Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Gurjit Brar

65 cases2005–2015

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 24, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of parallel WSIB appeal.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the ground of disability by the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board regarding his benefits and work transition services.

The applicant noted an ongoing WSIB appeal and agreed to defer the application.

The respondent confirmed the ongoing appeal and supported deferral.

The Tribunal found that the WSIB appeal dealt with the same facts and allegations, and ordered the application deferred pending the conclusion of the WSIB process.

Michael Kontopodis v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2012 HRTO 1036

Two human rights applications alleging disability discrimination in employment consolidated to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

The applicant filed two human rights applications alleging employment discrimination on the basis of disability against the Toronto Police Services Board and related respondents.

The applicant requested that the applications be consolidated.

The respondents did not oppose consolidation but raised an issue regarding disclosure of the applicant's medical files, which was subsequently resolved.

The Tribunal ordered the applications consolidated to avoid a multiplicity of proceedings, expense, and the risk of inconsistent results.

Cobb v. Toronto Police Services, 2012 HRTO 1015

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 18, 2012

Request to dismiss human rights application denied as WSIB had not yet addressed discrimination issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, claiming the respondent failed to accommodate his workplace injury and discriminatorily dismissed him.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing that the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) had already dealt with the substance of the matter.

The Tribunal denied the request to dismiss, finding that the WSIB process was in its early stages and had not addressed the discrimination issues.

The Tribunal ordered the parties to provide written submissions on whether the application should be deferred pending the WSIB proceedings.

Khanh Truong v. Megaform Automotive Inc., 2012 HRTO 988

Voula Michaelidis

Deceased3 cases2010–2013

Mitchell Rose

3 cases2003–2012

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 18, 2012

Request to defer human rights application pending civil action against disability insurer denied due to minimal overlap.

The respondent employer requested that the Tribunal defer the human rights application because the applicant had commenced a civil action against her long-term disability insurer.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding minimal overlap between the proceedings.

The civil action involved different parties and distinct legal issues regarding disability benefits eligibility, whereas the human rights application focused on allegations of discrimination, failure to accommodate, and reprisal by the employer.

Roycroft v. Premier Salons Ltd., 2012 HRTO 1013

Erin M. Miller

2 cases2012–2012

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 17, 2012

Tribunal orders limited disclosure of applicant's occupational health files to allow respondent to prepare Response.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability and age, claiming the respondent failed to accommodate him and refused training due to his anticipated retirement.

Prior to filing its Response, the respondent requested an order requiring the applicant to consent to the disclosure of his occupational health files from 2000 to present, arguing the information was necessary to defend the accommodation claims.

The Tribunal found the health files were arguably relevant but limited the temporal scope of the disclosure to January 2010 onwards, aligning with the events described in the application.

The respondent's nurse was ordered to disclose the limited files and the respondent was granted an extension to file its Response.

Quesnelle v. Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, 2012 HRTO 982

Carol VandenHoek

5 cases2012–2016

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 16, 2012

Preliminary request to dismiss human rights application denied as section 53(8) requires previous complaint against same respondent.

The respondent requested the early dismissal of a human rights application alleging discrimination regarding inaccessible premises.

The respondent argued the application should be dismissed under section 53(8) of the Human Rights Code because the applicant had pursued similar allegations against other businesses.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that section 53(8) only applies where a previous complaint was filed against the same respondent or a related entity, which was not the case here.

Matthew Wozenilek v. Duncan-McPhee Inc., 2012 HRTO 986

Judith Hupé

3 cases2012–2025

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 16, 2012

Human rights application against Children's Aid Society dismissed at summary hearing for lacking evidence of discrimination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination by the Children's Aid Society of Ottawa regarding the apprehension of her newborn child.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that while the Society's actions constituted 'services' under the Human Rights Code, the applicant failed to provide any evidence linking the Society's conduct to the prohibited grounds of discrimination.

The application was dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success.

C.B. v. Children’s Aid Society of Ottawa, 2012 HRTO 998

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 14, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent WSIB appeal raising identical facts and issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed or deferred because the applicant had an ongoing Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) appeal regarding the same facts and issues.

The Tribunal found significant overlap between the WSIB matters and the human rights allegations, and ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the WSIB process to avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent findings.

Walsh v. The Barclay Construction Group Inc., 2012 HRTO 972

Tracy A. Kay

5 cases2003–2012

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 14, 2012

Request to dismiss human rights application denied as civil counter-claim did not seek human rights remedies.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging employment discrimination based on creed, marital status, and association.

The respondent requested the application be dismissed under section 34(11) of the Human Rights Code because the applicant had filed a counter-claim in a Small Claims Court action, or deferred due to a Ministry of Labour claim.

The Tribunal denied the request to dismiss, finding that the Small Claims Court counter-claim did not seek human rights remedies.

The request to defer to the Ministry of Labour was also denied as that claim had been withdrawn.

The Tribunal requested submissions on whether to defer pending the Small Claims Court process.

Mark Thomas v. 381883 Ontario Ltd., 2012 HRTO 971

Paul Meier

115 cases2006–2026

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 11, 2012

Two human rights applications involving overlapping facts and allegations of reprisal consolidated to avoid multiplicity.

The applicant filed two human rights applications against the respondent employer, alleging discrimination and reprisal.

The respondent sought to consolidate the applications, while the applicant opposed consolidation.

The Tribunal applied the Persaud factors and found that the applications involved overlapping facts, witnesses, and a chronological connection.

To avoid a multiplicity of proceedings and the risk of inconsistent results, the Tribunal ordered the applications consolidated.

Ronald Ihasz v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Revenue, 2012 HRTO 953

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 11, 2012

Tribunal orders applicant to provide disclosure and remedial particulars; defers ruling on Facebook records request.

In an application alleging sex discrimination and sexual harassment in employment, the respondents requested an order for disclosure of the applicant's Facebook wall, Record of Employment, and particulars of her remedial claim.

The Tribunal ordered the applicant to provide her arguably relevant disclosure and an itemized list of her remedial claims, noting she had failed to comply with the Rules.

The Tribunal deferred ruling on the Facebook and Record of Employment requests, ordering the respondents to first provide submissions explaining how those documents are arguably relevant to the proceeding.

Powell v. Sans Sole Tanning Salon Inc., 2012 HRTO 964

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 10, 2012

Human rights application dismissed due to applicant's failure to provide accurate contact information.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal was unable to deliver the Notice of Application to the respondent at the provided address.

The Tribunal also discovered the applicant no longer resided at her provided address.

The Tribunal directed the applicant via email to provide accurate contact information for the respondent by a specified deadline, warning that failure to do so could result in dismissal.

The applicant failed to respond or update her own contact information.

Pursuant to the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, the application was dismissed.

Sura Abdulaziz v. Subway Restaurants, 2012 HRTO 949

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 10, 2012

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as the respondent is a federally regulated employer.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability in employment, claiming he was dismissed after a workplace injury.

The respondent argued the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction because it is a federally regulated employer.

The Tribunal found that the respondent exclusively provides staffing services to a federal undertaking and therefore falls under federal jurisdiction.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Dale Munroe v. Unique Personnel Canada Inc., 2012 HRTO 945

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 8, 2012

Human rights application dismissed for delay as applicant failed to prove good faith.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal based on creed nearly four years after the last alleged incident.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for delay.

The applicant argued the delay was due to mental illness and his lawyer's failure to act promptly.

The Tribunal found the applicant failed to provide medical evidence demonstrating his mental health prevented him from pursuing his rights, and that the lawyer's delay occurred after the limitation period expired.

The application was dismissed as the delay was not incurred in good faith.

Ross v. Simcoe County District School Board, 2012 HRTO 918

Susan Chapman

4 cases2012–2017

Raj Anand

54 cases1981–2017

Jack Copelovici

Not Practising Law11 cases2002–2016

Glynnis Burt

9 cases2006–2026

Geoffrey Baker

17 cases2002–2013

Beth Beattie

13 cases2008–2016

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 4, 2012

Human rights applications alleging discriminatory medical care dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant filed human rights applications against numerous dentists, physicians, and administrative staff, alleging discrimination based on disability and creed, as well as reprisal.

He claimed he received substandard medical and dental care because he was an ODSP recipient and because of his spiritual beliefs.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing and dismissed the applications, finding no reasonable prospect of success as the applicant could not point to any evidence linking the alleged mistreatment to the protected grounds under the Code.

Iarossi v. Herzog, 2012 HRTO 893

Richard Miller

43 cases2005–2025

Katherine Pollock

4 cases2012–2016

Jeffery Andrew

1 case2012–2012

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 4, 2012

Union granted intervenor status; parties ordered to provide update on concurrent grievances before deferral decision.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment.

The applicant's union requested intervenor status, noting it had filed grievances on behalf of the applicant.

The respondents requested the Tribunal defer the application pending the grievance process.

The Tribunal granted the union intervenor status and ordered the parties to provide an update on the status of the outstanding grievances before deciding on the deferral request.

Chau Quach v. HMS Host International Canada, 2012 HRTO 892

Karen Sargeant

13 cases1999–2022

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 3, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending the conclusion of concurrent workplace grievances.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability and age.

The respondent requested that the Tribunal defer the application because the applicant's union had filed concurrent workplace grievances regarding the same issues, including a denial of modified duties and termination of employment.

The Tribunal found that the grievances directly overlapped with the substance of the application and deferred the application to avoid concurrent proceedings and the risk of inconsistent findings.

Davila v. McKesson Canada, 2012 HRTO 880

Jordana K. Joseph

5 cases2012–2017

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 2, 2012

Human rights application deferred on consent pending conclusion of concurrent grievance proceedings.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment.

The applicant also had four outstanding grievances related to the same subject matter and requested that the Tribunal defer the application.

The respondents supported the deferral.

The Tribunal deferred the application pending the conclusion of the grievance proceedings to avoid concurrent proceedings and the possibility of inconsistent decisions.

McPhail v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2012 HRTO 876

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 1, 2012

Human rights application alleging historical discrimination from the 1960s dismissed for delay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging his teaching certificate was revoked in the 1960s due to discrimination based on sexual orientation.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application was filed decades after the alleged events.

The applicant argued the delay was justified because he had pursued remedies through other agencies, including the Ombudsman and the courts, eventually regaining his certificate in 1989.

The Tribunal found that pursuing other avenues of redress does not, on its own, justify a delay in filing a human rights application.

The Tribunal concluded the applicant failed to establish that the delay was incurred in good faith under section 34(2) of the Human Rights Code and dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction.

Eugene Stasiuk v. Ministry of Education (Ontario), 2012 HRTO 864

Vicky Satta

4 cases2011–2016

Paul Boileua

1 case2012–2012

Alayna Miller

13 cases2011–2019

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 30, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent workplace grievances on the same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of race and sex.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer because the applicant had concurrent workplace grievances covering the same subject matter.

Despite the applicant's opposition, the Tribunal found that deferral was appropriate to avoid concurrent proceedings and the risk of inconsistent findings.

The application was deferred pending the conclusion of the grievance proceedings.

Tracey v. The Ottawa Hospital, 2012 HRTO 856

Page 15 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 15 of 44 (867 cases)

Gurjit Brar

Ena Chadha

Michael Kontopodis v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2012 HRTO 1036

Jessica Kearsey

Jeffrey Board

Ena Chadha

Cobb v. Toronto Police Services, 2012 HRTO 1015

Ena Chadha

Khanh Truong v. Megaform Automotive Inc., 2012 HRTO 988

Voula Michaelidis

Mitchell Rose

Ena Chadha

Roycroft v. Premier Salons Ltd., 2012 HRTO 1013

Erin M. Miller

Ena Chadha

Quesnelle v. Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, 2012 HRTO 982

Carol VandenHoek

Ena Chadha

Matthew Wozenilek v. Duncan-McPhee Inc., 2012 HRTO 986

Judith Hupé

Ena Chadha

C.B. v. Children’s Aid Society of Ottawa, 2012 HRTO 998

Ena Chadha

Walsh v. The Barclay Construction Group Inc., 2012 HRTO 972

Tracy A. Kay

Ena Chadha

Mark Thomas v. 381883 Ontario Ltd., 2012 HRTO 971

Paul Meier

Ena Chadha

Ronald Ihasz v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Revenue, 2012 HRTO 953

Ena Chadha

Powell v. Sans Sole Tanning Salon Inc., 2012 HRTO 964

Ena Chadha

Sura Abdulaziz v. Subway Restaurants, 2012 HRTO 949

Ena Chadha

Dale Munroe v. Unique Personnel Canada Inc., 2012 HRTO 945

Ena Chadha

Ross v. Simcoe County District School Board, 2012 HRTO 918

Susan Chapman

Raj Anand

Jack Copelovici

Glynnis Burt

Geoffrey Baker

Beth Beattie

Ena Chadha

Iarossi v. Herzog, 2012 HRTO 893

Richard Miller

Katherine Pollock

Jeffery Andrew

Ena Chadha

Chau Quach v. HMS Host International Canada, 2012 HRTO 892

Karen Sargeant

Ena Chadha

Davila v. McKesson Canada, 2012 HRTO 880

Jordana K. Joseph

Ena Chadha

McPhail v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2012 HRTO 876

Ena Chadha

Eugene Stasiuk v. Ministry of Education (Ontario), 2012 HRTO 864

Vicky Satta

Paul Boileua

Alayna Miller

Ena Chadha

Tracey v. The Ottawa Hospital, 2012 HRTO 856

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein