Paul Slansky is an Ontario lawyer (In Private Practice) with 81 court cases on record from 1990 to 2026. Practice areas include administrative law, criminal/quasi-criminal law, ontario court of justice provincial offences act matters.

What courts has Paul Slansky appeared in?

Paul Slansky has appeared in Court of Appeal, Superior Court of Justice, Divisional Court, Supreme Court of Canada, with most appearances at the Court of Appeal.

How many cases has Paul Slansky handled?

Paul Slansky has 81 cases on record from 1990 to 2026.

What judges has Paul Slansky appeared before?

Paul Slansky has most frequently appeared before Justice Deena Baltman, Justice Kathryn N. Feldman, Justice Stephen T. Goudge.

minicounsel

Administrative Law

Criminal/Quasi-Criminal Law

Ontario Court of Justice Provincial Offences Act matters

Ontario Court of Justice – Summary Conviction Offences

Criminal and Quasi-Criminal Law

Civil Litigation - Plaintiff

Civil Litigation - Defendant

Corporate/Commercial Law

Paul Slansky

Q: What areas does Paul Slansky practice in?

Paul Slansky practices in administrative law, criminal/quasi-criminal law, ontario court of justice provincial offences act matters and 1 other areas, based on 81 court appearances across Ontario.

In Private PracticeOCA

LSO Profile

Also known as: Paul Benjamin Slansky

LSO #25998I

81 total

Cross-examining an accused on prior testimony solely to impeach credibility does not violate Charter s. 13.

The accused was convicted of failing to remain at the scene of an accident.

A new trial was ordered on appeal.

At the second trial, the Crown cross-examined the accused on inconsistencies between his current testimony and his testimony at the first trial to impeach his credibility.

The accused was convicted again, but the Court of Appeal quashed the conviction, holding that the cross-examination violated s. 13 of the Charter.

The Supreme Court of Canada allowed the Crown's appeal, holding that using a prior inconsistent statement from a former proceeding solely to impugn the credibility of an accused does not incriminate that person and therefore does not violate s. 13.