24 total
The court sanctioned the CCAA plans of major tobacco companies to effect a global settlement.
This decision sanctions the CCAA Plans of Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, JTI-Macdonald Corp., and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., effecting a global settlement of all tobacco-related claims in Canada.
The court reviews the structure, allocation, and fairness of the plans, including the creation of a $1 billion Cy-près Foundation, and addresses objections from social stakeholders.
The court finds the plans fair, reasonable, and in the public interest, and grants the requested relief, including third-party releases and the appointment of plan administrators.
The court granted an unopposed motion to approve a notice protocol order for class action plaintiffs.
This endorsement concerns ongoing insolvency proceedings under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) involving JTI-Macdonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. The specific motion, brought by the applicants, sought a Quebec Class Action Plaintiffs Notice Protocol Order.
The motion was unopposed and was granted by the court, with the requested order signed.
The court granted an unopposed motion for a Sanction Protocol Order in ongoing CCAA proceedings.
This endorsement concerns a joint motion brought by the court-appointed Monitors for JTI-Macdonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. in their ongoing Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings.
The Monitors sought a Sanction Protocol Order to establish the date for the Sanction Hearing, ratify the litigation timetable, approve the dissemination of the Agenda and Sanction Hearing procedure, approve the Omnibus Sanction Hearing Notice, and set the deadline for Sanction Hearing Objection Notices.
The motion was unopposed and was granted by the court, with three orders signed.
The court confirmed that notice elements in the Claims Procedure Orders were reasonable.
This supplementary endorsement addresses a request from JTI-Macdonald Corp. regarding the adequacy of notice elements in the Claims Procedure Order within the ongoing Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings.
The court confirmed its satisfaction that the notice elements in the Claims Procedure Orders are reasonable in the circumstances, addressing an oversight from previous submissions.
The court granted Meeting Orders and Claims Procedure Orders to advance a $32.5 billion global settlement of tobacco claims under the CCAA.
The Superior Court of Justice addressed multiple motions within the complex Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings of JTI-Macdonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. The court granted a stay extension until January 31, 2025, and approved Meeting Orders and Claims Procedure Orders.
These orders facilitate the advancement of comprehensive Plans of Arrangement, developed by the court-appointed Mediator and Monitors, aiming for a Pan-Canadian global settlement of tobacco claims totaling $32.5 billion.
The court found the plans were not "doomed to fail" despite outstanding issues regarding financial allocation among the Tobacco Companies and the creditor status of JTI-Macdonald TM Corp.
The court approved a stay extension, a $30 million debtor-in-possession facility, and various restructuring protocols under the CCAA.
The applicants, Pride Group Holdings Inc. et al., sought an amended and restated initial order under the CCAA, including an extension of the stay period, approval of a debtor-in-possession (DIP) facility, elevation of charge priorities, confirmation against set-off, and approval of governance, real estate monetization, and intercompany/unsecured claims preservation protocols.
The court granted the requested stay extension to June 30, 2024, approved the $30 million DIP facility, and approved all proposed protocols.
The court declined to add an exception to the paramountcy provision as requested by certain securitization funders and approved a carve-out for Triumph Business Capital but limited it to CDN $3 million.
The court granted unopposed motions extending the CCAA stay period and authorizing ancillary operational relief for the applicant tobacco companies.
This endorsement concerns three tobacco companies (JTI-MacDonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc.) operating under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).
Each applicant sought an extension of their stay period until September 30, 2024, to continue formulating plans of arrangement.
Imperial also requested authorization to terminate a retirement plan and post security for a vaping product license.
RBH sought a procedural amendment for employee grievances.
The court, finding no opposition and satisfied with the applicants' good faith, diligence, and sufficient resources, granted all requested relief, noting significant progress in ongoing mediation.
The court granted an unopposed stay extension in complex CCAA proceedings and directed the Monitors and Mediator to collaboratively develop plans of arrangement.
This endorsement concerns the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings for JTI-MacDonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. The court granted an unopposed motion to extend the stay period until March 29, 2024.
Recognizing the complexity and the four-and-a-half-year duration of negotiations, the court directed the three court-appointed Monitors, in conjunction with the court-appointed Mediator, to collaborate and develop comprehensive Plans of Compromise or Arrangement.
The objective is to finalize plans that are fair and reasonable to all applicants and creditors, moving from observable activity to meaningful action.
Court defers determination of Third Party RHBP Claims process in Laurentian University CCAA proceedings.
In the CCAA proceedings of Laurentian University, the applicant sought an order regarding a Compensation Claims Process.
On consent, the court deferred relief related to Third Party RHBP Claims to a subsequent hearing, ordering that the deadlines and procedures in the Compensation Claims Process Order would not apply to those claims at this time.
The remaining unopposed relief was granted.
Secured creditor denied access to mistakenly collected park levies; funds ordered returned to unrepresented purchasers.
The Construction Receiver brought a motion for approval of its activities, fees, final distribution, and discharge.
Terra Firma, the highest-ranking secured creditor, brought a second motion seeking distribution of a $202,500 Park Levy Reserve collected from unrepresented condominium purchasers.
The court granted the Receiver's motion but dismissed Terra Firma's motion, finding that the Park Levy was mistakenly collected, never became the property of the debtor, and therefore could not form part of Terra Firma's collateral.
The Receiver was directed to return the funds to the unrepresented purchasers.
CCAA Plan of Arrangement sanctioned as fair and reasonable, including third-party releases and DIP charge increase.
The Applicants, part of the Lydian Group which owns a development-stage gold mine in Armenia, sought an order sanctioning their Plan of Arrangement under the CCAA.
The Plan, supported by the Monitor and the requisite majority of secured creditors, provides for the privatization of the Lydian Group and the release of existing indebtedness to Senior Lenders.
The court found the Plan to be fair and reasonable, noting that while equity claimants would receive no compensation, this reflected the economic reality of the insolvency.
The court also approved third-party releases, an increase to the DIP charge, an extension of the stay period, a sealing order for commercially sensitive information, and the Monitor's activities and fees.
The court exercised its statutory and inherent jurisdiction to extend insolvency timelines and alter deemed annulment thresholds due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Superintendent of Bankruptcy brought a motion seeking orders to provide flexibility to the administration of Ontario insolvency estates affected by COVID-19.
The relief sought included increasing payment defaults/time for deemed annulment of consumer proposals under s. 66.31(1) BIA, extending timelines for creditor meetings (ss. 51, 66.15, 102 BIA) and mediations (rules 105(4), (10) BIGR), extending time for court referrals (s. 170.1(3) BIA), applying the order to all active and future insolvency filings until June 30, 2020, and dispensing with notice.
The court granted the requested relief, finding jurisdiction under ss. 66.31(1) and 187(11) of the BIA, and its inherent jurisdiction, given the exceptional circumstances of the pandemic.
The court dismissed Ontario's motion to lift the CCAA stay on its $330 billion health care cost recovery action against tobacco companies.
Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario sought to lift a stay on its $330 billion health care cost recovery action against three tobacco companies (JTI-Macdonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc.) and eleven co-defendants, which was imposed under CCAA proceedings.
Ontario proposed to temporarily stay the effects of any judgment.
The court dismissed the motion, emphasizing the need to preserve the status quo in CCAA proceedings to facilitate a global resolution of significant claims.
Allowing Ontario's action to proceed would alter the level playing field, distract from restructuring efforts, and impose significant costs, prejudicing other stakeholders.
The court granted an Initial Order under the CCAA to a tobacco company facing a $13.5 billion judgment.
JTI-Macdonald Corp. (JTIM) sought an Initial Order under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) following a $13.5 billion judgment from the Quebec Court of Appeal and other significant health care costs recovery actions.
The court granted the Initial Order, including a stay of proceedings against JTIM and other defendants, appointment of Deloitte Restructuring Inc. as Monitor, approval of administrative, directors', and tax charges, authorization to pay pre-filing and post-filing obligations, appointment of Blue Tree Advisors Inc. as Chief Restructuring Officer, and authorization to appeal the Quebec Judgment to the Supreme Court of Canada.
The court found JTIM to be an insolvent company to which the CCAA applies, and that a stay of proceedings was appropriate to facilitate a collective solution for all stakeholders.
The court appointed a single arbitrator to concurrently determine property valuation and insolvency claims.
Oxford Properties Group brought a motion seeking the appointment of a specific arbitrator to determine the current value of the Newmarket Property under an option agreement.
Sears Canada Inc. and its Monitor brought a cross-motion requesting the appointment of a different arbitrator, who was already acting as a Claims Officer in the CCAA proceedings, to determine both the property's value and Oxford's related disputed claims.
The court found the issues to be inextricably linked and that separate proceedings would lead to additional cost and delay.
The court granted the cross-motion, appointing the arbitrator proposed by Sears and the Monitor to resolve all outstanding issues related to the property in a single, consolidated proceeding, thereby dismissing Oxford's motion.
Tax Relief granted
Alvarez & Marsal Canada Inc., as Construction Receiver for Urbancorp entities, sought approval of its fees and its counsels' fees totaling over $3.4 million.
Terra Firma Capital Corporation, a junior secured creditor, objected to the fees of the Construction Receiver and its independent counsel (Blakes), seeking a 30% reduction, citing unreasonable hourly rates, disproportionate time spent, and duplication of services.
The court reviewed the fees based on the Belyea factors, emphasizing value provided over time spent.
The court found the receivership complex and the rates reasonable, but identified some duplication due to the excessive number of timekeepers from Blakes.
The court approved most fees but applied a minor reduction of $35,000 to Blakes' fees.
Privacy law did not block compelled mortgage disclosure for judgment enforcement.
A judgment creditor sought disclosure of a mortgage discharge statement to enforce a writ of seizure and sale against debtors' property.
The appeal addressed whether federal privacy legislation barred disclosure absent express consent.
The Court held disclosure could be ordered under the court-order exception and that implied consent arose in the enforcement context once judgment and seizure steps were completed with notice.
The Court emphasized access to justice and rejected requiring additional formalistic motions where substantively identical relief was sought.
The appeal was allowed and the mortgagee was ordered to produce the statement.
Motion for Mareva injunction and lifting of CCAA stay dismissed for lack of evidence and disclosure.
The moving parties, construction lien creditors of the Mady Group of Companies, brought a motion seeking to lift a CCAA stay of proceedings, amend their statements of claim, and obtain a Mareva injunction against several individuals and corporations.
The court dismissed the motion, finding that the moving parties failed to make full and fair disclosure, failed to establish a strong prima facie case of fraud or breach of trust, and provided no evidence of a risk of dissipation or removal of assets from the jurisdiction.
Leave to appeal CCAA order setting aside initial protection denied due to lack of Canadian connection.
The moving parties, a group of affiliated companies, sought leave to appeal a judgment setting aside an ex parte CCAA Initial Order.
The respondents, creditors of a Singapore subsidiary, successfully argued before the application judge that the CCAA court lacked jurisdiction over the subsidiary.
A single judge of the Court of Appeal held he had jurisdiction to hear the leave motion but refused leave, finding no error in the application judge's conclusion that the real debtors were Singapore companies with little connection to Canada and that the evidence did not support the initial ex parte findings of insolvency and intertwined finances.
Court maintains interim stay to preserve assets pending cross‑border insolvency motions.
Recognition proceedings were brought under the cross‑border insolvency provisions of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act concerning a foreign main liquidation proceeding in the Commonwealth of the Bahamas.
Multiple parties asserted competing claims to approximately $4 million in assets held by a Canadian financial institution.
Motions were pending regarding whether a stay of proceedings should be lifted or modified to permit bankruptcy proceedings in Canada or enforcement of claimed interests.
The court held there was insufficient time to fully argue the issues and maintained the existing interim stay and related orders to preserve the status quo pending a full hearing.
The endorsement emphasized that the interim directions were not intended to interfere with the foreign main proceeding.