Who is Leslie Reaume?

Leslie Reaume is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 325 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Leslie Reaume sit on?

Leslie Reaume sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Leslie Reaume decide?

Leslie Reaume's most common areas include Human Rights (325 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (97 decisions), Administrative Law (94 decisions). Leslie Reaume has handled 325 decisions across 8 areas.

How many decisions has Leslie Reaume made?

Leslie Reaume has 325 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Leslie Reaume?

Representatives who frequently appear before Leslie Reaume include David Patacairk, Alexandre Papouchine, Yavar Hameed.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Leslie Reaume — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Real Estate Law

Leslie Reaume

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

325

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 229Adjudicator· 50Vice-chair· 29Adjudicator· 7Vice-Chair· 4Vice-chair· 2Vice-Chair· 2Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 1

James Renaud

9 cases1987–2025

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 24, 2014

Tribunal finds employer discriminated by terminating injured worker shortly after return on modified duties.

The applicant, a lead packer, was injured at work and returned on modified duties.

Shortly after, he was terminated following a customer complaint about a short-shipment that occurred prior to his injury.

The applicant alleged his termination was discriminatory based on his disability.

The Tribunal found that the applicant established a prima facie case of discrimination, as the timing of the termination and the lack of a thorough investigation into the short-shipment suggested his injury was a factor.

The respondent failed to provide a credible, non-discriminatory explanation.

The Tribunal awarded $15,000 for injury to dignity, feelings, and self-respect, three months of lost wages, reimbursement for counselling, and ordered the respondent to undergo human rights training.

Elliott v. Can-Art Aluminum Extrusion Inc., 2014 HRTO 1574

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 21, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Tracey Gowan v. Zehrs, 2014 HRTO 1561

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 10, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the application on the basis that it appeared to be outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Miran Jordanka Ubavka Doslo v. LIUNA Local 783, 2014 HRTO 1522

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 3, 2014

Application dismissed as abandoned after the applicant failed to attend the scheduled summary hearing.

The Tribunal scheduled a summary hearing by conference call to determine if the application should proceed.

Counsel for the respondent attended the teleconference, but the applicant did not.

After waiting 30 minutes in accordance with Tribunal practice, the adjudicator concluded that the applicant had abandoned the application.

The application was dismissed.

Anne Speelman v. Windsor Regional Hospital, 2014 HRTO 1301

Human rights application deferred pending the outcome of the applicant's parallel civil proceeding regarding termination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of age and disability, claiming she was terminated after becoming disabled.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application because the applicant had also commenced a civil proceeding regarding her termination.

The applicant opposed deferral, arguing the civil claim involved distinct legal issues, while the respondent supported deferral.

The Tribunal found significant factual overlap between the two proceedings, particularly regarding the reasons for termination, and ordered the application deferred pending the outcome of the civil proceeding to avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent findings.

Salinas v. Vigour Limited Partnership, 2014 HRTO 1236

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 31, 2014

Leave to proceed with nine applications denied as applicant failed to show they were not vexatious.

The applicant, previously declared a vexatious litigant, sought leave to proceed with nine applications alleging discrimination and reprisal against various respondents, including the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario and the Ontario Human Rights Commission.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to satisfy the onus of explaining why the applications were a legitimate effort to vindicate his rights under the Human Rights Code, rather than an attempt to vex or harass the respondents.

Leave to proceed was denied and the applications were dismissed.

Papouchine v. Named Respondents, 2014 HRTO 1148

Susan Ursel

42 cases1985–2024

Grant Bowers

34 cases1995–2014

Gail Geronimo

18 cases2013–2017

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 21, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as teacher failed to link workplace conflict to his identity.

The applicant, a secondary school teacher and Curriculum Leader, filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal by his colleagues and the school board based on his race, colour, ancestry, place of origin, and ethnic origin.

The applicant claimed he was subjected to a coordinated attack and a poisoned work environment.

After hearing the applicant's evidence in chief, the Tribunal dismissed the application, finding that while there was a serious workplace dispute, the applicant failed to establish a credible link between the adverse treatment he experienced and his identity.

The Tribunal concluded that the applicant's allegations were based on unreliable perceptions, assumptions, and speculations.

Alexander v. Toronto District School Board, 2014 HRTO 1060

George Crossman

1 case2014–2014

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 8, 2014

Summary hearing concludes application has a reasonable prospect of success and will proceed.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of sex, family status, marital status, and reprisal.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing by teleconference to determine whether the application should be dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

After considering the materials and oral submissions, the Tribunal found that it could not conclude there was no reasonable prospect of success, despite the application largely relating to wrongful dismissal.

The application was directed to continue to the next stage in the hearing process.

Jay Csanady v. Ottawa City Street Café Ltd., 2014 HRTO 997

Diane Tsang

1 case2014–2014

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 19, 2014

Human rights application dismissed under s. 45.1 as the substance was already decided by the GSB.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment, claiming he was forced to retire due to the employer's failure to accommodate his disability during a facility closure.

The Tribunal held a preliminary hearing to determine if the application should be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal found that the applicant had previously filed grievances on the exact same issues, which were dismissed by the Grievance Settlement Board.

Concluding that the substance of the application had been appropriately dealt with in the prior proceeding, the Tribunal dismissed the application.

Jordan v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2014 HRTO 905

Patrick Brode

26 cases1985–2023

Matthew Todd

6 cases2012–2023

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 16, 2014

Tribunal dismisses overlapping allegations to prevent re-litigation of issues decided in a related application.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging racial discrimination and reprisal in employment.

Most allegations were previously dismissed for timeliness, leaving four incidents.

Three of these incidents were subsequently addressed and dismissed by the Tribunal in a related application involving a different applicant.

The respondent argued that proceeding with these three allegations would constitute re-litigation.

The Tribunal agreed, dismissing the three overlapping allegations and directing that the application proceed only with respect to the single remaining incident.

Davis v. Windsor (City), 2014 HRTO 880

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 16, 2014

Request for reconsideration of dismissed human rights application denied for failing to meet Rule 26.5 criteria.

The applicant sought reconsideration of a decision dismissing their human rights application regarding a driver's licence suspension.

The original application was dismissed because there was no evidence connecting the suspension, which was for failing to provide medical information, to a prohibited ground under the Code.

The Tribunal denied the request for reconsideration, finding that the applicant merely repeated previous arguments and failed to establish any of the criteria under Rule 26.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

Thiyagarajah v. Ontario (Transportation), 2014 HRTO 878

Yavar Hameed

In Private Practice36 cases2010–2026

Darrell Kloeze

4 cases2010–2014

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 16, 2014

Reconsideration denied; applicant failed to establish criteria under Rule 26.5 and attempted to re-argue original issues.

The applicant sought reconsideration of a decision dismissing her human rights application against the Attorney General of Ontario.

The original application was dismissed because the allegations related to judicial decision-making rather than court administration services.

The Tribunal found that the applicant was attempting to re-argue the same issues and failed to establish any of the criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26.5.

The request for reconsideration was denied.

Pytka v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2014 HRTO 881

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 12, 2014

Request for reconsideration denied as applicant failed to establish criteria under Rule 26.5.

The applicant sought reconsideration of a decision dismissing her human rights application against her employer, individual respondents, and the WSIB.

The original application was dismissed due to delay and because the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to review WSIB decisions.

The applicant argued that the summary hearing was too short and that she had filed documents supporting her allegations.

The Tribunal found that the applicant was merely attempting to re-argue her case and failed to establish any of the criteria under Rule 26.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The request for reconsideration was denied.

Craig v. Sarnia Marriott Reservation Centre, 2014 HRTO 869

Gordon Woods

2 cases2014–2015

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 27, 2014

Summary hearing motion to dismiss human rights application denied; matter requires evidence to resolve.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination with respect to services because of disability, claiming the respondent police service treated her as if she had a mental illness during interactions since 2006.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had no reasonable prospect of success or should be dismissed for delay.

The Tribunal found that, accepting the applicant's allegations as true, the application had a reasonable prospect of success and required evidence to resolve.

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a response to the most recent alleged incident.

Angela Morgan v. Durham Regional Police Service, 2014 HRTO 756

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 5, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend summary hearing.

The applicant failed to attend a scheduled summary hearing by teleconference.

The Tribunal waited 30 minutes, and the applicant did not appear or communicate with the Tribunal.

The application was deemed abandoned and dismissed.

De Lottinville v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2014 HRTO 615

Virginia Nelder

8 cases2009–2014

Naomi Calla

32 cases2009–2017

Amandi Esonwanne

21 cases2009–2023

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 5, 2014

Summary hearing request to dismiss human rights application for timeliness and no reasonable prospect of success denied.

The applicant, a woman of African descent employed by the City of Toronto, filed a human rights application alleging systemic racial and gender discrimination spanning from 2001 to 2010.

The respondents requested a summary hearing to dismiss the application for lack of timeliness and no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal declined to dismiss the application, finding that the allegations constituted a series of incidents, the last of which occurred within the one-year limitation period.

The Tribunal also held that the application had a reasonable prospect of success, as the applicant's allegations, if proven, could establish a culture of systemic discrimination in the workplace.

The matter was directed to mediation or a full hearing on the merits.

Grange v. Toronto (City), 2014 HRTO 633

Tracey McKiernan

1 case2014–2014

Matthew Carroll

2 cases2011–2014

David Alli

1 case2014–2014

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 28, 2014

Human rights applications dismissed for no reasonable prospect of success; applicant declared a vexatious litigant.

The applicant filed multiple human rights applications against various respondents, alleging discrimination on the basis of ancestry, place of origin, and ethnic origin in the provision of goods and services.

The applicant claimed he received poor service because he is East European, Russian, and not of noble birth.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the applications had a reasonable prospect of success and whether the applicant should be declared a vexatious litigant.

The Tribunal dismissed the applications, finding no evidence connecting the respondents' alleged conduct to any prohibited grounds under the Human Rights Code.

Furthermore, the Tribunal declared the applicant a vexatious litigant due to his persistent filing of meritless applications and ordered that he must obtain leave before filing any future applications.

Papouchine v. Touram L.P., 2014 HRTO 588

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 24, 2014

Respondent deemed to have accepted human rights allegations after failing to file a Response.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability and sex.

The respondent failed to file a Response despite multiple directions from the Tribunal.

The Tribunal ordered that the respondent is deemed to have accepted all allegations and waived all rights to notice or participation in the proceedings.

A case management teleconference was scheduled to determine next steps.

Sonja Tyson v. Country Style Food Inc., 2014 HRTO 416

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 13, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) on the basis that the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant was directed to respond but failed to do so by the deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Glover v. Central Marine 2245618 Ontario Inc., 2014 HRTO 350

Kecia Podetz

7 cases2012–2017

Chantal Tie

30 cases2001–2017

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 12, 2014

Request to remove individual respondent dismissed as he allegedly engaged personally in discriminatory conduct.

The respondents requested an order removing the individual respondent from the human rights application.

Applying the factors from Persaud v. Toronto District School Board, the Tribunal found that the individual respondent was alleged to have personally engaged in discrimination by failing to accommodate the applicant, rather than merely acting as an instrument of the corporate respondent.

The Tribunal concluded it may be appropriate to make an order against him personally if an infringement is found.

The request to remove the individual respondent was dismissed.

Mongeon v. D A McLeod Company Ltd., 2014 HRTO 341

Page 6 of 17 (325 cases)

Applicant

Nadia CurrieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margaret CraigSelf-represented
1 appearance
I.K.Self-represented
1 appearance
Sohiala KhaksarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Desmond PitterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Nana Kow KuffourSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rubie Ann ComrieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Crystal ParkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Judith PidgeonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerald WaiteSelf-represented
1 appearance
Naser SoufanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Michele M. WarnerCounsel
1 appearance
Dianne KellyCounsel
1 appearance
Omar ShahabCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Tania Bloomfield, Jonathan Cohen, Davina Blenman, Zoraida Van Ael, Nina Sengupta, Christine MacDonell and Sarah Hicks

Susan UrselCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Daniel GuttmanCounsel
1 appearance
Geoffry BakerCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
1 appearance
Gail GeronimoCounsel
1 appearance

for Akbar Ali

Akbar AliSelf-represented
1 appearance

for ArcelorMittal Dofasco

Kathryn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for ARCH Legal Clinic

Tess SheldonCounsel
1 appearance

for Audi Mississauga

David AlliCounsel
1 appearance

for CAPREIT

Kristin LeyCounsel
1 appearance

for Eglinton-Bayview Physiotherapy Centre and Toula Reppas

Maria KotsopolousCounsel
1 appearance

for Great-West Life

Jody HechtCounsel
1 appearance

for Hellenic Home for the Aged Inc. and Kosta Kostouros

John D. CampbellCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Revenue and the Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zisser

Roslyn BaichooCounsel
1 appearance

for Houselink Community Homes

Jessica DiFedericoCounsel
1 appearance

for Irmela Murphy and Ottawa-Carleton District School Board

Roger MillsCounsel
1 appearance

for James White

Susan UrselCounsel
1 appearance

for Jean-Pierre Juneau, 2117125 Ontario Inc. o/a Caldwell and Associates Property Management, and Named Individual

David LymanCounsel
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Kevin Dhinsa

Mark LabenskiCounsel
1 appearance

for Lucy Troisi

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Sophia ZaidiCounsel
1 appearance

for Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 971

Mr. AntiaAgent
1 appearance

for Morneau Sheppell Ltd.

Roslyn KoganCounsel
1 appearance

for Niagara Health System, Carl Sebasta

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for Outotec (Canada) Ltd.

Jennifer FantiniCounsel
1 appearance

for Peter Wilson

Sarah ColemanCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods Division of Parrish & Heimbecker Limited, Reg Philips, Tracy Vanness-Brozoska, Craig Shaw and Luc Lacelle

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for Ram Shakyaver

Ram ShakyaverSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Ryan Baker, Brendan Stevenson, Michael Limsiaco, David Russell

Melanie FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Joseph’s Health Centre

Michelle WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for Storm Roll & Coil Repair Limited

Moira WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada

Mei-Mei K. ClarkeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Yavar HameedCounsel
4 appearances
Wayne CookSelf-represented
2 appearances
Joshua CohenAgent
2 appearances
D.D.Self-represented
2 appearances
Jemila MacanovicSelf-represented
2 appearances
Sheryl AbbeySelf-represented
2 appearances
Donna MageeSelf-represented
2 appearances
Desiree DespresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Marisa Scotto di LuzioCounsel
2 appearances
Samuel AlexanderSelf-represented
2 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
2 appearances
Clayton Talbert Sr.Agent
2 appearances
Virginia NelderCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
John BartolomeoCounsel
2 appearances
Grant HowellAgent
2 appearances
Mohit BaliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith PidgeonSelf-represented
2 appearances
David BloomCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicants

Mohammad BhattiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Samir IbrahimSelf-represented
1 appearance
Muhammad AlviSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Chief of Police and Toronto Police Service

Ansuya PachaiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Children’s Aid Society of the District of Nipissing and Parry Sound and Kristine Smith

Heather ZuckCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto, Mark Lawson, Ann Ulusoy, Arthur Beauregard, Donna Kovachis, Kathy Wiele and Don Boyle

Amandi EsonwanneCounsel
1 appearance

for the College of Physicians and Surgeons

Carina LentschCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Kikee MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Anthony D. GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Anthony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Nils RiisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Suzan FraserCounsel
2 appearances
Peter RosenthalCounsel
1 appearance
Reni ChangCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie LetherenCounsel
1 appearance
Laura TherrienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kerri JoffeCounsel
1 appearance
Janet HaynesAgent
1 appearance
Munyonzwe HamalengwaCounsel
1 appearance
John HaratsisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randy SelingerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Loralyn BenoitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cecil NormanAgent
1 appearance
Asafo AddaiSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Complainant and for Darlene Hendershott and himself

Mel HendershottSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Complainant/Applicant

Kimberly HealySelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Complainant Chad Aiken

Richard MillerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant Dimeji Temidire

Taiwo OlalereCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants and Applicants

Julian H. FalconerCounsel
1 appearance
Jackie EsmondeCounsel
1 appearance
Asha JamesCounsel
1 appearance

for the District of Nipissing Social Services Administrative Board

Peter E.G. LeckieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Hamilton Police Association

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Hamilton Police Services Board and Chief Mullan

Lynda BordeleauCounsel
1 appearance
David MigicovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual Respondents

Susan UrselCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Matthew ToddCounsel
2 appearances
Steven WelchnerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Neil KeatingCounsel
1 appearance
Samantha LambCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Bridgette OsborneCounsel
1 appearance
Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the James W. Stewart Medicine Professional Corporation and B.A. Demers Medicine Professional Corporation

Jennifer KatsunoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Jean-Jacques Primeau

Dona SalmonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Kelly J. Morgan Psychotherapy/Assessments

Amanda SmallwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Legal Department Paralegal

Chris LafranceAgent
1 appearance

for the North Bay Regional Health Centre

Shane SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Prabhu RajanCounsel
2 appearances
Raj DhirCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Anthony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Anthony D. GriffinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent James White

Susan UrselCounsel
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondents

Steven WelchnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondents Peter Wilson and Irmela Murphy

Phuong T.V. NgoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Public Guardian and Trustee

Judie ImCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Patrick BrodeCounsel
3 appearances
Sharon GreeneCounsel
2 appearances
Darrell KloezeCounsel
2 appearances
Gordon WoodsCounsel
2 appearances
David PatacairkCounsel
2 appearances
John Paul ZubecCounsel
2 appearances
Cathy PhanCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Chris DockrillCounsel
2 appearances
Laura ClarkCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
2 appearances
Todd WeisbergCounsel
1 appearance
William RobinsonCounsel
1 appearance
The Ethiopian Emergency Mutual Relief Association of Toronto Inc.Self-represented
1 appearance
Iain AspenliederCounsel
1 appearance
Suzanne GautreauAgent
1 appearance
A. AdamCounsel
1 appearance
Roger MillsCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance
Matthew DemeoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 559185 Ontario Ltd. cob Can Tech Services

Paul LewisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union - Local 1572

Beverley J. BurnsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Intervenor

Jacqueline Dais-ViscaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brockville Professional Firefighters Association

Peter EngelmannCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees

Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent City of Brockville

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent City of Toronto

Matthew LongoCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dan McCaw

Kandace DaviesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Durham Regional Police Services Board

Angela J. KhouryCounsel
1 appearance
Ian B. JohnstoneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Guelph Police Service

Judith C. Sidlofsky StoffmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Minister of Education and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Minister of Training, Colleges and Universities

Kisha ChaterjeeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Finance

Lori PatykCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Ministry of the Attorney General

Tamar FriedmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kely Morgan

Lisa E. HamiltonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Liquor Control Board of Ontario

Lauri ReesorCounsel
1 appearance
Justin DiggleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mental Health Penetanguishene Corporation

Shane SmithCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Mike Del Grande

Melanie FranklynCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada), Local 555

Lewis GottheilCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ottawa-Carleton District School Board

Roger MillsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ottawa Police Services Board

Leanne N. FisherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Stephen BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

David PatacairkCounsel
6 appearances
William D. AndersonCounsel
2 appearances
Trevor LawsonCounsel
2 appearances
Roger MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Patty MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Gary BoydCounsel
1 appearance
Nicole GodfreyCounsel
1 appearance
Marnie TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Mary KokosisAgent
1 appearance
Paula YudkovitchCounsel
1 appearance
Gail GeronimoCounsel
1 appearance
Stephane PerreaultCounsel
1 appearance
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
1 appearance
Kara SmithCounsel
1 appearance
Kecia PodetzCounsel
1 appearance
David ElenbaasCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher G. RiggsCounsel
1 appearance
Danesh RanaCounsel
1 appearance
Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents (Browne Complaint)

Kevin McGivneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents City of Mississauga Transportation and Works and MiWay Transit

Graham WalshCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Electrical Fire Safety Authority and Jenn Vautour

David G. CowlingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents (Maynard Complaint)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents McMaster University, Dale Schenk and Peter George

George AvraamCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Peterborough

Alan BarberCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ontario Educational Communications Authority on behalf of the Independent Learning Centre

Jonathan LauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Wollaston Township

Suzanne HuntCounsel
1 appearance

for the Salvation Army

Christine LeBlancCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Workplace Safety Insurance Board Head Office

Greg BullenCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Community Housing Corporation and Winston X

Saira CassimCounsel
1 appearance

for Touram L.P. d.b.a. Air Canada Vacations

Jean-Francois Bisson RossAgent
1 appearance

for Travel Industry Council of Ontario

Tracey McKiernanCounsel
1 appearance

for Trustees of CMHA - Ottawa Branch and Various Individual Respondents

Stephanie DoucetCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada Locals 175 & 633

Catherine DavisCounsel
1 appearance

for Volkswagen Canada and Arthur Bode

Matthew CarrollCounsel
1 appearance

for Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, Mike Shewan

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for Yvonne D’souza

Yvonne D’souzaSelf-represented
1 appearance

Litigation Guardian for the Applicant

Dan DanielAgent
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Sylvia OsvaldSelf-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Rivka HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lin ZhangSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Alexander AllarieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Abdallah KarsiemSelf-represented
1 appearance

On their own behalf

Keith RoubleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Leslie RoubleSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative for the Respondents

Kim FerjoAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

Steve LavenderCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

Denis D. BuchananCounsel
1 appearance

Sarnia Marriott Reservation Centre and Carol Kameka, Marie Frew, John Johnson, Marianne Gibbs, Linda Ryan, Respondents

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Samuel AlexanderSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-Represented

Zenon MacyshynSelf-represented
1 appearance

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, Respondent

Greg BullenCounsel
1 appearance

325

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

2.8

cases/mo

HRTO325(100%)

Decision types

motion

281

trial

Page 6 of 17 (325 cases)

James Renaud

Leslie Reaume

Elliott v. Can-Art Aluminum Extrusion Inc., 2014 HRTO 1574

Leslie Reaume

Tracey Gowan v. Zehrs, 2014 HRTO 1561

Leslie Reaume

Miran Jordanka Ubavka Doslo v. LIUNA Local 783, 2014 HRTO 1522

Leslie Reaume

Anne Speelman v. Windsor Regional Hospital, 2014 HRTO 1301

Todd Weisberg

Marvin A. Gorodensky

Leslie Reaume

Salinas v. Vigour Limited Partnership, 2014 HRTO 1236

Leslie Reaume

Papouchine v. Named Respondents, 2014 HRTO 1148

Susan Ursel

Grant Bowers

Gail Geronimo

Leslie Reaume

Alexander v. Toronto District School Board, 2014 HRTO 1060

George Crossman

Leslie Reaume

Jay Csanady v. Ottawa City Street Café Ltd., 2014 HRTO 997

Diane Tsang

Leslie Reaume

Jordan v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2014 HRTO 905

Patrick Brode

Matthew Todd

Leslie Reaume

Davis v. Windsor (City), 2014 HRTO 880

Leslie Reaume

Thiyagarajah v. Ontario (Transportation), 2014 HRTO 878

Yavar Hameed

Darrell Kloeze

Leslie Reaume

Pytka v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2014 HRTO 881

Leslie Reaume

Craig v. Sarnia Marriott Reservation Centre, 2014 HRTO 869

Gordon Woods

Leslie Reaume

Angela Morgan v. Durham Regional Police Service, 2014 HRTO 756

Leslie Reaume

De Lottinville v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2014 HRTO 615

Virginia Nelder

Naomi Calla

Amandi Esonwanne

Leslie Reaume

Grange v. Toronto (City), 2014 HRTO 633

Tracey McKiernan

Matthew Carroll

David Alli

Leslie Reaume

Papouchine v. Touram L.P., 2014 HRTO 588

Leslie Reaume

Sonja Tyson v. Country Style Food Inc., 2014 HRTO 416

Leslie Reaume

Glover v. Central Marine 2245618 Ontario Inc., 2014 HRTO 350

Kecia Podetz

Chantal Tie

Leslie Reaume

Mongeon v. D A McLeod Company Ltd., 2014 HRTO 341

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Tania Bloomfield, Jonathan Cohen, Davina Blenman, Zoraida Van Ael, Nina Sengupta, Christine MacDonell and Sarah Hicks

Counsel for the Commission

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for Toronto District School Board

for Akbar Ali

for ArcelorMittal Dofasco

for ARCH Legal Clinic

for Audi Mississauga

for CAPREIT

for Eglinton-Bayview Physiotherapy Centre and Toula Reppas

for Great-West Life

for Hellenic Home for the Aged Inc. and Kosta Kostouros

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Revenue and the Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zisser

for Houselink Community Homes

for Irmela Murphy and Ottawa-Carleton District School Board

for James White

for Jean-Pierre Juneau, 2117125 Ontario Inc. o/a Caldwell and Associates Property Management, and Named Individual