Mark Hart is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 623 decisions on record from 2007 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Mark Hart sit on?

Mark Hart sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Mark Hart decide?

Mark Hart's most common areas include Human Rights (623 decisions), Administrative Law (299 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (150 decisions). Mark Hart has handled 623 decisions across 9 areas.

How many decisions has Mark Hart made?

Mark Hart has 623 decisions on record from 2007 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Mark Hart?

Representatives who frequently appear before Mark Hart include Prabhu Rajan, John Bell, Self-represented.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Mark Hart — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Health Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Workers' Compensation

Mark Hart

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2007

623

cases · 11 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 364Adjudicator· 92Vice-chair· 83Vice-Chair· 42Adjudicator· 23Vice-Chair· 11Vice-chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Michelle Henry

10 cases2009–2017

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 10, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as substance was appropriately dealt with in prior union grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed a human rights complaint alleging discrimination and harassment in employment based on disability.

The matter was deferred pending the outcome of a union grievance arbitration, which ultimately awarded the applicant damages for lost income and injury to dignity, feelings, and self-respect due to the employer's failure to accommodate.

The respondents sought to dismiss the human rights application under s. 45.1 of the Code, arguing the substance had been appropriately dealt with at arbitration.

The Tribunal agreed, finding that the arbitrator had considered the totality of the events and their impact on the applicant.

The Tribunal also found that the applicant's remaining allegations regarding earlier events were untimely and not incurred in good faith.

The application was dismissed.

Brown v. Loblaw Companies Limited, 2011 HRTO 1128

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 27, 2011

Adjournment request denied; allegations of adjudicator bias and tribunal misconduct found to be baseless.

The complainant requested an adjournment of his scheduled human rights hearing on the grounds of alleged adjudicator bias, the reduction of scheduled hearing days, the bifurcation of the hearing, and his intention to seek judicial review.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding no basis for the allegations of bias or misconduct, and explaining that the scheduling changes were administrative responses to the complainant's prior incarcerations.

Goodridge v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2011 HRTO 1024

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 24, 2011

Adjournment request denied due to lack of extraordinary circumstances and history of non-compliance.

The applicants requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing date on the basis that their litigation guardian was out of the country.

The respondent opposed the request.

The Tribunal noted the applicants' history of non-compliance with scheduling and pre-hearing obligations.

Finding no extraordinary circumstances to justify the adjournment, the Tribunal denied the request and directed the applicants to confirm their attendance and comply with pre-hearing obligations, failing which the applications may be dismissed as abandoned.

D.F. v. University of Ottawa, 2011 HRTO 990

Ed Posliff

2 cases2011–2020

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 18, 2011

Human rights application alleging discrimination in municipal decision-making process dismissed for failing to establish prima facie case.

The applicant, an advocate for disability and accessibility issues, alleged discrimination in the provision of services by the Town of Amherstburg.

She claimed that her correspondence was ignored, she received offensive responses, and she was not recognized to speak at a public meeting.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination, noting she had frequent access to decision-makers and did not personally experience disadvantage in accessing municipal facilities like the public library.

The application was dismissed.

Saxon v. Amherstburg (Town), 2011 HRTO 960

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 16, 2011

Request to re-activate deferred human rights application denied as grievance arbitration on same issues was actively proceeding.

The applicant requested that the Tribunal re-activate her human rights application, which had been deferred pending an ongoing grievance arbitration before the Grievance Settlement Board.

The applicant argued that the union was failing to advance her grievances properly and that the process was bogged down.

The Tribunal found that the grievance arbitration was actively proceeding, having already heard 30 days of evidence on the same issues.

The Tribunal dismissed the request to re-activate, concluding that doing so would be duplicative, risk inconsistent findings, and waste resources.

The application remains deferred.

Morsi v. Ontario (Finance), 2011 HRTO 936

Lior Samfiru

In Private Practice24 cases2006–2024

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 12, 2011

Tribunal reconsiders and sets aside order disposing of application after finding purported settlement never existed.

The Tribunal reconsidered its previous order which had disposed of a transitional human rights application on the basis of a purported settlement.

In a subsequent contravention of settlement application, the Tribunal found that no settlement had actually been achieved.

Consequently, the Tribunal initiated a reconsideration of its own motion, finding that the lack of a real foundation for the original order outweighed the public interest in finality.

The order was set aside, reviving the application, and the parties were directed to provide submissions on whether the matter should be deferred pending a related WSIAT appeal.

Faizool Shaffick v. The Oakville Club Ltd., 2011 HRTO 925

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 12, 2011

Tribunal excludes new allegations of sexual solicitation not raised in the original human rights complaint.

In an interim decision during an ongoing hearing, the Tribunal addressed a respondent's objection that the applicant was raising new allegations not contained in her original complaint.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's allegation that the respondent asked her to 'go out' with him was beyond the scope of the subject-matter of the transitional complaint filed with the Commission.

The Tribunal ruled it would not consider evidence regarding this allegation.

The Tribunal also provided procedural directions regarding the filing of documents, the attendance of a court reporter, and the calling of expert witnesses.

Zohreh Soheil-Fakhaei v. Canadian Business College, 2011 HRTO 921

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 11, 2011

Human rights application re-activated as there was insufficient overlap with concurrent wrongful dismissal civil action.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and harassment in employment based on disability, marital status, and family status.

She also commenced a civil action for wrongful dismissal.

The human rights application was initially deferred on consent pending mandatory mediation in the civil action.

The applicant, now self-represented, requested to re-activate the human rights application.

The respondents opposed and sought dismissal due to the applicant's failure to comply with Tribunal directions.

The Tribunal found insufficient overlap between the factual issues in the two proceedings to justify continued deferral and ordered the application to be re-activated.

Benjamin v. PTC Accounting & Finance Inc., 2011 HRTO 918

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 9, 2011

Adjournment request denied despite parties' consent; travel and elective surgery not extraordinary circumstances.

The applicants requested a fourth adjournment of their human rights hearing, scheduled for June 2011, on the basis that the lead applicant would be out of the country and another applicant had scheduled elective surgery.

The respondents consented to the request.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario denied the adjournment, noting that the events at issue dated back over four years and three previous adjournments had already been granted.

The Tribunal held that the parties' consent was insufficient to override the institutional interest in timely access to justice, and the reasons provided did not constitute extraordinary circumstances.

Anderson v. Malachowski, 2011 HRTO 902

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 9, 2011

Psychiatric Patient Advocate Office granted intervenor status in human rights complaint regarding police apprehension and hospital treatment.

The Psychiatric Patient Advocate Office (PPAO) requested intervenor status as a full party in a human rights application alleging discrimination based on perceived mental disability by police and hospital respondents.

The applicant consented to the intervention, while the respondents opposed it, arguing the PPAO failed to specify issues, intended to act as an advocate, and raised systemic issues not present in the individual complaint.

The Tribunal granted the PPAO intervenor status, finding its expertise in mental health issues would assist the Tribunal, particularly since the applicant was self-represented.

Marshall v. Durham Regional Police Service, 2011 HRTO 898

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 6, 2011

Adjournment granted based on new medical evidence of applicant's psychological incapacity to proceed.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing based on new medical evidence from his psychologist indicating he was psychologically incapable of proceeding without his primary witness.

The Tribunal granted the adjournment, noting the potential consequences to the applicant's health, and directed the parties to provide availability for rescheduled dates in September 2011.

The Tribunal also extended the deadline for the applicant to file pre-hearing materials.

Mathew Blakely v. Queen’s University, 2011 HRTO 891

Human rights application alleging workplace harassment because of disability dismissed; employer's conduct was reasonable.

The applicant, who suffered from coronary artery disease, alleged that he experienced harassment in employment because of his disability during a warehouse consolidation process.

He claimed that various management representatives made inappropriate comments, coerced him regarding long-term disability benefits, and threatened to cut off his sick leave when he failed to provide comprehensive medical consent.

The Tribunal found that while one manager's comment about doctors writing whatever employees want was unfortunate and vexatious, it was an isolated incident that did not amount to a course of conduct required for harassment.

The Tribunal dismissed the remaining allegations, finding the employer's actions in requesting medical information and managing the accommodation process were reasonable and not discriminatory.

Mark Rodgers v. Hydro One Networks Inc., 2011 HRTO 877

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 3, 2011

Consent order issued detailing remedies, policy changes, and training following a finding of human rights liability.

The applicant filed human rights applications against the Children's Aid Society of Toronto and Alliance Youth Services Inc. Following a finding of liability in a bifurcated hearing, the parties engaged in mediation-adjudication to determine the appropriate remedy.

The parties agreed to a consent order, which included an undisclosed sum for general damages, the development and implementation of human rights policies and training by the respondents, and a review of an outstanding payment claim.

The Tribunal issued the consent order and remained seized of implementation issues for 12 months.

Williams v. Children’s Aid Society of Toronto, 2011 HRTO 878

Richard Charney

25 cases1986–2025

Rachel Silver

3 cases2011–2011

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 28, 2011

Applicant's request for witnesses to testify by phone granted; disclosure of witness CVs ordered.

The applicant in a human rights proceeding requested that her three witnesses be permitted to testify by phone due to their locations in Ottawa and Saskatoon.

The respondent objected, citing prejudice to cross-examination, inability to monitor the witnesses, and lack of access to exhibits.

The Tribunal granted the applicant's request, finding that the witnesses were not testifying to contradictory versions of specific events, but rather to their experiences with the applicant.

The Tribunal also ordered the applicant to disclose the CVs of her witnesses to the respondent.

Mahant v. York University, 2011 HRTO 831

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 28, 2011

Request for disclosure of internal complaint procedures denied as applicant lacked status under the relevant statute.

The applicant, a foster parent, requested an order for disclosure of the respondent Children's Aid Society's internal complaint review procedures under s. 68 of the Child and Family Services Act.

The Tribunal denied the request, noting that the Child and Family Services Review Board had previously determined the applicant lacked status to bring a complaint under s. 68 because she was a service provider, not a service recipient.

Consequently, the requested procedures were not arguably relevant to any remedy within the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

Williams v. Children’s Aid Society of Toronto, 2011 HRTO 830

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 19, 2011

Consent request to adjourn hearing for settlement negotiations denied pursuant to Tribunal practice direction.

The applicants requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing on consent to allow for ongoing settlement negotiations.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario denied the request, citing its Practice Direction which expressly discourages adjourning hearing dates for settlement discussions.

The hearing was ordered to proceed as scheduled, though the Tribunal extended the deadline for filing witness statements.

Sutherland v. District School Board Ontario North East, 2011 HRTO 771

John Razulis

2 cases2000–2011

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 19, 2011

Human rights application dismissed; parents failed to cooperate in the accommodation process for child's behavioural needs.

The applicant, a 10-year-old boy with ADHD, alleged discrimination in services by his before and after school program.

Following a serious behavioural incident, the respondents required an additional Child Care Worker to accommodate the applicant's needs for the upcoming school year.

The applicant's parents refused the proposed options, demanded a refund, and filed a human rights complaint.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding insufficient evidence that the precipitating behaviours were attributable to the applicant's disability.

Furthermore, the Tribunal held that even if the behaviours were disability-related, the respondents' requirement for additional resources was reasonable, and the applicant's parents failed in their duty to cooperate in the accommodation process by prematurely ending discussions.

A.H. v. Le Club Child Care Program, 2011 HRTO 769

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 15, 2011

Applicant's requests for particulars and appointment of an investigator denied ahead of preliminary hearing.

The applicant filed a Request for Order seeking to combine two applications, obtain particulars regarding employer transfer decisions and investigations, obtain particulars of union grievances, and have the Tribunal appoint an investigator.

The Tribunal denied the requests, finding that the requested particulars were not arguably relevant to the narrow issues to be determined at the upcoming preliminary hearing (whether the applicant had a disability, whether she communicated it, and whether her relocation was an accommodation).

The Tribunal also found no basis to order an inquiry under section 44 of the Code at this stage.

The Tribunal provided case management directions and an agenda for the preliminary hearing.

Crowley v. Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2011 HRTO 736

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 13, 2011

Adjournment request denied for lack of extraordinary circumstances; extension for pre-hearing materials granted.

The applicant requested an adjournment of a scheduled hearing before the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, citing medical issues and the unavailability of a key witness.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment request, finding that the medical evidence provided did not establish extraordinary circumstances and that the hearing had already been rescheduled once to accommodate the witness.

However, the Tribunal granted the applicant an extension of time to file pre-hearing materials and directed him to provide a written statement of the unavailable witness's proposed evidence.

Mathew Blakely v. Queen’s University, 2011 HRTO 706

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 12, 2011

Request for reconsideration of jurisdictional dismissal denied as applicant failed to establish grounds under Rule 25.5.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed her application for lack of jurisdiction.

The applicant argued that the Tribunal erred in its procedural rulings regarding the respondent's response and in its substantive finding that her complaints about the Commission's investigation were beyond the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to establish that the decision conflicted with established jurisprudence or that other factors outweighed the public interest in finality.

The request for reconsideration was denied.

Macanovic v. Ontario (Human Rights Commission), 2011 HRTO 697

Page 17 of 32 (623 cases)

Applicant

Philton MooreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jenny DeGoeySelf-represented
1 appearance
Derek FranciscoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark RobertsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Viktoriya StepanovaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Raywatie BaldeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bright (Zeguo) QiuSelf-represented
1 appearance

assisted the Applicant

Michael CraigAgent
1 appearance

Counsel

Michelle WongCounsel
1 appearance
E.C. Carla ZabekCounsel
1 appearance
Jayson RiderCounsel
1 appearance
Kelly HarbridgeCounsel
1 appearance
Darrell KloezeCounsel
1 appearance
William McDowellCounsel
1 appearance
Woodward McCaigCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance
Fateh SalimCounsel
1 appearance
Sheryl JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance
Timothy LawsonCounsel
1 appearance
Woodward McKaigCounsel
1 appearance
Roger MillsCounsel
1 appearance
Leslie McIntoshCounsel
1 appearance
Michael M. MillerCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi LoewithCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Dr. Erik Paidra

Anne PosnoCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Lakeridge Health Corporation

Shane SmithCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Novopharm Limited, Gail Lucyk and Halima Khan

Angela RaeCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Cynthia MackenzieCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Intervener

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for the respondents

Mark EllisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Clarisa WaldmanCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Niki LunquistCounsel
1 appearance

for 2117392 Ontario Inc., William Farmer and Brandon Farmer

Tanya WalkerCounsel
1 appearance

for A.A. Property Management & Associates Inc.

Edmond PriftiAgent
1 appearance

for A.C.

P.S.-C.Self-represented
1 appearance

for Andy Carson

Paula Soares-CarsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Anthony Piazza and Maria Perry

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for Arista Homes Limited

Michael CooperCounsel
1 appearance

for Bata Limited (Canada Corporation No. 678234-5)

Leslie TennenbaumCounsel
2 appearances

for Bata Limited (now known as Athletes World Limited)

Connie ReeveCounsel
1 appearance

for Brian Edwards

Grace SkowronskiAgent
1 appearance
Aaron WudrickCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Auto Workers Local 199

Keith OsborneUnion representative
1 appearance

for Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 997 and Lynn Raback

Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance

for Centennial College

Nancy FisherAgent
1 appearance

for Communications, Energy & Paperworkers Union, Local 324 and George Smith

Denis EllicksonCounsel
2 appearances

for Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

Colin OsterbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Anita Grewal

Fred TranquilliCounsel
1 appearance

for D.S.

L.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board, Herman Viloria and John Lezon

Nadya TymochenkoCounsel
2 appearances

for Dylan Sigrist

Lori SigristSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Gary Clarke, Jeff Gillies, Joseph Rapai, Terry Grand, Anne Kavelaars, Evelyn Paparella, Tamare Nugent, Des Desalaiz

Melanie A. WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for General Motors of Canada Limited

David BannonCounsel
1 appearance

for Georgina Watts

Victoria ShenCounsel
1 appearance

for Halton Condominium Corporation #77, J & W Condominium Management Ltd., and Don Rowatt

Karen KisielCounsel
1 appearance

for Hamilton Police Service and Troy Ashbaugh

Marco VisentiniCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services and Toula Bezas

Chris DonszelmannCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Education

Karen InselbacherCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, Theren Beecroft and Kent Milligan

Christina DonszelmannCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as Represented by the Ministry of Education and Training, Intervenor

Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Paul SharmaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dean de LottinvilleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael BradtSelf-represented
1 appearance
Douglas MooreSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Joe Ramos

Louis StrezosCounsel
1 appearance

for Jose Pratas

Greg McGivernCounsel
1 appearance
Laura JoyCounsel
1 appearance

for Justicia for Migrant Workers

Grace VaccarelliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kevin Cote, David Lenchuk and Stan Belza

Joanne MulcahyCounsel
2 appearances

for London District Catholic School Board

Eric M. RoherCounsel
1 appearance

for March of Dimes Canada

Lee HardingAgent
1 appearance

for McMaster Association of Part-Time Students

Suzan FraserCounsel
1 appearance

for McMaster Students Union Inc.

Derek CollinsCounsel
1 appearance

for McMaster University

George AvraamCounsel
1 appearance
Dina MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Lisa StamCounsel
1 appearance

for Metro Ontario Inc. and Rick Crean

Charles RobertsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Nigel Thomas

Joanne MulcahyCounsel
1 appearance

for Olymel S.E.C. / L.P. and Michel Boudreault

Stephen BernardoCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Human Rights Commission

Tony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Step

Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Peel Regional Police Services Board and Jeff Duffield

Patricia MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Lauri WallCounsel
1 appearance

for Presteve Foods Ltd.

Gino MorgaCounsel
1 appearance

for Shelley Kiewning

Theodore ScollieCounsel
2 appearances

for Sonja Bata

Ronald J. McCloskeyCounsel
1 appearance

for Special Education Tribunal, Intervenor

Lucy McSweeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Parties Hamilton Police Service and Troy Ashbaugh

Marco VisentiniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Parties The City of Hamilton and Linda Blake-Evans

Byrdena MacNeilCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

W. Gordon SteinbergCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Brian HumphreyUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Davies Bagambiire

Davies BagambiireSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Kevin Robinson

Kevin RobinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Affected Party The Ontario Ombudsman

Jean-Frédéric HübschCounsel
1 appearance

for The AIDS Network

Kevin RobinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
5 appearances
Philton MooreSelf-represented
5 appearances
Johnson AzigaSelf-represented
5 appearances
Glen MorrisonAgent
4 appearances
Mathew BlakelySelf-represented
4 appearances
Robert LeeSelf-represented
4 appearances
Sandra BartonCounsel
4 appearances
Allison TaylorCounsel
4 appearances
Wade PoziomkaCounsel
3 appearances
Osborne BarnwellCounsel
3 appearances
C.R.E.Self-represented
3 appearances
Hugh ScherCounsel
3 appearances
Edelgard MahantSelf-represented
3 appearances
Rosario BoncoriSelf-represented
3 appearances
Julie WilsonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Sharmaine HallCounsel
3 appearances
Roshika WilliamsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersCounsel
3 appearances
Randy KingSelf-represented
3 appearances

for the Applicants

Mary Ellen McIntyreCounsel
1 appearance
Glen MorrisonAgent
1 appearance
Oksana LevkivskaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bradley ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
Niki LundquistCounsel
1 appearance
Elita McAdamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brenda CulbertCounsel
1 appearance
Yuriy GrygorchukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Debbie DraganitsCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ayoob KhanAgent
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants Durrell Claybourn and Dave Ferguson

Bruce BestCounsel
1 appearance

for The City of Hamilton and Linda Blake-Evans

Dennis PerlinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Prabhu RajanCounsel
8 appearances
Monmi GoswamiCounsel
4 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Christine ElwellCounsel
2 appearances
Sheena ScottCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Tony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Anthony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Tamara JosephCounsel
3 appearances
Roger RoweCounsel
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersCounsel
2 appearances
Brian KampeSelf-represented
2 appearances
Martha MacKinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Avvy Yao-Yao GoCounsel
1 appearance
Lee Ann ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance
Barbara Boldt-MacPhersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Greg GoodridgeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randy KingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug LundySelf-represented
1 appearance
Megan Evans-MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant A.C.

P.S-C.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Complainant Andy Carson

Paula Soares-CarsonAgent
1 appearance

for the Complainant D.S.

L.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Complainant Dylan Sigrist

Lori SigristAgent
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for The Corporation of the County of Lambton

David CribbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Financial Services Commission of Ontario

Reesha HoseinCounsel
1 appearance
Padraic RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Independent Electricity System Operator

Pamela HofmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Alanna MihaljCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew ReynoldsCounsel
1 appearance
Nini JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Denise CooneyCounsel
1 appearance
Monica MulvahillUnion representative
1 appearance
Tina LieCounsel
1 appearance
Debra McKennaCounsel
1 appearance
Roberto HenriquezCounsel
1 appearance
Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebUnion representative
1 appearance
Rana ArbabianCounsel
1 appearance
Bill ColeAgent
1 appearance
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Independent Police Review Director

Jean IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Justicia for Migrant Workers

Grace VaccarelliCounsel
2 appearances

for the Intervenor Ontario Human Rights Commission

Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenors African Canadian Legal Clinic, Metro Toronto Chinese & Southeast Asian Legal Clinic and South Asian Legal Clinic of Ontario

Avvy Yao-Yao GoCounsel
1 appearance
Virginia NelderCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Toronto Civic Employees’ Union, Local 416 (CUPE)

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Christine ElwellCounsel
2 appearances
Tony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Raj DhirCounsel
1 appearance
Sheena ScottCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers Federation

Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Non-Party Intervenor

Caroline V. (Nini)_ JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the proposed Respondents

Bruce EllisCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Robin BasuCounsel
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Matthew Ma and Reynaldo Corpuz

Sharon DuffyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Patricia MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
John W. WoonCounsel
4 appearances
Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
3 appearances
Andrea RiskCounsel
3 appearances
Richard CharneyCounsel
3 appearances
Brenda BowlbyCounsel
3 appearances
Michael FailesCounsel
3 appearances
Paula RusakCounsel
3 appearances
Rachel SilverCounsel
3 appearances
Elizabeth Ann MartensSelf-represented
2 appearances
Gaynor RogerCounsel
2 appearances
Arthur TarasukCounsel
2 appearances
Sheila MacKinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Vilija YcasAgent
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
2 appearances
Matthew CurtisCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel ChodosCounsel
2 appearances
Glenn ChristieCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent, Acclaim Ability Management Inc.

Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
1 appearance
Peter StraszynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Party

Frances R. GallopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bata Limited (now known as Athletes World Limited)

Connie ReeveCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Auto Workers, Local 199

Keith OsborneUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Business College

Syed Ali Mazher JafferyAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 416

Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Michael MazzucaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dr. Anita Grewal

Fred TranquilliCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dr. Sameer D’Souza

Matthew SammonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Durham Catholic District School Board

Dolores BarbiniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Durham Children’s Aid Society

Helen MurphyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Durham Regional Police Services Board

Ian JohnstoneCounsel
1 appearance
Angela KhouryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario

Christine DaviesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Engel and Associates Professional Corporation

Bruce EngelCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance
Carli GutmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent General Motors of Canada Limited

David BannonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gravel Charest Fisher Law Firm

Allan O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services (Ontario Provincial Police)

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance
Marnie CorboldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Finance (Financial Services Commission of Ontario)

Larissa EassonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Community and Social Services (Family Responsibility Office)

Kristen KizoffCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

William GeorgasCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hospital for Sick Children

Melanie WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Humber College Institute of Technology & Advanced Learning

Catherine PetersCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Huronia Area Aboriginal Assistance Corporation o/a Huronia Area Aboriginal Management Board

Kent ElsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joseph Brant Hospital

Dolores BarbiniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joyce Phillips

Colin YoungmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 183

Virginia NelderCounsel
1 appearance
Robert GibsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Legal Aid Ontario

Carolyn PadgettCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea DanonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO)

S. Jodi Gallagher-HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mahle Filter Systems Canada ULC

Stephanie RamsayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mazerolle & Lemay Law Firm

Denis CadieuxCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Provincial Police

Amal ChaudryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Presteve Foods Ltd.

Gino MorgaCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Royal LePage Partners Realty Inc.

Al KrochAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents

John BellCounsel
7 appearances
Catherine PetersCounsel
5 appearances
Stacey BallCounsel
5 appearances
Sheila MacKinnonCounsel
5 appearances
Andrea RiskCounsel
3 appearances
Robert BaldwinCounsel
3 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
3 appearances
Lior SamfiruCounsel
3 appearances
Harry KopytoAgent
2 appearances
Daniel LublinCounsel
2 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Patty MurrayCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher RiggsCounsel
2 appearances
Firdaus WaleleCounsel
2 appearances
Soma Ray-EllisCounsel
2 appearances
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
2 appearances
David StrashinCounsel
2 appearances
Glorie AlfredCounsel
2 appearances
Barry BrownCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Alliance Youth Services Inc., Steve Catney and Ed Barron

Robert FernandesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Children’s Aid Society of Toronto, Carol Manak and Pam Dawe

Ryan ConlinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents City of Toronto and Sandra Cuff

Darragh MeagherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents David Hurst and Maggie Lalande

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Dr. Michael Weinstein and Dr. Christopher Parshuram

Kasia CzajkowskiCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah CormanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Durham Regional Police Services Board and Sara Foote

David CowlingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sean Logan

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Securitas Canada Limited

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sheridan College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning

Patricia MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, Theren Beecroft and Kent Milligan

Tina EarlCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ministry of Community and Social Services, Hazel Romaine and Jermyne Graham

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Olivieri Foods Inc. and Cathy Martin

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sonja Bata

Ronald J. McCloskeyCounsel
1 appearance
Sara BeheshtiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ontario Public Service Employees Union, Susan Quinn, Natalie Lachapelle, Anita Fulford, Marian Chipchase and Dan Dean

Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Service and Toronto Police Services Board

Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Work Able Centres Inc. and Louise Korhonen

Thomas StefanikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Windsor

Patrick BrodeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patty MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Regional Municipality of Waterloo Police Services Board

Don JarvisCounsel
1 appearance
Daina SearchCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Young Women’s Christian Association of Hamilton

Timothy DugganCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Tony Dionisio

Tony DionisioSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Community Housing Corporation

William LeMayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Trillium Lakelands District School Board

Carolyn KayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Trish Meekins

Andrew DruryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor (formerly CAW), Local 1941

Mike ByrneUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of New Brunswick

Clarence BennettCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Waterloo Regional Police Association

Nini JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Osler Health Centre o/a Etobicoke General Hospital

Michele WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Windsor Police Services Board

Mark NazarewichCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent York Regional Police Services Board

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent YWCA Toronto

Frances GallopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Special Education Tribunal

Lucy McSweeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for The TDL Group Corp.

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Waterloo Region District School Board

Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board

Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance
David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for Trillium Lakelands District School Board

Nadine ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Local Unions 175 & 633

Michael HancockCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, B. Steed, M. Nunno, and M. Powell

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Damian HornichAgent
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police for the City of Toronto

Jerome Wiley, Q.C.Counsel
2 appearances
George H. CowleyCounsel
1 appearance

for Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Greg BullenCounsel
1 appearance

for York Condominium Corporation No. 365

Ashley WinbergCounsel
1 appearance

Litigation Guardian for Andy Carson

Paula Soares-CarsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Litigation Guardian for Dylan Sigrist

Lori SigristSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of the Respondent

Keith OsborneUnion representative
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Janet CoatesSelf-represented
2 appearances

On her own behalf

Svetlana WhiteSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cathy O’ReganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Charmaine MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance
H. G.Self-represented
1 appearance
Farideh GhafourianSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara Boldt-MacPhersonSelf-represented
1 appearance

on her own behalf and as litigation guardian for L.M.

E.M.Self-represented
1 appearance

on his own behalf

Craig BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Kuralraj KulasingamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stacy SweezeySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jerzy NatalukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Keith RamoutarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kam Chong LiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gary AtamanykSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy StevensSelf-represented
1 appearance
Guy BabineauSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajoo MakhiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul ChukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Oscar MedranoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lebert AlladiceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Greg GoodridgeSelf-represented
1 appearance

on their own behalf

J. B.Self-represented
1 appearance
E. B.Self-represented
1 appearance

Representative

Henry FreitagAgent
1 appearance

Respondents

Gail NeilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Douglas MooreSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents Ellen Helden and 1312788 Ontario Limited

Erin HallockCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Henry FreitagSelf-represented
1 appearance

623

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.1

cases/mo

HRTO623(100%)

Decision types

motion

511

trial

112

Page 17 of 32 (623 cases)

Michelle Henry

Mark Hart

Brown v. Loblaw Companies Limited, 2011 HRTO 1128

Mark Hart

Goodridge v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2011 HRTO 1024

Mark Hart

D.F. v. University of Ottawa, 2011 HRTO 990

Ed Posliff

Mark Hart

Saxon v. Amherstburg (Town), 2011 HRTO 960

Mark Hart

Morsi v. Ontario (Finance), 2011 HRTO 936

Lior Samfiru

Mark Hart

Faizool Shaffick v. The Oakville Club Ltd., 2011 HRTO 925

Mark Hart

Zohreh Soheil-Fakhaei v. Canadian Business College, 2011 HRTO 921

Mark Hart

Benjamin v. PTC Accounting & Finance Inc., 2011 HRTO 918

Mark Hart

Anderson v. Malachowski, 2011 HRTO 902

Mark Hart

Marshall v. Durham Regional Police Service, 2011 HRTO 898

Mark Hart

Mathew Blakely v. Queen’s University, 2011 HRTO 891

Hugh Scher

Dana McDonald

Mark Hart

Mark Rodgers v. Hydro One Networks Inc., 2011 HRTO 877

Mark Hart

Williams v. Children’s Aid Society of Toronto, 2011 HRTO 878

Richard Charney

Rachel Silver

Mark Hart

Mahant v. York University, 2011 HRTO 831

Mark Hart

Williams v. Children’s Aid Society of Toronto, 2011 HRTO 830

Mark Hart

Sutherland v. District School Board Ontario North East, 2011 HRTO 771

John Razulis

Mark Hart

A.H. v. Le Club Child Care Program, 2011 HRTO 769

Mark Hart

Crowley v. Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2011 HRTO 736

Mark Hart

Mathew Blakely v. Queen’s University, 2011 HRTO 706

Mark Hart

Macanovic v. Ontario (Human Rights Commission), 2011 HRTO 697

Applicant

assisted the Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Dr. Erik Paidra

Counsel for Lakeridge Health Corporation

Counsel for Novopharm Limited, Gail Lucyk and Halima Khan

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the Intervener

Counsel for the Respondent

counsel for the respondents

Counsel for the Respondents

for 2117392 Ontario Inc., William Farmer and Brandon Farmer

for A.A. Property Management & Associates Inc.

for A.C.

for Andy Carson

for Anthony Piazza and Maria Perry

for Arista Homes Limited

for Bata Limited (Canada Corporation No. 678234-5)

for Bata Limited (now known as Athletes World Limited)

for Brian Edwards

for Canadian Auto Workers Local 199

for Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 997 and Lynn Raback

for Centennial College

for Communications, Energy & Paperworkers Union, Local 324 and George Smith

for Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

for Dr. Anita Grewal

for D.S.

for Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board, Herman Viloria and John Lezon

for Dylan Sigrist

for Gary Clarke, Jeff Gillies, Joseph Rapai, Terry Grand, Anne Kavelaars, Evelyn Paparella, Tamare Nugent, Des Desalaiz

for General Motors of Canada Limited

for Georgina Watts