The Crown appealed an order of the Superior Court of Justice that overturned a summary conviction judge's ruling.
The summary conviction judge had held that he lacked jurisdiction to hear a freestanding application for costs based on alleged Charter breaches after the Crown withdrew the charges prior to arraignment and plea.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and restored the summary conviction judge's ruling.
The Court held that absent abuse of process or flagrant impropriety by the Crown, the summary conviction court's jurisdiction ends when charges are withdrawn, and it cannot hold a freestanding hearing on costs.
The respondent's remedy lies in a civil action.