Mark Hart is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 623 decisions on record from 2007 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Mark Hart sit on?

Mark Hart sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Mark Hart decide?

Mark Hart's most common areas include Human Rights (623 decisions), Administrative Law (299 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (150 decisions). Mark Hart has handled 623 decisions across 9 areas.

How many decisions has Mark Hart made?

Mark Hart has 623 decisions on record from 2007 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Mark Hart?

Representatives who frequently appear before Mark Hart include Prabhu Rajan, John Bell, Self-represented.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Mark Hart — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Health Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Workers' Compensation

Mark Hart

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2007

623

cases · 11 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 364Adjudicator· 92Vice-chair· 83Vice-Chair· 42Adjudicator· 23Vice-Chair· 11Vice-chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 31, 2010

Request for reconsideration dismissed due to late filing and lack of substantive merit.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed his application for lack of jurisdiction.

The request was filed beyond the 30-day time limit without adequate justification.

The adjudicator also reviewed the substantive grounds raised by the applicant, which included allegations of unfairness, misinterpretation of the law, and bias during the original hearing.

The adjudicator found no merit in any of the allegations and concluded there was no proper basis to alter the original decision.

The request for reconsideration was dismissed.

Makhi v. Ontario Human Rights Commission, 2010 HRTO 1783

Darrell Kloeze

4 cases2010–2014

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 30, 2010

Human rights application against tribunal adjudicator dismissed based on common law quasi-judicial immunity.

The applicant, a paralegal with a hearing impairment, filed a human rights complaint alleging a failure to accommodate his disability by an adjudicator of the Landlord and Tenant Board during a hearing.

The respondents raised preliminary objections, arguing the adjudicator was protected by judicial immunity.

The Tribunal found that the adjudicator's decisions regarding the applicant's accommodation requests were integral to her decision-making process and therefore protected by the common law principle of judicial or quasi-judicial immunity.

The Tribunal also found that this immunity was not displaced by the Tenant Protection Act.

The application was dismissed against all respondents.

Babineau v. Ontario (Municipal Affairs and Housing), 2010 HRTO 1777

Human rights application alleging racial discrimination by emergency room physician dismissed.

The applicant alleged that he experienced discrimination based on race, ancestry, ethnic origin, place of origin, and disability during an emergency room visit for an asthma attack.

He claimed the treating physician was dismissive and discriminatory because the applicant is Hindu and he believed the physician was a Goan Christian.

The Tribunal found that any tension between the parties was due to the applicant's intoxication and his denial of alcohol consumption, rather than any discriminatory animus.

The application was dismissed.

Kumar v. William Osler Health Centre, 2010 HRTO 1766

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 20, 2010

Tribunal orders partial production of documents and information relating to student's special education accommodation.

The applicant, a former student with multiple disabilities, brought an application alleging the respondent school board failed to appropriately accommodate his needs.

In this interim decision, the Tribunal addressed the applicant's request for production of various documents, including policies, Special Incidence Portion applications, and information regarding the assignment of a specific Special Education Assistant.

The Tribunal ordered the respondent to produce certain documents and information by a specified date, while declining to order production of other requested materials at this stage.

Wattie v. Toronto District School Board, 2010 HRTO 1729

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 20, 2010

Human rights application regarding commercial driver's licence visual requirements dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

The applicant filed a human rights complaint alleging discrimination after his commercial driver's licence was downgraded to a GZ licence due to a visual impairment following a stroke.

The respondent requested the application be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

The Tribunal found that section 19(1) of Regulation 340/94 under the Highway Traffic Act explicitly states that the visual requirements for a Class A or C licence apply despite the Human Rights Code.

Pursuant to section 47(2) of the Code, the Tribunal concluded it lacked jurisdiction to determine whether the visual requirement contravened the Code.

The application was dismissed.

Daoust v. Ontario (Transportation), 2010 HRTO 1725

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 19, 2010

Adjournment of preliminary hearing denied where Commission had not actually filed request to intervene.

The applicant requested an adjournment of a scheduled preliminary hearing, arguing that the Ontario Human Rights Commission had been formally requested to seek intervenor status due to the systemic nature of the complaint.

The respondents opposed the adjournment.

The Tribunal denied the request, noting that the Commission had not filed a Request to Intervene nor indicated any intention to do so, and therefore there were no extraordinary circumstances to justify an adjournment under the Tribunal's Practice Direction.

Richard Burns v. Thunder Bay Police Service Board and Robert Herman, 2010 HRTO 1722

Matthew Valitutti

3 cases2010–2025

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 19, 2010

Human rights application dismissed under section 45.1 as the underlying facts were previously decided by the OLRB.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on race, colour, ethnic origin, and place of origin, claiming he was constructively dismissed due to harassment by the property manager.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing the substance of the application was already dealt with by the Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB).

The Tribunal found that the OLRB had already held a hearing on the same factual allegations of harassment and mistreatment, concluding they were not supported by evidence.

As the underlying factual issues were substantially the same and appropriately dealt with by the OLRB, the Tribunal dismissed the application.

Zeamanuel v. Avcan Management Inc., 2010 HRTO 1721

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 18, 2010

Tribunal dismisses older allegations for delay and orders applicant to seek Youth Court authorization for criminal records.

The respondents brought a Request for Order seeking dismissal of portions of the human rights application for delay, dismissal under s. 45.1 of the Code, removal of the personal respondent, and production of documents.

The Tribunal dismissed the allegations relating to incidents prior to April 16, 2007, finding they did not form a series of incidents and the delay was not incurred in good faith.

The Tribunal declined to remove the personal respondent, finding his actions were central to the allegations.

The Tribunal ordered the applicant to commence an application before a Youth Court judge to obtain authorization to disclose transcripts from his related criminal proceeding, and deferred the s. 45.1 dismissal request until those transcripts are available.

Henry v. Waterloo Catholic District School Board, 2010 HRTO 1715

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 18, 2010

Tribunal strikes reprisal allegations from statement of additional facts in transitional human rights application.

The respondent school board requested an order striking several paragraphs from the applicant's statement of additional facts in a transitional human rights application.

The respondent argued the paragraphs raised new allegations, including reprisal and Employment Standards Act violations, that were not part of the original complaint.

The Tribunal struck the paragraphs alleging reprisal and failure to cooperate in the Commission process, finding that new allegations of Code violations cannot be added to a transitional application without a formal amendment prior to the transition.

The remaining paragraphs were permitted to stand as they provided factual context or were relevant to the issue of remedy.

Fair v. Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board, 2010 HRTO 1712

Alexander Curry

6 cases2007–2017

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 17, 2010

Reconsideration granted to allow application to proceed after applicant retained representation and corrected deficiencies.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a decision dismissing her human rights application for failing to rectify deficiencies.

The request was filed past the 30-day deadline.

The Tribunal granted an extension of time, noting the applicant had recently retained a representative and acted diligently thereafter.

The Tribunal also granted the reconsideration request, finding that the applicant's previous lack of legal representation and difficulties understanding the process outweighed the public interest in finality, especially since the application had not been heard on its merits.

Higgins v. Community Living Mississauga, 2010 HRTO 1707

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 16, 2010

Reconsideration request denied; applicant failed to show new evidence could not have been obtained earlier.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of the Tribunal's previous decisions regarding her age discrimination claim against the respondent hospital.

She argued that new evidence from a former colleague and the Tribunal's reliance on hearsay evidence warranted reconsideration.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the new evidence could have reasonably been obtained earlier and was largely irrelevant.

The Tribunal also clarified that in a circumstantial discrimination case, the respondent only needs to provide a legitimate, non-discriminatory explanation for termination, which it did through direct evidence from the decision-maker.

Clennon v. Toronto East General Hospital, 2010 HRTO 1693

Niki Lunquist

1 case2010–2010

Clarisa Waldman

3 cases2010–2015

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 13, 2010

Human rights applications dismissed under s. 45.1 as the substance was already decided by the CIRB.

The applicant filed human rights applications alleging discrimination based on race, colour, and ethnic origin regarding his suspension as financial secretary and removal of signing authority by the respondent unions.

The respondents requested dismissal under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing the matter was already dealt with by the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB).

The Tribunal found that the CIRB proceeding appropriately dealt with the substance of the applications, as the CIRB had already determined the applicant did not experience discrimination under the broader definition in the Canada Labour Code.

The applications were dismissed.

Chuk v. CAW Local 4003, 2010 HRTO 1682

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 30, 2010

Reconsideration of decision dismissing application based on signed release denied.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed her human rights application on the basis of a signed release.

She argued that there was new evidence regarding the lack of a staff reduction and that the Tribunal breached procedural fairness at the preliminary hearing.

The Tribunal found no error in its previous findings, noting that the applicant had not repudiated the settlement agreement and that no procedural unfairness occurred.

The request for reconsideration was denied.

O’Regan v. Firestone Textiles Company, 2010 HRTO 1627

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 30, 2010

Adjournment request denied due to late notice and failure to establish exceptional circumstances.

The applicant requested an adjournment of a scheduled hearing because two witnesses, including his doctor, were out of the country.

The respondents opposed the request.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment, noting that the applicant had known about the hearing date for over four months, failed to file witness lists or will-say statements by the deadline, and did not raise the issue of witness unavailability until shortly before the hearing.

The Tribunal found no exceptional circumstances to justify the late request.

Rodriques v. Toronto Community Housing, 2010 HRTO 1629

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 30, 2010

Reconsideration request denied as applicant failed to provide required details and representations.

The applicant filed a request for reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision dismissing his application.

The applicant checked boxes indicating reliance on new evidence and conflict with established jurisprudence, but failed to provide any details, reasons, or representations to support these claims.

The Tribunal found no basis in the submitted material to support the request and denied the reconsideration.

Kularaj Kulasingam v. Toral Cast Integrated Technologies, 2010 HRTO 1626

Naomi Calla

32 cases2009–2017

David Gourlay

34 cases2010–2017

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 29, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as substance was appropriately dealt with in prior police complaint proceeding.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination by police officers who allegedly dismissed her reports of tampering based on a perception that she had a mental illness.

The respondents requested dismissal under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing the matter was already dealt with through a Police Services Act complaint.

The Tribunal found that the prior police investigation and subsequent review by the Ontario Civilian Commission on Police Services constituted a proceeding that appropriately dealt with the substance of the human rights application.

The application was dismissed.

Ghafourian v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2010 HRTO 1620

Soma Ray-Ellis

In Private Practice7 cases2010–2024

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 29, 2010

Co-worker's inappropriate comments constituted harassment, but employer's response was adequate and termination was not reprisal.

The applicant alleged discrimination, harassment, and reprisal in employment based on ethnic origin, family status, marital status, and sex.

The Tribunal found that a co-worker made two inappropriate comments related to the applicant's sex, marital status, and family status, which constituted harassment and created a poisoned work environment.

However, the Tribunal dismissed the allegations that the employer failed to adequately respond to the internal complaint, finding the employer's actions reasonable.

The Tribunal also dismissed the reprisal allegations, including the claim that the applicant's termination was retaliatory, concluding that the employer had legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for the termination, primarily related to chronic lateness and interpersonal conflicts.

Ouliana Baisa v. Skills for Change and Nelson Briceno, 2010 HRTO 1621

Carl Peterson

53 cases1984–2023

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 26, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abuse of process due to prior union grievance settlement.

The applicant filed a human rights application regarding issues that were previously the subject of a union grievance.

The grievance had been settled between the applicant's union and the respondent employer, and the applicant received and accepted the settlement funds.

The respondents requested that the application be dismissed as an abuse of process or under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's claims of duress were unsubstantiated and that allowing the application to proceed in the face of the settlement would be an abuse of process.

The application was dismissed.

Cheryl Park (now Cheryl DeFoa) v. Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Ann Steadman, 2010 HRTO 1604

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 23, 2010

Adjournment request denied; failure to file additional facts implies reliance on original complaint only.

The respondents requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing, arguing they were prejudiced by the applicant's failure to file a statement of additional facts, a description of remedies sought, and disclosure as required by the Tribunal's Transitional Rules.

The Tribunal dismissed the adjournment request, finding that the failure to file a statement of additional facts or remedies simply means the applicant intends to rely only on those set out in the original complaint.

The Tribunal noted that any attempt by the applicant to introduce new facts, remedies, or undisclosed documents at the hearing could be objected to at that time.

der von Felix v. BlueGenesis.com Corporation/Hostopia.com, 2010 HRTO 1597

Christopher Ashby

18 cases2001–2015

Mark Hart

HRTO0 cases2007–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 23, 2010

Employer breached procedural duty to accommodate by failing to inquire, despite substantive accommodation being impossible.

The applicant alleged he was terminated from his employment because of a disability for which he claimed WSIB benefits, contrary to the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal found that the substantive duty to accommodate was not breached, as the applicant was unable to perform the essential duties of his position and his prognosis was unknown, which would cause undue hardship.

However, the Tribunal found that the employer breached the procedural duty to accommodate by failing to actively inquire into whether the applicant's restrictions could be accommodated.

The Tribunal awarded $2,000 for the procedural breach, reduced by $1,900 owed by the applicant to the employer, resulting in a net order of $100.

McKee v. Imperial Irrigation Co. Ltd., 2010 HRTO 1598

Page 22 of 32 (623 cases)

Applicant

Philton MooreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jenny DeGoeySelf-represented
1 appearance
Derek FranciscoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark RobertsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Viktoriya StepanovaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Raywatie BaldeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bright (Zeguo) QiuSelf-represented
1 appearance

assisted the Applicant

Michael CraigAgent
1 appearance

Counsel

Michelle WongCounsel
1 appearance
E.C. Carla ZabekCounsel
1 appearance
Jayson RiderCounsel
1 appearance
Kelly HarbridgeCounsel
1 appearance
Darrell KloezeCounsel
1 appearance
William McDowellCounsel
1 appearance
Woodward McCaigCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance
Fateh SalimCounsel
1 appearance
Sheryl JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance
Timothy LawsonCounsel
1 appearance
Woodward McKaigCounsel
1 appearance
Roger MillsCounsel
1 appearance
Leslie McIntoshCounsel
1 appearance
Michael M. MillerCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi LoewithCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Dr. Erik Paidra

Anne PosnoCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Lakeridge Health Corporation

Shane SmithCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Novopharm Limited, Gail Lucyk and Halima Khan

Angela RaeCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Cynthia MackenzieCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Intervener

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for the respondents

Mark EllisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Clarisa WaldmanCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Niki LunquistCounsel
1 appearance

for 2117392 Ontario Inc., William Farmer and Brandon Farmer

Tanya WalkerCounsel
1 appearance

for A.A. Property Management & Associates Inc.

Edmond PriftiAgent
1 appearance

for A.C.

P.S.-C.Self-represented
1 appearance

for Andy Carson

Paula Soares-CarsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Anthony Piazza and Maria Perry

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for Arista Homes Limited

Michael CooperCounsel
1 appearance

for Bata Limited (Canada Corporation No. 678234-5)

Leslie TennenbaumCounsel
2 appearances

for Bata Limited (now known as Athletes World Limited)

Connie ReeveCounsel
1 appearance

for Brian Edwards

Grace SkowronskiAgent
1 appearance
Aaron WudrickCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Auto Workers Local 199

Keith OsborneUnion representative
1 appearance

for Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 997 and Lynn Raback

Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance

for Centennial College

Nancy FisherAgent
1 appearance

for Communications, Energy & Paperworkers Union, Local 324 and George Smith

Denis EllicksonCounsel
2 appearances

for Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

Colin OsterbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Anita Grewal

Fred TranquilliCounsel
1 appearance

for D.S.

L.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board, Herman Viloria and John Lezon

Nadya TymochenkoCounsel
2 appearances

for Dylan Sigrist

Lori SigristSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Gary Clarke, Jeff Gillies, Joseph Rapai, Terry Grand, Anne Kavelaars, Evelyn Paparella, Tamare Nugent, Des Desalaiz

Melanie A. WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for General Motors of Canada Limited

David BannonCounsel
1 appearance

for Georgina Watts

Victoria ShenCounsel
1 appearance

for Halton Condominium Corporation #77, J & W Condominium Management Ltd., and Don Rowatt

Karen KisielCounsel
1 appearance

for Hamilton Police Service and Troy Ashbaugh

Marco VisentiniCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services and Toula Bezas

Chris DonszelmannCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Education

Karen InselbacherCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, Theren Beecroft and Kent Milligan

Christina DonszelmannCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as Represented by the Ministry of Education and Training, Intervenor

Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Paul SharmaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dean de LottinvilleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael BradtSelf-represented
1 appearance
Douglas MooreSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Joe Ramos

Louis StrezosCounsel
1 appearance

for Jose Pratas

Greg McGivernCounsel
1 appearance
Laura JoyCounsel
1 appearance

for Justicia for Migrant Workers

Grace VaccarelliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kevin Cote, David Lenchuk and Stan Belza

Joanne MulcahyCounsel
2 appearances

for London District Catholic School Board

Eric M. RoherCounsel
1 appearance

for March of Dimes Canada

Lee HardingAgent
1 appearance

for McMaster Association of Part-Time Students

Suzan FraserCounsel
1 appearance

for McMaster Students Union Inc.

Derek CollinsCounsel
1 appearance

for McMaster University

George AvraamCounsel
1 appearance
Dina MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Lisa StamCounsel
1 appearance

for Metro Ontario Inc. and Rick Crean

Charles RobertsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Nigel Thomas

Joanne MulcahyCounsel
1 appearance

for Olymel S.E.C. / L.P. and Michel Boudreault

Stephen BernardoCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Human Rights Commission

Tony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Step

Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Peel Regional Police Services Board and Jeff Duffield

Patricia MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Lauri WallCounsel
1 appearance

for Presteve Foods Ltd.

Gino MorgaCounsel
1 appearance

for Shelley Kiewning

Theodore ScollieCounsel
2 appearances

for Sonja Bata

Ronald J. McCloskeyCounsel
1 appearance

for Special Education Tribunal, Intervenor

Lucy McSweeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Parties Hamilton Police Service and Troy Ashbaugh

Marco VisentiniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Parties The City of Hamilton and Linda Blake-Evans

Byrdena MacNeilCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

W. Gordon SteinbergCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Brian HumphreyUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Davies Bagambiire

Davies BagambiireSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Kevin Robinson

Kevin RobinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Affected Party The Ontario Ombudsman

Jean-Frédéric HübschCounsel
1 appearance

for The AIDS Network

Kevin RobinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
5 appearances
Philton MooreSelf-represented
5 appearances
Johnson AzigaSelf-represented
5 appearances
Glen MorrisonAgent
4 appearances
Mathew BlakelySelf-represented
4 appearances
Robert LeeSelf-represented
4 appearances
Sandra BartonCounsel
4 appearances
Allison TaylorCounsel
4 appearances
Wade PoziomkaCounsel
3 appearances
Osborne BarnwellCounsel
3 appearances
C.R.E.Self-represented
3 appearances
Hugh ScherCounsel
3 appearances
Edelgard MahantSelf-represented
3 appearances
Rosario BoncoriSelf-represented
3 appearances
Julie WilsonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Sharmaine HallCounsel
3 appearances
Roshika WilliamsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersCounsel
3 appearances
Randy KingSelf-represented
3 appearances

for the Applicants

Mary Ellen McIntyreCounsel
1 appearance
Glen MorrisonAgent
1 appearance
Oksana LevkivskaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bradley ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
Niki LundquistCounsel
1 appearance
Elita McAdamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brenda CulbertCounsel
1 appearance
Yuriy GrygorchukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Debbie DraganitsCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ayoob KhanAgent
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants Durrell Claybourn and Dave Ferguson

Bruce BestCounsel
1 appearance

for The City of Hamilton and Linda Blake-Evans

Dennis PerlinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Prabhu RajanCounsel
8 appearances
Monmi GoswamiCounsel
4 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Christine ElwellCounsel
2 appearances
Sheena ScottCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Tony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Anthony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Tamara JosephCounsel
3 appearances
Roger RoweCounsel
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersCounsel
2 appearances
Brian KampeSelf-represented
2 appearances
Martha MacKinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Avvy Yao-Yao GoCounsel
1 appearance
Lee Ann ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance
Barbara Boldt-MacPhersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Greg GoodridgeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randy KingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug LundySelf-represented
1 appearance
Megan Evans-MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant A.C.

P.S-C.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Complainant Andy Carson

Paula Soares-CarsonAgent
1 appearance

for the Complainant D.S.

L.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Complainant Dylan Sigrist

Lori SigristAgent
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for The Corporation of the County of Lambton

David CribbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Financial Services Commission of Ontario

Reesha HoseinCounsel
1 appearance
Padraic RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Independent Electricity System Operator

Pamela HofmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Alanna MihaljCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew ReynoldsCounsel
1 appearance
Nini JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Denise CooneyCounsel
1 appearance
Monica MulvahillUnion representative
1 appearance
Tina LieCounsel
1 appearance
Debra McKennaCounsel
1 appearance
Roberto HenriquezCounsel
1 appearance
Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebUnion representative
1 appearance
Rana ArbabianCounsel
1 appearance
Bill ColeAgent
1 appearance
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Independent Police Review Director

Jean IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Justicia for Migrant Workers

Grace VaccarelliCounsel
2 appearances

for the Intervenor Ontario Human Rights Commission

Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenors African Canadian Legal Clinic, Metro Toronto Chinese & Southeast Asian Legal Clinic and South Asian Legal Clinic of Ontario

Avvy Yao-Yao GoCounsel
1 appearance
Virginia NelderCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Toronto Civic Employees’ Union, Local 416 (CUPE)

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Christine ElwellCounsel
2 appearances
Tony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Raj DhirCounsel
1 appearance
Sheena ScottCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers Federation

Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Non-Party Intervenor

Caroline V. (Nini)_ JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the proposed Respondents

Bruce EllisCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Robin BasuCounsel
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Matthew Ma and Reynaldo Corpuz

Sharon DuffyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Patricia MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
John W. WoonCounsel
4 appearances
Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
3 appearances
Andrea RiskCounsel
3 appearances
Richard CharneyCounsel
3 appearances
Brenda BowlbyCounsel
3 appearances
Michael FailesCounsel
3 appearances
Paula RusakCounsel
3 appearances
Rachel SilverCounsel
3 appearances
Elizabeth Ann MartensSelf-represented
2 appearances
Gaynor RogerCounsel
2 appearances
Arthur TarasukCounsel
2 appearances
Sheila MacKinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Vilija YcasAgent
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
2 appearances
Matthew CurtisCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel ChodosCounsel
2 appearances
Glenn ChristieCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent, Acclaim Ability Management Inc.

Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
1 appearance
Peter StraszynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Party

Frances R. GallopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bata Limited (now known as Athletes World Limited)

Connie ReeveCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Auto Workers, Local 199

Keith OsborneUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Business College

Syed Ali Mazher JafferyAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 416

Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Michael MazzucaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dr. Anita Grewal

Fred TranquilliCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dr. Sameer D’Souza

Matthew SammonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Durham Catholic District School Board

Dolores BarbiniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Durham Children’s Aid Society

Helen MurphyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Durham Regional Police Services Board

Ian JohnstoneCounsel
1 appearance
Angela KhouryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario

Christine DaviesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Engel and Associates Professional Corporation

Bruce EngelCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance
Carli GutmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent General Motors of Canada Limited

David BannonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gravel Charest Fisher Law Firm

Allan O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services (Ontario Provincial Police)

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance
Marnie CorboldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Finance (Financial Services Commission of Ontario)

Larissa EassonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Community and Social Services (Family Responsibility Office)

Kristen KizoffCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

William GeorgasCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hospital for Sick Children

Melanie WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Humber College Institute of Technology & Advanced Learning

Catherine PetersCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Huronia Area Aboriginal Assistance Corporation o/a Huronia Area Aboriginal Management Board

Kent ElsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joseph Brant Hospital

Dolores BarbiniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joyce Phillips

Colin YoungmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 183

Virginia NelderCounsel
1 appearance
Robert GibsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Legal Aid Ontario

Carolyn PadgettCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea DanonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO)

S. Jodi Gallagher-HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mahle Filter Systems Canada ULC

Stephanie RamsayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mazerolle & Lemay Law Firm

Denis CadieuxCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Provincial Police

Amal ChaudryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Presteve Foods Ltd.

Gino MorgaCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Royal LePage Partners Realty Inc.

Al KrochAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents

John BellCounsel
7 appearances
Catherine PetersCounsel
5 appearances
Stacey BallCounsel
5 appearances
Sheila MacKinnonCounsel
5 appearances
Andrea RiskCounsel
3 appearances
Robert BaldwinCounsel
3 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
3 appearances
Lior SamfiruCounsel
3 appearances
Harry KopytoAgent
2 appearances
Daniel LublinCounsel
2 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Patty MurrayCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher RiggsCounsel
2 appearances
Firdaus WaleleCounsel
2 appearances
Soma Ray-EllisCounsel
2 appearances
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
2 appearances
David StrashinCounsel
2 appearances
Glorie AlfredCounsel
2 appearances
Barry BrownCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Alliance Youth Services Inc., Steve Catney and Ed Barron

Robert FernandesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Children’s Aid Society of Toronto, Carol Manak and Pam Dawe

Ryan ConlinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents City of Toronto and Sandra Cuff

Darragh MeagherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents David Hurst and Maggie Lalande

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Dr. Michael Weinstein and Dr. Christopher Parshuram

Kasia CzajkowskiCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah CormanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Durham Regional Police Services Board and Sara Foote

David CowlingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sean Logan

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Securitas Canada Limited

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sheridan College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning

Patricia MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, Theren Beecroft and Kent Milligan

Tina EarlCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ministry of Community and Social Services, Hazel Romaine and Jermyne Graham

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Olivieri Foods Inc. and Cathy Martin

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sonja Bata

Ronald J. McCloskeyCounsel
1 appearance
Sara BeheshtiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ontario Public Service Employees Union, Susan Quinn, Natalie Lachapelle, Anita Fulford, Marian Chipchase and Dan Dean

Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Service and Toronto Police Services Board

Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Work Able Centres Inc. and Louise Korhonen

Thomas StefanikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Windsor

Patrick BrodeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patty MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Regional Municipality of Waterloo Police Services Board

Don JarvisCounsel
1 appearance
Daina SearchCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Young Women’s Christian Association of Hamilton

Timothy DugganCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Tony Dionisio

Tony DionisioSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Community Housing Corporation

William LeMayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Trillium Lakelands District School Board

Carolyn KayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Trish Meekins

Andrew DruryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor (formerly CAW), Local 1941

Mike ByrneUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of New Brunswick

Clarence BennettCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Waterloo Regional Police Association

Nini JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Osler Health Centre o/a Etobicoke General Hospital

Michele WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Windsor Police Services Board

Mark NazarewichCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent York Regional Police Services Board

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent YWCA Toronto

Frances GallopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Special Education Tribunal

Lucy McSweeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for The TDL Group Corp.

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Waterloo Region District School Board

Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board

Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance
David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for Trillium Lakelands District School Board

Nadine ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Local Unions 175 & 633

Michael HancockCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, B. Steed, M. Nunno, and M. Powell

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Damian HornichAgent
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police for the City of Toronto

Jerome Wiley, Q.C.Counsel
2 appearances
George H. CowleyCounsel
1 appearance

for Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Greg BullenCounsel
1 appearance

for York Condominium Corporation No. 365

Ashley WinbergCounsel
1 appearance

Litigation Guardian for Andy Carson

Paula Soares-CarsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Litigation Guardian for Dylan Sigrist

Lori SigristSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of the Respondent

Keith OsborneUnion representative
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Janet CoatesSelf-represented
2 appearances

On her own behalf

Svetlana WhiteSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cathy O’ReganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Charmaine MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance
H. G.Self-represented
1 appearance
Farideh GhafourianSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara Boldt-MacPhersonSelf-represented
1 appearance

on her own behalf and as litigation guardian for L.M.

E.M.Self-represented
1 appearance

on his own behalf

Craig BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Kuralraj KulasingamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stacy SweezeySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jerzy NatalukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Keith RamoutarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kam Chong LiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gary AtamanykSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy StevensSelf-represented
1 appearance
Guy BabineauSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajoo MakhiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul ChukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Oscar MedranoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lebert AlladiceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Greg GoodridgeSelf-represented
1 appearance

on their own behalf

J. B.Self-represented
1 appearance
E. B.Self-represented
1 appearance

Representative

Henry FreitagAgent
1 appearance

Respondents

Gail NeilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Douglas MooreSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents Ellen Helden and 1312788 Ontario Limited

Erin HallockCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Henry FreitagSelf-represented
1 appearance

623

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.1

cases/mo

HRTO623(100%)

Decision types

motion

511

trial

112

Page 22 of 32 (623 cases)

Mark Hart

Makhi v. Ontario Human Rights Commission, 2010 HRTO 1783

Darrell Kloeze

Mark Hart

Babineau v. Ontario (Municipal Affairs and Housing), 2010 HRTO 1777

Michele Warner

Matthew Sammon

Mark Hart

Kumar v. William Osler Health Centre, 2010 HRTO 1766

Mark Hart

Wattie v. Toronto District School Board, 2010 HRTO 1729

Mark Hart

Daoust v. Ontario (Transportation), 2010 HRTO 1725

Mark Hart

Richard Burns v. Thunder Bay Police Service Board and Robert Herman, 2010 HRTO 1722

Matthew Valitutti

Mark Hart

Zeamanuel v. Avcan Management Inc., 2010 HRTO 1721

Mark Hart

Henry v. Waterloo Catholic District School Board, 2010 HRTO 1715

Mark Hart

Fair v. Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board, 2010 HRTO 1712

Alexander Curry

Mark Hart

Higgins v. Community Living Mississauga, 2010 HRTO 1707

Mark Hart

Clennon v. Toronto East General Hospital, 2010 HRTO 1693

Niki Lunquist

Clarisa Waldman

Mark Hart

Chuk v. CAW Local 4003, 2010 HRTO 1682

Mark Hart

O’Regan v. Firestone Textiles Company, 2010 HRTO 1627

Mark Hart

Rodriques v. Toronto Community Housing, 2010 HRTO 1629

Mark Hart

Kularaj Kulasingam v. Toral Cast Integrated Technologies, 2010 HRTO 1626

Naomi Calla

David Gourlay

Mark Hart

Ghafourian v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2010 HRTO 1620

Soma Ray-Ellis

Mark Hart

Ouliana Baisa v. Skills for Change and Nelson Briceno, 2010 HRTO 1621

Carl Peterson

Mark Hart

Cheryl Park (now Cheryl DeFoa) v. Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Ann Steadman, 2010 HRTO 1604

Mark Hart

der von Felix v. BlueGenesis.com Corporation/Hostopia.com, 2010 HRTO 1597

Christopher Ashby

Mark Hart

McKee v. Imperial Irrigation Co. Ltd., 2010 HRTO 1598

Applicant

assisted the Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Dr. Erik Paidra

Counsel for Lakeridge Health Corporation

Counsel for Novopharm Limited, Gail Lucyk and Halima Khan

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the Intervener

Counsel for the Respondent

counsel for the respondents

Counsel for the Respondents

for 2117392 Ontario Inc., William Farmer and Brandon Farmer

for A.A. Property Management & Associates Inc.

for A.C.

for Andy Carson

for Anthony Piazza and Maria Perry

for Arista Homes Limited

for Bata Limited (Canada Corporation No. 678234-5)

for Bata Limited (now known as Athletes World Limited)

for Brian Edwards

for Canadian Auto Workers Local 199

for Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 997 and Lynn Raback

for Centennial College

for Communications, Energy & Paperworkers Union, Local 324 and George Smith

for Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

for Dr. Anita Grewal

for D.S.

for Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board, Herman Viloria and John Lezon