The appellant, a vendor of undeveloped land, appealed a Superior Court judgment requiring it to pay $407,582 in development-related costs as a condition of obtaining a severance consent from the municipality.
The Agreement of Purchase and Sale contained a clause permitting the vendor to refuse onerous or unreasonable severance conditions.
The application judge decided the case on the basis of a zoning clause not raised by the parties, constituting a denial of procedural fairness.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, finding that requiring a non-developing vendor to pay development costs was unreasonable under the contract, and that the respondent purchaser bore the obligation to satisfy such conditions or terminate the agreement.