Julie A. Zamprogna

The accused was found not criminally responsible for second-degree murder after killing his mother while experiencing psychotic delusions.

The Ontario Review Board held an initial disposition hearing.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to his schizoaffective disorder, history of non-compliance with treatment, and alcohol use.

The Board ordered a Detention Order at the Southwest Centre for Forensic Mental Health Care with gradual privileges and added a non-association condition regarding certain family members.

The hospital requested an early review hearing for an accused previously found not criminally responsible for arson.

The accused had been living in the community under a Conditional Discharge but recently relapsed into methamphetamine use, lost his employment, and experienced an exacerbation of psychotic symptoms requiring multiple involuntary hospital admissions.

The Ontario Review Board found that the accused represents a significant threat to public safety and that a Detention Order is the necessary and appropriate disposition to manage his risk.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the disposition for an accused found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder.

The parties jointly proposed continuing the Detention Order with modifications, including extended passes, a partial exemption for alcohol and cannabis from the substance abstention clause, and reduced reporting frequency.

The Board found that the accused continues to represent a significant threat to public safety due to his schizoaffective disorder and history of substance-induced decompensation.

However, noting his recent stability, abstinence, and engagement in treatment, the Board adopted the joint submission, concluding that the modified Detention Order is the least onerous and least restrictive disposition necessary to manage his risk.

The accused was found not criminally responsible for failing to comply with release and probation orders, which stemmed from attending his former partner's residence.

The Ontario Review Board held a disposition hearing and found that the accused represents a significant threat to public safety due to schizophrenia and a severe substance use disorder.

The Board ordered a Detention Order with privileges up to community living in approved accommodation, adopting the joint submission of the parties to provide necessary structure and support for his rehabilitation.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the disposition for Rick Duc Lao, who was previously found not criminally responsible for criminal harassment.

Mr. Lao suffers from treatment-resistant schizophrenia and a substance use disorder.

The Board accepted the uncontroverted expert evidence that Mr. Lao lacks insight into his condition, continues to use substances that exacerbate his psychosis, and poses a moderate to high risk of violence.

The Board concluded that Mr. Lao remains a significant threat to public safety and ordered the continuation of his detention order at the forensic hospital.

The Ontario Review Board held an initial hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for assault and uttering threats.

The accused suffers from bipolar disorder and a cannabis use disorder.

The Board found that the accused represents a significant threat to public safety due to the risk of decompensation and violence if he stops taking his medication or resumes substance use.

The Board ordered a Conditional Discharge.

While the parties jointly recommended omitting a substance use abstention clause, the Board rejected this submission, finding that a strict prohibition on intoxicants was necessary to manage the accused's risk and support his reintegration.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review and a Restriction of Liberty hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for robbery and using an imitation firearm.

The accused had been placed in locked seclusion after brandishing a pencil as a weapon and expressing violent intent towards staff while experiencing active psychosis and refusing medication.

The Board found that the initial and ongoing restrictions of liberty were warranted, necessary, and the least restrictive options available.

Relying on uncontroverted expert psychiatric evidence, the Board concluded that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety and ordered the continuation of his Detention Order.

The accused, who was found not criminally responsible for attempted murder, appeared before the Ontario Review Board for an annual disposition review.

The accused suffers from schizophrenia complicated by excited catatonia and a cannabis use disorder.

The Board accepted the joint submission of the parties, supported by the expert evidence of the attending psychiatrist, that the accused remains a significant threat to public safety.

The Board ordered a continued Detention Order with expanded geographical privileges for accompanied community passes to facilitate family visits, noting that the accused is not yet ready for indirectly supervised passes while medication optimization is ongoing.

The Ontario Review Board held a Restriction of Liberties hearing following the accused's readmission to the hospital.

The accused, who was previously living in the community, experienced a deterioration in his mental condition and an escalation in psychotic symptoms linked to crystal methamphetamine use.

The Board found that the readmission constituted a significant increase in the restrictions on his liberty, but concluded that the hospital's actions were warranted and justified to manage his increased risk to public safety.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for assault.

The accused, diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder and a major neurocognitive disorder, had a history of medication non-adherence in the community.

The attending psychiatrist testified that the accused's violent behavior was managed with medication and hospital structure, but he would likely discontinue medication without supervision.

The Board found that the accused continues to represent a significant threat to the safety of the public and ordered that he remain subject to a Detention Order with an added condition restricting his proximity to the victim.

The accused was found unfit to stand trial on charges of dangerous driving causing bodily harm and failing to stop at an accident.

The Ontario Review Board held an initial disposition hearing.

Based on psychiatric evidence, the Board found the accused suffers from a major neurocognitive disorder, rendering him permanently unfit to stand trial.

The Board ordered a Conditional Discharge, requiring the accused to reside at a long-term care facility, and declined to impose abstain or submit clauses regarding alcohol and drugs, finding them unnecessary and overly onerous given his cognitive impairment and historical substance use.

The accused, previously found unfit to stand trial on a charge of attempted murder, appeared before the Ontario Review Board for an annual review.

The Board heard evidence from her attending psychiatrist that she continues to struggle with cognitive deficits and emotional regulation, but that her symptoms may be related to complex trauma rather than a permanent intellectual disability.

The Board found that the accused remains unfit to stand trial, but declined to find her permanently unfit.

The Board ordered that the current detention disposition at the hospital remains necessary and appropriate, with privileges to live in approved accommodation in Ontario.

The accused, previously found not criminally responsible for various offences including robbery with a weapon, was subject to an annual review and a Restriction of Liberty (ROL) hearing.

After a period of residing in the community, the accused's mental status decompensated following a reduction in antipsychotic medication and a return to substance use, leading to her readmission to the hospital.

The Ontario Review Board found that the readmission was warranted and the least restrictive option available.

The Board concluded that the accused continues to represent a significant threat to public safety and ordered the continuation of her Detention Order, with the addition of a clause requiring her to abstain from alcohol and other substances.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition.

The accused, who was found not criminally responsible for break and enter with intent, is currently detained at a forensic mental health centre.

The parties presented a joint submission that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety and that the current detention disposition should continue.

The Board accepted the joint submission, noting the accused's history of violence, substance abuse, and need for a high level of structure and supervision to maintain recent improvements and prevent decompensation.

The Ontario Review Board held a mandatory review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for assault causing bodily harm.

The accused, who has schizophrenia, had been living in a long-term care home and demonstrated improved behaviour and medication adherence, though he continued to experience residual symptoms.

The Board accepted the joint submission that the accused no longer posed a significant threat to public safety, noting his stable living situation, the involvement of a specialized geriatric mental health team, and the availability of the Mental Health Act if future decompensation occurred.

An absolute discharge was granted.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for mischief and failing to comply with a release order.

The accused, diagnosed with schizophrenia, substance use disorder, and an acquired brain injury, had been living in the community under a detention order.

The Board found that the accused continues to represent a significant threat to the safety of the public due to the risk of rapid decompensation and violence if he relapses into substance use.

The Board ordered a continuation of the detention disposition but removed the abstain and residential treatment clauses and reduced reporting requirements to assess his internal motivation to maintain abstinence.

The accused, who was found not criminally responsible for assault, was subject to a detention disposition at a psychiatric hospital.

The hospital significantly restricted his indirectly supervised community privileges after he exhibited intimidating behaviour toward a clinician and engaged in a pattern of inappropriate sexual and interpersonal conduct.

The Ontario Review Board held a restriction of liberty hearing and found that the increased restrictions were necessary and appropriate to manage his risk while the treatment team worked to address his behaviours.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for criminal harassment and other offences.

The accused, who has a history of substance-induced psychosis, had transitioned to less structured housing and remained stable on medication.

The hospital recommended continuing the detention disposition with reduced reporting requirements.

The Board agreed, finding the accused remained a significant threat to public safety and required ongoing support and supervision before independent living or a conditional discharge could be considered.

The accused, previously found not criminally responsible for invitation to sexual touching and break and enter, was subject to a mandatory annual Review Board hearing.

The Board found that the accused continues to represent a significant threat to public safety due to schizoaffective disorder, substance use disorder, and intellectual disability.

However, noting his stability, abstinence, and voluntary hospitalization during a period of stress, the Board ordered a conditional discharge with conditions including residence at an approved group home and abstention from substances.

The accused, previously found not criminally responsible for first-degree murder, was subject to a mandatory annual review hearing before the Ontario Review Board.

The Board found that the accused continues to represent a significant threat to the safety of the public due to his bipolar disorder with psychotic features and the risk of relapse.

The Board ordered a continuation of his detention disposition at the hospital, with expanded privileges to allow for gradual reintegration into his community.