The appellant mother appealed a consent order implementing the recommendations of a jointly retained assessor for parallel parenting.
She argued the judge failed to consider the children's best interests and that the assessor's investigation was flawed.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding the judge made no error in giving effect to the parties' agreement to be bound by the assessor's recommendations, and the appellant failed to demonstrate any palpable and overriding error in the assessor's factual findings.
