Consent request for adjournment denied because late document disclosure did not constitute extraordinary circumstances.
The applicant requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing dates to allow time for the respondents to produce recently requested documents.
The respondents consented to the adjournment.
The Tribunal denied the request, noting that its practice direction requires extraordinary circumstances for adjournments.
The Tribunal found that the applicant's delay in requesting the documents did not constitute an extraordinary circumstance, and that the hearing could proceed with the available evidence while the documents were being produced.
Rajiv Sharma v. The Corporation of the City of Waterloo, Andrew Cooper and Pat Lago, 2015 HRTO 1289