Who is Geneviève Debané?

Geneviève Debané is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 487 decisions on record from 2011 to 2016. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Geneviève Debané sit on?

Geneviève Debané sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Geneviève Debané decide?

Geneviève Debané's most common areas include Human Rights (487 decisions), Administrative Law (164 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (138 decisions). Geneviève Debané has handled 487 decisions across 8 areas.

How many decisions has Geneviève Debané made?

Geneviève Debané has 487 decisions on record from 2011 to 2016.

Who frequently appears before Geneviève Debané?

Representatives who frequently appear before Geneviève Debané include Self-represented, Mafario Amicucci, Nepthys Aberdeen.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Geneviève Debané — Vice-chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Workers' Compensation

Geneviève Debané

Vice-chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2011

487

cases · 6 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 386Adjudicator· 48Vice-chair· 24Vice-présidente· 23Adjudicator· 3Arbitre· 1

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 6, 2013

Human rights application dismissed at preliminary stage for failing to link allegations to protected grounds.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment based on race and record of offences after failing a questionnaire at a placement agency and subsequently being served with a Notice of Trespass.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction requesting submissions on how the allegations linked to the protected grounds.

Finding no submissions linking the events to race or record of offences, the Tribunal dismissed the application at the preliminary stage, concluding it was plain and obvious that the matter fell outside its jurisdiction.

Benito Zeppieri v. Labour Ready {Dependable Temporary Labour}, 2013 HRTO 386

Kathleen DeBlock Boersma

5 cases2013–2023

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 6, 2013

Notice of Intent to Dismiss withdrawn after applicant clarified allegations of sex discrimination.

The Registrar issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application for lack of jurisdiction, as it did not set out specific incidents of alleged discrimination related to a Code ground.

In response, the applicant alleged discrimination and harassment on the basis of sex.

The Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the Application fell outside its jurisdiction and declined to dismiss it at this stage, directing that the Application be delivered to the respondents.

Susan Duvall v. Manpower, Listowel Technology Inc. and BTE - Assembly Ltd., 2013 HRTO 363

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 5, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to jurisdictional notice.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss on the basis that the application did not appear to be within its jurisdiction, directing the applicant to provide written submissions.

The applicant failed to provide submissions by the deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Allison Osborne v. Threadcount Textile & Design aka Cesaer`s Fabrics, 2013 HRTO 377

Patricia Murray

26 cases1997–2017

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 1, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend summary hearing.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

A summary hearing was scheduled to determine if the application had no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant failed to attend the teleconference hearing without explanation.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Donna Truax v. Midland Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 354

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 28, 2013

Human rights application dismissed at summary hearing for lacking evidence linking termination to prohibited grounds.

The applicant, a Registered Practical Nurse, alleged discrimination on the basis of race, colour, ancestry, place of origin, and ethnic origin following her termination.

The employer terminated her employment after an incident with a child client and subsequent allegations of falsified documentation.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing and dismissed the application, finding no reasonable prospect of success as the applicant failed to propose any evidence linking her treatment to a prohibited ground under the Code.

Elrington v. Saint Elizabeth Health Care, 2013 HRTO 348

Raj Anand

54 cases1981–2017

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 11, 2013

Tribunal orders partial production of police notes and denies respondents' last-minute adjournment request.

The applicant brought a human rights application against a police services board and individual officers.

In this interim decision, the Tribunal addressed the applicant's request for production of documents and the respondents' request for an adjournment.

The Tribunal ordered the production of specific police notes and chain of custody documents relevant to the applicant's arrests, but denied requests for documents based on speculative allegations of conspiracy and collusion.

The Tribunal also denied the respondents' request to adjourn the hearing, finding that retaining new counsel who was unavailable for the scheduled dates did not constitute exceptional circumstances.

Amicucci v. York Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 242

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 6, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned due to applicant's failure to comply with Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction requiring the applicant to deliver and file hearing materials by a specified date.

The applicant failed to comply with the direction and did not communicate with the Tribunal.

The Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned and cancelled the scheduled hearing.

Nathaniel Misurka v. Spinrite LP, 2013 HRTO 217

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 5, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned due to applicant's failure to comply with Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction requiring the applicant to deliver and file documents and a witness list.

The applicant failed to comply with the directions and did not communicate with the Tribunal.

The Tribunal found that the applicant had abandoned the application and dismissed it.

April Dougherty v. Stream Global Services, 2013 HRTO 206

Sari Springer

31 cases1993–2017

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 25, 2013

Human rights application dismissed; campus police arrest of student was appropriate and not discriminatory.

The applicant, a university student, alleged discrimination and reprisal on the basis of sex, race, ethnic origin, and disability after an incident where she disputed a grade.

She refused to leave a professor's office, tore up her paper, and was subsequently arrested by campus police.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's perception of events was likely affected by a reduction in her psychiatric medication.

The Tribunal concluded that the respondent's actions, including calling campus police and arresting the applicant, were appropriate responses to her uncooperative and aggressive behaviour, and were not motivated by discrimination.

The application was dismissed.

Aberdeen v. Governing Council of the University of Toronto, 2013 HRTO 138

Tribunal removes individual union and employer representatives as personal respondents from human rights application.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal against her employer, her union, and several individual respondents.

The respondents requested the removal of the named personal respondents.

The applicant consented to the removal of the employer's personal respondents but opposed the removal of the union representatives, though she provided no written submissions.

Applying the Persaud factors, the Tribunal found no compelling reason to keep the union representatives as personal respondents, as the core allegations concerned their failure to properly address her workplace issues on behalf of the union.

The Tribunal ordered all personal respondents removed from the proceeding.

Benson v. Chrysler Canada Inc., 2013 HRTO 94

Nini Jones

23 cases2000–2025

Andrew Morrison

In Private Practice9 cases2013–2025

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 10, 2013

Adjournment of summary hearing granted due to sudden withdrawal of applicant's counsel.

The applicant requested an adjournment of a scheduled summary hearing after his counsel withdrew from the case on short notice.

The respondent consented to the request.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's sudden lack of representation constituted exceptional circumstances under its Practice Direction and granted the adjournment.

Hassell v. Ontario Public Service Employees Union, 2013 HRTO 48

Samantha Lamb

7 cases2013–2022

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 10, 2013

Union granted intervenor status; issue of privilege over communications deferred to preliminary hearing.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondent employer.

The applicant's bargaining agent requested intervenor status, which the Tribunal granted as its interests were engaged.

The union also sought directions regarding responding to allegations, claiming privilege over its communications with the applicant.

The Tribunal deferred the issue of privilege to the upcoming preliminary hearing, noting it was unclear if the allegations were relevant to the preliminary issues.

René Laviolette v. City of Ottawa, 2013 HRTO 42

Stephen Maio

21 cases2009–2017

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 9, 2013

Tribunal denies removal of personal police respondents and allows addition of another officer.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination, harassment, and reprisal by police officers during and after an arrest.

The respondents requested the removal of two personal respondents, arguing the police board accepted vicarious liability.

The applicant requested to add a third officer as a personal respondent and sought document production.

The Tribunal denied the request to remove the personal respondents, finding their alleged conduct central to the application and potentially subject to individual remedies.

The Tribunal granted the request to add the third officer and ordered the respondents to address outstanding production issues and specific allegations.

Amicucci v. York Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 34

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 20, 2012

Applicant's unopposed request to amend remedies sought in human rights application granted.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on age and sex, specifically sexual harassment by a patron.

Prior to the hearing, the applicant brought a Request for an Order During Proceedings to amend the remedies sought in the Application.

The respondent did not oppose the request.

The Tribunal granted the request, finding it was brought in a timely manner, would not delay proceedings, and would not prejudice the respondent.

Taylor v. SMG Canada ULC, 2012 HRTO 2349

Marianne Craig

5 cases2012–2016

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 13, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as an abuse of process due to a validly executed release.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal after her employment was terminated.

The respondents sought to dismiss the application on the basis that the applicant had signed a Full and Final Release upon termination.

The applicant argued she signed the release under duress and did not understand its significance.

The Tribunal found no evidence of duress, noting the applicant had the opportunity to read the release and subsequently cashed the settlement cheques.

The Tribunal held that proceeding with the application would be an abuse of process and dismissed it.

Assivero v. 1693238 Ontario Inc., 2012 HRTO 2344

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 7, 2012

Medical notes containing spouse's information ordered redacted before disclosure to respondent.

In an application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability, the parties agreed to have the adjudicator review the applicant's family doctor's notes to determine their relevance for production.

The adjudicator found that a portion of the notes erroneously contained the medical assessment of the applicant's spouse.

The adjudicator ordered that the irrelevant portion relating to the spouse be redacted and the remainder of the notes be disclosed to the respondent.

Qin Chen v. Midland Food Products Inc., 2012 HRTO 2309

Kendal McKinney

5 cases2011–2015

Gurjit Brar

65 cases2005–2015

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 7, 2012

Summary hearing request to dismiss age discrimination application denied due to credibility issues requiring full hearing.

The applicant alleged age discrimination after she was unsuccessful in obtaining a Work Transition Specialist position with the respondent, despite having previously performed similar duties.

The respondent requested a summary hearing, arguing the applicant was not hired due to performance concerns and low interview scores.

The Tribunal dismissed the respondent's request to dismiss the application, finding that the matter raised issues of fact and credibility that required a full hearing.

Loiselle v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2012 HRTO 2310

Ryan Goldvine

17 cases2011–2012

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 4, 2012

Application not dismissed under s. 45.1 where applicant did not consent to union's grievance settlement.

The respondent sought to dismiss the human rights application under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing that a grievance arbitration and subsequent settlement appropriately dealt with the substance of the application.

The applicant's union had entered into a Memorandum of Settlement to resolve the grievance, but the applicant refused to sign or agree to its terms.

The Tribunal found that while the arbitration was a 'proceeding', it did not appropriately deal with the substance of the application because the applicant expressly objected to the settlement.

The request to dismiss the application was denied.

Xian Li v. University Health Network, 2012 HRTO 2260

Michael Klug

28 cases1992–2024

Frank Angeletti

25 cases1991–2017

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 3, 2012

Consent request to amend human rights application granted.

The applicant filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings seeking to amend his human rights application to include new allegations of discrimination.

The respondent consented to the request and filed a second amended response.

The Tribunal granted the request on consent, ordering the application and response amended, and directed the applicant to file a consolidated book of pleadings prior to the hearing.

Jerome Miller v. London Transit Commission, 2012 HRTO 2254

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 21, 2012

Respondent's unopposed request to amend its Response in a human rights application granted.

The respondent in a human rights application filed a Request for an Order during Proceedings to amend its Response.

The applicant did not file a response to the request.

The Tribunal found it fair and just to allow the amendment, as it provided more detail on the respondent's position, and granted the applicant 14 days to file a Reply to the amended Response.

Tony Khauv v. Primeline Windows Inc., 2012 HRTO 2182

Page 18 of 25 (487 cases)

Applicant

Richard ColemanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mafario AmicucciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BoyerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cesare PellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Guillaume KibaleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Godfred Kwaku HiameySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marc BourguignonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ezra TaylorSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheri DaviesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Allen RosarioSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lilly WiddisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marvin LagaceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chatebadhur BalchandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Senan HodonouSelf-represented
1 appearance
Karen DavisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lewis CarrollSelf-represented
1 appearance
Renu VermaSelf-represented
1 appearance
J.D.Self-represented
1 appearance
Lydia SabourinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BlommesteynSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Stephen MaioCounsel
2 appearances
Fatema DadaCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance
Michael DoupeCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher M. WallaceCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea YorkCounsel
1 appearance
Rina M. LiCounsel
1 appearance
Chris DonszelmannCounsel
1 appearance
Rani KhanCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Auto Workers, Local 444

Piper HendersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd.

Meaghan RussellCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 146

Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

for Cassellholme for the Aged

Lise EllisCounsel
1 appearance

for Centum Fundamental Financial Inc.

Victor HuoAgent
1 appearance

for Chrysler Canada Inc.

Clifford J. HartCounsel
1 appearance

for Collin & Diana Parker Sales Ltd.

Arthur P. TarasukCounsel
1 appearance

for David Mirvish

Stephen A. BernofskyCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry, Proposed Intervenor

Andrew McCutcheonCounsel
1 appearance

for Eastern Independent Telecommunications Ltd.

Jason WhiteAgent
1 appearance

for himself

Justin StylesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ronald HarpelleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Russel RamlochanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for IATSE Local 822 (Toronto), IATSE Local 58 (Toronto), IATSE 129 (Hamilton), IATSE 461 Niagara, Cheryl Batulis, Heather Clarkson, Matthew D. Loeb, and Blair Egglestone

Andrea BowkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Marks Work Wearhouse Ltd., Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited and Donna Lodu

S. John PageCounsel
1 appearance

former representative for Mr. Liu

Kenny YauParalegal
1 appearance

for Pegasus Hospitality Group

Markos MarkoulisAgent
1 appearance

for Rogers Communications Partnership

Israel BalterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

D.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Susan HoustonAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
9 appearances
Mafario AmicucciSelf-represented
4 appearances
Nepthys AberdeenSelf-represented
4 appearances
Eric SabbahAgent
3 appearances
S.D.Self-represented
3 appearances
Jean-Alexandre De BousquetSelf-represented
3 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
3 appearances
Jean-Yves BernardSelf-represented
3 appearances
Rigaud BastienSelf-represented
3 appearances
Nagy RiadSelf-represented
3 appearances
Anthony HicksSelf-represented
2 appearances
Stevie Massela SikouSelf-represented
2 appearances
Keith AllenAgent
2 appearances
Joel ShusterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Abdullah MozaffarianSelf-represented
2 appearances
Eric LettsCounsel
2 appearances
Malek BouraouiSelf-represented
2 appearances
Leonard KerriganAgent
2 appearances
Rani KhanCounsel
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Doug MacCleodCounsel
1 appearance
A.B.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto, Myles Currie, Hector Moreno, Trevor Tenn, Ted MacMillan and John Murphy

Omo AkintanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Elementary Teachers' Federation of Ontario

Stephanie HobbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Barry KuretzkyCounsel
3 appearances
Samantha LambCounsel
2 appearances
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
2 appearances
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance
Danielle BisnarCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance
J. Craig MorrisonCounsel
1 appearance
Rochelle FoxCounsel
1 appearance
Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance
Michele Hamilton MeyersCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher PerriCounsel
1 appearance
Natalie WileyCounsel
1 appearance
John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance
Lisa LeinveerAgent
1 appearance
Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance

for the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board

Colin YoungmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Judith ParkerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Judicial Counsel

Geri SansonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Gregory KoCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea LueyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Colin JohnstonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Joanna S. RainbowCounsel
3 appearances
Frank AngelettiCounsel
3 appearances
Ted KovacsCounsel
3 appearances
Newton WongCounsel
2 appearances
Christine EntaCounsel
2 appearances
Sari SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Margot BlightCounsel
2 appearances
Saba ZiaCounsel
2 appearances
Judith ParkerCounsel
2 appearances
Lia ChiarottoCounsel
2 appearances
Stephen MaioCounsel
2 appearances
Patty MurrayCounsel
2 appearances
Michael WillsCounsel
2 appearances
Rob LevesqueAgent
1 appearance
Lise EllisAgent
1 appearance
Keri BennettCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BellCounsel
1 appearance
Xavier NavarreteCounsel
1 appearance
Jeanine WattCounsel
1 appearance
Stephen A. BernofskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondents

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent ARAMARK Canada Ltd.

George MacMasterAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Association de la police de l'Ontario

Michele Hamilton MayersCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BramCity Taxi

Ron FolkesAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Centum Fundamental Financial Inc.

Victor HuoAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Conseil scolaire de district Catholique Centre-Sud

Christian PaquetteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Daiva Lenauskus

Andrew McCutcheonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dresden Industrial

Sven PoysaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Samantha CrumbCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eaton Chelsea Hotel

Donna D’AndreaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent G4S Secure Solutions (Canada) Ltd

Tina BaldwinAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hôpital Montfort

André ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joanne Euler

Jessica DiFedericoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Le Syndicat Canadien de la fonction Publique et sa section locale 3189

Jean-Michel CorbeilCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent London Police Service

Frank A. AngelettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community and Social Services

Benjamin ParryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Minto Properties Inc.

Maria MavrikkouCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario College of Teachers

Lai-King HumCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ottawa Police

Iain AspenliederCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents

Sonia PhilipszAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances
Sheryl JohnsonCounsel
2 appearances
Justin BasingerCounsel
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Neena GuptaCounsel
1 appearance
John D. CampbellCounsel
1 appearance
Marnie BacherCounsel
1 appearance
Jennifer RothSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patty MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Derek CollinsCounsel
1 appearance
Pamela WakewichSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meredith GaydaCounsel
1 appearance
Sheila C. HandlerCounsel
1 appearance
Kristin BurnettSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mana KhamiCounsel
1 appearance
Mario DelgadoCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl RovisCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia JasenSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondents 1960 Keel Investments Inc., Ira Marder, Shirley Marder, Michael Sosnowicz, Shlomo Marder, David Dunn, Merle Stein, David Rubin, Michael Harari, Iggy Florez, Marbrook Developments Limited, and D&D Associates Paralegal

David RubinAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents Association des enseignantes et des enseignants franco-ontariens and Sack Goldblatt Mitchell LLP

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 4721

Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sharon Galway

Vilija YcasAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local Union No. 540

Aaron HartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP and Julie Skinner

Sean McGeeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ontario Provincial Police and Wayne Morris

Marnie CorboldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Résidence St. Louis (Bruyère Soins Continus) and Nicole McEachren

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Regional Municipality of Peel and Mark Castro

Chantel MorrisonCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher SansonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Ottawa Hospital

Raquel ChisolmCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toyota Motor Manufacturing Inc.

Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Local 333

Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University Health Network

Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ontario Institute of Technology

Cheryl FoyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Zeta Psi Social Fraternity

Kim DuongCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Civic Employees Union, Local 416 and Alex Krebelj

Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance

for Wendy Benson

David DeluzioCounsel
1 appearance

for William Osler Health Systems

Melanie de WitCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend

M.D.Agent
1 appearance

on behalf of Danny Liu

Vartan ManoukianCounsel
1 appearance

on behalf of herself and J.P

V.P.Self-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Navneet SinghSelf-represented
1 appearance

on the applicant's behalf

Susan HoustonAgent
1 appearance

pour la requérante

Lyne DrapeauSelf-represented
1 appearance
Odile CoiminSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sylia ArsenaultSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kibondo Max KilongoziCounsel
1 appearance
Bernadette KanyindaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chantal TieCounsel
1 appearance

pour le requérant

Karimou Dia HantchiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marc Elie OstainvilSelf-represented
1 appearance
J.A. Gilles FortinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stéphane VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance

pour les intimées

Sébastien HuardCounsel
1 appearance

pour les intimés

Noëlle CalorenCounsel
1 appearance
Christine LonsdaleCounsel
1 appearance
André ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance
Gabriel PoliquinCounsel
1 appearance
Annie BerthiaumeCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intervenant

Benjamin PiperCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intimé

Marc DelormeCounsel
1 appearance
Annie BerthiaumeCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intimée

Jean-Rodrigue YobouaCounsel
1 appearance
David M. BolgerCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intimée Joanne David

Kevin MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intimée proposée

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intimé proposé

Paul MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

procureur

Owen M. ReesCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

procureurs

Christian PaquetteCounsel
1 appearance
Claire VachonCounsel
1 appearance

Representative

Agnes WintersingerAgent
1 appearance

Representative, Self-represented

A.B.Self-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Andrew N. ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance
Danny LiuSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented

Hong Bing (Richard) WangSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mazigh MassylesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BlommesteynSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jaime CastellanosSelf-represented
1 appearance

se représentant lui-même

Ronald GariepySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marc Elie OstainvilSelf-represented
1 appearance

Se représentant lui-même

Étienne MouajouSelf-represented
1 appearance

Se représente lui-même

Godfred Kwaku HiameySelf-represented
1 appearance

487

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.1

cases/mo

HRTO487(100%)

Decision types

motion

465

trial

Page 18 of 25 (487 cases)

Geneviève Debané

Benito Zeppieri v. Labour Ready {Dependable Temporary Labour}, 2013 HRTO 386

Kathleen DeBlock Boersma

Geneviève Debané

Susan Duvall v. Manpower, Listowel Technology Inc. and BTE - Assembly Ltd., 2013 HRTO 363

Geneviève Debané

Allison Osborne v. Threadcount Textile & Design aka Cesaer`s Fabrics, 2013 HRTO 377

Patricia Murray

Geneviève Debané

Donna Truax v. Midland Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 354

Geneviève Debané

Elrington v. Saint Elizabeth Health Care, 2013 HRTO 348

Raj Anand

Geneviève Debané

Amicucci v. York Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 242

Geneviève Debané

Nathaniel Misurka v. Spinrite LP, 2013 HRTO 217

Geneviève Debané

April Dougherty v. Stream Global Services, 2013 HRTO 206

Sari Springer

Geneviève Debané

Aberdeen v. Governing Council of the University of Toronto, 2013 HRTO 138

Piper Henderson

David Deluzio

Clifford J. Hart

Geneviève Debané

Benson v. Chrysler Canada Inc., 2013 HRTO 94

Nini Jones

Andrew Morrison

Geneviève Debané

Hassell v. Ontario Public Service Employees Union, 2013 HRTO 48

Samantha Lamb

Geneviève Debané

René Laviolette v. City of Ottawa, 2013 HRTO 42

Stephen Maio

Geneviève Debané

Amicucci v. York Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 34

Geneviève Debané

Taylor v. SMG Canada ULC, 2012 HRTO 2349

Marianne Craig

Geneviève Debané

Assivero v. 1693238 Ontario Inc., 2012 HRTO 2344

Geneviève Debané

Qin Chen v. Midland Food Products Inc., 2012 HRTO 2309

Kendal McKinney

Gurjit Brar

Geneviève Debané

Loiselle v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2012 HRTO 2310

Ryan Goldvine

Geneviève Debané

Xian Li v. University Health Network, 2012 HRTO 2260

Michael Klug

Frank Angeletti

Geneviève Debané

Jerome Miller v. London Transit Commission, 2012 HRTO 2254

Geneviève Debané

Tony Khauv v. Primeline Windows Inc., 2012 HRTO 2182

Applicant

Counsel

for Canadian Auto Workers, Local 444

for Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd.

for Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 146

for Cassellholme for the Aged

for Centum Fundamental Financial Inc.

for Chrysler Canada Inc.

for Collin & Diana Parker Sales Ltd.

for David Mirvish

for Dr. Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry, Proposed Intervenor

for Eastern Independent Telecommunications Ltd.

for himself

for IATSE Local 822 (Toronto), IATSE Local 58 (Toronto), IATSE 129 (Hamilton), IATSE 461 Niagara, Cheryl Batulis, Heather Clarkson, Matthew D. Loeb, and Blair Egglestone

for Marks Work Wearhouse Ltd., Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited and Donna Lodu

former representative for Mr. Liu

for Pegasus Hospitality Group

for Rogers Communications Partnership

for the Affected Party

for the applicant

for the Applicant

for the Applicants

for the City of Toronto, Myles Currie, Hector Moreno, Trevor Tenn, Ted MacMillan and John Murphy