3 total
Tribunal's finding of serious and irreversible harm to Blanding's turtle from wind project roads restored; remedy remitted.
The appellant appealed a Divisional Court decision that set aside an Environmental Review Tribunal's revocation of a Renewable Energy Approval for a wind farm project.
The Tribunal had found the project would cause serious and irreversible harm to the Blanding's turtle due to increased road mortality.
The Court of Appeal held the Divisional Court erred in its standard of review application, finding the Tribunal's decision on serious and irreversible harm was reasonable despite lacking precise numerical data.
However, the Court of Appeal agreed the Tribunal erred in revoking the approval without allowing the parties to make submissions on the appropriate remedy.
The matter was remitted to the Tribunal to determine the remedy.
Class action certification denied for G20 Summit mass arrests due to lack of commonality and overbroad class definition.
The plaintiff sought to certify a class action against multiple police services and government entities regarding mass arrests and detentions during the 2010 G20 Summit in Toronto.
The court dismissed the certification motion, finding that while some causes of action (like false imprisonment and battery) were properly pleaded against the Toronto Police Services Board, the claims against other defendants failed.
Crucially, the plaintiff failed to satisfy the identifiable class, common issues, and preferable procedure requirements of the Class Proceedings Act due to the highly variable individual conduct of protesters and the impermissible use of subclasses.
Motion to strike hearsay evidence deferred; issue of applicant's capacity referred to full Divisional Court panel.
The respondent Moose Cree First Nation brought a motion to strike portions of a judicial review application and supporting affidavit filed by the MoCreebec Council of the Cree Nation regarding a hydroelectric project.
The parties resolved several issues, including the removal of Charter and Aboriginal rights claims.
The court deferred a decision on striking hearsay evidence in the affidavit pending further information.
Given the complexity and public policy implications, the court referred the remaining issue of the applicant's capacity to bring the application to a full panel of the Divisional Court.