The defendant moved to stay an Ontario negligence and contract action arising from alleged defects in industrial thermostats supplied under an international commercial relationship.
The moving party relied on a contractual clause submitting to the jurisdiction of the English courts and argued that Ontario lacked jurisdiction or, alternatively, that England was the clearly more appropriate forum.
Applying the presumptive connecting factors framework, the court held that the alleged torts were committed in Ontario and that Ontario therefore had jurisdiction.
The court further held that the moving party failed to establish forum non conveniens or to show that the English courts should displace the plaintiff's chosen forum.