Who is Leslie Reaume?

Leslie Reaume is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 325 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Leslie Reaume sit on?

Leslie Reaume sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Leslie Reaume decide?

Leslie Reaume's most common areas include Human Rights (325 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (97 decisions), Administrative Law (94 decisions). Leslie Reaume has handled 325 decisions across 8 areas.

How many decisions has Leslie Reaume made?

Leslie Reaume has 325 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Leslie Reaume?

Representatives who frequently appear before Leslie Reaume include David Patacairk, Yavar Hameed, Alexandre Papouchine.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Leslie Reaume — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Real Estate Law

Leslie Reaume

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

325

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 229Adjudicator· 50Vice-chair· 29Adjudicator· 7Vice-Chair· 4Vice-chair· 2Vice-Chair· 2Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 1

David Patacairk

51 cases2009–2017

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 2, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend scheduled hearing.

The applicant failed to attend the scheduled two-day hearing.

After waiting 30 minutes, the adjudicator concluded that the applicant had abandoned the application.

The application was dismissed as abandoned.

Mohamed Yussuf v. Ottawa Police Services Board and Joshua R. Pulfer, 2015 HRTO 249

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 18, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to status inquiry.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code, which was deferred pending the outcome of another proceeding.

The Tribunal issued a Registrar's letter directing the applicant to provide the status of the other proceeding, warning that failure to respond could result in the application being dismissed as abandoned.

The applicant failed to respond within the required time.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Stone v. Direct Energy, 2015 HRTO 215

William D. Anderson

14 cases1996–2019

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 13, 2015

Request to remove individual respondents denied because reprisal allegations raise issues of intent and vicarious liability.

The respondents requested the removal of the individually named respondents from a human rights application alleging workplace reprisal.

The Tribunal denied the request, noting that while individual respondents are routinely removed in discrimination cases where the employer is vicariously liable, allegations of reprisal raise issues of intent that may affect the corporate respondent's deemed or vicarious liability.

Joel Lacoursiere v. Orangeville Police Service, 2015 HRTO 203

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 13, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the application and directed the applicant to respond by a specified date.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Chris Leies v. Latham Pool Products Inc., 2015 HRTO 204

Marisa Scotto di Luzio

14 cases2013–2025

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 10, 2015

Tribunal amends final decision to correct the legal name of the corporate respondent.

The applicant requested an amendment to a final decision to reflect the correct legal name of the corporate respondent, changing 'Impression Bridal Inc.' to 'Impression Bridal Ltd.' The respondent did not file submissions.

The Tribunal granted the request pursuant to its Rules and section 21.1 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, noting the error was inadvertent and the respondent had participated in the hearing without raising the issue.

Kujtim Emra v. Impression Bridal Ltd., 2015 HRTO 185

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 5, 2015

Human rights application dismissed for abandonment after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued two Case Assessment Directions requiring the applicant to respond, warning that failure to do so could result in dismissal for abandonment.

The applicant failed to respond within the specified time.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Bourgeois v. Kumar, 2015 HRTO 173

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 23, 2015

Reconsideration request denied as applicant failed to meet Rule 26.5 criteria and merely reargued case.

The applicant sought reconsideration of a previous decision denying him leave to proceed with nine applications.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to establish any of the criteria under Rule 26.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The applicant's arguments primarily consisted of disagreements with the previous decision and unfounded allegations of bias and evidence tampering.

The request for reconsideration was denied.

Papouchine v. Named Respondents, 2015 HRTO 107

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 22, 2015

Request for reconsideration denied as applicant failed to establish grounds under Rule 26.5.

The applicant sought reconsideration of a previous decision that declared him a vexatious litigant and dismissed his applications for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to establish any of the criteria under Rule 26.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure to warrant reconsideration.

The applicant's request to correct alleged clerical errors was also denied, as the requested changes were substantive disagreements with the Tribunal's findings.

The request for reconsideration was denied.

Papouchine v. Touram L.P., 2015 HRTO 92

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 19, 2015

Request for reconsideration denied as applicant merely sought to reargue the dismissed case.

The applicant sought reconsideration of a previous decision dismissing his human rights application.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's request merely sought to reargue the case and disagreed with the original findings of fact and analysis.

As the applicant failed to establish any of the criteria under Rule 26.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, the request for reconsideration was denied.

Alexander v. Toronto District School Board, 2015 HRTO 72

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as the dispute arose from a federally-regulated employment relationship.

The applicant, a bus driver for OC Transpo, filed an application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability regarding his attempts to secure accommodation through the City of Ottawa's priority placement program.

The respondent challenged the Tribunal's jurisdiction, arguing that OC Transpo is a federal undertaking and its labour relations are governed by federal legislation.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's rights to priority placement were derived from his collective agreement and his ongoing status as an OC Transpo employee.

Consequently, the Tribunal concluded it lacked jurisdiction over the subject-matter and dismissed the application.

Jamal Hassan v. City of Ottawa, 2015 HRTO 71

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 8, 2015

Reconsideration request dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend case management conference call.

The applicant filed a request for reconsideration of a decision dismissing their human rights application for failing to respond to a Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The Tribunal scheduled a case management conference call to hear oral submissions on the reconsideration request.

The applicant failed to attend the call despite receiving notice.

The Tribunal deemed the reconsideration request abandoned and dismissed it.

Doslo v. LIUNA Local 783, 2015 HRTO 25

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 6, 2015

Human rights applications deferred pending outcome of parallel civil action involving same parties and facts.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction to determine whether multiple human rights applications should be deferred pending the outcome of a related civil action involving the same parties.

The civil action involved similar allegations of harassment and defamation, and included a no-communication order that would impede the Tribunal's hearing process.

Finding significant factual overlap and a risk of inconsistent findings, the Tribunal ordered the applications deferred until the conclusion of the civil proceeding.

Murray v. William Mills, 2015 HRTO 20

Denis D. Buchanan

1 case2014–2014

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 30, 2014

Time limit to reactivate deferred application waived due to good faith delay and lack of prejudice.

The applicant filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings to reactivate her human rights application, which had been deferred pending the conclusion of a criminal proceeding.

The respondents opposed the reactivation because the request was filed beyond the 60-day time limit under Rule 14.4.

The Tribunal waived the time limit, finding that the applicant's delay was incurred in good faith as she was unaware the criminal proceeding had concluded, and that the short delay caused no substantial prejudice to the respondents.

The application was reactivated.

Park v. Discount Car and Truck Rentals, 2014 HRTO 1838

Michael Martosh

20 cases2000–2015

Melissa Kronick

19 cases1994–2014

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 3, 2014

Human rights application dismissed under s. 45.1 as allegations were previously resolved in arbitration.

The applicant alleged discrimination and reprisal on the basis of race, colour, and sex in his employment.

The allegations were previously heard and dismissed by an arbitrator following a seven-day hearing.

The Tribunal dismissed the human rights application under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, finding that the substance of the application had been appropriately dealt with in the arbitration process.

Martin v. Toronto (City), 2014 HRTO 1746

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 2, 2014

Application to enforce settlement dismissed; Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to enforce its own orders.

The applicant filed a second Application for Contravention of Settlement, alleging the respondent failed to comply with a previous Tribunal order to pay settlement funds.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, noting that it does not have the authority to enforce its own orders.

Pursuant to section 19 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, the authority to enforce a Tribunal order lies with the Superior Court of Justice.

Malabre v. LMC Endocrinology Centres (Toronto) Ltd., 2014 HRTO 1742

Marisa Scotto di Luzio

14 cases2013–2025

Ford Wong

1 case2014–2014

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 1, 2014

Tribunal awards $58,280 to employee terminated due to anxiety disorder and perceived disability.

The applicant, who suffers from Generalized Anxiety Disorder, alleged he was terminated from his employment because of his disability and perceived disability.

The respondent claimed the applicant voluntarily resigned because he found the job too stressful.

The Tribunal found the applicant's version of events more credible, supported by contemporaneous notes from the Human Rights Legal Support Centre and text messages.

The Tribunal concluded the applicant was terminated and his disability was a factor.

The respondent was ordered to pay $25,000 for injury to dignity, feelings, and self-respect, $33,280 for lost wages, and to implement human rights policies and training.

Emra v. Impression Bridal Ltd., 2014 HRTO 1736

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 20, 2014

Landlord ordered to pay $5,000 for failing to address discriminatory conduct by condominium staff against disabled tenant.

The applicant, a tenant with multiple disabilities, alleged discrimination and reprisal by his landlord regarding housing.

The Tribunal found that the landlord failed to address discriminatory conduct by condominium staff, including threatening to disable the applicant's key fob, demanding unnecessary forms, and refusing to accommodate his need for reasonable notice of inspections.

This conduct breached the applicant's right to equal treatment in accommodation under section 2(1) of the Human Rights Code.

The reprisal allegations were dismissed for lack of evidence.

The Tribunal awarded the applicant $5,000 for injury to dignity, feelings, and self-respect.

Mohit Bali v. Les Madhavji, 2014 HRTO 1683

Amandi Esonwanne

21 cases2009–2023

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 17, 2014

Request for reconsideration of interim decision on timeliness dismissed as the decision was not final.

The respondent requested reconsideration of an interim decision that denied its request to dismiss the application on the basis of timeliness.

The Tribunal held that a decision not to dismiss an application for timeliness is not a final decision, as it does not finally dispose of a claim or issue, determine the real matter in dispute, or dispose of a substantial issue between the parties.

Accordingly, the request for reconsideration was dismissed.

Faye Grange v. City of Toronto, 2014 HRTO 1660

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 10, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Case Assessment Direction.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction requiring the applicant to respond to the respondent's request, warning that failure to do so could result in dismissal for abandonment.

The applicant failed to respond within the required time.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Gustaw v. Miller Waste Systems Inc., 2014 HRTO 1640

Judith C. Sidlofsky Stoffman

1 case2014–2014

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 29, 2014

Human rights applications dismissed for delay and lack of jurisdiction over general unfairness claims.

The applicants filed human rights applications against the Guelph Police Service, an insurance company, and other individuals, alleging discrimination based on race and other grounds during a robbery investigation.

The Tribunal held a teleconference to address jurisdictional and timeliness issues, during which the self-represented applicant behaved inappropriately and hung up.

The Tribunal dismissed the applications against the police service because they were filed outside the one-year limitation period and the delay was not incurred in good faith.

The applications against the remaining respondents were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, as they contained only general allegations of unfairness without a nexus to a prohibited ground of discrimination.

Samir Ibrahim and Yvonne Stafanous v. Guelph Police Service et al., 2014 HRTO 1594

Page 5 of 17 (325 cases)

Applicant

Crystal ParkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Desmond PitterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerald WaiteSelf-represented
1 appearance
I.K.Self-represented
1 appearance
Judith PidgeonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margaret CraigSelf-represented
1 appearance
Nadia CurrieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Nana Kow KuffourSelf-represented
1 appearance
Naser SoufanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rubie Ann ComrieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sohiala KhaksarSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Dianne KellyCounsel
1 appearance
Michele M. WarnerCounsel
1 appearance
Omar ShahabCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Tania Bloomfield, Jonathan Cohen, Davina Blenman, Zoraida Van Ael, Nina Sengupta, Christine MacDonell and Sarah Hicks

Susan UrselCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Daniel GuttmanCounsel
1 appearance
Geoffry BakerCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Toronto District School Board

Gail GeronimoCounsel
1 appearance
Grant BowersCounsel
1 appearance

for Akbar Ali

Akbar AliSelf-represented
1 appearance

for ArcelorMittal Dofasco

Kathryn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for ARCH Legal Clinic

Tess SheldonCounsel
1 appearance

for Audi Mississauga

David AlliCounsel
1 appearance

for CAPREIT

Kristin LeyCounsel
1 appearance

for Eglinton-Bayview Physiotherapy Centre and Toula Reppas

Maria KotsopolousCounsel
1 appearance

for Great-West Life

Jody HechtCounsel
1 appearance

for Hellenic Home for the Aged Inc. and Kosta Kostouros

John D. CampbellCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Revenue and the Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zisser

Roslyn BaichooCounsel
1 appearance

for Houselink Community Homes

Jessica DiFedericoCounsel
1 appearance

for Irmela Murphy and Ottawa-Carleton District School Board

Roger MillsCounsel
1 appearance

for James White

Susan UrselCounsel
1 appearance

for Jean-Pierre Juneau, 2117125 Ontario Inc. o/a Caldwell and Associates Property Management, and Named Individual

David LymanCounsel
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Kevin Dhinsa

Mark LabenskiCounsel
1 appearance

for Lucy Troisi

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Sophia ZaidiCounsel
1 appearance

for Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 971

Mr. AntiaAgent
1 appearance

for Morneau Sheppell Ltd.

Roslyn KoganCounsel
1 appearance

for Niagara Health System, Carl Sebasta

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for Outotec (Canada) Ltd.

Jennifer FantiniCounsel
1 appearance

for Peter Wilson

Sarah ColemanCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods Division of Parrish & Heimbecker Limited, Reg Philips, Tracy Vanness-Brozoska, Craig Shaw and Luc Lacelle

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for Ram Shakyaver

Ram ShakyaverSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Ryan Baker, Brendan Stevenson, Michael Limsiaco, David Russell

Melanie FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Joseph’s Health Centre

Michelle WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for Storm Roll & Coil Repair Limited

Moira WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada

Mei-Mei K. ClarkeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Yavar HameedCounsel
4 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Mohit BaliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Joshua CohenAgent
2 appearances
Desiree DespresSelf-represented
2 appearances
John BartolomeoCounsel
2 appearances
Clayton Talbert Sr.Agent
2 appearances
Judith PidgeonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Samuel AlexanderSelf-represented
2 appearances
Sheryl AbbeySelf-represented
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Jemila MacanovicSelf-represented
2 appearances
D.D.Self-represented
2 appearances
Virginia NelderCounsel
2 appearances
Wayne CookSelf-represented
2 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
2 appearances
Grant HowellAgent
2 appearances
Marisa Scotto di LuzioCounsel
2 appearances
Donna MageeSelf-represented
2 appearances
C.K.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

Mohammad BhattiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Samir IbrahimSelf-represented
1 appearance
Muhammad AlviSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Chief of Police and Toronto Police Service

Ansuya PachaiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Children’s Aid Society of the District of Nipissing and Parry Sound and Kristine Smith

Heather ZuckCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto, Mark Lawson, Ann Ulusoy, Arthur Beauregard, Donna Kovachis, Kathy Wiele and Don Boyle

Amandi EsonwanneCounsel
1 appearance

for the College of Physicians and Surgeons

Carina LentschCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Kikee MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Anthony D. GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Anthony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Nils RiisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Suzan FraserCounsel
2 appearances
Laura TherrienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Asafo AddaiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cecil NormanAgent
1 appearance
Janet HaynesAgent
1 appearance
John HaratsisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kerri JoffeCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie LetherenCounsel
1 appearance
Loralyn BenoitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Munyonzwe HamalengwaCounsel
1 appearance
Peter RosenthalCounsel
1 appearance
Randy SelingerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Reni ChangCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant and for Darlene Hendershott and himself

Mel HendershottSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Complainant/Applicant

Kimberly HealySelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Complainant Chad Aiken

Richard MillerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant Dimeji Temidire

Taiwo OlalereCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants and Applicants

Asha JamesCounsel
1 appearance
Jackie EsmondeCounsel
1 appearance
Julian H. FalconerCounsel
1 appearance

for the District of Nipissing Social Services Administrative Board

Peter E.G. LeckieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Hamilton Police Association

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Hamilton Police Services Board and Chief Mullan

Lynda BordeleauCounsel
1 appearance
David MigicovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual Respondents

Susan UrselCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Matthew ToddCounsel
2 appearances
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Neil KeatingCounsel
1 appearance
Samantha LambCounsel
1 appearance
Steven WelchnerCounsel
1 appearance
Bridgette OsborneCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance

for the James W. Stewart Medicine Professional Corporation and B.A. Demers Medicine Professional Corporation

Jennifer KatsunoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Jean-Jacques Primeau

Dona SalmonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Kelly J. Morgan Psychotherapy/Assessments

Amanda SmallwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Legal Department Paralegal

Chris LafranceAgent
1 appearance

for the North Bay Regional Health Centre

Shane SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Prabhu RajanCounsel
2 appearances
Anthony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance
Raj DhirCounsel
1 appearance
Anthony D. GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent James White

Susan UrselCounsel
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondents

Steven WelchnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondents Peter Wilson and Irmela Murphy

Phuong T.V. NgoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Public Guardian and Trustee

Judie ImCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Patrick BrodeCounsel
3 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Darrell KloezeCounsel
2 appearances
Gordon WoodsCounsel
2 appearances
Laura ClarkCounsel
2 appearances
John Paul ZubecCounsel
2 appearances
Sharon GreeneCounsel
2 appearances
David PatacairkCounsel
2 appearances
Cathy PhanCounsel
2 appearances
Chris DockrillCounsel
2 appearances
Bernd M. RichardtCounsel
1 appearance
Bradley TroupCounsel
1 appearance
Cara GibbonsCounsel
1 appearance
Carol DirksCounsel
1 appearance
Charles GibsonCounsel
1 appearance
Charles V. HofleyCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher LittleCounsel
1 appearance
David J. BannonCounsel
1 appearance
Dennis TousenardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 559185 Ontario Ltd. cob Can Tech Services

Paul LewisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union - Local 1572

Beverley J. BurnsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Intervenor

Jacqueline Dais-ViscaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brockville Professional Firefighters Association

Peter EngelmannCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees

Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent City of Brockville

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent City of Toronto

Matthew LongoCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dan McCaw

Kandace DaviesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Durham Regional Police Services Board

Ian B. JohnstoneCounsel
1 appearance
Angela J. KhouryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Guelph Police Service

Judith C. Sidlofsky StoffmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Minister of Education and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Minister of Training, Colleges and Universities

Kisha ChaterjeeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Finance

Lori PatykCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Ministry of the Attorney General

Tamar FriedmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kely Morgan

Lisa E. HamiltonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Liquor Control Board of Ontario

Justin DiggleCounsel
1 appearance
Lauri ReesorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mental Health Penetanguishene Corporation

Shane SmithCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Mike Del Grande

Melanie FranklynCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada), Local 555

Lewis GottheilCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ottawa-Carleton District School Board

Roger MillsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ottawa Police Services Board

Leanne N. FisherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Stephen BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

David PatacairkCounsel
6 appearances
Roger MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Trevor LawsonCounsel
2 appearances
William D. AndersonCounsel
2 appearances
Meighan Ferris-MilesCounsel
1 appearance
Mireille KhoraychAgent
1 appearance
Nadia LaeequeCounsel
1 appearance
Nicole GodfreyCounsel
1 appearance
Omo AkintanCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Patrick GannonCounsel
1 appearance
Patty MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Paula RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Aero Tek Manufacturing Ltd.Self-represented
1 appearance
Andrew ChungAgent
1 appearance
Carole JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy GeddisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher G. RiggsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents (Browne Complaint)

Kevin McGivneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents City of Mississauga Transportation and Works and MiWay Transit

Graham WalshCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Electrical Fire Safety Authority and Jenn Vautour

David G. CowlingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents (Maynard Complaint)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents McMaster University, Dale Schenk and Peter George

George AvraamCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Peterborough

Alan BarberCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ontario Educational Communications Authority on behalf of the Independent Learning Centre

Jonathan LauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Wollaston Township

Suzanne HuntCounsel
1 appearance

for the Salvation Army

Christine LeBlancCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Workplace Safety Insurance Board Head Office

Greg BullenCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Community Housing Corporation and Winston X

Saira CassimCounsel
1 appearance

for Touram L.P. d.b.a. Air Canada Vacations

Jean-Francois Bisson RossAgent
1 appearance

for Travel Industry Council of Ontario

Tracey McKiernanCounsel
1 appearance

for Trustees of CMHA - Ottawa Branch and Various Individual Respondents

Stephanie DoucetCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada Locals 175 & 633

Catherine DavisCounsel
1 appearance

for Volkswagen Canada and Arthur Bode

Matthew CarrollCounsel
1 appearance

for Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, Mike Shewan

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for Yvonne D’souza

Yvonne D’souzaSelf-represented
1 appearance

Litigation Guardian for the Applicant

Dan DanielAgent
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Sylvia OsvaldSelf-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Lin ZhangSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rivka HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Abdallah KarsiemSelf-represented
1 appearance
Alexander AllarieSelf-represented
1 appearance

On their own behalf

Keith RoubleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Leslie RoubleSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative for the Respondents

Kim FerjoAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

Steve LavenderCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

Denis D. BuchananCounsel
1 appearance

Sarnia Marriott Reservation Centre and Carol Kameka, Marie Frew, John Johnson, Marianne Gibbs, Linda Ryan, Respondents

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Samuel AlexanderSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-Represented

Zenon MacyshynSelf-represented
1 appearance

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, Respondent

Greg BullenCounsel
1 appearance

325

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

2.8

cases/mo

HRTO325(100%)

Decision types

motion

281

trial

Page 5 of 17 (325 cases)

David Patacairk

Leslie Reaume

Mohamed Yussuf v. Ottawa Police Services Board and Joshua R. Pulfer, 2015 HRTO 249

Leslie Reaume

Stone v. Direct Energy, 2015 HRTO 215

William D. Anderson

Leslie Reaume

Joel Lacoursiere v. Orangeville Police Service, 2015 HRTO 203

Leslie Reaume

Chris Leies v. Latham Pool Products Inc., 2015 HRTO 204

Marisa Scotto di Luzio

Leslie Reaume

Kujtim Emra v. Impression Bridal Ltd., 2015 HRTO 185

Leslie Reaume

Bourgeois v. Kumar, 2015 HRTO 173

Leslie Reaume

Papouchine v. Named Respondents, 2015 HRTO 107

Leslie Reaume

Papouchine v. Touram L.P., 2015 HRTO 92

Leslie Reaume

Alexander v. Toronto District School Board, 2015 HRTO 72

Samantha Lamb

Russell MacCrimmon

David Patacairk

Leslie Reaume

Jamal Hassan v. City of Ottawa, 2015 HRTO 71

Leslie Reaume

Doslo v. LIUNA Local 783, 2015 HRTO 25

Leslie Reaume

Murray v. William Mills, 2015 HRTO 20

Denis D. Buchanan

Leslie Reaume

Park v. Discount Car and Truck Rentals, 2014 HRTO 1838

Michael Martosh

Melissa Kronick

Leslie Reaume

Martin v. Toronto (City), 2014 HRTO 1746

Leslie Reaume

Malabre v. LMC Endocrinology Centres (Toronto) Ltd., 2014 HRTO 1742

Marisa Scotto di Luzio

Ford Wong

Leslie Reaume

Emra v. Impression Bridal Ltd., 2014 HRTO 1736

Leslie Reaume

Mohit Bali v. Les Madhavji, 2014 HRTO 1683

Amandi Esonwanne

Leslie Reaume

Faye Grange v. City of Toronto, 2014 HRTO 1660

Leslie Reaume

Gustaw v. Miller Waste Systems Inc., 2014 HRTO 1640

Judith C. Sidlofsky Stoffman

Leslie Reaume

Samir Ibrahim and Yvonne Stafanous v. Guelph Police Service et al., 2014 HRTO 1594

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Tania Bloomfield, Jonathan Cohen, Davina Blenman, Zoraida Van Ael, Nina Sengupta, Christine MacDonell and Sarah Hicks

Counsel for the Commission

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for Toronto District School Board

for Akbar Ali

for ArcelorMittal Dofasco

for ARCH Legal Clinic

for Audi Mississauga

for CAPREIT

for Eglinton-Bayview Physiotherapy Centre and Toula Reppas

for Great-West Life

for Hellenic Home for the Aged Inc. and Kosta Kostouros

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Revenue and the Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zisser

for Houselink Community Homes

for Irmela Murphy and Ottawa-Carleton District School Board

for James White

for Jean-Pierre Juneau, 2117125 Ontario Inc. o/a Caldwell and Associates Property Management, and Named Individual

for Jennette Frost

for Kevin Dhinsa

for Lucy Troisi

for Manulife Financial

for Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 971

for Morneau Sheppell Ltd.

for Niagara Health System, Carl Sebasta

for Outotec (Canada) Ltd.