Mark Hart is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 623 decisions on record from 2007 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Mark Hart sit on?

Mark Hart sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Mark Hart decide?

Mark Hart's most common areas include Human Rights (623 decisions), Administrative Law (299 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (150 decisions). Mark Hart has handled 623 decisions across 9 areas.

How many decisions has Mark Hart made?

Mark Hart has 623 decisions on record from 2007 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Mark Hart?

Representatives who frequently appear before Mark Hart include Prabhu Rajan, John Bell, Self-represented.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Mark Hart — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Health Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Workers' Compensation

Mark Hart

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2007

623

cases · 11 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 364Adjudicator· 92Vice-chair· 83Vice-Chair· 42Adjudicator· 23Vice-Chair· 11Vice-chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 9, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant repeatedly failed to comply with Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.

Following a conference call, the Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction requiring the applicant to file witness statements and other documents by a specified deadline.

The applicant failed to comply, requested and received an extension, but again failed to comply or communicate with the Tribunal for over four months.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to comply with his obligations under the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure without reasonable justification and dismissed the application as abandoned.

Church v. Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, 2016 HRTO 1047

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 8, 2016

Human rights application dismissed for delay as applicant failed to diligently pursue claims for ten years.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging his employment was terminated because of his race almost ten years after the termination occurred.

He claimed he only discovered the alleged discriminatory reason when he received documents from the Ontario Labour Relations Board in 2015.

The Tribunal held a preliminary hearing to determine if the application should be dismissed for delay.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to make reasonable and diligent efforts to discover the reason for his termination during a six-year period of inaction, and therefore the delay was not incurred in good faith.

The application was dismissed.

Morris v. The Llewellyn Group Inc., 2016 HRTO 1045

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 4, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abuse of process due to binding settlement agreement.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging failure to accommodate her disability and harassment.

The parties subsequently signed Minutes of Settlement resolving a related grievance.

The respondent sought to dismiss the human rights application as an abuse of process based on the settlement.

The Tribunal found that the settlement was intended to resolve all outstanding issues, including the human rights claims, and that the applicant failed to establish duress or lack of capacity to agree to the settlement.

The application was dismissed as an abuse of process.

Zealand v. Metro Canada Inc., 2016 HRTO 1040

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 2, 2016

Human rights application alleging discrimination in removal of footbridge dismissed for no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant alleged discrimination and reprisal based on disability after the respondent municipality removed a footbridge she had built on municipal property and created a speed bump at the end of her driveway.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing and dismissed the application, finding no reasonable prospect of success.

The evidence showed the footbridge was removed due to neighbour complaints, sight line obstructions, and being on municipal property without permission, not because of the applicant's disability.

The applicant also failed to establish a disability-related need for the footbridge or that the driveway work was discriminatory or retaliatory.

D’Angelo v. Innisfil (Town), 2016 HRTO 1020

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 28, 2016

Human rights application dismissed summarily as evidence showed former employer provided a neutral, not negative, reference.

The applicant alleged that her former employer provided a discriminatory negative reference to a prospective employer, Dynacare, preventing her from securing a new position.

Following an interim order compelling Dynacare to produce records of the reference check, the evidence showed that the former employer provided a neutral reference confirming only employment and position, in accordance with company policy.

The Tribunal dismissed the application at a summary hearing, finding no reasonable prospect that the applicant could prove the reference was negative or discriminatory.

Brooks v. LifeLabs LP, 2016 HRTO 995

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 21, 2016

Reconsideration request denied as applicants presented no new evidence and case splitting was impermissible.

The applicants requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed their human rights application under s. 45.1 of the Code and as an abuse of process.

The applicants argued that their discrimination allegations were not raised in a prior civil proceeding and thus were not appropriately dealt with by the Court.

The Tribunal denied the reconsideration request, finding that the applicants presented no new facts or evidence, the previous decision was not in conflict with established jurisprudence, and the application was properly dismissed as an impermissible attempt to split their case.

Levkivska v. Peel Condominium Corporation No. 231, 2016 HRTO 956

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 21, 2016

Request for reconsideration of dismissed human rights application denied for failing to meet Rule 26.5 criteria.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application against the respondent credit union.

The applicant argued there were new facts regarding his company's receivership, lack of preparation time, and errors in the original decision's factual findings.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the applicant failed to meet the criteria under Rule 26.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, as he did not present new evidence that could not have been reasonably obtained earlier, nor did he demonstrate that the decision conflicted with established jurisprudence or that other factors outweighed the public interest in finality.

Kalair v. Central 1 Credit Union, 2016 HRTO 964

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 21, 2016

Reconsideration granted to rescind term declaring withdrawn human rights allegations unsubstantiated.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that granted her request to withdraw her human rights application but imposed a term declaring her allegations unsubstantiated.

The Tribunal found that imposing such a term conflicted with established jurisprudence, which holds that a withdrawal does not implicate any finding on the substance of the allegations.

The Tribunal granted the reconsideration request and rescinded the term declaring the allegations unsubstantiated.

Drummond v. Community Living Ajax Pickering Whitby, 2016 HRTO 963

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 19, 2016

Human rights application alleging discrimination by tobacco enforcement inspector dismissed for no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant, a convenience store owner, alleged discrimination based on race, colour, disability, and age by a tobacco enforcement inspector who ticketed him for selling cigarettes to a minor.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that even accepting the applicant's version of events, there was no evidence linking the inspector's conduct to any protected grounds under the Human Rights Code.

The application was dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

Lian Huang v. City of Toronto and Kathleen Buchanan, 2016 HRTO 945

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 11, 2016

Tribunal awards $15,000 settlement amount plus $5,000 for emotional distress after respondents breached settlement agreement.

The applicant filed a Contravention of Settlement Application alleging the respondents failed to pay a $15,000 settlement reached at mediation.

The respondents did not appear at the hearing despite receiving notice.

The Tribunal found the respondents breached the settlement by failing to pay the agreed amount.

Applying contractual principles, the Tribunal ordered the respondents to pay the $15,000 settlement amount, plus $5,000 in general damages for the emotional harm and distress caused by the breach, along with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest.

Rollick v. 1526597 Ontario Inc. o/a Tim Horton’s Store No. 2533, 2016 HRTO 910

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 17, 2016

Human rights application alleging police racial slur dismissed due to lack of credible evidence.

The applicant alleged that a police officer uttered a racial slur during a traffic stop, contrary to the Human Rights Code.

The officer denied the allegation.

The Tribunal reviewed audio recordings of the interaction which contradicted the applicant's initial timeline of when the slur was allegedly spoken.

The applicant subsequently changed his evidence to claim the slur occurred during an unrecorded portion of the stop.

The Tribunal found the applicant's revised evidence lacked credibility and dismissed the application due to insufficient reliable evidence.

Tsiofas v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2016 HRTO 825

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 13, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after the applicant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.

Despite receiving proper notice of the hearing and filing hearing materials as directed, the applicant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

The Tribunal dismissed the Application, deeming it abandoned due to the applicant's non-attendance.

Anas Alahdab v. ATD Contracting Services Inc., 2016 HRTO 797

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 8, 2016

Human rights application dismissed for delay and lacking a reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant, a former Registered Practical Nurse, filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of race, place of origin, ethnic origin, creed, and reprisal.

The Tribunal held a preliminary hearing to determine whether the application should be dismissed for delay or having no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the timely allegations, which primarily involved routine workplace management and discipline, lacked any reasonable prospect of success as there was no evidence linking the events to a protected ground.

The Tribunal further held that the untimely allegations were barred by the one-year limitation period, as the applicant's explanations for the delay—internal complaints and fear of reprisal—did not constitute good faith under section 34(2) of the Human Rights Code.

The application was dismissed in its entirety.

Mozafarian v. Saint Elizabeth Health Care, 2016 HRTO 784

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 12, 2016

Summary dismissal denied; volunteer scrutineer's disability discrimination claim has reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant, a volunteer scrutineer for a political leadership campaign, alleged discrimination based on disability after being asked to leave a polling station shortly after raising accessibility concerns.

The matter was referred to a summary hearing to determine if the application had no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's volunteer work could potentially fall under the protected areas of services or employment under the Human Rights Code.

Furthermore, there was circumstantial evidence that could link the adverse treatment to his disability.

The Tribunal concluded the application had a reasonable prospect of success and ordered it to proceed.

Sprague v. Yufest, 2016 HRTO 642

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 11, 2016

Human rights application regarding disability parking accommodation allowed to proceed past summary hearing stage.

The applicant, a tenant with a mobility impairment, alleged discrimination based on disability after being denied a parking space close to his building.

The respondents claimed parking was not included in the lease and required an additional fee.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing and found the application had a reasonable prospect of success, as the denial of parking could constitute an adverse impact due to disability-related needs, and the respondents may have failed in their procedural duty to accommodate.

The Tribunal also granted the applicant's request to amend the application, finding no prejudice to the respondents.

Craig Hinkley v. Eastbury Properties Ltd., 2016 HRTO 631

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 3, 2016

Tribunal denies respondents' request to testify via videoconference in human rights hearing involving credibility issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and sexual harassment in employment.

In this interim decision, the Tribunal addressed three preliminary requests.

The Tribunal denied the respondents' request to attend the hearing by videoconference from Alberta, finding that financial constraints did not justify departing from the expectation of in-person testimony where credibility is at issue.

The Tribunal granted the applicant's request to amend the corporate respondent's name.

Finally, the Tribunal declined to order the personal respondent to produce text messages, as he claimed the phone was lost or destroyed.

Durocher v. The Empty Plate Eatery Inc., 2016 HRTO 581

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 14, 2016

Applications consolidated on consent; request for production of other students' extension requests denied for irrelevance.

The applicant brought two human rights applications alleging discrimination on the basis of family status after his request for an extension to complete a nursing program was denied.

In this interim decision, the Tribunal consolidated the two applications on consent.

The Tribunal denied the applicant's request for production of extension requests made by other students, finding that the documents were not arguably relevant to the issue of whether the applicant's family status-related needs were properly considered and accommodated.

Ananda v. Humber College Institute of Technology & Advanced Learning, 2016 HRTO 332

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 11, 2016

Most human rights allegations dismissed for delay or no reasonable prospect of success; disability termination claim proceeds.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on multiple grounds, including disability, race, and sex.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to clarify the issues and determine if any allegations had no reasonable prospect of success or were barred by delay.

The Tribunal dismissed the majority of the allegations, finding they either had no reasonable prospect of success or were filed outside the one-year limitation period without a good faith explanation for the delay.

However, the Tribunal allowed the applicant's core allegation—that his employment was terminated because of his disability—to proceed to a full hearing.

Khoja v. Alliance International Credit Corporation, 2016 HRTO 322

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 29, 2016

Human rights application regarding social assistance benefits dismissed under s. 45.1 and for no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant alleged discrimination by the City of Windsor and the Ministry of Community and Social Services regarding the deduction of her Ukrainian disability pension from her Ontario Works benefits and alleged rude treatment by City staff.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine whether the application should be dismissed.

The Tribunal dismissed the portion of the application regarding the pension deduction under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, finding that the Social Benefits Tribunal had already appropriately dealt with the substance of that issue.

The Tribunal dismissed the remaining allegations of bad treatment and reprisal as having no reasonable prospect of success, as the applicant could not establish a link between the alleged treatment and any protected ground.

The application was dismissed in its entirety.

Stepanova v. Windsor (City), 2016 HRTO 269

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 29, 2016

Human rights application dismissed under s. 45.1 as substance was dealt with in prior court proceedings.

The applicants filed a human rights application alleging discrimination by their condominium corporation.

The respondents requested dismissal under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing the substance of the application was already dealt with in prior Superior Court proceedings under the Condominium Act.

The Tribunal found that the factual underpinnings of both proceedings were identical and the Court's factual findings precluded a finding of discrimination.

The Tribunal dismissed the application under s. 45.1 and alternatively as an abuse of process, as the applicants impermissibly split their case by failing to raise the Code allegations in the prior court proceedings.

Levkivska v. Peel Condominium Corporation No. 231, 2016 HRTO 270

Page 3 of 32 (623 cases)

Applicant

Philton MooreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jenny DeGoeySelf-represented
1 appearance
Derek FranciscoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark RobertsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Viktoriya StepanovaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Raywatie BaldeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bright (Zeguo) QiuSelf-represented
1 appearance

assisted the Applicant

Michael CraigAgent
1 appearance

Counsel

Michelle WongCounsel
1 appearance
E.C. Carla ZabekCounsel
1 appearance
Jayson RiderCounsel
1 appearance
Kelly HarbridgeCounsel
1 appearance
Darrell KloezeCounsel
1 appearance
William McDowellCounsel
1 appearance
Woodward McCaigCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance
Fateh SalimCounsel
1 appearance
Sheryl JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance
Timothy LawsonCounsel
1 appearance
Woodward McKaigCounsel
1 appearance
Roger MillsCounsel
1 appearance
Leslie McIntoshCounsel
1 appearance
Michael M. MillerCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi LoewithCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Dr. Erik Paidra

Anne PosnoCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Lakeridge Health Corporation

Shane SmithCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Novopharm Limited, Gail Lucyk and Halima Khan

Angela RaeCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Cynthia MackenzieCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Intervener

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for the respondents

Mark EllisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Clarisa WaldmanCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Niki LunquistCounsel
1 appearance

for 2117392 Ontario Inc., William Farmer and Brandon Farmer

Tanya WalkerCounsel
1 appearance

for A.A. Property Management & Associates Inc.

Edmond PriftiAgent
1 appearance

for A.C.

P.S.-C.Self-represented
1 appearance

for Andy Carson

Paula Soares-CarsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Anthony Piazza and Maria Perry

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for Arista Homes Limited

Michael CooperCounsel
1 appearance

for Bata Limited (Canada Corporation No. 678234-5)

Leslie TennenbaumCounsel
2 appearances

for Bata Limited (now known as Athletes World Limited)

Connie ReeveCounsel
1 appearance

for Brian Edwards

Grace SkowronskiAgent
1 appearance
Aaron WudrickCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Auto Workers Local 199

Keith OsborneUnion representative
1 appearance

for Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 997 and Lynn Raback

Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance

for Centennial College

Nancy FisherAgent
1 appearance

for Communications, Energy & Paperworkers Union, Local 324 and George Smith

Denis EllicksonCounsel
2 appearances

for Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

Colin OsterbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Anita Grewal

Fred TranquilliCounsel
1 appearance

for D.S.

L.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board, Herman Viloria and John Lezon

Nadya TymochenkoCounsel
2 appearances

for Dylan Sigrist

Lori SigristSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Gary Clarke, Jeff Gillies, Joseph Rapai, Terry Grand, Anne Kavelaars, Evelyn Paparella, Tamare Nugent, Des Desalaiz

Melanie A. WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for General Motors of Canada Limited

David BannonCounsel
1 appearance

for Georgina Watts

Victoria ShenCounsel
1 appearance

for Halton Condominium Corporation #77, J & W Condominium Management Ltd., and Don Rowatt

Karen KisielCounsel
1 appearance

for Hamilton Police Service and Troy Ashbaugh

Marco VisentiniCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services and Toula Bezas

Chris DonszelmannCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Education

Karen InselbacherCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, Theren Beecroft and Kent Milligan

Christina DonszelmannCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as Represented by the Ministry of Education and Training, Intervenor

Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Paul SharmaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dean de LottinvilleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael BradtSelf-represented
1 appearance
Douglas MooreSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Joe Ramos

Louis StrezosCounsel
1 appearance

for Jose Pratas

Greg McGivernCounsel
1 appearance
Laura JoyCounsel
1 appearance

for Justicia for Migrant Workers

Grace VaccarelliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kevin Cote, David Lenchuk and Stan Belza

Joanne MulcahyCounsel
2 appearances

for London District Catholic School Board

Eric M. RoherCounsel
1 appearance

for March of Dimes Canada

Lee HardingAgent
1 appearance

for McMaster Association of Part-Time Students

Suzan FraserCounsel
1 appearance

for McMaster Students Union Inc.

Derek CollinsCounsel
1 appearance

for McMaster University

George AvraamCounsel
1 appearance
Dina MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Lisa StamCounsel
1 appearance

for Metro Ontario Inc. and Rick Crean

Charles RobertsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Nigel Thomas

Joanne MulcahyCounsel
1 appearance

for Olymel S.E.C. / L.P. and Michel Boudreault

Stephen BernardoCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Human Rights Commission

Tony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Step

Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Peel Regional Police Services Board and Jeff Duffield

Patricia MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Lauri WallCounsel
1 appearance

for Presteve Foods Ltd.

Gino MorgaCounsel
1 appearance

for Shelley Kiewning

Theodore ScollieCounsel
2 appearances

for Sonja Bata

Ronald J. McCloskeyCounsel
1 appearance

for Special Education Tribunal, Intervenor

Lucy McSweeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Parties Hamilton Police Service and Troy Ashbaugh

Marco VisentiniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Parties The City of Hamilton and Linda Blake-Evans

Byrdena MacNeilCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

W. Gordon SteinbergCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Brian HumphreyUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Davies Bagambiire

Davies BagambiireSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Kevin Robinson

Kevin RobinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Affected Party The Ontario Ombudsman

Jean-Frédéric HübschCounsel
1 appearance

for The AIDS Network

Kevin RobinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
5 appearances
Philton MooreSelf-represented
5 appearances
Johnson AzigaSelf-represented
5 appearances
Glen MorrisonAgent
4 appearances
Mathew BlakelySelf-represented
4 appearances
Robert LeeSelf-represented
4 appearances
Sandra BartonCounsel
4 appearances
Allison TaylorCounsel
4 appearances
Wade PoziomkaCounsel
3 appearances
Osborne BarnwellCounsel
3 appearances
C.R.E.Self-represented
3 appearances
Hugh ScherCounsel
3 appearances
Edelgard MahantSelf-represented
3 appearances
Rosario BoncoriSelf-represented
3 appearances
Julie WilsonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Sharmaine HallCounsel
3 appearances
Roshika WilliamsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersCounsel
3 appearances
Randy KingSelf-represented
3 appearances

for the Applicants

Mary Ellen McIntyreCounsel
1 appearance
Glen MorrisonAgent
1 appearance
Oksana LevkivskaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bradley ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
Niki LundquistCounsel
1 appearance
Elita McAdamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brenda CulbertCounsel
1 appearance
Yuriy GrygorchukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Debbie DraganitsCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ayoob KhanAgent
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants Durrell Claybourn and Dave Ferguson

Bruce BestCounsel
1 appearance

for The City of Hamilton and Linda Blake-Evans

Dennis PerlinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Prabhu RajanCounsel
8 appearances
Monmi GoswamiCounsel
4 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Christine ElwellCounsel
2 appearances
Sheena ScottCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Tony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Anthony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Tamara JosephCounsel
3 appearances
Roger RoweCounsel
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersCounsel
2 appearances
Brian KampeSelf-represented
2 appearances
Martha MacKinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Avvy Yao-Yao GoCounsel
1 appearance
Lee Ann ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance
Barbara Boldt-MacPhersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Greg GoodridgeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randy KingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug LundySelf-represented
1 appearance
Megan Evans-MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant A.C.

P.S-C.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Complainant Andy Carson

Paula Soares-CarsonAgent
1 appearance

for the Complainant D.S.

L.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Complainant Dylan Sigrist

Lori SigristAgent
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for The Corporation of the County of Lambton

David CribbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Financial Services Commission of Ontario

Reesha HoseinCounsel
1 appearance
Padraic RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Independent Electricity System Operator

Pamela HofmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Alanna MihaljCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew ReynoldsCounsel
1 appearance
Nini JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Denise CooneyCounsel
1 appearance
Monica MulvahillUnion representative
1 appearance
Tina LieCounsel
1 appearance
Debra McKennaCounsel
1 appearance
Roberto HenriquezCounsel
1 appearance
Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebUnion representative
1 appearance
Rana ArbabianCounsel
1 appearance
Bill ColeAgent
1 appearance
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Independent Police Review Director

Jean IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Justicia for Migrant Workers

Grace VaccarelliCounsel
2 appearances

for the Intervenor Ontario Human Rights Commission

Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenors African Canadian Legal Clinic, Metro Toronto Chinese & Southeast Asian Legal Clinic and South Asian Legal Clinic of Ontario

Avvy Yao-Yao GoCounsel
1 appearance
Virginia NelderCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Toronto Civic Employees’ Union, Local 416 (CUPE)

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Christine ElwellCounsel
2 appearances
Tony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Raj DhirCounsel
1 appearance
Sheena ScottCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers Federation

Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Non-Party Intervenor

Caroline V. (Nini)_ JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the proposed Respondents

Bruce EllisCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Robin BasuCounsel
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Matthew Ma and Reynaldo Corpuz

Sharon DuffyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Patricia MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
John W. WoonCounsel
4 appearances
Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
3 appearances
Andrea RiskCounsel
3 appearances
Richard CharneyCounsel
3 appearances
Brenda BowlbyCounsel
3 appearances
Michael FailesCounsel
3 appearances
Paula RusakCounsel
3 appearances
Rachel SilverCounsel
3 appearances
Elizabeth Ann MartensSelf-represented
2 appearances
Gaynor RogerCounsel
2 appearances
Arthur TarasukCounsel
2 appearances
Sheila MacKinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Vilija YcasAgent
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
2 appearances
Matthew CurtisCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel ChodosCounsel
2 appearances
Glenn ChristieCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent, Acclaim Ability Management Inc.

Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
1 appearance
Peter StraszynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Party

Frances R. GallopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bata Limited (now known as Athletes World Limited)

Connie ReeveCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Auto Workers, Local 199

Keith OsborneUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Business College

Syed Ali Mazher JafferyAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 416

Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Michael MazzucaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dr. Anita Grewal

Fred TranquilliCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dr. Sameer D’Souza

Matthew SammonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Durham Catholic District School Board

Dolores BarbiniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Durham Children’s Aid Society

Helen MurphyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Durham Regional Police Services Board

Ian JohnstoneCounsel
1 appearance
Angela KhouryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario

Christine DaviesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Engel and Associates Professional Corporation

Bruce EngelCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance
Carli GutmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent General Motors of Canada Limited

David BannonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gravel Charest Fisher Law Firm

Allan O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services (Ontario Provincial Police)

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance
Marnie CorboldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Finance (Financial Services Commission of Ontario)

Larissa EassonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Community and Social Services (Family Responsibility Office)

Kristen KizoffCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

William GeorgasCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hospital for Sick Children

Melanie WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Humber College Institute of Technology & Advanced Learning

Catherine PetersCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Huronia Area Aboriginal Assistance Corporation o/a Huronia Area Aboriginal Management Board

Kent ElsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joseph Brant Hospital

Dolores BarbiniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joyce Phillips

Colin YoungmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 183

Virginia NelderCounsel
1 appearance
Robert GibsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Legal Aid Ontario

Carolyn PadgettCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea DanonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO)

S. Jodi Gallagher-HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mahle Filter Systems Canada ULC

Stephanie RamsayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mazerolle & Lemay Law Firm

Denis CadieuxCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Provincial Police

Amal ChaudryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Presteve Foods Ltd.

Gino MorgaCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Royal LePage Partners Realty Inc.

Al KrochAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents

John BellCounsel
7 appearances
Catherine PetersCounsel
5 appearances
Stacey BallCounsel
5 appearances
Sheila MacKinnonCounsel
5 appearances
Andrea RiskCounsel
3 appearances
Robert BaldwinCounsel
3 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
3 appearances
Lior SamfiruCounsel
3 appearances
Harry KopytoAgent
2 appearances
Daniel LublinCounsel
2 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Patty MurrayCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher RiggsCounsel
2 appearances
Firdaus WaleleCounsel
2 appearances
Soma Ray-EllisCounsel
2 appearances
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
2 appearances
David StrashinCounsel
2 appearances
Glorie AlfredCounsel
2 appearances
Barry BrownCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Alliance Youth Services Inc., Steve Catney and Ed Barron

Robert FernandesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Children’s Aid Society of Toronto, Carol Manak and Pam Dawe

Ryan ConlinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents City of Toronto and Sandra Cuff

Darragh MeagherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents David Hurst and Maggie Lalande

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Dr. Michael Weinstein and Dr. Christopher Parshuram

Kasia CzajkowskiCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah CormanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Durham Regional Police Services Board and Sara Foote

David CowlingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sean Logan

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Securitas Canada Limited

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sheridan College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning

Patricia MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, Theren Beecroft and Kent Milligan

Tina EarlCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ministry of Community and Social Services, Hazel Romaine and Jermyne Graham

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Olivieri Foods Inc. and Cathy Martin

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sonja Bata

Ronald J. McCloskeyCounsel
1 appearance
Sara BeheshtiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ontario Public Service Employees Union, Susan Quinn, Natalie Lachapelle, Anita Fulford, Marian Chipchase and Dan Dean

Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Service and Toronto Police Services Board

Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Work Able Centres Inc. and Louise Korhonen

Thomas StefanikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Windsor

Patrick BrodeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patty MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Regional Municipality of Waterloo Police Services Board

Don JarvisCounsel
1 appearance
Daina SearchCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Young Women’s Christian Association of Hamilton

Timothy DugganCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Tony Dionisio

Tony DionisioSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Community Housing Corporation

William LeMayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Trillium Lakelands District School Board

Carolyn KayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Trish Meekins

Andrew DruryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor (formerly CAW), Local 1941

Mike ByrneUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of New Brunswick

Clarence BennettCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Waterloo Regional Police Association

Nini JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Osler Health Centre o/a Etobicoke General Hospital

Michele WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Windsor Police Services Board

Mark NazarewichCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent York Regional Police Services Board

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent YWCA Toronto

Frances GallopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Special Education Tribunal

Lucy McSweeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for The TDL Group Corp.

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Waterloo Region District School Board

Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board

Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance
David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for Trillium Lakelands District School Board

Nadine ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Local Unions 175 & 633

Michael HancockCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, B. Steed, M. Nunno, and M. Powell

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Damian HornichAgent
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police for the City of Toronto

Jerome Wiley, Q.C.Counsel
2 appearances
George H. CowleyCounsel
1 appearance

for Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Greg BullenCounsel
1 appearance

for York Condominium Corporation No. 365

Ashley WinbergCounsel
1 appearance

Litigation Guardian for Andy Carson

Paula Soares-CarsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Litigation Guardian for Dylan Sigrist

Lori SigristSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of the Respondent

Keith OsborneUnion representative
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Janet CoatesSelf-represented
2 appearances

On her own behalf

Svetlana WhiteSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cathy O’ReganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Charmaine MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance
H. G.Self-represented
1 appearance
Farideh GhafourianSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara Boldt-MacPhersonSelf-represented
1 appearance

on her own behalf and as litigation guardian for L.M.

E.M.Self-represented
1 appearance

on his own behalf

Craig BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Kuralraj KulasingamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stacy SweezeySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jerzy NatalukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Keith RamoutarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kam Chong LiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gary AtamanykSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy StevensSelf-represented
1 appearance
Guy BabineauSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajoo MakhiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul ChukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Oscar MedranoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lebert AlladiceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Greg GoodridgeSelf-represented
1 appearance

on their own behalf

J. B.Self-represented
1 appearance
E. B.Self-represented
1 appearance

Representative

Henry FreitagAgent
1 appearance

Respondents

Gail NeilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Douglas MooreSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents Ellen Helden and 1312788 Ontario Limited

Erin HallockCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Henry FreitagSelf-represented
1 appearance

623

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.1

cases/mo

HRTO623(100%)

Decision types

motion

511

trial

112

Page 3 of 32 (623 cases)