Mark Hart is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 623 decisions on record from 2007 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Mark Hart sit on?

Mark Hart sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Mark Hart decide?

Mark Hart's most common areas include Human Rights (623 decisions), Administrative Law (299 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (150 decisions). Mark Hart has handled 623 decisions across 9 areas.

How many decisions has Mark Hart made?

Mark Hart has 623 decisions on record from 2007 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Mark Hart?

Representatives who frequently appear before Mark Hart include Prabhu Rajan, John Bell, Self-represented.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Mark Hart — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Health Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Workers' Compensation

Mark Hart

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2007

623

cases · 11 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 364Adjudicator· 92Vice-chair· 83Vice-Chair· 42Adjudicator· 23Vice-Chair· 11Vice-chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 21, 2017

Human rights application dismissed for delay as applicant failed to establish good faith explanation.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of race, ethnic origin, and disability 27.5 months after the last alleged incident.

The Tribunal held a preliminary hearing to determine if the delay was incurred in good faith under section 34(2) of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant argued that her mental health disability, ignorance of her rights, and reliance on her union caused the delay.

The Tribunal found that the applicant was able to pursue other legal matters during the delay period, had reason to inquire about her rights, and could not rely on concurrent union proceedings to justify the delay.

The application was dismissed for delay.

Mei Tan v. Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2017 HRTO 1692

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 20, 2017

Human rights application against real estate broker dismissed for lack of service relationship.

The applicant filed a human rights application against a real estate broker, alleging discrimination based on disability.

The applicant's former home, which contained a licensed medical marijuana garden, was sold by the bank under a writ of possession.

The bank's legal counsel instructed the respondent real estate broker to list the property as a 'grow op'.

The Tribunal dismissed the application at a preliminary hearing, finding no reasonable prospect of success because the respondent was providing a service to the bank, not the applicant, and therefore no service relationship existed under section 1 of the Human Rights Code.

Martin v. Your Choice Realty Corp., 2017 HRTO 1690

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 20, 2017

Human rights application dismissed for delay and as an abuse of process for re-litigating previously dismissed claims.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on race and disability, nearly two years after her employment was terminated.

She had previously filed an application regarding the same termination, which was dismissed.

The Tribunal held a preliminary hearing to determine if the current application should be dismissed for delay or as an abuse of process.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay, as she did not provide medical evidence that her eye surgery prevented her from filing in a timely manner.

Furthermore, the Tribunal found the application to be an abuse of process because it re-raised issues that had already been addressed and dismissed in the first application.

The application was dismissed.

Zaneefa Rooplall v. Trillium Health Partners, 2017 HRTO 1687

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 15, 2017

Human rights application dismissed; 'record of offences' protection does not apply to mere criminal charges.

The applicant alleged discrimination in employment on the basis of disability and record of offences after his employment was terminated shortly after he was charged with criminal offences.

The respondent requested a summary hearing to dismiss the application.

The Tribunal found that the applicant had no reasonable prospect of success in establishing that his work restrictions were a factor in his termination.

Furthermore, the Tribunal held that the ground of 'record of offences' under the Human Rights Code only applies to convictions, not mere charges.

The application was dismissed.

MacLean v. B&T MacFarlane Ottawa Limited, 2017 HRTO 1668

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 23, 2017

Tribunal awards $6,000 for discrimination where disability was a factor in termination, despite performance issues.

The applicant, a restaurant server with multiple sclerosis, alleged discrimination in employment after his employment was discontinued following a brief trial period.

The respondent claimed the applicant was let go due to poor performance, bad attitude, and inability to work in a fast-paced team environment.

The Tribunal found that while the applicant's poor attitude and performance were the primary reasons for his dismissal, the respondent's expressed concerns about his safety at work were related to his multiple sclerosis and formed at least one factor in the decision.

The Tribunal concluded this constituted discrimination under section 5 of the Human Rights Code.

However, because the employment would have been terminated in any event for non-discriminatory reasons, including reported drinking on the job, no lost wages were awarded.

The respondent was ordered to pay $6,000 for injury to dignity, feelings, and self-respect, and management was ordered to complete human rights training.

Tavares v. Mistura Restaurant & Hang Out Inc., 2017 HRTO 1553

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 9, 2017

Application dismissed due to applicant's refusal to participate and lack of reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination with respect to housing based on race, colour, family status, and receipt of public assistance.

A summary and preliminary hearing was scheduled to determine if the application should be dismissed for delay or having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant attended the teleconference hearing but refused to participate or make submissions without legal representation, despite her requests for an adjournment being previously denied.

The adjudicator dismissed the application due to the applicant's refusal to participate, and further found that the allegations were either out of time with no good faith explanation for the delay, or had no reasonable prospect of success as there was no evidence linking the respondent's actions to the alleged Code grounds.

Rankine v. Orchard Grove Housing Co-operative Inc., 2017 HRTO 1484

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 8, 2017

Request to re-activate deferred human rights application denied due to unexplained 9-month delay.

The applicant sought to re-activate his human rights application alleging workplace reprisal, which had been deferred pending the outcome of a union grievance process.

The grievance process concluded in April 2016, but the applicant did not request re-activation until April 2017, well beyond the 60-day deadline under the Tribunal's Rules.

The Tribunal denied the request and dismissed the application, finding that the applicant failed to provide a good explanation for his failure to inquire about the status of his grievance and that the lengthy delay would prejudice the respondent.

Andrew Jayashankar v. 145 Richmond Street West Limited Partnership, 2017 HRTO 1474

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 7, 2017

Human rights application dismissed for delay and having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of race, sex, and family status against multiple police services, a children's aid society, and the Family Responsibility Office.

At a preliminary hearing, the Tribunal found that the three timely allegations—concerning police responses to child access disputes, child support enforcement policies, and a children's aid society's decision not to investigate a report—had no reasonable prospect of success, as there was no evidence of adverse treatment linked to a protected ground.

The Tribunal further dismissed the remaining untimely allegations, some dating back nine years, finding the applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation to establish that the delay was incurred in good faith.

Vasuki Thillainadarajah v. York Regional Police Services Board, 2017 HRTO 1472

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 1, 2017

Tribunal declines to dismiss disability discrimination claim regarding withholding of pension commuted value.

The applicant alleged that the respondents discriminated against him on the basis of disability by refusing to pay out the commuted value of his pension while his employment status remained in dispute due to an outstanding human rights application.

The respondents requested that the application be dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success and for delay.

The Tribunal declined to dismiss the application, finding that the issues of adverse effect discrimination were more appropriately determined on a full evidentiary record, and that the application was filed within the one-year limitation period.

Salisbury v. Independent Electricity System Operator, 2017 HRTO 1440

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 17, 2017

Human rights application dismissed as an abuse of process due to case splitting with civil claim.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging a security guard made discriminatory comments based on ancestry and place of origin.

The applicant also commenced a Small Claims Court action regarding the same events of April 27, 2016, but attempted to exclude the human rights allegations from the civil claim.

The Tribunal held that splitting the case into two separate proceedings arising from the same factual transaction constitutes an abuse of process.

The application was dismissed.

Rinaldi v. Paragon Security, 2017 HRTO 1370

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 16, 2017

Human rights application alleging race and sexual orientation discrimination dismissed for no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant, a Black gay man from the Caribbean, alleged discrimination in employment on the basis of race and sexual orientation.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the applicant could not point to any evidence linking the alleged adverse treatment—including denial of a promotion, denial of a loan, and termination of employment for absenteeism—to his race or sexual orientation.

The application was dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success.

Wilson v. J. Sterling Industries, 2017 HRTO 1364

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 4, 2017

Tribunal orders production of applicant's medical records with temporal limits and privacy redactions.

The respondents in a human rights application alleging disability discrimination brought a Request for Order seeking production of the applicant's medical records, including clinical files from her family doctor and psychologist, as well as statements from her long-term disability application.

The Tribunal found the records were relevant because the applicant had put her medical status and ability to return to work in issue.

The Tribunal ordered production but limited the temporal scope to the period following her maternity leave until her resignation, and directed that the psychologist's records be redacted to remove private matters unrelated to her symptoms, restrictions, or ability to work.

Espinoza v. The Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board, 2017 HRTO 1301

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 4, 2017

Request for disclosure and cross-examination transcript denied as documents were irrelevant, unavailable, or non-existent.

The applicant filed a Request for Order seeking disclosure of documents relating to a junior litigation lawyer role, interview notes for other employees, and a copy of the Tribunal's transcript of a cross-examination.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the respondents did not possess the requested documents regarding the lawyer role, the interview notes were not arguably relevant, and no transcript of the cross-examination existed as the adjudicator's personal notes are not producible.

Moore v. The Estate of Lou Ferro, 2017 HRTO 1307

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 4, 2017

Request for reconsideration denied; applicant failed to establish grounds to add successor law firm as respondent.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of an interim decision that denied his request to add Bayview Personal Injury Lawyers as a respondent and upheld a statutory stay under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act against the Estate of Lou Ferro.

The applicant argued that Ferro & Company was an unincorporated association rather than a sole proprietorship, and that Bayview was operating jointly with Ferro & Company.

The Tribunal found that Ferro & Company was a sole proprietorship and that Bayview was at most a successor business, not a joint operator.

The Tribunal concluded that the applicant failed to show that the interim decision conflicted with established jurisprudence or that other factors outweighed the public interest in finality.

The request for reconsideration was denied.

Moore v. The Estate of Lou Ferro, 2017 HRTO 1306

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 28, 2017

Request for reconsideration of decision dismissing human rights application for delay denied.

The applicant filed a request for reconsideration of a previous decision that dismissed her human rights application for delay.

The request was filed out of time.

The Tribunal considered the request but found that the applicant failed to present new facts or evidence that could not reasonably have been obtained earlier, nor did she establish that the decision conflicted with established jurisprudence or that other factors outweighed the public interest in finality.

The request for reconsideration was denied.

Sharma v. University of Toronto, 2017 HRTO 1282

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 25, 2017

Summary hearing request to dismiss racial discrimination application denied; full evidentiary hearing required.

The applicant, a Black woman, alleged racial discrimination in her employment, claiming a manager engaged in a pattern of abusive behaviour towards her and that her subsequent termination was discriminatory.

The respondent requested the application be dismissed at a summary hearing for having no reasonable prospect of success, arguing the conflict was purely interpersonal.

The Tribunal declined to dismiss the application, finding that the allegations of subtle racial discrimination and the reasons for termination required a full evidentiary hearing to resolve.

Clarke v. Nuform Building Technologies Inc., 2017 HRTO 1254

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 22, 2017

Human rights application against Peel Police dismissed at summary hearing for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant alleged discrimination based on race, colour, and ethnic origin against the Peel Police Services Board and the Windsor Police Services Board.

The Peel Police Services Board requested a summary hearing to dismiss the allegations against it.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's allegations regarding racial comments during transport, a phone call to his employer, and comments by an investigating detective had no reasonable prospect of success, largely due to inconsistencies with his prior OIPRD complaint and shifting explanations.

The allegations against the Peel Police Services Board were dismissed, and the matter was directed to proceed to a hearing on the merits against the Windsor Police Services Board.

Maligie Koroma v. The Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board and the Windsor Police Services Board, 2017 HRTO 1248

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 13, 2017

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to comply with pre-hearing obligations.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of race, colour, place of origin, and citizenship.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction requiring the parties to file pre-hearing materials, warning that failure to comply could result in the application being dismissed as abandoned.

While the respondent complied, the applicant failed to file the required materials or communicate with the Tribunal despite receiving notice.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned and cancelled the scheduled hearing.

Zeng v. Conversion Marketing-Communication Inc., 2017 HRTO 1199

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 11, 2017

Human rights application dismissed; rental application denial and eviction were based on non-discriminatory reasons.

The applicant alleged discrimination in accommodation on the basis of ethnic origin, citizenship, and marital status after her rental application was denied and she was removed from her ex-spouse's rental unit by police.

The Tribunal found that the respondent denied the rental application for legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons, including unstable employment, poor credit, and lack of rental history.

The Tribunal also found that the respondent's actions in changing the locks and having the applicant removed were driven by the need to secure vacant possession for new tenants, not by discriminatory factors.

The application was dismissed.

Kurti v. 2730979 Canada Inc., 2017 HRTO 1181

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 5, 2017

Reconsideration denied where applicant failed to formally request adjournment and did not attend hearing.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application after he failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

The applicant argued he was waiting for a response to an adjournment request because his prospective legal counsel was unavailable.

The Tribunal found that the applicant never formally requested an adjournment from the Tribunal, despite being instructed to do so, and failed to attend the hearing.

The request for reconsideration was denied as there were no factors outweighing the public interest in the finality of decisions.

Phillips v. Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services (Ontario Provincial Police), 2017 HRTO 1148

Page 1 of 32 (623 cases)

Applicant

Philton MooreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jenny DeGoeySelf-represented
1 appearance
Derek FranciscoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark RobertsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Viktoriya StepanovaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Raywatie BaldeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bright (Zeguo) QiuSelf-represented
1 appearance

assisted the Applicant

Michael CraigAgent
1 appearance

Counsel

Michelle WongCounsel
1 appearance
E.C. Carla ZabekCounsel
1 appearance
Jayson RiderCounsel
1 appearance
Kelly HarbridgeCounsel
1 appearance
Darrell KloezeCounsel
1 appearance
William McDowellCounsel
1 appearance
Woodward McCaigCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance
Fateh SalimCounsel
1 appearance
Sheryl JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance
Timothy LawsonCounsel
1 appearance
Woodward McKaigCounsel
1 appearance
Roger MillsCounsel
1 appearance
Leslie McIntoshCounsel
1 appearance
Michael M. MillerCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi LoewithCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Dr. Erik Paidra

Anne PosnoCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Lakeridge Health Corporation

Shane SmithCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Novopharm Limited, Gail Lucyk and Halima Khan

Angela RaeCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Cynthia MackenzieCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Intervener

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for the respondents

Mark EllisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Clarisa WaldmanCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Niki LunquistCounsel
1 appearance

for 2117392 Ontario Inc., William Farmer and Brandon Farmer

Tanya WalkerCounsel
1 appearance

for A.A. Property Management & Associates Inc.

Edmond PriftiAgent
1 appearance

for A.C.

P.S.-C.Self-represented
1 appearance

for Andy Carson

Paula Soares-CarsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Anthony Piazza and Maria Perry

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for Arista Homes Limited

Michael CooperCounsel
1 appearance

for Bata Limited (Canada Corporation No. 678234-5)

Leslie TennenbaumCounsel
2 appearances

for Bata Limited (now known as Athletes World Limited)

Connie ReeveCounsel
1 appearance

for Brian Edwards

Grace SkowronskiAgent
1 appearance
Aaron WudrickCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Auto Workers Local 199

Keith OsborneUnion representative
1 appearance

for Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 997 and Lynn Raback

Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance

for Centennial College

Nancy FisherAgent
1 appearance

for Communications, Energy & Paperworkers Union, Local 324 and George Smith

Denis EllicksonCounsel
2 appearances

for Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

Colin OsterbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Anita Grewal

Fred TranquilliCounsel
1 appearance

for D.S.

L.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board, Herman Viloria and John Lezon

Nadya TymochenkoCounsel
2 appearances

for Dylan Sigrist

Lori SigristSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Gary Clarke, Jeff Gillies, Joseph Rapai, Terry Grand, Anne Kavelaars, Evelyn Paparella, Tamare Nugent, Des Desalaiz

Melanie A. WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for General Motors of Canada Limited

David BannonCounsel
1 appearance

for Georgina Watts

Victoria ShenCounsel
1 appearance

for Halton Condominium Corporation #77, J & W Condominium Management Ltd., and Don Rowatt

Karen KisielCounsel
1 appearance

for Hamilton Police Service and Troy Ashbaugh

Marco VisentiniCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services and Toula Bezas

Chris DonszelmannCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Education

Karen InselbacherCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, Theren Beecroft and Kent Milligan

Christina DonszelmannCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as Represented by the Ministry of Education and Training, Intervenor

Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Paul SharmaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dean de LottinvilleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael BradtSelf-represented
1 appearance
Douglas MooreSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Joe Ramos

Louis StrezosCounsel
1 appearance

for Jose Pratas

Greg McGivernCounsel
1 appearance
Laura JoyCounsel
1 appearance

for Justicia for Migrant Workers

Grace VaccarelliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kevin Cote, David Lenchuk and Stan Belza

Joanne MulcahyCounsel
2 appearances

for London District Catholic School Board

Eric M. RoherCounsel
1 appearance

for March of Dimes Canada

Lee HardingAgent
1 appearance

for McMaster Association of Part-Time Students

Suzan FraserCounsel
1 appearance

for McMaster Students Union Inc.

Derek CollinsCounsel
1 appearance

for McMaster University

George AvraamCounsel
1 appearance
Dina MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Lisa StamCounsel
1 appearance

for Metro Ontario Inc. and Rick Crean

Charles RobertsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Nigel Thomas

Joanne MulcahyCounsel
1 appearance

for Olymel S.E.C. / L.P. and Michel Boudreault

Stephen BernardoCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Human Rights Commission

Tony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Step

Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Peel Regional Police Services Board and Jeff Duffield

Patricia MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Lauri WallCounsel
1 appearance

for Presteve Foods Ltd.

Gino MorgaCounsel
1 appearance

for Shelley Kiewning

Theodore ScollieCounsel
2 appearances

for Sonja Bata

Ronald J. McCloskeyCounsel
1 appearance

for Special Education Tribunal, Intervenor

Lucy McSweeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Parties Hamilton Police Service and Troy Ashbaugh

Marco VisentiniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Parties The City of Hamilton and Linda Blake-Evans

Byrdena MacNeilCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

W. Gordon SteinbergCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Brian HumphreyUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Davies Bagambiire

Davies BagambiireSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Kevin Robinson

Kevin RobinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Affected Party The Ontario Ombudsman

Jean-Frédéric HübschCounsel
1 appearance

for The AIDS Network

Kevin RobinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
5 appearances
Philton MooreSelf-represented
5 appearances
Johnson AzigaSelf-represented
5 appearances
Glen MorrisonAgent
4 appearances
Mathew BlakelySelf-represented
4 appearances
Robert LeeSelf-represented
4 appearances
Sandra BartonCounsel
4 appearances
Allison TaylorCounsel
4 appearances
Wade PoziomkaCounsel
3 appearances
Osborne BarnwellCounsel
3 appearances
C.R.E.Self-represented
3 appearances
Hugh ScherCounsel
3 appearances
Edelgard MahantSelf-represented
3 appearances
Rosario BoncoriSelf-represented
3 appearances
Julie WilsonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Sharmaine HallCounsel
3 appearances
Roshika WilliamsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersCounsel
3 appearances
Randy KingSelf-represented
3 appearances

for the Applicants

Mary Ellen McIntyreCounsel
1 appearance
Glen MorrisonAgent
1 appearance
Oksana LevkivskaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bradley ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
Niki LundquistCounsel
1 appearance
Elita McAdamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brenda CulbertCounsel
1 appearance
Yuriy GrygorchukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Debbie DraganitsCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ayoob KhanAgent
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants Durrell Claybourn and Dave Ferguson

Bruce BestCounsel
1 appearance

for The City of Hamilton and Linda Blake-Evans

Dennis PerlinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Prabhu RajanCounsel
8 appearances
Monmi GoswamiCounsel
4 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Christine ElwellCounsel
2 appearances
Sheena ScottCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Tony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Anthony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Tamara JosephCounsel
3 appearances
Roger RoweCounsel
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersCounsel
2 appearances
Brian KampeSelf-represented
2 appearances
Martha MacKinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Avvy Yao-Yao GoCounsel
1 appearance
Lee Ann ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance
Barbara Boldt-MacPhersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Greg GoodridgeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randy KingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug LundySelf-represented
1 appearance
Megan Evans-MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant A.C.

P.S-C.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Complainant Andy Carson

Paula Soares-CarsonAgent
1 appearance

for the Complainant D.S.

L.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Complainant Dylan Sigrist

Lori SigristAgent
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for The Corporation of the County of Lambton

David CribbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Financial Services Commission of Ontario

Reesha HoseinCounsel
1 appearance
Padraic RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Independent Electricity System Operator

Pamela HofmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Alanna MihaljCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew ReynoldsCounsel
1 appearance
Nini JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Denise CooneyCounsel
1 appearance
Monica MulvahillUnion representative
1 appearance
Tina LieCounsel
1 appearance
Debra McKennaCounsel
1 appearance
Roberto HenriquezCounsel
1 appearance
Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebUnion representative
1 appearance
Rana ArbabianCounsel
1 appearance
Bill ColeAgent
1 appearance
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Independent Police Review Director

Jean IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Justicia for Migrant Workers

Grace VaccarelliCounsel
2 appearances

for the Intervenor Ontario Human Rights Commission

Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenors African Canadian Legal Clinic, Metro Toronto Chinese & Southeast Asian Legal Clinic and South Asian Legal Clinic of Ontario

Avvy Yao-Yao GoCounsel
1 appearance
Virginia NelderCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Toronto Civic Employees’ Union, Local 416 (CUPE)

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Christine ElwellCounsel
2 appearances
Tony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Raj DhirCounsel
1 appearance
Sheena ScottCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers Federation

Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Non-Party Intervenor

Caroline V. (Nini)_ JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the proposed Respondents

Bruce EllisCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Robin BasuCounsel
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Matthew Ma and Reynaldo Corpuz

Sharon DuffyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Patricia MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
John W. WoonCounsel
4 appearances
Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
3 appearances
Andrea RiskCounsel
3 appearances
Richard CharneyCounsel
3 appearances
Brenda BowlbyCounsel
3 appearances
Michael FailesCounsel
3 appearances
Paula RusakCounsel
3 appearances
Rachel SilverCounsel
3 appearances
Elizabeth Ann MartensSelf-represented
2 appearances
Gaynor RogerCounsel
2 appearances
Arthur TarasukCounsel
2 appearances
Sheila MacKinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Vilija YcasAgent
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
2 appearances
Matthew CurtisCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel ChodosCounsel
2 appearances
Glenn ChristieCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent, Acclaim Ability Management Inc.

Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
1 appearance
Peter StraszynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Party

Frances R. GallopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bata Limited (now known as Athletes World Limited)

Connie ReeveCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Auto Workers, Local 199

Keith OsborneUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Business College

Syed Ali Mazher JafferyAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 416

Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Michael MazzucaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dr. Anita Grewal

Fred TranquilliCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dr. Sameer D’Souza

Matthew SammonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Durham Catholic District School Board

Dolores BarbiniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Durham Children’s Aid Society

Helen MurphyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Durham Regional Police Services Board

Ian JohnstoneCounsel
1 appearance
Angela KhouryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario

Christine DaviesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Engel and Associates Professional Corporation

Bruce EngelCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance
Carli GutmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent General Motors of Canada Limited

David BannonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gravel Charest Fisher Law Firm

Allan O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services (Ontario Provincial Police)

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance
Marnie CorboldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Finance (Financial Services Commission of Ontario)

Larissa EassonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Community and Social Services (Family Responsibility Office)

Kristen KizoffCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

William GeorgasCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hospital for Sick Children

Melanie WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Humber College Institute of Technology & Advanced Learning

Catherine PetersCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Huronia Area Aboriginal Assistance Corporation o/a Huronia Area Aboriginal Management Board

Kent ElsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joseph Brant Hospital

Dolores BarbiniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joyce Phillips

Colin YoungmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 183

Virginia NelderCounsel
1 appearance
Robert GibsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Legal Aid Ontario

Carolyn PadgettCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea DanonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO)

S. Jodi Gallagher-HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mahle Filter Systems Canada ULC

Stephanie RamsayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mazerolle & Lemay Law Firm

Denis CadieuxCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Provincial Police

Amal ChaudryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Presteve Foods Ltd.

Gino MorgaCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Royal LePage Partners Realty Inc.

Al KrochAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents

John BellCounsel
7 appearances
Catherine PetersCounsel
5 appearances
Stacey BallCounsel
5 appearances
Sheila MacKinnonCounsel
5 appearances
Andrea RiskCounsel
3 appearances
Robert BaldwinCounsel
3 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
3 appearances
Lior SamfiruCounsel
3 appearances
Harry KopytoAgent
2 appearances
Daniel LublinCounsel
2 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Patty MurrayCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher RiggsCounsel
2 appearances
Firdaus WaleleCounsel
2 appearances
Soma Ray-EllisCounsel
2 appearances
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
2 appearances
David StrashinCounsel
2 appearances
Glorie AlfredCounsel
2 appearances
Barry BrownCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Alliance Youth Services Inc., Steve Catney and Ed Barron

Robert FernandesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Children’s Aid Society of Toronto, Carol Manak and Pam Dawe

Ryan ConlinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents City of Toronto and Sandra Cuff

Darragh MeagherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents David Hurst and Maggie Lalande

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Dr. Michael Weinstein and Dr. Christopher Parshuram

Kasia CzajkowskiCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah CormanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Durham Regional Police Services Board and Sara Foote

David CowlingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sean Logan

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Securitas Canada Limited

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sheridan College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning

Patricia MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, Theren Beecroft and Kent Milligan

Tina EarlCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ministry of Community and Social Services, Hazel Romaine and Jermyne Graham

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Olivieri Foods Inc. and Cathy Martin

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sonja Bata

Ronald J. McCloskeyCounsel
1 appearance
Sara BeheshtiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ontario Public Service Employees Union, Susan Quinn, Natalie Lachapelle, Anita Fulford, Marian Chipchase and Dan Dean

Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Service and Toronto Police Services Board

Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Work Able Centres Inc. and Louise Korhonen

Thomas StefanikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Windsor

Patrick BrodeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patty MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Regional Municipality of Waterloo Police Services Board

Don JarvisCounsel
1 appearance
Daina SearchCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Young Women’s Christian Association of Hamilton

Timothy DugganCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Tony Dionisio

Tony DionisioSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Community Housing Corporation

William LeMayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Trillium Lakelands District School Board

Carolyn KayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Trish Meekins

Andrew DruryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor (formerly CAW), Local 1941

Mike ByrneUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of New Brunswick

Clarence BennettCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Waterloo Regional Police Association

Nini JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Osler Health Centre o/a Etobicoke General Hospital

Michele WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Windsor Police Services Board

Mark NazarewichCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent York Regional Police Services Board

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent YWCA Toronto

Frances GallopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Special Education Tribunal

Lucy McSweeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for The TDL Group Corp.

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Waterloo Region District School Board

Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board

Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance
David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for Trillium Lakelands District School Board

Nadine ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Local Unions 175 & 633

Michael HancockCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, B. Steed, M. Nunno, and M. Powell

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Damian HornichAgent
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police for the City of Toronto

Jerome Wiley, Q.C.Counsel
2 appearances
George H. CowleyCounsel
1 appearance

for Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Greg BullenCounsel
1 appearance

for York Condominium Corporation No. 365

Ashley WinbergCounsel
1 appearance

Litigation Guardian for Andy Carson

Paula Soares-CarsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Litigation Guardian for Dylan Sigrist

Lori SigristSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of the Respondent

Keith OsborneUnion representative
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Janet CoatesSelf-represented
2 appearances

On her own behalf

Svetlana WhiteSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cathy O’ReganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Charmaine MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance
H. G.Self-represented
1 appearance
Farideh GhafourianSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara Boldt-MacPhersonSelf-represented
1 appearance

on her own behalf and as litigation guardian for L.M.

E.M.Self-represented
1 appearance

on his own behalf

Craig BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Kuralraj KulasingamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stacy SweezeySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jerzy NatalukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Keith RamoutarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kam Chong LiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gary AtamanykSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy StevensSelf-represented
1 appearance
Guy BabineauSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajoo MakhiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul ChukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Oscar MedranoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lebert AlladiceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Greg GoodridgeSelf-represented
1 appearance

on their own behalf

J. B.Self-represented
1 appearance
E. B.Self-represented
1 appearance

Representative

Henry FreitagAgent
1 appearance

Respondents

Gail NeilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Douglas MooreSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents Ellen Helden and 1312788 Ontario Limited

Erin HallockCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Henry FreitagSelf-represented
1 appearance

623

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.1

cases/mo

HRTO623(100%)

Decision types

motion

511

trial

112

Page 1 of 32 (623 cases)