This appeal concerned the appropriate remedy for a party who deliberately accessed the opposing party's privileged information.
The application judge had struck the appellant's Notice of Appearance, barred them from filing evidence, and ordered the Partition Application to proceed undefended.
The appellant argued that this remedy was unpleaded, unproven, and that lesser remedies were available.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, affirming the application judge's decision.
The court found no error in applying the three-part test for unauthorized access to privileged documents, particularly given the appellant's failure to rebut the presumption of prejudice or propose effective alternative remedies.