Tribunal consolidates age discrimination and reprisal applications but refuses to delay scheduled mediation.
The applicant filed two human rights applications alleging age discrimination and reprisal.
The respondent requested that the applications be consolidated and the scheduled mediation be delayed.
The Tribunal ordered the consolidation of the applications as they involved the same parties and connected issues, but declined to delay the mediation, finding no compelling reason to do so.
Union granted intervenor status in human rights application; applicant's request for return of medical information denied.
The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability.
The applicant's union requested intervenor status, which the applicant opposed on the basis of inadequate representation.
The Tribunal granted the union intervenor status, noting its obvious interest in the proceedings and the collective agreement.
The Tribunal also denied the applicant's request for an order directing the return of medical information previously provided to the respondent and the union, as the disclosure obligations for the current proceeding had not yet arisen.
Human rights application deferred pending resolution of parallel federal proceeding due to uncertain jurisdiction.
The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.
The respondents requested that the application be dismissed, arguing that they are federally regulated and the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction.
The applicant requested that the matter be deferred pending resolution of a parallel proceeding under the Canadian Human Rights Act.
The Tribunal found that the jurisdictional issue was uncertain and that it would be most fair, just, and expeditious to defer the application rather than put the parties to further expense and delay.
Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent Public Service Grievance Board complaint.
The respondents filed a Request for Order During Proceeding seeking to defer the human rights application alleging age discrimination pending the resolution of a concurrent complaint filed with the Public Service Grievance Board.
The applicant did not oppose the request.
The Tribunal found that the issues raised in the grievance were essentially the same as those in the application.
Noting that grievance arbitrators have the authority to enforce human rights obligations, the Tribunal deferred the application to avoid concurrent proceedings and ensure the orderly administration of justice.
Style of cause amended to remove incorrectly added personal respondent.
The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.
In a previous interim decision, the Tribunal incorrectly added another individual as a personal respondent.
The Tribunal issued this interim decision to amend the style of cause and correct the error.
Human rights application dismissed at summary hearing for lacking a reasonable prospect of success.
The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination with respect to housing on the basis of race, colour, ancestry, ethnic origin, and sex.
The applicant alleged that members of the condominium board of directors falsely accused her of misusing funds and engaged in other inappropriate conduct.
The Tribunal held a summary hearing and dismissed the application, finding no reasonable prospect that the applicant could prove a link between the respondents' alleged actions and a protected Code ground.
Union's unopposed request to intervene in member's human rights application granted.
The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment.
The applicant's bargaining agent, the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 942, filed a Request to Intervene.
Noting that a union generally has an interest in a human rights application brought by a bargaining unit employee, and with no opposition from the other parties, the Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene.
Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond.
A mediation session was scheduled, but the applicant failed to attend.
The Tribunal subsequently wrote to the applicant warning that failure to respond could result in the application being deemed abandoned.
The applicant did not respond.
Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.
Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.
The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of ethnic origin, place of origin, race, and reprisal.
After failing to attend mediation, the applicant indicated a desire to continue, but subsequently failed to respond to a Tribunal Case Assessment Direction requiring a response to the respondent's Request for Summary Hearing.
The Tribunal found that the applicant had abandoned the application and dismissed it.
Human rights application against union dismissed at summary hearing for lacking evidence of discrimination.
The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination with respect to employment because of race and colour against her union.
She claimed the union failed to adequately support her and file a grievance following a workplace harassment dispute.
The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.
The Tribunal found that the applicant provided no evidence linking the union's alleged failure to represent her to her race or colour, and dismissed the application.
Request for production of additional job competition documents denied as speculative and not arguably relevant.
The applicant filed a second Request for Order During Proceedings seeking the production of additional documents related to a job competition, including interview notes and feedback for all candidates.
The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the documents were not arguably relevant to the issues in dispute and that the request amounted to a speculative search for evidence on the eve of the hearing.
Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent civil proceeding covering the same factual ground.
The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal by the respondent college.
Prior to filing the application, the applicant had commenced a civil proceeding against the respondent covering the same factual ground.
The Tribunal considered whether to dismiss the application under section 34(11) of the Human Rights Code or defer it under section 45.
Finding that the civil claim did not explicitly frame the dispute as a human rights violation but covered the same facts, the Tribunal declined to dismiss the application but ordered it deferred pending the conclusion of the civil proceeding to avoid concurrent litigation.
Request for reconsideration denied as applicant failed to meet threshold criteria and attempted to re-argue case.
The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous decision that dismissed his human rights application for being filed out of time and failing to identify specific acts of discrimination.
The Tribunal found that the applicant did not meet any of the threshold criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26.5, as he merely reiterated previous submissions and attempted to re-argue the case.
The request for reconsideration was denied.
Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to file required documents.
The applicant failed to comply with the Tribunal's Rules 16 and 17 regarding the delivery and filing of witness lists, witness statements, and documents.
Despite a Case Assessment Direction warning that the application could be dismissed as abandoned if the materials were not filed, the applicant did not comply or respond to correspondence.
The Tribunal concluded that the applicant had abandoned the application and dismissed it.
Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond to correspondence.
The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of sex.
The parties agreed to mediation, but the applicant failed to attend the scheduled mediation session.
The Tribunal directed the applicant to advise whether she intended to proceed with the application, warning that failure to respond could result in the application being deemed abandoned.
The applicant did not respond to the Tribunal's correspondence.
Breach of settlement applications dismissed; Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to void settlements for duress under section 45.9.
The applicant filed applications alleging a breach of a 2009 settlement agreement by his former employer and union.
The applicant claimed he was tricked into signing the settlement and accepted it under economic duress.
The respondents argued the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction under section 45.9 of the Human Rights Code to consider these allegations as a breach of settlement.
The Tribunal agreed, finding that an allegation of duress is a claim that the contract does not represent a voluntary agreement, not an allegation that a party contravened the settlement.
The applications were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Adjournment request to seek legal representation denied as it does not constitute an exceptional circumstance.
The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment.
Shortly before the scheduled hearing, the applicant requested an adjournment to seek legal representation.
The Tribunal denied the request, noting that under its Practice Direction, adjournments are only granted in extraordinary circumstances.
The Tribunal held that a party's decision to retain counsel after a hearing is scheduled does not constitute an exceptional circumstance, particularly where the party had several months to do so.
Request for production of interview notes for other unsuccessful job candidates denied for lack of relevance.
The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment regarding a job competition.
She brought a Request for Order During Proceeding seeking the production of various documents, including interview notes and names of all applicants.
The Tribunal dismissed the request for materials relating to other unsuccessful candidates, finding the applicant failed to establish their arguable relevance.
The respondent was ordered to produce the formal offer made to the successful candidate, as agreed.
Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to NOID.
The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.
The applicant failed to respond to the NOID by the specified deadline.
Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond to Tribunal.
The applicant failed to attend a scheduled mediation, although his legal representative attended.
The Tribunal sent a letter requiring the applicant to confirm his intention to proceed, warning that failure to respond could result in the application being dismissed as abandoned.
The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.