Who is Mary Anne McKellar?

Mary Anne McKellar is a vice-chair at the Ontario Pay Equity Hearings Tribunal with 330 decisions on record from 1992 to 2019. Key areas include employment and labour law, administrative law, human rights.

What tribunal does Mary Anne McKellar sit on?

Mary Anne McKellar has sat on Ontario Pay Equity Hearings Tribunal and Ontario Labour Relations Board and Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Mary Anne McKellar decide?

Mary Anne McKellar's most common areas include Employment and Labour Law (280 decisions), Administrative Law (132 decisions), Human Rights (120 decisions). Mary Anne McKellar has handled 330 decisions across 8 areas.

How many decisions has Mary Anne McKellar made?

Mary Anne McKellar has 330 decisions on record from 1992 to 2019 across 3 tribunals.

Who frequently appears before Mary Anne McKellar?

Representatives who frequently appear before Mary Anne McKellar include William Holder, Sharon Ffolkes Abrahams, William Gale.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Employment and Labour Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Mary Anne McKellar

Vice-Chair·Ontario Pay Equity Hearings Tribunal·Since 1992

OPEHT OLRB HRTO

330

cases · 28 yrs · OPEHT, OLRB, HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-Chair· 73Vice-Chair· 62Chair· 49Vice-Chair· 47Adjudicator· 30Chair· 12Vice-chair· 11Acting Chair· 9

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalJan 16, 2017

Enforcement referral adjourned sine die on joint request of the parties.

The Pay Equity Office referred a matter seeking enforcement of a Review Officer's Order against the Sexual Assault Support Centre of Ottawa.

During a teleconference, the parties jointly requested that the matter be adjourned sine die until September 30, 2017.

The Tribunal granted the request, noting that the matter would be deemed abandoned if no party sought to proceed by that date.

Pay Equity Office v. Sexual Assault Support Centre of Ottawa, 2017 CanLII 1758

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalDec 9, 2016

Review Officer's Order varied to exclude employee who failed to contest employer's release.

The Pay Equity Office referred a Review Officer's Order for enforcement, while the employer applied to object to the Order.

The Tribunal previously dismissed the employer's objection except regarding whether one employee had relinquished her entitlement by executing a release.

As the employee failed to file submissions opposing the employer's position, the Tribunal varied the Order to exclude her from the pay equity adjustments.

The Tribunal also directed a conference call to address the Pay Equity Office's unusual request to adjourn the enforcement application in part and proceed in part.

Pay Equity Office v. Sexual Assault Support Centre of Ottawa, 2016 CanLII 87867

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalAug 24, 2016

Tribunal cancelled pre-hearing conference and directed written submissions regarding employee's release of pay equity entitlement.

The Pay Equity Office referred a Review Officer's Order for enforcement against the Sexual Assault Support Centre of Ottawa.

The Employer objected, arguing one employee had signed a release depriving her of entitlement.

After the Tribunal directed a Pre-Hearing Conference, the Employer provided new information that the employee had not received notice and that it had made or scheduled payments to other employees.

The Tribunal cancelled the Pre-Hearing Conference, directed the Employer to provide written submissions to the employee regarding the release, and directed the Pay Equity Office to advise on how the enforcement application should proceed given the Employer's ongoing compliance efforts.

Pay Equity Office v. Sexual Assault Support Centre of Ottawa, 2016 CanLII 56854

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalJul 15, 2016

Employer directed to make submissions on remedial relief after conceding non-compliance with pay equity order.

The Pay Equity Office referred a Review Officer's Order for enforcement after the employer, Sexual Assault Support Centre of Ottawa, failed to comply.

The employer had previously objected to the Order, but the objection was dismissed except regarding one employee's release.

As the employer conceded non-compliance, the Tribunal directed the employer to make submissions within 10 days regarding the remedial relief sought by the Office.

Pay Equity Office v Sexual Assault Support Centre of Ottawa, 2016 CanLII 45881

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalJul 11, 2016

Applications objecting to pay equity plan consolidated and treated as timely; respondent granted extension to reply.

Three employees filed applications objecting to a pay equity plan ordered by a Review Officer.

The responding party raised an issue regarding the timeliness of two of the applications and requested an extension of time to file its response.

The Tribunal treated all three applications as timely, consolidated them for hearing, and granted the responding party's request for a short extension of time to file a single response.

Nadine Triemstra v The Seguin Public Library Board, 2016 CanLII 44767

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalMay 4, 2016

Applicant directed to file completed Application to pursue pay equity objection or face abandonment.

The applicant filed an objection to an amended pay equity plan with the Pay Equity Office.

The Office advised it would not investigate and that the Tribunal must hold a hearing.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to file a completed Application and Statement of Service by May 19, 2016, failing which her objection would be deemed abandoned.

Nadine Triemstra v The Seguin Public Library Board, 2016 CanLII 26310

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalMay 2, 2016

Application terminated as moot following employer's compliance with Review Officer's order.

The Pay Equity Office referred a matter to the Tribunal asserting that the respondent employer had not complied with a Review Officer's order.

The Office subsequently advised the Tribunal that the employer had complied.

The Tribunal terminated the application as moot.

Pay Equity Office v. 1821372 Ontario Limited o/a The Kennedy Public House, 2016 CanLII 25559

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalApr 13, 2016

Enforcement applications held in abeyance pending disposition of union's applications objecting to pay equity orders.

The Pay Equity Office filed applications to enforce Review Officer orders against various Community Care Access Centres (CCACs) regarding the maintenance of pay equity.

The Ontario Nurses' Association (ONA) subsequently filed applications objecting to the Review Officer's conclusion that the CCACs were not required to negotiate with ONA respecting the steps to maintain pay equity.

ONA requested that the enforcement applications be held in abeyance pending the disposition of the objecting applications.

The Tribunal granted the request, relieving ONA and the CCACs from filing responses to the enforcement applications until directed otherwise.

The Tribunal declined to consolidate the objecting applications but directed that they be listed together for any pre-hearing or hearing.

Pay Equity Office v. South West Community Care Access Centre, 2016 CanLII 21296

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalMar 31, 2016

Tribunal finds employer failed to comply with Review Officer's order after failing to respond.

The Pay Equity Office referred a matter to the Tribunal, asserting that the Employer failed to comply with a Review Officer's Order.

The Employer did not file a response or communicate with the Tribunal.

In the absence of a response, the Tribunal concluded that the Employer had not complied with the Order and directed that an order would be made against the Employer unless submissions were filed by a specified date.

Pay Equity Office v. CS Wind Canada Inc., 2016 CanLII 18499

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalMar 31, 2016

Tribunal finds employer non-compliant with Review Officer's Order after failing to file a response.

The Pay Equity Office referred a matter to the Tribunal asserting that the respondent employer failed to comply with a Review Officer's Order.

The employer failed to file a response by the deadline.

The Tribunal concluded that the employer had not complied with the Order and directed that unless the employer filed submissions by April 8, 2016, an order would be made in the form requested by the applicant.

Pay Equity Office v. 1821372 Ontario Limited o/a The Kennedy Public House, 2016 CanLII 18498

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalMar 11, 2016

Employer ordered to comply with pay equity requirements after failing to respond to Tribunal direction.

The Pay Equity Office referred a matter to the Tribunal under section 24(5) of the Pay Equity Act, alleging the employer failed to comply with a Review Officer's order.

After finding non-compliance in a previous decision and receiving no submissions from the employer, the Tribunal ordered the employer to take specific steps to achieve pay equity, including posting the order, evaluating job classes, calculating adjustments, and paying outstanding amounts with interest.

The Tribunal dismissed the Office's request to confirm the substantive decision, noting it lacked jurisdiction on a referral to do anything other than determine compliance.

Pay Equity Office v Mary-Am Hospitality Corp., 2016 CanLII 13482

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalFeb 24, 2016

Tribunal finds employer non-compliant with Review Officer's order after failing to respond to application.

The Pay Equity Office referred a matter to the Tribunal alleging the Employer failed to comply with a Review Officer's Order.

The Employer failed to file a response by the deadline.

The Tribunal concluded the Employer had not complied and directed that an order would be issued unless the Employer filed submissions by March 3, 2016.

Pay Equity Office v. Mary-Am Hospitality Corp., 2016 CanLII 9864

Proxy pay equity must be maintained, but not by ongoing proxy comparisons.

These applications concerned whether pay equity achieved through proxy pay equity plans in female-dominated long-term care workplaces must be maintained by continued reference to proxy establishments.

The Tribunal held that the Pay Equity Act imposes a maintenance obligation on proxy plans, but that maintenance does not require ongoing monitoring of changes in compensation or job value in the proxy employer’s establishment.

Instead, maintenance is to be carried out internally by monitoring the compensation/value relationship already established for the key and non-key female job classes.

The Tribunal also rejected the section 15 Charter challenge and held that workplace changes affecting job value made the existing $1.50 plans inappropriate absent a negotiated gender-neutral comparison system.

The matter was adjourned for nine months with directions to negotiate an amendment to the plans.

Ontario Nurses' Association v. "Participating Nursing Homes", 2016 CanLII 2675

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalJan 12, 2016

Tribunal directed Pay Equity Office to provide notice of proceedings to an unidentified employee.

The Pay Equity Office referred a matter to the Tribunal alleging the employer failed to comply with a Review Officer's Order.

The employer filed an application objecting to the Order, citing financial inability.

The Tribunal directed the Office to provide an unidentified employee, who was a party to the original complaint, with a copy of the employer's application and a blank Response form, outlining the employee's right to participate anonymously through an agent.

Pay Equity Office v. Sexual Assault Support Centre of Ottawa, 2016 CanLII 1325

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalJan 5, 2016

Pay Equity Office granted intervenor status to address Review Officer's jurisdiction.

The Employer applied under the Pay Equity Act objecting to an Order of a Review Officer, challenging the Review Officer's jurisdiction.

The Pay Equity Office sought to intervene to address the jurisdictional question.

The Tribunal granted the Pay Equity Office intervenor status, limited to addressing the jurisdiction of the Review Officer.

The Corporation of the City of Cambridge v. April Souwand et al., 2016 CanLII 400

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalJan 5, 2016

Extension of time to file response denied; matter referred for hearing on remedy.

The applicant applied to enforce a Review Officer's Order against the responding party.

The responding party failed to file a response within the directed 10-day period and instead sought an unspecified extension of time on the day before the deadline.

The Tribunal declined to grant the extension, noting that without a response, the responding party could not meet its onus to establish compliance with the Order.

The matter was referred to the Registrar to be set down for an expedited hearing to determine the appropriate remedy for non-compliance.

Pay Equity Office v. Norwood Nursing Home Limited, 2016 CanLII 393

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalDec 15, 2015

Tribunal ordered responding party to file response to enforcement application within 10 days.

The Pay Equity Office applied for enforcement of a Review Officer's order against Norwood Nursing Home Limited.

The application had been adjourned sine die before a response was filed.

The Pay Equity Office requested the matter proceed.

The Tribunal ordered the responding party to file its response within 10 working days, failing which the Tribunal would conclude that the order had not been complied with.

Pay Equity Office v Norwood Nursing Home Limited, 2015 CanLII 85527

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalNov 2, 2015

Tribunal grants partial extension of time for filing response absent consent for longer extension.

The responding party trade union requested a three-week extension of time to file its response in order to speak to counsel.

The Pay Equity Hearings Tribunal declined to grant the full extension absent consent from the applicant's counsel, but granted a shorter extension of one week, noting the parties could agree to a further extension on consent.

The Corporation of the City of Cambridge v. April Souwand et al., 2015 CanLII 72241

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalOct 7, 2015

Tribunal directed written submissions on whether the Crown is the employer under the Pay Equity Act.

The applicant sought to identify the Crown in Right of Ontario as the employer of the employees affected by a Review Officer's pay equity orders.

The Crown responded that it was not the employer and that the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction.

The Tribunal directed the parties to file written submissions on the preliminary issue of the impact of section 1.1(1) of the Pay Equity Act and O.Reg. 387/07 on the applications.

Community Living North Perth v. Ontario Public Service Employees Union, Local 226, 2015 CanLII 64713

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalAug 31, 2015

Tribunal directed removal of Pay Equity Office as respondent unless advised otherwise.

The Pay Equity Hearings Tribunal issued a procedural direction regarding the status of the Pay Equity Office as a respondent in two applications.

The Office had been named as a respondent but wrote to the Tribunal suggesting it was not a proper party based on prior jurisprudence.

The Tribunal clarified its expectation that any named respondent who believes they are improperly named must formally request removal.

The Tribunal directed that unless advised otherwise by a specified date, the style of cause would be amended to remove the Office as a respondent, leaving the applicants as the sole parties.

Accor Canada Inc. c.o.b. as Novotel v. Pay Equity Commission, 2015 CanLII 55348

Applicant

Sun Yuen LeungSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel for the Commission

Roger PalacioCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Patricia ConwayCounsel
1 appearance

for 944639 Ontario Limited and John Polizogopoulos

David LanthierCounsel
1 appearance

for Barbara Adams

Senka DukovichCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Mortgage & Housing Corporation

Alan D’SilvaCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Mental Health

Carolyn Kay-AggioCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 1734

Liz CarlisleCounsel
1 appearance
Joe PoitrasCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy LaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Caressant Care Nursing Home

Jennifer PerryCounsel
1 appearance

for Caroline Co-operative Housing Inc.

Bruce CameronCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW and its Local 252

Sukvindor JohlCounsel
1 appearance
Kim BirminghamCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine GilbertCounsel
1 appearance

for CUPE

Cathy LaceCounsel
1 appearance
Brian SheehanCounsel
1 appearance

for Domtar Inc. Forest Resources

Tom MoutsatsosCounsel
1 appearance
Jim RamsayCounsel
1 appearance

for Francis Naraine

Muneshwar DeopaulCounsel
1 appearance

for Helen Henderson Care Centre

Malcolm WinterCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Tracey OdellSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dawn MetsalaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Helen SarlinaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doris JaehnkeSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself and Ashley's Optical

Sandra ElliottSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself and the Respondent, Group of Employees

Mary O’ConnellSelf-represented
2 appearances

for himself

Dr. Indar MaharajSelf-represented
2 appearances
Jeremiah ShellSelf-represented
1 appearance
Alfredo DaSilvaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself and Bargain Optical

Dr. A. R. SebastianSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Larry McGrath

Larry McGrathSelf-represented
1 appearance

for London and District Service Workers Union, Local 183 and 220

Michelle SherwoodUnion representative
1 appearance

for McKesson Canada Corporation, Frank Sedore, Marvin Kalchman, and Joe Varkul

Dan PugenCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance

for Morris A. Hunter Investments Ltd.

Morris A. HunterAgent
1 appearance

for Ontario Northland Employees Independent Union

Debbie GrahamUnion representative
1 appearance
Brian StevensUnion representative
1 appearance
John LangUnion representative
1 appearance

for Ontario Nurses’ Association

Elizabeth McIntyreCounsel
1 appearance
Jan BorowyCounsel
1 appearance

for Participating Nursing Homes

Michael AllenCounsel
1 appearance
Scott RidgewayCounsel
1 appearance
Mary KokosisCounsel
1 appearance

for Rainbow Concrete Industries Ltd., Boris Naneff and Jack Myers

Geoff JeffreyCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union, Local 1

Jennifer QuitoCounsel
1 appearance
Emily DixonCounsel
1 appearance
Mary CornishCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Joseph's Villa

Carole PietteCounsel
1 appearance

for Terex Bartell Limited

Stewart SaxeCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Mary CornishCounsel
3 appearances
Jan BorowyCounsel
2 appearances
Jan FilmanUnion representative
1 appearance
Gail HodgsonCounsel
1 appearance
Sue CaseyAgent
1 appearance
Cathy LaceCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah KahanCounsel
1 appearance
Nadine BlumCounsel
1 appearance
Lorraine BoakeUnion representative
1 appearance
Pierina DeBellisUnion representative
1 appearance
Fran BoyceAgent
1 appearance
Carolyn KayCounsel
1 appearance
Sharyn BriscoeUnion representative
1 appearance
Wallace EastonAgent
1 appearance
Anne DidierCounsel
1 appearance
Ellen ZaunickAgent
1 appearance
Jim HolmesAgent
1 appearance
Lynn HudsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steve LillicoUnion representative
1 appearance
Katherine BarretteUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Samuel RodgersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jacques PerronSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patricia KellyCounsel
1 appearance
Brett ChristenCounsel
1 appearance
Raymond BernickySelf-represented
1 appearance
Glendon RayworthSelf-represented
1 appearance
Greg StuartCounsel
1 appearance
Glen MorrisonAgent
1 appearance
Winston MattisCounsel
1 appearance
Lynn HudsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dale YoumansSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ms. HoglundCounsel
1 appearance
Carmen D. TitusCounsel
1 appearance
Wayne CookSelf-represented
1 appearance
Worrick RussellAgent
1 appearance
Mary CornishCounsel
1 appearance
Carolyn Kay-AggioCounsel
1 appearance
Yaser Al SharifSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ann McNeilSelf-represented
1 appearance
Angela CutulleAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 3009

Cathy LaceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant Caressant Care

Daina GroskaufmanisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant, Pay Equity Office

Carrie GallantCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicants

USW 1998Union representative
1 appearance
Reg VachonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Robert WhitesideSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mickey HurleySelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants Chelsey Park, Helen Henderson and Kensington Village

Malcolm WinterCounsel
1 appearance
Michael AllenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicants in Tribunal Files PE 0626-97; PE 0631-97; and PE 0633-97

Mr. WinterAgent
1 appearance

for the Commission

Ena ChadhaCounsel
2 appearances
Mr. HolderCounsel
2 appearances
Raj DhirCounsel
2 appearances
Brian EyolfsonCounsel
2 appearances
John JudgeCounsel
1 appearance
Roger PalacioCounsel
1 appearance
Cathryn PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth PillonCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Sheena ScottCounsel
2 appearances
Harry KopytoAgent
2 appearances
Leilani FarhaCounsel
2 appearances
Bruce PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Sheilagh TurkingtonCounsel
1 appearance
William S. ChallisCounsel
1 appearance
Bruce PorterAgent
1 appearance
Williams S. ChallisCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl Ann LarrowSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrew PintoCounsel
1 appearance
Robert C. L. WongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul WiseCounsel
1 appearance
Bonnie MacDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bonnie SeguinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Leslie ReaumeCounsel
1 appearance
Lilia HancockSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sun Yuen LeungSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brian KelseyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Peter GeorgakopoulosAgent
3 appearances
Mr. McTavishCounsel
2 appearances
Sarah RimmingtonCounsel
1 appearance
Leilani FarhaCounsel
1 appearance
Bruce PorterAgent
1 appearance

for the Corporate Respondent

Charles RobertsonCounsel
2 appearances
Jenny StephensonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporate Respondent and Personal Respondent

Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Employees

Marilyn WrightSelf-represented
1 appearance

For the Employer and Mr. Norm Guenette

N. GuenetteSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Group of Employees

Judy HodgkinsonCounsel
1 appearance
Kay ValentineCounsel
1 appearance
George VassosCounsel
1 appearance
Madeleine Thibault-SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Sarah KraicerCounsel
1 appearance
Jennifer AugustCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Susan BiggsAgent
1 appearance
Richard AnstrutherCounsel
1 appearance
John RappCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

Ken StuebingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Carolyn KayCounsel
1 appearance
Jacqueline J. LukshaCounsel
1 appearance
Frank CesarioCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

William HolderCounsel
6 appearances
Sharon Ffolkes AbrahamsCounsel
4 appearances
Lisa CirilloCounsel
2 appearances
Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Roger PalacioCounsel
2 appearances
Cathryn PikeCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer ScottCounsel
1 appearance
Cory BoydCounsel
1 appearance
Raj DhirCounsel
1 appearance
Jennifer ServinisCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans-MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance
Sheena ScottCounsel
1 appearance
Sharon Ffolkes-AbrahamsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Nurses' Association

Kim GilletUnion representative
1 appearance
Anne-Marie DeloreyUnion representative
1 appearance
Gloria McIntyreUnion representative
1 appearance
Raymonde BoileauUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Pay Equity Office

Senka DukovichCounsel
1 appearance
Ann PeersCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Ena ChadhaCounsel
1 appearance
Lisa CirilloCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

John HarrisCounsel
1 appearance
Carolyn KayCounsel
1 appearance
David GoreAgent
1 appearance
Marilee MarcotteCounsel
1 appearance
Sharon KellyAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Jeff RooneyAgent
2 appearances
Mike CruseAgent
1 appearance
Victoria ReaumeCounsel
1 appearance
Mary CornishCounsel
1 appearance
Marcelle GoldenbergCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan CockerCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BassCounsel
1 appearance
Shaun O'BrienCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MaeCounsel
1 appearance
Tom SmallCounsel
1 appearance
anes DawesCounsel
1 appearance
Stanley MayesCounsel
1 appearance
Carole E. HoglundCounsel
1 appearance
Larry BishopCounsel
1 appearance
Charles RobertsonCounsel
1 appearance
Paul SchabasCounsel
1 appearance
Jim SimmonsCounsel
1 appearance
Carole HoglundCounsel
1 appearance
Brad BoyceAgent
1 appearance
Susan UrselCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Canadian Union of Public Employees

Carmen HenryAgent
1 appearance
Brian SheehanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent C.A.W., Local 303

Lewis GottheilCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent City of London

James BarberCounsel
1 appearance
Cristin KelleeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent City of Toronto

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dianne Haskett

Kathryn McKerlieCounsel
1 appearance
Scott RitchieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, GL&V Process Equipment Group Inc.

Mark TessierCounsel
1 appearance
Carolyn Kay-AggioCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent New Village Retirement Home/Pine Villa Nursing Home Inc.

Mark J. ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ottawa Police Services Board

David PatacairkCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

William GaleCounsel
4 appearances
Barbara HumphreyCounsel
2 appearances
Mr. JeffreyCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher AndreeCounsel
1 appearance
Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance
Brian D. MulroneyCounsel
1 appearance
Alan PopeCounsel
1 appearance
Jane DawesCounsel
1 appearance
Carole HoglundCounsel
1 appearance
Michael S. RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew AshenhurstCounsel
1 appearance
Ian JohncoxCounsel
1 appearance
Peter IsraelCounsel
1 appearance
Lucy SiraccoCounsel
1 appearance
Kim CogarCounsel
1 appearance
Nancy RamalhoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents General Motors of Canada Ltd. and Pat Cowling

Jason HansonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Service Employees’ International Union, Local 183 and London and District Service Workers’ Union, Local 220

Michelle SherwoodCounsel
1 appearance
Sharon Ffolkes AbrahamsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Civic Employees Union, Local 416 and Dave Hewitt

Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Villa Colombo Homes for the Aged, Inc.

Terry McBurneyAgent
1 appearance
Angela RaeCounsel
1 appearance
Vince LucaAgent
1 appearance

for the responding party

Carolyn KayCounsel
1 appearance
Danny BernsteinCounsel
1 appearance
Arthur BosuaAgent
1 appearance
Val D’SaCounsel
1 appearance
Roy FilionCounsel
1 appearance
Sandy LevinAgent
1 appearance
Trish FultonAgent
1 appearance
Dorothy CammaertCounsel
1 appearance
Adriana HaganAgent
1 appearance
Neil CarruthersCounsel
1 appearance
Angela BradleyAgent
1 appearance
David LazenbyAgent
1 appearance
Mark BlagraveAgent
1 appearance
Patty MaloneAgent
1 appearance
Chris TulleyCounsel
1 appearance
Frank AngelettiCounsel
1 appearance
Bruce RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance
Carolyn Cornford GreavesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Responding Party

Cecil MooreUnion representative
1 appearance
Wally DubinskyUnion representative
1 appearance
R. R. FieldsUnion representative
1 appearance
Alex KeeneyUnion representative
1 appearance
Mark GallinaUnion representative
1 appearance
Al McIntyreUnion representative
1 appearance
David TavaresUnion representative
1 appearance
Bert PoulinUnion representative
1 appearance
Dave DuffusUnion representative
1 appearance
Vince BaileyUnion representative
1 appearance
Gary BoissonneaultUnion representative
1 appearance
Frank McAnallyUnion representative
1 appearance
Bob ByersUnion representative
1 appearance
Wayne GillisUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Township of McGarry

Gary CunningtonAgent
1 appearance
Lauri A. ReesorCounsel
1 appearance
Paul SchwartzmanCounsel
1 appearance

For the Union and Mr. Kerry MacNeil

B. PoulinUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Workers' Compensation Board

Janice BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the York Region Board of Education

Bruce RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance
Colette NemniCounsel
1 appearance
Roy C. FilionCounsel
1 appearance
Laurel JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the York Region Women Teachers' Association and the Ontario Public School Teachers' Federation, York Region District

Lorraine StewartCounsel
2 appearances
Regine BakerCounsel
2 appearances
Fred MayorCounsel
2 appearances
Victoria ReaumeCounsel
2 appearances

for the York Region Women Teachers’ Association and the Ontario Public School Teachers’ Federation, York Region District

Lorraine StewartCounsel
1 appearance
Fred MayorCounsel
1 appearance
Regine BakerCounsel
1 appearance
Victoria ReaumeCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Hydro and T. Bell

Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance

for York Region Board of Education

Colette NemniCounsel
4 appearances
Maria CianiCounsel
3 appearances
Angela RaeCounsel
3 appearances
Roy FilionCounsel
1 appearance
Marketta JokinenCounsel
1 appearance

for York Region Women Teachers' Association and the Ontario Public School Teachers' Federation, York Region District

Pat ClarkeCounsel
1 appearance
Regine BakerCounsel
1 appearance
Fred MayorCounsel
1 appearance
Karen FalkCounsel
1 appearance
Victoria ReaumeCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth ShiltonCounsel
1 appearance
Bev SaskoleyCounsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Mini ChackoSelf-represented
2 appearances
Solange LavenderSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edna AnonuevoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eva DebowskaSelf-represented
1 appearance

on his own behalf

Dr. Indar MaharajSelf-represented
2 appearances
James MoffattSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LeonisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dave FreemanSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

James MoffattSelf-represented
1 appearance
Robert C. L. WongSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Doug McNairAgent
1 appearance
Dave HiseySelf-represented
1 appearance

330

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

1.0

cases/mo

OPEHT149(45%)

OLRB113(34%)

HRTO68(21%)

Decision types

motion

275

trial

appeal

costs

/Adjudicator

Mary Anne McKellar — Vice-Chair

Employment and Labour Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Mary Anne McKellar

Vice-Chair·Ontario Pay Equity Hearings Tribunal·Since 1992

OPEHT OLRB HRTO

330

cases · 28 yrs · OPEHT, OLRB, HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-Chair· 73Vice-Chair· 62Chair· 49Vice-Chair· 47Adjudicator· 30Chair· 12Vice-chair· 11Acting Chair· 9

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalJan 16, 2017

Enforcement referral adjourned sine die on joint request of the parties.

The Pay Equity Office referred a matter seeking enforcement of a Review Officer's Order against the Sexual Assault Support Centre of Ottawa.

During a teleconference, the parties jointly requested that the matter be adjourned sine die until September 30, 2017.

The Tribunal granted the request, noting that the matter would be deemed abandoned if no party sought to proceed by that date.

Pay Equity Office v. Sexual Assault Support Centre of Ottawa, 2017 CanLII 1758

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalDec 9, 2016

Review Officer's Order varied to exclude employee who failed to contest employer's release.

The Pay Equity Office referred a Review Officer's Order for enforcement, while the employer applied to object to the Order.

The Tribunal previously dismissed the employer's objection except regarding whether one employee had relinquished her entitlement by executing a release.

As the employee failed to file submissions opposing the employer's position, the Tribunal varied the Order to exclude her from the pay equity adjustments.

The Tribunal also directed a conference call to address the Pay Equity Office's unusual request to adjourn the enforcement application in part and proceed in part.

Pay Equity Office v. Sexual Assault Support Centre of Ottawa, 2016 CanLII 87867

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalAug 24, 2016

Tribunal cancelled pre-hearing conference and directed written submissions regarding employee's release of pay equity entitlement.

The Pay Equity Office referred a Review Officer's Order for enforcement against the Sexual Assault Support Centre of Ottawa.

The Employer objected, arguing one employee had signed a release depriving her of entitlement.

After the Tribunal directed a Pre-Hearing Conference, the Employer provided new information that the employee had not received notice and that it had made or scheduled payments to other employees.

Pay Equity Office v. Sexual Assault Support Centre of Ottawa, 2016 CanLII 56854

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalJul 15, 2016

Employer directed to make submissions on remedial relief after conceding non-compliance with pay equity order.

The Pay Equity Office referred a Review Officer's Order for enforcement after the employer, Sexual Assault Support Centre of Ottawa, failed to comply.

The employer had previously objected to the Order, but the objection was dismissed except regarding one employee's release.

As the employer conceded non-compliance, the Tribunal directed the employer to make submissions within 10 days regarding the remedial relief sought by the Office.

Pay Equity Office v Sexual Assault Support Centre of Ottawa, 2016 CanLII 45881

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalJul 11, 2016

Applications objecting to pay equity plan consolidated and treated as timely; respondent granted extension to reply.

Three employees filed applications objecting to a pay equity plan ordered by a Review Officer.

The responding party raised an issue regarding the timeliness of two of the applications and requested an extension of time to file its response.

The Tribunal treated all three applications as timely, consolidated them for hearing, and granted the responding party's request for a short extension of time to file a single response.

Nadine Triemstra v The Seguin Public Library Board, 2016 CanLII 44767

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalMay 4, 2016

Applicant directed to file completed Application to pursue pay equity objection or face abandonment.

The applicant filed an objection to an amended pay equity plan with the Pay Equity Office.

The Office advised it would not investigate and that the Tribunal must hold a hearing.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to file a completed Application and Statement of Service by May 19, 2016, failing which her objection would be deemed abandoned.

Nadine Triemstra v The Seguin Public Library Board, 2016 CanLII 26310

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalMay 2, 2016

Application terminated as moot following employer's compliance with Review Officer's order.

The Pay Equity Office referred a matter to the Tribunal asserting that the respondent employer had not complied with a Review Officer's order.

The Office subsequently advised the Tribunal that the employer had complied.

The Tribunal terminated the application as moot.

Pay Equity Office v. 1821372 Ontario Limited o/a The Kennedy Public House, 2016 CanLII 25559

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalApr 13, 2016

Enforcement applications held in abeyance pending disposition of union's applications objecting to pay equity orders.

The Pay Equity Office filed applications to enforce Review Officer orders against various Community Care Access Centres (CCACs) regarding the maintenance of pay equity.

ONA requested that the enforcement applications be held in abeyance pending the disposition of the objecting applications.

The Tribunal granted the request, relieving ONA and the CCACs from filing responses to the enforcement applications until directed otherwise.

The Tribunal declined to consolidate the objecting applications but directed that they be listed together for any pre-hearing or hearing.

Pay Equity Office v. South West Community Care Access Centre, 2016 CanLII 21296

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalMar 31, 2016

Tribunal finds employer failed to comply with Review Officer's order after failing to respond.

The Pay Equity Office referred a matter to the Tribunal, asserting that the Employer failed to comply with a Review Officer's Order.

The Employer did not file a response or communicate with the Tribunal.

Pay Equity Office v. CS Wind Canada Inc., 2016 CanLII 18499

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalMar 31, 2016

Tribunal finds employer non-compliant with Review Officer's Order after failing to file a response.

The Pay Equity Office referred a matter to the Tribunal asserting that the respondent employer failed to comply with a Review Officer's Order.

The employer failed to file a response by the deadline.

Pay Equity Office v. 1821372 Ontario Limited o/a The Kennedy Public House, 2016 CanLII 18498

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalMar 11, 2016

Employer ordered to comply with pay equity requirements after failing to respond to Tribunal direction.

The Pay Equity Office referred a matter to the Tribunal under section 24(5) of the Pay Equity Act, alleging the employer failed to comply with a Review Officer's order.

The Tribunal dismissed the Office's request to confirm the substantive decision, noting it lacked jurisdiction on a referral to do anything other than determine compliance.

Pay Equity Office v Mary-Am Hospitality Corp., 2016 CanLII 13482

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalFeb 24, 2016

Tribunal finds employer non-compliant with Review Officer's order after failing to respond to application.

The Pay Equity Office referred a matter to the Tribunal alleging the Employer failed to comply with a Review Officer's Order.

The Employer failed to file a response by the deadline.

The Tribunal concluded the Employer had not complied and directed that an order would be issued unless the Employer filed submissions by March 3, 2016.

Pay Equity Office v. Mary-Am Hospitality Corp., 2016 CanLII 9864

Scott Ridgeway

In Private Practice1 case2016–2016

Michael Allen

Licence Surrendered - Retired8 cases2000–2020

Mary Kokosis

In Private Practice11 cases2013–2016

Mary Cornish

In Private Practice53 cases1981–2022

Jennifer Quito

Not Practising Law - Employed4 cases2013–2016

Jan Borowy

5 cases2010–2026

Jacqueline J. Luksha

1 case2016–2016

Frank Cesario

In Private Practice126 cases2001–2026

Emily Dixon

1 case2016–2016

Elizabeth McIntyre

27 cases1981–2016

Carolyn Kay

31 cases2004–2026

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

Catherine Bickley

OPEHTUnanimous157 cases2001–2026

Carla Zabek

OPEHTUnanimous0 cases2013–2023

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalJan 21, 2016

Proxy pay equity must be maintained, but not by ongoing proxy comparisons.

Instead, maintenance is to be carried out internally by monitoring the compensation/value relationship already established for the key and non-key female job classes.

The matter was adjourned for nine months with directions to negotiate an amendment to the plans.

Ontario Nurses' Association v. "Participating Nursing Homes", 2016 CanLII 2675

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalJan 12, 2016

Tribunal directed Pay Equity Office to provide notice of proceedings to an unidentified employee.

The Pay Equity Office referred a matter to the Tribunal alleging the employer failed to comply with a Review Officer's Order.

The employer filed an application objecting to the Order, citing financial inability.

Pay Equity Office v. Sexual Assault Support Centre of Ottawa, 2016 CanLII 1325

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalJan 5, 2016

Pay Equity Office granted intervenor status to address Review Officer's jurisdiction.

The Employer applied under the Pay Equity Act objecting to an Order of a Review Officer, challenging the Review Officer's jurisdiction.

The Pay Equity Office sought to intervene to address the jurisdictional question.

The Tribunal granted the Pay Equity Office intervenor status, limited to addressing the jurisdiction of the Review Officer.

The Corporation of the City of Cambridge v. April Souwand et al., 2016 CanLII 400

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalJan 5, 2016

Extension of time to file response denied; matter referred for hearing on remedy.

The applicant applied to enforce a Review Officer's Order against the responding party.

The responding party failed to file a response within the directed 10-day period and instead sought an unspecified extension of time on the day before the deadline.

The Tribunal declined to grant the extension, noting that without a response, the responding party could not meet its onus to establish compliance with the Order.

The matter was referred to the Registrar to be set down for an expedited hearing to determine the appropriate remedy for non-compliance.

Pay Equity Office v. Norwood Nursing Home Limited, 2016 CanLII 393

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalDec 15, 2015

Tribunal ordered responding party to file response to enforcement application within 10 days.

The Pay Equity Office applied for enforcement of a Review Officer's order against Norwood Nursing Home Limited.

The application had been adjourned sine die before a response was filed.

The Pay Equity Office requested the matter proceed.

The Tribunal ordered the responding party to file its response within 10 working days, failing which the Tribunal would conclude that the order had not been complied with.

Pay Equity Office v Norwood Nursing Home Limited, 2015 CanLII 85527

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalNov 2, 2015

Tribunal grants partial extension of time for filing response absent consent for longer extension.

The responding party trade union requested a three-week extension of time to file its response in order to speak to counsel.

The Corporation of the City of Cambridge v. April Souwand et al., 2015 CanLII 72241

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalOct 7, 2015

Tribunal directed written submissions on whether the Crown is the employer under the Pay Equity Act.

The applicant sought to identify the Crown in Right of Ontario as the employer of the employees affected by a Review Officer's pay equity orders.

The Crown responded that it was not the employer and that the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction.

The Tribunal directed the parties to file written submissions on the preliminary issue of the impact of section 1.1(1) of the Pay Equity Act and O.Reg. 387/07 on the applications.

Community Living North Perth v. Ontario Public Service Employees Union, Local 226, 2015 CanLII 64713

Mary Anne McKellar

OPEHT0 cases1992–2019

OPEHTOntario Pay Equity Hearings TribunalAug 31, 2015

Tribunal directed removal of Pay Equity Office as respondent unless advised otherwise.

The Pay Equity Hearings Tribunal issued a procedural direction regarding the status of the Pay Equity Office as a respondent in two applications.

The Office had been named as a respondent but wrote to the Tribunal suggesting it was not a proper party based on prior jurisprudence.

The Tribunal clarified its expectation that any named respondent who believes they are improperly named must formally request removal.

The Tribunal directed that unless advised otherwise by a specified date, the style of cause would be amended to remove the Office as a respondent, leaving the applicants as the sole parties.

Accor Canada Inc. c.o.b. as Novotel v. Pay Equity Commission, 2015 CanLII 55348

Page 2 of 17 (330 cases)

Applicant

Sun Yuen LeungSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel for the Commission

Roger PalacioCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Patricia ConwayCounsel
1 appearance

for 944639 Ontario Limited and John Polizogopoulos

David LanthierCounsel
1 appearance

for Barbara Adams

Senka DukovichCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Mortgage & Housing Corporation

Alan D’SilvaCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Mental Health

Carolyn Kay-AggioCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 1734

Liz CarlisleCounsel
1 appearance
Joe PoitrasCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy LaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Caressant Care Nursing Home

Jennifer PerryCounsel
1 appearance

for Caroline Co-operative Housing Inc.

Bruce CameronCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW and its Local 252

Sukvindor JohlCounsel
1 appearance
Kim BirminghamCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine GilbertCounsel
1 appearance

for CUPE

Cathy LaceCounsel
1 appearance
Brian SheehanCounsel
1 appearance

for Domtar Inc. Forest Resources

Tom MoutsatsosCounsel
1 appearance
Jim RamsayCounsel
1 appearance

for Francis Naraine

Muneshwar DeopaulCounsel
1 appearance

for Helen Henderson Care Centre

Malcolm WinterCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Tracey OdellSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dawn MetsalaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Helen SarlinaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doris JaehnkeSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself and Ashley's Optical

Sandra ElliottSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself and the Respondent, Group of Employees

Mary O’ConnellSelf-represented
2 appearances

for himself

Dr. Indar MaharajSelf-represented
2 appearances
Jeremiah ShellSelf-represented
1 appearance
Alfredo DaSilvaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself and Bargain Optical

Dr. A. R. SebastianSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Larry McGrath

Larry McGrathSelf-represented
1 appearance

for London and District Service Workers Union, Local 183 and 220

Michelle SherwoodUnion representative
1 appearance

for McKesson Canada Corporation, Frank Sedore, Marvin Kalchman, and Joe Varkul

Dan PugenCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance

for Morris A. Hunter Investments Ltd.

Morris A. HunterAgent
1 appearance

for Ontario Northland Employees Independent Union

Debbie GrahamUnion representative
1 appearance
Brian StevensUnion representative
1 appearance
John LangUnion representative
1 appearance

for Ontario Nurses’ Association

Elizabeth McIntyreCounsel
1 appearance
Jan BorowyCounsel
1 appearance

for Participating Nursing Homes

Michael AllenCounsel
1 appearance
Scott RidgewayCounsel
1 appearance
Mary KokosisCounsel
1 appearance

for Rainbow Concrete Industries Ltd., Boris Naneff and Jack Myers

Geoff JeffreyCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union, Local 1

Jennifer QuitoCounsel
1 appearance
Emily DixonCounsel
1 appearance
Mary CornishCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Joseph's Villa

Carole PietteCounsel
1 appearance

for Terex Bartell Limited

Stewart SaxeCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Mary CornishCounsel
3 appearances
Jan BorowyCounsel
2 appearances
Jan FilmanUnion representative
1 appearance
Gail HodgsonCounsel
1 appearance
Sue CaseyAgent
1 appearance
Cathy LaceCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah KahanCounsel
1 appearance
Nadine BlumCounsel
1 appearance
Lorraine BoakeUnion representative
1 appearance
Pierina DeBellisUnion representative
1 appearance
Fran BoyceAgent
1 appearance
Carolyn KayCounsel
1 appearance
Sharyn BriscoeUnion representative
1 appearance
Wallace EastonAgent
1 appearance
Anne DidierCounsel
1 appearance
Ellen ZaunickAgent
1 appearance
Jim HolmesAgent
1 appearance
Lynn HudsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steve LillicoUnion representative
1 appearance
Katherine BarretteUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Samuel RodgersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jacques PerronSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patricia KellyCounsel
1 appearance
Brett ChristenCounsel
1 appearance
Raymond BernickySelf-represented
1 appearance
Glendon RayworthSelf-represented
1 appearance
Greg StuartCounsel
1 appearance
Glen MorrisonAgent
1 appearance
Winston MattisCounsel
1 appearance
Lynn HudsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dale YoumansSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ms. HoglundCounsel
1 appearance
Carmen D. TitusCounsel
1 appearance
Wayne CookSelf-represented
1 appearance
Worrick RussellAgent
1 appearance
Mary CornishCounsel
1 appearance
Carolyn Kay-AggioCounsel
1 appearance
Yaser Al SharifSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ann McNeilSelf-represented
1 appearance
Angela CutulleAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 3009

Cathy LaceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant Caressant Care

Daina GroskaufmanisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant, Pay Equity Office

Carrie GallantCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicants

USW 1998Union representative
1 appearance
Reg VachonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Robert WhitesideSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mickey HurleySelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants Chelsey Park, Helen Henderson and Kensington Village

Malcolm WinterCounsel
1 appearance
Michael AllenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicants in Tribunal Files PE 0626-97; PE 0631-97; and PE 0633-97

Mr. WinterAgent
1 appearance

for the Commission

Ena ChadhaCounsel
2 appearances
Mr. HolderCounsel
2 appearances
Raj DhirCounsel
2 appearances
Brian EyolfsonCounsel
2 appearances
John JudgeCounsel
1 appearance
Roger PalacioCounsel
1 appearance
Cathryn PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth PillonCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Sheena ScottCounsel
2 appearances
Harry KopytoAgent
2 appearances
Leilani FarhaCounsel
2 appearances
Bruce PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Sheilagh TurkingtonCounsel
1 appearance
William S. ChallisCounsel
1 appearance
Bruce PorterAgent
1 appearance
Williams S. ChallisCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl Ann LarrowSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrew PintoCounsel
1 appearance
Robert C. L. WongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul WiseCounsel
1 appearance
Bonnie MacDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bonnie SeguinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Leslie ReaumeCounsel
1 appearance
Lilia HancockSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sun Yuen LeungSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brian KelseyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Peter GeorgakopoulosAgent
3 appearances
Mr. McTavishCounsel
2 appearances
Sarah RimmingtonCounsel
1 appearance
Leilani FarhaCounsel
1 appearance
Bruce PorterAgent
1 appearance

for the Corporate Respondent

Charles RobertsonCounsel
2 appearances
Jenny StephensonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporate Respondent and Personal Respondent

Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Employees

Marilyn WrightSelf-represented
1 appearance

For the Employer and Mr. Norm Guenette

N. GuenetteSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Group of Employees

Judy HodgkinsonCounsel
1 appearance
Kay ValentineCounsel
1 appearance
George VassosCounsel
1 appearance
Madeleine Thibault-SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Sarah KraicerCounsel
1 appearance
Jennifer AugustCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Susan BiggsAgent
1 appearance
Richard AnstrutherCounsel
1 appearance
John RappCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

Ken StuebingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Carolyn KayCounsel
1 appearance
Jacqueline J. LukshaCounsel
1 appearance
Frank CesarioCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

William HolderCounsel
6 appearances
Sharon Ffolkes AbrahamsCounsel
4 appearances
Lisa CirilloCounsel
2 appearances
Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Roger PalacioCounsel
2 appearances
Cathryn PikeCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer ScottCounsel
1 appearance
Cory BoydCounsel
1 appearance
Raj DhirCounsel
1 appearance
Jennifer ServinisCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans-MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance
Sheena ScottCounsel
1 appearance
Sharon Ffolkes-AbrahamsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Nurses' Association

Kim GilletUnion representative
1 appearance
Anne-Marie DeloreyUnion representative
1 appearance
Gloria McIntyreUnion representative
1 appearance
Raymonde BoileauUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Pay Equity Office

Senka DukovichCounsel
1 appearance
Ann PeersCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Ena ChadhaCounsel
1 appearance
Lisa CirilloCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

John HarrisCounsel
1 appearance
Carolyn KayCounsel
1 appearance
David GoreAgent
1 appearance
Marilee MarcotteCounsel
1 appearance
Sharon KellyAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Jeff RooneyAgent
2 appearances
Mike CruseAgent
1 appearance
Victoria ReaumeCounsel
1 appearance
Mary CornishCounsel
1 appearance
Marcelle GoldenbergCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan CockerCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BassCounsel
1 appearance
Shaun O'BrienCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MaeCounsel
1 appearance
Tom SmallCounsel
1 appearance
anes DawesCounsel
1 appearance
Stanley MayesCounsel
1 appearance
Carole E. HoglundCounsel
1 appearance
Larry BishopCounsel
1 appearance
Charles RobertsonCounsel
1 appearance
Paul SchabasCounsel
1 appearance
Jim SimmonsCounsel
1 appearance
Carole HoglundCounsel
1 appearance
Brad BoyceAgent
1 appearance
Susan UrselCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Canadian Union of Public Employees

Carmen HenryAgent
1 appearance
Brian SheehanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent C.A.W., Local 303

Lewis GottheilCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent City of London

James BarberCounsel
1 appearance
Cristin KelleeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent City of Toronto

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dianne Haskett

Kathryn McKerlieCounsel
1 appearance
Scott RitchieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, GL&V Process Equipment Group Inc.

Mark TessierCounsel
1 appearance
Carolyn Kay-AggioCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent New Village Retirement Home/Pine Villa Nursing Home Inc.

Mark J. ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ottawa Police Services Board

David PatacairkCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

William GaleCounsel
4 appearances
Barbara HumphreyCounsel
2 appearances
Mr. JeffreyCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher AndreeCounsel
1 appearance
Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance
Brian D. MulroneyCounsel
1 appearance
Alan PopeCounsel
1 appearance
Jane DawesCounsel
1 appearance
Carole HoglundCounsel
1 appearance
Michael S. RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew AshenhurstCounsel
1 appearance
Ian JohncoxCounsel
1 appearance
Peter IsraelCounsel
1 appearance
Lucy SiraccoCounsel
1 appearance
Kim CogarCounsel
1 appearance
Nancy RamalhoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents General Motors of Canada Ltd. and Pat Cowling

Jason HansonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Service Employees’ International Union, Local 183 and London and District Service Workers’ Union, Local 220

Michelle SherwoodCounsel
1 appearance
Sharon Ffolkes AbrahamsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Civic Employees Union, Local 416 and Dave Hewitt

Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Villa Colombo Homes for the Aged, Inc.

Terry McBurneyAgent
1 appearance
Angela RaeCounsel
1 appearance
Vince LucaAgent
1 appearance

for the responding party

Carolyn KayCounsel
1 appearance
Danny BernsteinCounsel
1 appearance
Arthur BosuaAgent
1 appearance
Val D’SaCounsel
1 appearance
Roy FilionCounsel
1 appearance
Sandy LevinAgent
1 appearance
Trish FultonAgent
1 appearance
Dorothy CammaertCounsel
1 appearance
Adriana HaganAgent
1 appearance
Neil CarruthersCounsel
1 appearance
Angela BradleyAgent
1 appearance
David LazenbyAgent
1 appearance
Mark BlagraveAgent
1 appearance
Patty MaloneAgent
1 appearance
Chris TulleyCounsel
1 appearance
Frank AngelettiCounsel
1 appearance
Bruce RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance
Carolyn Cornford GreavesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Responding Party

Cecil MooreUnion representative
1 appearance
Wally DubinskyUnion representative
1 appearance
R. R. FieldsUnion representative
1 appearance
Alex KeeneyUnion representative
1 appearance
Mark GallinaUnion representative
1 appearance
Al McIntyreUnion representative
1 appearance
David TavaresUnion representative
1 appearance
Bert PoulinUnion representative
1 appearance
Dave DuffusUnion representative
1 appearance
Vince BaileyUnion representative
1 appearance
Gary BoissonneaultUnion representative
1 appearance
Frank McAnallyUnion representative
1 appearance
Bob ByersUnion representative
1 appearance
Wayne GillisUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Township of McGarry

Gary CunningtonAgent
1 appearance
Lauri A. ReesorCounsel
1 appearance
Paul SchwartzmanCounsel
1 appearance

For the Union and Mr. Kerry MacNeil

B. PoulinUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Workers' Compensation Board

Janice BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the York Region Board of Education

Bruce RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance
Colette NemniCounsel
1 appearance
Roy C. FilionCounsel
1 appearance
Laurel JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the York Region Women Teachers' Association and the Ontario Public School Teachers' Federation, York Region District

Lorraine StewartCounsel
2 appearances
Regine BakerCounsel
2 appearances
Fred MayorCounsel
2 appearances
Victoria ReaumeCounsel
2 appearances

for the York Region Women Teachers’ Association and the Ontario Public School Teachers’ Federation, York Region District

Lorraine StewartCounsel
1 appearance
Fred MayorCounsel
1 appearance
Regine BakerCounsel
1 appearance
Victoria ReaumeCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Hydro and T. Bell

Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance

for York Region Board of Education

Colette NemniCounsel
4 appearances
Maria CianiCounsel
3 appearances
Angela RaeCounsel
3 appearances
Roy FilionCounsel
1 appearance
Marketta JokinenCounsel
1 appearance

for York Region Women Teachers' Association and the Ontario Public School Teachers' Federation, York Region District

Pat ClarkeCounsel
1 appearance
Regine BakerCounsel
1 appearance
Fred MayorCounsel
1 appearance
Karen FalkCounsel
1 appearance
Victoria ReaumeCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth ShiltonCounsel
1 appearance
Bev SaskoleyCounsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Mini ChackoSelf-represented
2 appearances
Solange LavenderSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edna AnonuevoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eva DebowskaSelf-represented
1 appearance

on his own behalf

Dr. Indar MaharajSelf-represented
2 appearances
James MoffattSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LeonisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dave FreemanSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

James MoffattSelf-represented
1 appearance
Robert C. L. WongSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Doug McNairAgent
1 appearance
Dave HiseySelf-represented
1 appearance

330

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

1.0

cases/mo

OPEHT149(45%)

OLRB113(34%)

HRTO68(21%)

Decision types

motion

275

trial

appeal

costs

Page 2 of 17 (330 cases)