The applicant moved for a temporary order for spousal support following the breakdown of a 30-year traditional marriage.
The respondent opposed the motion, arguing the applicant suffered no economic disadvantage and failed to mitigate expenses by selling the matrimonial home.
The court found the applicant entitled to support on a non-compensatory and compensatory basis under the Family Law Act.
The court ordered the respondent to pay temporary spousal support at the high end of the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines range ($2,568 per month) until the matrimonial home is sold, after which support will reduce to the mid-range amount ($2,297 per month).
