Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 18, 2012

Applicants ordered to file required documentation to reactivate or withdraw deferred applications or face dismissal.

The Tribunal previously deferred the human rights applications pending the conclusion of criminal proceedings.

After the criminal proceedings ended, the applicant advised that the parties had resolved their differences but failed to file the required forms to withdraw or settle the applications.

Despite repeated directions from the Tribunal to comply with Rules 14.3 and 14.4 to reactivate or close the files, the applicants failed to do so.

The Tribunal ordered the applicants to confirm their intentions and file the necessary documentation within 7 days, failing which the applications would be dismissed as abandoned.

Hadani v. Kingwest Fitness, 2012 HRTO 1190

Carol VandenHoek

5 cases2012–2016

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 18, 2012

Applicant ordered to produce arguably relevant documents within 7 days or face potential dismissal.

The respondent filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking an order to compel the applicant to produce all arguably relevant documents in accordance with Rule 16.1 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The Tribunal granted the request, noting the importance of disclosure for a fair and timely hearing.

The applicant was ordered to comply within 7 days, failing which the Application could be dismissed as abandoned or the applicant could be barred from calling witnesses.

Smith v. Camis, 2012 HRTO 1199

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 18, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to provide her intentions regarding the application, but she failed to respond.

After a subsequent warning that the file would be closed if she did not reply, the applicant again failed to communicate with the Tribunal.

The application was deemed abandoned and dismissed.

Silliphant v. Ontario Securities Commission, 2012 HRTO 1203

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 15, 2012

Tribunal declines to dismiss application for delay at preliminary stage, finding it not plain and obvious.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability and sex, culminating in her dismissal.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for delay.

The applicant submitted that her dismissal was the last in a series of discriminatory incidents related to her tenure application.

The Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the application was filed outside the one-year limitation period under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal directed that the application be served on the respondents, leaving the final determination on delay to be addressed later if raised.

Okouneva v. Ryerson University, 2012 HRTO 1191

Kelsey Orth

4 cases2012–2017

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 15, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent Pay Equity Commission complaint.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal on the grounds of sex and age, related to pay equity concerns.

She had previously filed a complaint with the Pay Equity Commission.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application pending the resolution of the pay equity complaint.

The respondents supported deferral, while the applicant did not file submissions.

The Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application to avoid concurrent proceedings, inconsistent findings, and potential double recovery, as the matters significantly overlapped.

Sacco v. John Howard Society of Peel Halton Dufferin, 2012 HRTO 1185

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent grievance arbitration on the same issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The respondent requested that the application be deferred because the applicant had already initiated concurrent grievance arbitration proceedings dealing with the same facts and issues.

The Tribunal found that deferral was warranted to avoid concurrent proceedings and the possibility of inconsistent decisions, and deferred the application pending the conclusion of the grievance arbitration.

Zurkowski v. Cargill Limited Canada, 2012 HRTO 1168

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 13, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to provide updated contact information.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal's correspondence to the applicant was returned as undeliverable, and the telephone number provided was not in service.

The applicant failed to provide updated contact information as required by Rule 1.13 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it pursuant to Rule 5.4.

Feliz v. Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, 2012 HRTO 1163

Veronica Mohan

Practising Law - Employed6 cases2012–2018

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 13, 2012

Tribunal amended style of cause and directed submissions on jurisdiction due to pending civil action.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal on the basis of disability.

The application initially named Manion, Wilkins & Associates Ltd. as a division of Manulife Financial.

Manulife Financial advised that Manion was a third-party administrator and requested the application be deferred pending a civil action.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to clarify the intended respondent.

The applicant confirmed his intention to name Manion as the sole respondent.

The Tribunal amended the style of cause to remove Manulife Financial and directed the parties to file written submissions on whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction under section 34(11) of the Human Rights Code given the pending civil action.

Brown v. Manion, Wilkins & Associates Ltd., 2012 HRTO 1164

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 11, 2012

Reconsideration request denied due to unexplained delay and failure to meet reconsideration criteria.

The applicant filed a request for reconsideration of a decision that dismissed her human rights application as abandoned after she failed to attend a conference call hearing.

The request was filed over six months late.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the applicant failed to establish that the delay was incurred in good faith and failed to meet the criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26.5, as she provided no medical confirmation of her illness or explanation for failing to notify the Tribunal of her absence.

Hardman v. Grey County Housing, 2012 HRTO 1142

Robert Champagne

8 cases2006–2013

Michael J. Kennedy

9 cases1996–2016

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 11, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent union grievance on the same issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of family status.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application because a concurrent grievance dealing with the same issues was already proceeding to arbitration.

The applicant's union and the respondents supported the deferral.

The Tribunal deferred the application, finding a significant risk of inconsistent findings of fact and duplication of resources if the application proceeded concurrently with the grievance.

Visentin v. University of Guelph, 2012 HRTO 1143

Jennifer Richards

82 cases2007–2019

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 8, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent union grievance based on same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination, harassment, and failure to accommodate in employment on the basis of disability and age.

The applicant had also filed a concurrent union grievance based on the same facts and issues.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application pending the resolution of the grievance.

The respondents supported deferral, while the applicant did not file submissions.

The Tribunal found that deferral was appropriate to avoid duplication and the potential for inconsistent findings, as the grievance arbitrator has the authority to enforce human rights obligations.

The application was deferred pending the conclusion of the grievance process.

Esther Cox v. Ontario (Health and Long-Term Care), 2012 HRTO 1129

Shaheen Hirani

Suspended Administratively14 cases1997–2022

Daniel R. McDonald

17 cases2009–2019

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 6, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent union grievance based on same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment on the basis of ethnic origin, disability, and creed.

The applicant also had an ongoing termination grievance filed by his union based on the same facts.

The respondents and the intervening union requested that the application be deferred pending the outcome of the grievance process.

The Tribunal found significant overlap between the application and the grievance and deferred the application to avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent findings.

Vetrenko v. Securitas Canada Limited, 2012 HRTO 1111

Patrick James

22 cases2010–2022

Evan Schiller

11 cases2010–2025

Carolyn Johnston

12 cases2011–2015

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 6, 2012

Tribunal denies early dismissal and requests grievance status updates before deciding on deferral.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and harassment on the basis of disability following her return from medical leave.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code or deferred pending the outcome of related union grievances.

The Tribunal granted the union intervenor status, denied the request to dismiss as no other proceeding had yet dealt with the substance of the application, and ordered the parties to provide further information regarding the status of the grievances before deciding on deferral.

Wright v. Caressant Care Nursing and Retirement Homes Ltd., 2012 HRTO 1107

Jeffery Board

1 case2012–2012

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 6, 2012

Human rights application reactivated following conclusion of related judicial review proceedings.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging age discrimination regarding the respondent's policy on retiree medical benefits.

The Tribunal previously deferred the application pending a Divisional Court judicial review of a related policy grievance.

Following the Divisional Court's dismissal of the judicial review, the applicant requested to reactivate the application.

The respondent opposed, seeking dismissal under section 45.1 of the Code.

The Tribunal ordered the application reactivated and scheduled a teleconference to hear submissions on the respondent's request to dismiss.

Eli Yunger v. City of Toronto, 2012 HRTO 1120

Derek T. Noyes

5 cases2012–2025

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 5, 2012

Request to change hearing venue due to financial constraints denied.

The applicant requested that the scheduled hearing be moved from Thunder Bay to Kenora, citing financial constraints and travel expenses.

The respondent opposed the change of venue.

The Tribunal denied the request, noting its standard practice of holding hearings in designated regional centres closest to the alleged discrimination.

The Tribunal found that financial considerations alone do not constitute an 'other need' under its Practice Direction to justify changing the venue outside a regional centre, especially when opposed by the other party.

Allan Crow v. Keewatin-Patricia District School Board, 2012 HRTO 1108

Paul Young

19 cases1986–2013

Erin Wallace

7 cases2011–2015

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 29, 2012

Human rights application dismissed for delay as applicant failed to establish good faith explanation.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal on the basis of disability, with the last incident occurring over three years prior.

The respondents requested dismissal due to delay.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to establish that the delay was incurred in good faith under section 34(2) of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant's ignorance of the law, pursuit of other proceedings, and medical condition did not adequately explain the delay.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Clowes-Haichuck v. Canada Safeway Ltd., 2012 HRTO 1060

Stephen M. Shaddock

1 case2012–2012

Patricia Forte

2 cases2003–2012

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 29, 2012

Request to dismiss human rights application denied because amended civil claim removed all human rights allegations.

The respondents requested the early dismissal of a human rights application under section 34(11) of the Human Rights Code, arguing that the applicant had commenced a civil action based on the same facts and seeking similar remedies.

The Tribunal found that while the original civil claim overlapped with the application, the applicant had amended the statement of claim to remove all allegations of human rights infringements and requests for human rights remedies.

Because the amended civil action only sought damages for a breach of the common law reasonable notice period, the Tribunal concluded that section 34(11) did not apply and denied the request to dismiss.

Taylor v. Fastenal Canada Ltd., 2012 HRTO 1067

Paula Rusak

Licence Surrendered - Retired31 cases1986–2017

Giuseppe Agostino

In Private Practice15 cases2012–2026

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 29, 2012

Union granted intervenor status and applicant granted extension of time to file Reply.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment on the ground of disability.

The applicant's union requested intervenor status, which was granted as per the Tribunal's standard practice.

The applicant also requested an extension of time to file a Reply, which was granted as the respondent identified no prejudice.

David Killeen v. Soncin Construction, 2012 HRTO 1063

Kevin D. Sherkin

148 cases2000–2026

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 28, 2012

Tribunal orders franchisor to file Response and applicant to clarify proper respondents in discrimination claim.

The applicant filed a human rights application against Bagel World alleging discrimination in services.

The franchisor, Bagel World, sought clarification on the proper respondent, noting the location was operated by a franchisee that had ceased operations.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction requiring the franchisor to provide contact information for the owner and file a Response.

When the franchisor failed to file a Response, the Tribunal issued an interim decision ordering the franchisor to file a Response within 35 days and requiring the applicant to provide accurate contact information for any other respondents she intends to proceed against.

Virgin Elgin v. Bagel World, 2012 HRTO 1061

Gurjit Brar

65 cases2005–2015

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 24, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of parallel WSIB appeal.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the ground of disability by the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board regarding his benefits and work transition services.

The applicant noted an ongoing WSIB appeal and agreed to defer the application.

The respondent confirmed the ongoing appeal and supported deferral.

The Tribunal found that the WSIB appeal dealt with the same facts and allegations, and ordered the application deferred pending the conclusion of the WSIB process.

Michael Kontopodis v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2012 HRTO 1036

Page 14 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 14 of 44 (867 cases)

Ena Chadha

Hadani v. Kingwest Fitness, 2012 HRTO 1190

Carol VandenHoek

Ena Chadha

Smith v. Camis, 2012 HRTO 1199

Ena Chadha

Silliphant v. Ontario Securities Commission, 2012 HRTO 1203

Ena Chadha

Okouneva v. Ryerson University, 2012 HRTO 1191

Kelsey Orth

Ena Chadha

Sacco v. John Howard Society of Peel Halton Dufferin, 2012 HRTO 1185

Rebecca Lee

Daniel L. Leone

Ena Chadha

Zurkowski v. Cargill Limited Canada, 2012 HRTO 1168

Ena Chadha

Feliz v. Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, 2012 HRTO 1163

Veronica Mohan

Ena Chadha

Brown v. Manion, Wilkins & Associates Ltd., 2012 HRTO 1164

Ena Chadha

Hardman v. Grey County Housing, 2012 HRTO 1142

Robert Champagne

Michael J. Kennedy

Ena Chadha

Visentin v. University of Guelph, 2012 HRTO 1143

Jennifer Richards

Ena Chadha

Esther Cox v. Ontario (Health and Long-Term Care), 2012 HRTO 1129

Shaheen Hirani

Daniel R. McDonald

Ena Chadha

Vetrenko v. Securitas Canada Limited, 2012 HRTO 1111

Patrick James

Evan Schiller

Carolyn Johnston

Ena Chadha

Wright v. Caressant Care Nursing and Retirement Homes Ltd., 2012 HRTO 1107

Jeffery Board

Ena Chadha

Eli Yunger v. City of Toronto, 2012 HRTO 1120

Derek T. Noyes

Ena Chadha

Allan Crow v. Keewatin-Patricia District School Board, 2012 HRTO 1108

Paul Young

Erin Wallace

Ena Chadha

Clowes-Haichuck v. Canada Safeway Ltd., 2012 HRTO 1060

Stephen M. Shaddock

Patricia Forte

Ena Chadha

Taylor v. Fastenal Canada Ltd., 2012 HRTO 1067

Paula Rusak

Giuseppe Agostino

Ena Chadha

David Killeen v. Soncin Construction, 2012 HRTO 1063

Kevin D. Sherkin

Ena Chadha

Virgin Elgin v. Bagel World, 2012 HRTO 1061

Gurjit Brar

Ena Chadha

Michael Kontopodis v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2012 HRTO 1036

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal