Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Christina Donszelmann

7 cases2012–2015

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 17, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent workplace grievance raising identical discrimination allegations.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging workplace discrimination and harassment on the basis of race and colour.

The respondent requested that the application be deferred because the applicant had already initiated a workplace grievance raising the exact same issues.

The Tribunal found significant overlap between the application and the grievance, and concluded that deferral was appropriate to avoid inconsistent findings and duplication of resources.

The application was deferred pending the conclusion of the grievance process.

Goodchild v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2012 HRTO 1399

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent Employment Standards claim regarding pregnancy-related termination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging her employment was terminated because of her intention to take maternity leave.

The respondent requested the Tribunal defer the application because an Employment Standards claim regarding the same allegations was ongoing before the Ministry of Labour.

The Tribunal found that the factual circumstances and remedial claims in both proceedings overlapped significantly.

To avoid the risk of inconsistent findings of fact, the Tribunal ordered the deferral of the human rights application pending the conclusion of the Employment Standards process.

Mounfield v. Cambridge Memorial Hospital, 2012 HRTO 1400

Mark D. Contini

23 cases1986–2024

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 13, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent union grievances on the same issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, specifically regarding workplace accommodation and return to work.

The respondents requested that the application be deferred because the applicant had filed concurrent grievances raising the exact same issues.

The Tribunal found significant overlap between the application and the grievances, raising a real concern of parallel proceedings and inconsistent findings.

The Tribunal ordered the application deferred pending the conclusion of the grievance process.

Darryl Murray v. Pilkington Glass of Canada Ltd. and Monica Bovett, 2012 HRTO 1387

Felix Lau

138 cases2006–2025

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 9, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent grievance proceeding on the same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging sex discrimination and harassment based on interactions during a meeting.

The applicant had previously filed a grievance regarding the same incident.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application pending the resolution of the grievance.

The respondent supported deferral, while the applicant did not file submissions.

The Tribunal deferred the application, noting that grievance arbitrators have the power and responsibility to enforce human rights obligations, and deferral avoids concurrent proceedings on the same facts.

Cripps v. Ontario (Environment), 2012 HRTO 1353

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 6, 2012

Human rights application dismissed for delay as it was filed 11 years after the alleged discrimination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging disability discrimination against the Attorney General of Ontario for failing to provide a fresh and complete transcript of his 2001 criminal trial.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application was filed almost 11 years after the trial, well beyond the one-year limitation period under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to demonstrate that the delay was incurred in good faith, noting that his mental health disability did not preclude him from actively pursuing his rights in other forums during the delay period.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Runnalls v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2012 HRTO 1349

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 4, 2012

Request to expedite proceedings granted due to applicant's deteriorating health and safety concerns.

The applicant, an 80-year-old woman with a degenerative nerve condition, filed a human rights application alleging discrimination after the respondent removed an accessibility ramp at her building.

She brought a request to expedite the proceedings, citing her deteriorating health, the upcoming winter months, and the loss of her personal support worker.

The Tribunal granted the request, finding that the applicant's significant safety and health concerns constituted urgent circumstances warranting an expedited hearing.

The Tribunal also granted a consent request to add the newly registered condominium corporation as a respondent.

Cecila Keefer v. Fifty-Four Rideau Terrace Investments Ltd. et al., 2012 HRTO 1324

Kristin Taylor

22 cases1995–2018

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 3, 2012

Request for particulars prior to filing a response denied as application contained sufficient detail.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and harassment in employment on the basis of race, ancestry, place of origin, and ethnic origin.

Prior to filing their Responses, the respondents requested an order directing the applicant to provide further particulars regarding the allegations.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the application contained sufficient detail about the alleged facts and legal issues to enable the respondents to file a meaningful response, and that no exceptional circumstances justified ordering particulars at this preliminary stage.

Nuur v. Chubb Edwards a U.T.C., Fire, Security and Climate Company, 2012 HRTO 1312

Michelle Friedman

12 cases2012–2022

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 3, 2012

Deferred human rights application reactivated due to lengthy delay and uncertain status of related grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in the denial of health benefits.

The application was previously deferred pending the outcome of related union grievances.

After nearly three years with the grievance arbitration held in abeyance and no clear timeline for its resolution, the applicant requested to reactivate the application.

The Tribunal granted the request, finding that the lengthy delay and uncertain status of the arbitration meant that the conditions for deferral had not materialized, and reactivation was the most fair, just, and expeditious approach.

Law v. Organizational Solutions Inc., 2012 HRTO 1313

Thomas Stefanik

17 cases1982–2016

Lauren Conti

5 cases2012–2024

Cathy Braker

12 cases2000–2013

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 3, 2012

Application withdrawn against union; union granted intervenor status in human rights complaint against employer.

The applicant filed a human rights application against his employer and his union.

Following a Case Assessment Direction, the applicant requested to withdraw the application against the union and consented to the union participating as an intervenor.

The Tribunal ordered the application withdrawn against the union, amended the employer's name, and granted the union intervenor status.

Doug Zimmer v. Cooper Standard Automotive Canada Limited, 2012 HRTO 1307

Christopher Taucar

5 cases2011–2015

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 29, 2012

Consolidated human rights applications reactivated following conclusion of judicial review proceedings.

The applicant requested to reactivate two consolidated human rights applications after the conclusion of judicial review proceedings and the exhaustion of all appeals, including a refusal of leave by the Supreme Court of Canada.

The respondents did not file submissions.

The Tribunal found it appropriate to reactivate the applications and ordered them reactivated.

Taucar v. University of Western Ontario, 2012 HRTO 1300

Mark Wright

49 cases1993–2022

Glorie Alfred

Practising Law - Employed24 cases2010–2014

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 29, 2012

Deferred human rights application reactivated after union abandoned parallel grievance arbitration.

The applicant requested to reactivate his human rights application, which had been deferred pending a grievance arbitration.

The union supported the reactivation, stating that the arbitration was adjourned sine die and it considered the grievances withdrawn.

The respondents opposed, arguing the grievance process was not yet completed.

The Tribunal found that since the arbitration was no longer active and there was no indication it would resume, reactivation was appropriate.

The Tribunal also granted the union intervenor status.

Chintaman v. Toronto District School Board, 2012 HRTO 1291

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 29, 2012

Human rights application held in abeyance for six months pending resolution of corporate respondent's CCAA proceedings.

The applicant requested a six-month extension of the abeyance of his human rights application against the corporate and individual respondents due to ongoing CCAA proceedings involving the corporate respondent.

The Tribunal granted the request, noting that a Receiver had been appointed and the applicant had filed a claim in the CCAA process.

The application was ordered held in abeyance for up to six months, pending the resolution of the CCAA proceedings or the lifting of the stay.

Brackenbury v. Priszm, 2012 HRTO 1292

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 28, 2012

Request for reconsideration of decision dismissing human rights application for delay denied.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous decision that dismissed her human rights application for delay.

The applicant alleged she was discriminatorily dismissed from her employment because of a past workplace injury.

The Tribunal found no new facts or evidence that could potentially be determinative of the delay issue and that could not reasonably have been obtained earlier.

The request for reconsideration was dismissed.

Courtney v. Faurecia Automotive Seating Canada Ltd., 2012 HRTO 1264

Peter Doucet

3 cases2012–2019

Lori Mishibinijima

12 cases2010–2017

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 26, 2012

Tribunal grants applicant's request to amend application to add corporate respondent and new grounds.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The applicant subsequently requested to amend the application to add the corporate respondent, add the grounds of family status and sex (pregnancy), and clarify remedial claims.

The Tribunal granted the requests to amend, finding no prejudice to the respondents.

The Tribunal also directed that a preliminary hearing be scheduled to address the respondents' argument that the application should be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Code due to a prior Employment Standards decision.

Picard v. Nails Plus by Nicole, 2012 HRTO 1252

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 26, 2012

Human rights application dismissed for delay; pursuing internal redress does not establish good faith.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging the respondent failed to accommodate his environmental allergies, leading to his termination.

The application was filed between two and four years after the last alleged incident.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for delay.

The applicant argued the delay was due to his attempts to seek redress directly from the respondent.

The Tribunal found that pursuing rights elsewhere does not justify delay and that the applicant failed to establish the delay was incurred in good faith under section 34(2) of the Human Rights Code.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Maharaj v. Toronto General Hospital, 2012 HRTO 1253

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 21, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to request to dismiss.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging disability discrimination and failure to accommodate.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing the substance had been dealt with in a Ministry of Labour proceeding.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to file a Reply and submissions responding to the request to dismiss.

The applicant failed to respond by the deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Mike Monteleone v. William Osler Health System and Cathy Renaud, 2012 HRTO 1216

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 21, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending completion of concurrent WSIB proceedings regarding the same workplace injury.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal with respect to employment on the basis of disability, following a workplace injury.

The respondent requested the application be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing the substance was dealt with by the WSIB.

The Tribunal considered whether to defer the application pending the completion of the ongoing WSIB proceedings.

Finding that the WSIB claim and appeal directly related to the human rights allegations and involved overlapping remedies, the Tribunal ordered the application deferred pending the conclusion of the WSIB matter.

Truong v. Megaform Automotive Inc., 2012 HRTO 1224

Robert J. Atkinson

18 cases1986–2014

Colleen Dunlop

1 case2012–2012

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 21, 2012

Tribunal resolves preliminary motions, allowing amendment for marital status but denying association ground and dismissal requests.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal on the basis of family status after being terminated following his return from parental leave.

The respondents brought preliminary requests to dismiss the application for delay, for summary hearing, and to remove one respondent for lack of an employment relationship.

The applicant sought to amend his application to add grounds of marital status and association with a person identified by a Code-ground.

The Tribunal denied the respondents' requests to dismiss and remove the party, allowed the applicant to add the ground of marital status, but denied the addition of the association ground.

A preliminary hearing was ordered to determine if the application should be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Code due to a prior Employment Standards Act decision.

Foster v. Domclean Limited, 2012 HRTO 1226

Tracy A. Kay

5 cases2003–2012

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 19, 2012

Human rights application deferred on consent pending conclusion of concurrent Small Claims Court action.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondent.

The Tribunal sought submissions on whether the application should be deferred due to a concurrent Small Claims Court action scheduled for trial.

Both parties agreed to the deferral to avoid inconsistent decisions.

The Tribunal ordered the application deferred pending the conclusion of the Small Claims Court action.

Mark Thomas v. 381883 Ontario Ltd. o/a 100 Jameson Avenue Apartments, 2012 HRTO 1209

Henry Dinsdale

9 cases1988–2013

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 19, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent union grievance on same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, reprisal, and association.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed or deferred pending the conclusion of a concurrent union grievance process.

The applicant's union also requested intervenor status.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene and ordered the deferral of the application, finding that the concurrent grievance dealt with the same facts and issues, making deferral the most fair and efficient way to proceed.

Smit v. Diageo Canada Inc., 2012 HRTO 1208

Page 13 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 13 of 44 (867 cases)

Christina Donszelmann

Ena Chadha

Goodchild v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2012 HRTO 1399

Seann D. McAleese

Ian S. Wright

Ena Chadha

Mounfield v. Cambridge Memorial Hospital, 2012 HRTO 1400

Mark D. Contini

Ena Chadha

Darryl Murray v. Pilkington Glass of Canada Ltd. and Monica Bovett, 2012 HRTO 1387

Felix Lau

Ena Chadha

Cripps v. Ontario (Environment), 2012 HRTO 1353

Ena Chadha

Runnalls v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2012 HRTO 1349

Ena Chadha

Cecila Keefer v. Fifty-Four Rideau Terrace Investments Ltd. et al., 2012 HRTO 1324

Kristin Taylor

Ena Chadha

Nuur v. Chubb Edwards a U.T.C., Fire, Security and Climate Company, 2012 HRTO 1312

Michelle Friedman

Ena Chadha

Law v. Organizational Solutions Inc., 2012 HRTO 1313

Thomas Stefanik

Lauren Conti

Cathy Braker

Ena Chadha

Doug Zimmer v. Cooper Standard Automotive Canada Limited, 2012 HRTO 1307

Christopher Taucar

Ena Chadha

Taucar v. University of Western Ontario, 2012 HRTO 1300

Mark Wright

Glorie Alfred

Ena Chadha

Chintaman v. Toronto District School Board, 2012 HRTO 1291

Ena Chadha

Brackenbury v. Priszm, 2012 HRTO 1292

Ena Chadha

Courtney v. Faurecia Automotive Seating Canada Ltd., 2012 HRTO 1264

Peter Doucet

Lori Mishibinijima

Ena Chadha

Picard v. Nails Plus by Nicole, 2012 HRTO 1252

Ena Chadha

Maharaj v. Toronto General Hospital, 2012 HRTO 1253

Ena Chadha

Mike Monteleone v. William Osler Health System and Cathy Renaud, 2012 HRTO 1216

Ena Chadha

Truong v. Megaform Automotive Inc., 2012 HRTO 1224

Robert J. Atkinson

Colleen Dunlop

Ena Chadha

Foster v. Domclean Limited, 2012 HRTO 1226

Tracy A. Kay

Ena Chadha

Mark Thomas v. 381883 Ontario Ltd. o/a 100 Jameson Avenue Apartments, 2012 HRTO 1209

Henry Dinsdale

Ena Chadha

Smit v. Diageo Canada Inc., 2012 HRTO 1208

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

for himself

for Jennette Frost

for Manulife Financial

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen