Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Human rights application allowed to proceed as concurrent civil shareholder action did not allege Code infringements.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of family status.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed under section 34(11) of the Human Rights Code, arguing that the applicant had commenced a civil suit based on the same facts.

The Tribunal found that the civil suit was a shareholder oppression action that did not allege human rights infringements or seek remedies for such violations.

The Tribunal concluded that section 34(11) did not apply and declined to defer the application, allowing it to proceed.

Luigi Pavone v. Navacro Machining Inc., 2012 HRTO 1592

Kecia Podetz

7 cases2012–2017

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 14, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent grievance on same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of sex and age, claiming he was refused teaching assignments.

The respondent requested that the application be deferred because the applicant had an ongoing grievance based on the same facts scheduled for arbitration.

The Tribunal found significant overlap between the application and the grievance, and deferred the application to avoid inconsistent findings of fact and duplication of resources.

Tait v. Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology, 2012 HRTO 1572

James D. Higginson

1 case2012–2012

Andrew C. Bome

5 cases1991–2012

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 14, 2012

Early dismissal denied; prior settlement and WSIB proceedings did not cover post-termination reprisal allegations.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging that the respondent employer reprised against him by selectively disclosing confidential mediation information to the WSIB and refusing to waive confidentiality.

The respondent requested early dismissal, arguing that the applicant had signed a full and final release in a previous application and that the WSIB process had already dealt with the substance of the matter.

The Tribunal denied the request for early dismissal, finding that the settlement did not cover post-termination reprisal allegations and that the WSIB proceeding dealt with benefits rather than human rights issues.

Osborne v. Eveley International Corp., 2012 HRTO 1573

Paul A. Young

4 cases1985–2016

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 13, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent workplace grievances on the same issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment regarding the denial of vacation and comp time.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer because the applicant had concurrent workplace grievances addressing the same issues scheduled for arbitration.

Finding a significant overlap in subject matter and a risk of inconsistent findings, the Tribunal deferred the application pending the conclusion of the grievance process.

Beirnes v. Family & Children’s Services of Waterloo Region, 2012 HRTO 1553

Marni Tolensky

18 cases2011–2016

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 13, 2012

Tribunal refuses to remove individual respondent or strike reprisal claim in disability discrimination application.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination, harassment, and reprisal on the basis of disability against her employer and a disability management specialist.

The respondents requested an interim order removing the individual respondent as a party and striking the reprisal allegation.

The Tribunal applied the Persaud factors and declined to remove the individual respondent, finding her alleged conduct was a central issue in the application.

The Tribunal also declined to strike the reprisal claim, as the applicant had pleaded facts that could potentially establish a breach of section 8 of the Code.

Both requests were dismissed.

Joanne O’Brien v. Toronto Transit Commission and Katherine Castillo, 2012 HRTO 1550

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 8, 2012

Request to dismiss human rights application for delay denied as it was filed within one-year limit.

The respondents requested that the human rights application be dismissed for delay, arguing it was filed more than one year after the last alleged incident of discrimination.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's employment was terminated on January 26, 2011, and the application was filed exactly one year later on January 26, 2012.

As the application was filed within the one-year limitation period under section 34(1) of the Human Rights Code, the respondents' request to dismiss for delay was denied.

Zanobia Chaudhary v. 2063849 Ontario Inc. – Hotel Indigo Toronto Airport and Sim Gill, 2012 HRTO 1538

Lorraine J. Por

8 cases2010–2017

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 8, 2012

Tribunal amended the corporate respondent's name on consent of the parties.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment.

The respondents noted that the corporate respondent was incorrectly named as EDPRO Energy Capital instead of EDPRO Energy Group Inc. Following a Case Assessment Direction, the applicant consented to the name change.

The Tribunal ordered the application and style of cause amended to reflect the correct corporate name.

Kay v. EDPRO Energy Group Inc., 2012 HRTO 1537

Kerri Kitchura

21 cases2003–2016

Erin Hallock

19 cases2012–2017

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 7, 2012

Request to dismiss human rights allegations for delay denied as events constituted a series of incidents.

The respondent requested to dismiss parts of the applicant's human rights application for delay, arguing that allegations prior to June 2010 were untimely.

The applicant alleged discrimination based on disability, sex, sexual orientation, and marital status, claiming a failure to accommodate her workplace injury and differential treatment regarding her same-sex marriage.

The Tribunal found that the events from July 2008 to June 2010 constituted a 'series of incidents' under section 34(1)(b) of the Human Rights Code, as they were sufficiently proximate in time, similar in nature, and involved the same parties.

The respondent's request to dismiss the allegations was denied.

Linda Labao v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2012 HRTO 1529

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 7, 2012

Tribunal orders preliminary hearing on standing and res judicata after mother loses custody in child protection proceedings.

The applicant's mother filed a human rights application on behalf of her infant daughter, alleging discrimination based on creed and family status by a child and family services agency.

The respondents requested deferral pending the outcome of child protection proceedings.

The Tribunal found that since the Ontario Court of Justice had recently granted Crown wardship of the child to the agency and ordered no access to the mother, deferral was no longer appropriate.

However, the Tribunal ordered a preliminary hearing to determine whether the mother still had standing to proceed as litigation guardian and whether the application should be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Code or the doctrines of res judicata and abuse of process.

M.L. v. Kenora-Rainy River Districts Child and Family Services, 2012 HRTO 1535

Roslyn Bachioo

1 case2012–2012

Katherine Cotton

2 cases2012–2013

Ian Werker

18 cases1987–2016

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 3, 2012

Internal workplace investigation is not a 'proceeding' under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondents requested the dismissal of a human rights application under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing that an internal Workplace Discrimination and Harassment Prevention Policy (WDHP) investigation appropriately dealt with the substance of the application.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that an internal investigation does not constitute a 'proceeding' within the meaning of section 45.1.

The Tribunal also scheduled a conference call to address a separate request to dismiss parts of the application for delay under section 34 of the Code.

Armstrong v. Ontario (Revenue), 2012 HRTO 1527

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 3, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond to communications.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of ancestry, disability, and reprisal.

The applicant failed to attend a scheduled mediation and subsequently failed to respond to multiple communications from the Tribunal, including a Case Assessment Direction warning that the application would be deemed abandoned.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Candace Cull v. Ljubica Nedimovic, 2012 HRTO 1523

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 31, 2012

Human rights application dismissed for delay as applicant failed to establish good faith reason.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, claiming she was dismissed in 2010 without notice or severance due to her right hand restrictions.

The application was filed more than two years after the last alleged incident.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for delay.

The applicant argued the delay was justified because she was waiting for the respondent to address her concerns and provide compensation.

The Tribunal found that attempting to seek redress elsewhere does not justify delay and that the applicant failed to meet the onus of showing the delay was incurred in good faith under section 34(2) of the Human Rights Code.

The application was dismissed.

Fisher v. Invest Hotels GPIII Ltd. Comfort Inn Westmont Hospitality, 2012 HRTO 1485

Ryan Goldvine

17 cases2011–2012

James D. Campbell

1 case2012–2012

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 31, 2012

Union granted intervenor status in employee's human rights application regarding religious accommodation.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging the respondent employer failed to accommodate his religious needs by not providing gender-separate break rooms.

The applicant's union requested intervenor status, noting its knowledge of the workplace and a prior grievance settlement.

The respondent opposed the intervention.

The Tribunal granted the union intervenor status, finding it had an interest in the outcome and could assist regarding the terms and conditions of employment.

Said Khalil v. Hellenic Home for the Aged Inc., 2012 HRTO 1464

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 31, 2012

Union granted intervenor status in member's human rights application alleging employment discrimination.

The applicant filed an application alleging employment discrimination on the basis of race, colour, ancestry, ethnic origin, and place of origin.

The applicant's union requested to intervene in the proceeding.

The Tribunal granted the union intervenor status, noting that a union typically has an interest in a human rights application brought by an employee in its bargaining unit.

Neville Hewage v. City of Greater Sudbury, 2012 HRTO 1491

Patrick James

22 cases2010–2022

Evan Schiller

11 cases2010–2025

Carolyn Johnston

12 cases2011–2015

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 25, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent workplace grievances regarding the same discipline.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discriminatory discipline and harassment on the basis of disability following her return from medical leave.

The respondent requested that the Tribunal defer the application because the applicant had also filed four workplace grievances regarding the same incidents of discipline.

Finding significant overlap in the subject matter and a risk of inconsistent findings of fact, the Tribunal deferred the application pending the conclusion of the grievance process.

Wright v. Caressant Care Nursing and Retirement Homes Ltd., 2012 HRTO 1453

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 25, 2012

Human rights application deemed timely where one-year limitation period expired on a weekend followed by a holiday.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discriminatory dismissal.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application was received more than one year after the alleged incident.

The applicant submitted that the one-year deadline fell on a Saturday, and the application was received on the next business day.

The Tribunal applied its Rules of Procedure and the Legislation Act, 2006, finding that because the deadline fell on a weekend followed by a statutory holiday, the time limit was extended to the next business day.

The Tribunal concluded it was not plain and obvious that the application was filed out of time and directed that it be processed.

Glazier v. Ryerson University, 2012 HRTO 1456

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 23, 2012

Tribunal declined to dismiss housing discrimination application at preliminary stage.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal with respect to housing because of disability, claiming a representative of the respondent removed his bicycle from a secured post.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, questioning its jurisdiction.

After receiving the applicant's submissions, the Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the application fell outside its jurisdiction, as the allegations raised Code-related concerns regarding differential treatment and reprisal.

The Tribunal ordered the application to be served on the respondent.

Weigl v. 109 Brien Tenants Association, 2012 HRTO 1421

Michael Horvat

24 cases2000–2023

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 19, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as it was filed outside the one-year limitation period without good faith.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability, claiming he was denied a promotion because his employer feared he would file claims related to a previous workplace injury.

The application was filed approximately 20 months after the last alleged discriminatory event.

The Tribunal found that the application was filed outside the one-year limitation period under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant's explanations for the delay, including his pursuit of a union grievance and mental health issues, did not establish that the delay was incurred in good faith.

The application was dismissed.

Joseph Manimalethu v. Kraft Canada Inc., 2012 HRTO 1406

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 18, 2012

Human rights application reactivated after criminal conviction; deferral not extended for pending appeal.

The applicant requested to reactivate her human rights application, which had been deferred pending the conclusion of a criminal proceeding against the personal respondent.

The personal respondent, having been convicted of sexual assault, requested an extension of the deferral pending his appeal.

The Tribunal denied the request to extend the deferral and reactivated the application, noting that the original criminal proceedings had concluded and there was no clear indication of if or when the appeal would be scheduled.

C.K. v. C[...] Inc., 2012 HRTO 1403

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 18, 2012

Three human rights applications alleging housing discrimination consolidated on consent.

The applicant filed three applications alleging discrimination in housing on the basis of race, colour, and disability against the respondent.

The applications pertained to the same alleged events involving family members.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction regarding consolidation.

As the parties consented, the Tribunal ordered the three applications consolidated to proceed together.

S.R. v. Drewlo Holdings, 2012 HRTO 1410

Page 12 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 12 of 44 (867 cases)

Wade Poziomka

Mark Zega

Ena Chadha

Luigi Pavone v. Navacro Machining Inc., 2012 HRTO 1592

Kecia Podetz

Ena Chadha

Tait v. Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology, 2012 HRTO 1572

James D. Higginson

Andrew C. Bome

Ena Chadha

Osborne v. Eveley International Corp., 2012 HRTO 1573

Paul A. Young

Ena Chadha

Beirnes v. Family & Children’s Services of Waterloo Region, 2012 HRTO 1553

Marni Tolensky

Ena Chadha

Joanne O’Brien v. Toronto Transit Commission and Katherine Castillo, 2012 HRTO 1550

Ena Chadha

Zanobia Chaudhary v. 2063849 Ontario Inc. – Hotel Indigo Toronto Airport and Sim Gill, 2012 HRTO 1538

Lorraine J. Por

Ena Chadha

Kay v. EDPRO Energy Group Inc., 2012 HRTO 1537

Kerri Kitchura

Erin Hallock

Ena Chadha

Linda Labao v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2012 HRTO 1529

Ena Chadha

M.L. v. Kenora-Rainy River Districts Child and Family Services, 2012 HRTO 1535

Roslyn Bachioo

Katherine Cotton

Ian Werker

Ena Chadha

Armstrong v. Ontario (Revenue), 2012 HRTO 1527

Ena Chadha

Candace Cull v. Ljubica Nedimovic, 2012 HRTO 1523

Ena Chadha

Fisher v. Invest Hotels GPIII Ltd. Comfort Inn Westmont Hospitality, 2012 HRTO 1485

Ryan Goldvine

James D. Campbell

Ena Chadha

Said Khalil v. Hellenic Home for the Aged Inc., 2012 HRTO 1464

Ena Chadha

Neville Hewage v. City of Greater Sudbury, 2012 HRTO 1491

Patrick James

Evan Schiller

Carolyn Johnston

Ena Chadha

Wright v. Caressant Care Nursing and Retirement Homes Ltd., 2012 HRTO 1453

Ena Chadha

Glazier v. Ryerson University, 2012 HRTO 1456

Ena Chadha

Weigl v. 109 Brien Tenants Association, 2012 HRTO 1421

Michael Horvat

Ena Chadha

Joseph Manimalethu v. Kraft Canada Inc., 2012 HRTO 1406

Ena Chadha

C.K. v. C[...] Inc., 2012 HRTO 1403

Ena Chadha

S.R. v. Drewlo Holdings, 2012 HRTO 1410

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

for himself

for Jennette Frost

for Manulife Financial

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen