Cathy Braker

The self-represented applicant filed a Request for Review of a Financial Services Tribunal decision regarding the University of Toronto Pension Plan.

Although the applicant missed the filing deadline by a few hours, the Tribunal exercised its discretion to extend the time for filing.

However, the Tribunal dismissed the Request for Review on the merits, finding that the applicant failed to meet the threshold for review.

The applicant merely attempted to reargue issues already decided and did not present any new evidence or arguments that were not reasonably available at the time of the original hearing.

The applicant brought a motion before the Financial Services Tribunal seeking an order to compel the union to respond to 27 interrogatories and produce two documents.

The underlying dispute concerned the applicant's pension entitlements and access to an early retirement window following her dismissal.

The Tribunal dismissed the motion, finding that the majority of the interrogatories related to the applicant's employment grievance rather than the pension issues within the Tribunal's jurisdiction, and thus failed the Monsanto test for arguable relevance.

The remaining interrogatories were either already answered or lacked sufficient particularization.