a receiver under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Courts of Justice Act, referencing relevant case law and statutory factors.
The receivership is found to be just and convenient in light of the joint venture’s financial distress, the failure of restructuring efforts, and the need to preserve and maximize value for stakeholders.
The order authorizes the receiver to borrow up to $20 million and provides for allocation of costs and a mechanism for secured lenders to terminate the receivership as to their collateral.
The court appointed an independent evaluator for representative counsel and approved a separate art auction.
The decision addresses motions regarding the appointment of representative counsel for current and former employees and retirees of Hudson’s Bay Company ULC and related entities in ongoing Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings.
The Court declined to appoint any of the nominated law firms as representative counsel at this stage, instead appointing the Honourable Herman Wilton-Siegel as an independent third party to evaluate proposals and make a recommendation.
The Court also approved amendments to the Sale and Investment Solicitation Process (SISP) to remove the company’s art and artifact collection from the SISP and to appoint Heffel Gallery Limited to conduct a separate auction for the collection, subject to further court approval of procedures.
The reasons review the legal framework for appointing representative counsel and the importance of balancing stakeholder interests in complex insolvency proceedings.
The court granted an unopposed extension of the CCAA stay of proceedings, increased the Directors' Charge, and approved a financial advisor's engagement.
This endorsement grants a brief adjournment in the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings involving Hudson’s Bay Company ULC and related entities, following ongoing discussions between the applicants and stakeholders.
The court extends the stay of proceedings, increases the Directors’ Charge, amends the relative priorities of charges, and approves the engagement of Reflect Advisors, LLC as financial advisor.
The court finds the requested relief appropriate, unopposed, and supported by the Monitor, and orders the requested amendments to the Initial Order.
The court sanctioned the CCAA plans of major tobacco companies to effect a global settlement.
This decision sanctions the CCAA Plans of Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, JTI-Macdonald Corp., and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., effecting a global settlement of all tobacco-related claims in Canada.
The court reviews the structure, allocation, and fairness of the plans, including the creation of a $1 billion Cy-près Foundation, and addresses objections from social stakeholders.
The court finds the plans fair, reasonable, and in the public interest, and grants the requested relief, including third-party releases and the appointment of plan administrators.
Court approved CCAA plan amendments and dismissed a social stakeholder's objection for lack of standing.
This endorsement addresses motions by the court-appointed Monitors in the ongoing Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings involving JTI-Macdonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited and Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. The Monitors sought approval for amendments to the CCAA Plans to resolve the allocation of a $750 million working capital holdback among the Tobacco Companies.
The only opposition came from the Heart and Stroke Foundation, which objected as a social stakeholder but was found to lack standing.
The court granted the motions, finding the amendments did not adversely affect any creditors and were appropriate in the circumstances.
The court confirmed that notice elements in the Claims Procedure Orders were reasonable.
This supplementary endorsement addresses a request from JTI-Macdonald Corp. regarding the adequacy of notice elements in the Claims Procedure Order within the ongoing Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings.
The court confirmed its satisfaction that the notice elements in the Claims Procedure Orders are reasonable in the circumstances, addressing an oversight from previous submissions.
The court granted Meeting Orders and Claims Procedure Orders to advance a $32.5 billion global settlement of tobacco claims under the CCAA.
The Superior Court of Justice addressed multiple motions within the complex Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings of JTI-Macdonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. The court granted a stay extension until January 31, 2025, and approved Meeting Orders and Claims Procedure Orders.
These orders facilitate the advancement of comprehensive Plans of Arrangement, developed by the court-appointed Mediator and Monitors, aiming for a Pan-Canadian global settlement of tobacco claims totaling $32.5 billion.
The court found the plans were not "doomed to fail" despite outstanding issues regarding financial allocation among the Tobacco Companies and the creditor status of JTI-Macdonald TM Corp.
Final order granted approving a CBCA plan of arrangement, including a novel reverse vesting order.
The applicants, Xplore Inc. and a wholly-owned subsidiary, sought a final order approving a plan of arrangement under the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA).
The arrangement aimed to implement a comprehensive recapitalization transaction to significantly deleverage the company's secured debt and secure new financing.
A key component of the plan was a reverse vesting order (RVO) to separate uneconomic satellite business obligations from the ongoing operations.
The court found that the arrangement met all statutory requirements, was proposed in good faith, and was fair and reasonable to all stakeholders, including the initially opposing satellite providers who reached a commercial resolution.
The court also confirmed its jurisdiction under s. 192(4) of the CBCA to grant an RVO and approved the inclusion of third-party releases.
Court granted CBCA interim order and upheld stay allowing reduced payments to critical satellite suppliers.
This endorsement addresses motions related to a proposed recapitalization transaction of Xplore Inc. and 16029167 Canada Inc. via a plan of arrangement under the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA).
The applicants sought an Interim Order to facilitate a vote on the arrangement, while certain satellite providers (unsecured creditors) brought 'comeback motions' objecting to the preliminary interim order's stay of remedies and the proposed treatment of their contracts, including non-payment of full contractual rates and the use of a reverse vesting order.
The court granted the Interim Order, finding that the applicants met the statutory requirements and acted in good faith, and that the fairness of the arrangement, including the novel reverse vesting order, warranted a full fairness hearing.
The court upheld the stay, finding the non-disclosure by applicants not material and that the court has broad discretion to impose terms on critical suppliers, drawing analogies to CCAA provisions.
The satellite providers' requests for full contractual payments and security were denied, and their motion to lift the stay for a bankruptcy application was adjourned.
Preliminary interim order and stay of proceedings granted under CBCA to facilitate telecommunications company's debt restructuring.
The applicants, Xplore Inc. and 16029167 Canada Inc., sought a preliminary interim order under s. 192(4) of the CBCA to facilitate a comprehensive recapitalization transaction.
The applicants requested a stay of proceedings to prevent unsecured creditors, particularly satellite providers, from taking unilateral actions that could disrupt services to rural customers while definitive agreements were finalized.
The court granted the preliminary interim order, finding that the proposed transaction constituted an arrangement, the solvency requirement was met, and the stay was necessary to provide stability during negotiations.
The court granted unopposed motions extending the CCAA stay period and authorizing ancillary operational relief for the applicant tobacco companies.
This endorsement concerns three tobacco companies (JTI-MacDonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc.) operating under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).
Each applicant sought an extension of their stay period until September 30, 2024, to continue formulating plans of arrangement.
Imperial also requested authorization to terminate a retirement plan and post security for a vaping product license.
RBH sought a procedural amendment for employee grievances.
The court, finding no opposition and satisfied with the applicants' good faith, diligence, and sufficient resources, granted all requested relief, noting significant progress in ongoing mediation.
The court granted an unopposed motion to recognize and enforce various U.S. Chapter 11 bankruptcy orders under section 49 of the CCAA.
Yellow Corporation, as Foreign Representative for itself and its Canadian affiliates (the Canadian Debtors), brought a motion under section 49 of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) to recognize and enforce various orders (U.S. Orders) issued by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware in their Chapter 11 proceedings.
The motion, which was unopposed, sought to preserve the value of the Canadian Debtors and business during the wind-down and sale efforts.
The court granted the motion, finding it necessary for the protection of the debtors' property and creditors' interests, and consistent with principles of comity and public policy.
The court granted an unopposed stay extension in complex CCAA proceedings and directed the Monitors and Mediator to collaboratively develop plans of arrangement.
This endorsement concerns the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings for JTI-MacDonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. The court granted an unopposed motion to extend the stay period until March 29, 2024.
Recognizing the complexity and the four-and-a-half-year duration of negotiations, the court directed the three court-appointed Monitors, in conjunction with the court-appointed Mediator, to collaborate and develop comprehensive Plans of Compromise or Arrangement.
The objective is to finalize plans that are fair and reasonable to all applicants and creditors, moving from observable activity to meaningful action.
The court recognized a U.S. bankruptcy dismissal and terminated the ancillary Canadian CCAA proceeding.
LTL Management LLC, acting as Foreign Representative, brought a motion seeking recognition of a U.S. Bankruptcy Court's dismissal order of its Chapter 11 proceeding, termination of the Canadian CCAA proceeding, discharge of the Information Officer (Ernst & Young) with a release, and approval of the Information Officer's activities and fees.
The motion was unopposed.
The court granted the requested relief, finding that with the foreign main proceeding dismissed and no stay of the appeal, there was no longer a basis for the Canadian recognition proceeding to continue.
The Information Officer's reports, activities, and fees were reviewed and approved, and the CCAA proceeding was terminated.
The court approved an insolvent company's unopposed motion for a stalking horse agreement, bidding procedures, and a sealing order.
DCL Corporation, an insolvent company under CCAA protection, sought court approval for a stalking horse agreement, bidding procedures for the sale of substantially all its assets, and a sealing order for confidential information.
The motion was unopposed and supported by the Monitor and key creditors.
The court granted the relief, finding the proposed sales process fair, transparent, commercially efficacious, and designed to optimize asset recovery, consistent with established insolvency principles.
The sealing order was also granted, applying the Sherman Estate test, on the basis that it protected important public interests in confidentiality and contractual sanctity.
The court granted the Monitor expanded powers to wind down the debtor and declared former employees eligible for WEPP payments.
The Monitor in the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings of DCL Corporation brought a motion seeking expanded powers for an orderly wind-down of the Applicant, declarations regarding the Canadian Designated Amount Portion and CCAA Cash Pool, and a declaration that former employees are eligible for Wage Earner Protection Program (WEPP) payments.
The court granted all requested relief, finding the expanded powers necessary due to the absence of company management and consistent with similar cases.
The court also declared former employees eligible for WEPP payments, satisfying the criteria under the WEPP Act and Regulations.
The court recognized LTL Management's second US Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a foreign main proceeding under the CCAA.
LTL Management LLC, an indirect subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, sought recognition of its second US Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding as a foreign main proceeding under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) in Canada.
This application followed the dismissal of its initial Chapter 11 filing due to insufficient immediate financial distress.
The new Chapter 11 was based on a negotiated Plan Support Agreement establishing an $8.9 billion trust for talc-related claims.
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice granted the recognition order, along with ancillary relief including a stay of proceedings against LTL and related Canadian co-defendants, and the appointment of Ernst & Young Inc. as Information Officer.
The court found the US proceeding to be a foreign main proceeding, with LTL's Centre of Main Interests (COMI) in the United States, and that the relief was appropriate to coordinate proceedings and ensure equal treatment of talc-related claims.
The application was unopposed.
US Chapter 11 proceeding recognized as a foreign main proceeding under the CCAA.
Voyager Digital Ltd. applied under Part IV of the CCAA for an Initial Recognition Order of its Chapter 11 proceedings in the United States.
The central issue was whether the US proceeding should be recognized as a 'foreign main proceeding' or a 'foreign non-main proceeding', which depended on determining the company's Centre of Main Interests (COMI).
Despite being incorporated in British Columbia and listed on the TSX, the court found that the company's COMI was in the US, where its operations, management, and principal assets were located.
The court recognized the US proceeding as a foreign main proceeding and granted the requested stay.
CCAA plan sanction denied because bar order and claim assignment provisions unfairly prejudiced non-settling defendants.
The Applicants, licensed cannabis producers, sought court approval and sanction of their second amended and restated plan of compromise and arrangement under the CCAA.
The Plan aimed to implement a settlement framework for multiple securities class actions arising from the Applicants' illegal cannabis growing operations.
While the court found the Allocation and Distribution Scheme reasonable and rejected KPMG's complaint about being excluded from voting, it refused to sanction the Plan.
The court held that the Plan's provisions regarding the assignment of claims against KPMG and the Judgment Reduction Provision in the Bar Order were not fair and reasonable to the non-settling defendants, as they failed to limit the non-settling defendants' liability to several liability.
UK scheme of arrangement proceedings recognized as foreign non-main proceedings under Part IV of the CCAA.
The applicant, acting as the foreign representative for the syncreon Group, sought an Initial Recognition Order under Part IV of the CCAA to recognize scheme of arrangement proceedings commenced in the United Kingdom.
The court found that the UK proceedings under Part 26 of the Companies Act constituted 'foreign non-main proceedings' under the CCAA.
The court granted the recognition order, recognized the UK Convening Order, appointed an Information Officer, and dispensed with the statutory publication requirement, finding that a formal cross-border protocol was unnecessary in this case.