Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 24, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending the conclusion of an ongoing union grievance concerning the same issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, claiming he was laid off because the respondent employer refused to accommodate his work-related injury.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application because the applicant had an ongoing union grievance based on the same facts and issues.

Finding significant overlap between the application and the grievance, and noting no submissions opposing deferral from the applicant or his union, the Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the grievance process.

Kevin Killby v. Kappeler Masonry Corporation, 2011 HRTO 164

Patrick Brode

26 cases1985–2023

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 24, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as barred by section 53(8) for duplicating a previous complaint.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal by the police service and an individual officer for refusing to accept his complaints.

The Tribunal found that the application was barred by section 53(8) of the Human Rights Code because it arose from the same factual history, dealt with the same issues, and asserted the same allegations as a previous complaint filed with the Commission.

The application was dismissed.

Christianson v. Windsor Police Service, 2011 HRTO 168

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 24, 2011

Request for early dismissal denied as the application raised issues within the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The respondent requested an early dismissal of the human rights application, arguing that the substance of the complaint was wrongful dismissal and lacked evidence of discrimination.

The applicant alleged discrimination and reprisal in employment on the basis of race, colour, ancestry, place of origin, ethnic origin, creed, family status, and marital status, claiming his employment was terminated because his status as an Indian and his spiritual beliefs were questioned.

The Tribunal found that the application raised issues within its jurisdiction and denied the respondent's request to dismiss the application without a hearing, ordering the respondent to file a full response.

Michelin v. Nishnawbe Gamik Friendship Centre, 2011 HRTO 162

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 21, 2011

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as the respondent bank is federally regulated.

The applicant filed an application alleging employment discrimination and reprisal against a bank and an individual respondent.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss on the basis that the respondent bank is a federally regulated organization.

The Tribunal found that it lacked jurisdiction to proceed, as banking falls exclusively under federal jurisdiction pursuant to s. 91(15) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

The application was dismissed.

Kenneth Gaetano v. HSBC Bank of Canada and Carol Kennedy, 2011 HRTO 159

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 21, 2011

Union granted intervenor status; hearing scheduled to determine if application barred by prior settlement.

The applicant filed an application alleging age discrimination and harassment in employment.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed on the basis that the applicant had previously signed a full and final release in Minutes of Settlement resolving related grievances.

The applicant's union requested intervenor status, which the Tribunal granted.

The Tribunal directed that a teleconference hearing be scheduled to determine whether the application is barred by the prior settlement.

Ken Willard v. City of Toronto and Raymond Kessler, 2011 HRTO 150

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 19, 2011

Tribunal adds employment agency as respondent on consent and directs filing of response.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of family status and disability against Transport V.A. Inc. Transport denied the allegations, asserting the applicant was employed by ADS Employment Agency.

The applicant requested to add ADS as a respondent, and ADS consented.

The Tribunal ordered ADS added as a party and directed ADS to file a Response before addressing other pending requests, including Transport's request to be removed.

White v. Transport V.A., 2011 HRTO 138

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 19, 2011

Human rights application dismissed for abandonment and lack of jurisdiction over federally regulated shipping business.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging disability discrimination in his employment as a boat deckhand.

The respondents submitted that the corporate respondent was a federally regulated shipping business governed by federal legislation.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding it was deemed abandoned and that the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction over interprovincial shipping under the Constitution Act, 1867.

Pierce v. Lower Lakes Towing Ltd., 2011 HRTO 134

Human rights application dismissed against union and OLRB due to judicial immunity and limitation period expiry.

The applicant filed a human rights application against his union (OSSTF) and the Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB), alleging discrimination on the basis of disability.

The respondents requested early dismissal on several grounds, including judicial immunity and delay.

The Tribunal found that the claims against the OLRB were barred by the doctrine of judicial immunity, as they challenged an adjudicative decision.

Furthermore, the Tribunal determined that the application against both respondents was filed beyond the one-year limitation period set out in section 34(1) of the Human Rights Code, and the applicant failed to demonstrate that the delay was incurred in good faith.

The application was dismissed.

William Thomson v. Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation and Ontario Labour Relations Board, 2011 HRTO 116

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 13, 2011

Human rights application deemed timely based on date of internal investigation conclusion; address update ordered for unserved respondent.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment on the basis of sex.

The respondents argued the application was out of time as it was filed more than one year after the applicant's dismissal.

The Tribunal found the application was timely because the last incident—a letter concluding the corporate respondent's internal investigation—occurred within the one-year limitation period.

Additionally, the Tribunal ordered the corporate respondent to provide the last known address for a personal respondent whose application package was returned undelivered, and directed the applicant to provide a current address if she wished to proceed against him.

Indrama Ramcharran v. 3PD Inc., Alan Hamill and Rory Kitchen, 2011 HRTO 100

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 12, 2011

Request to add corporate respondent granted where allegations could support a finding of Code violations.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code against an individual respondent regarding the termination of her employment.

She subsequently filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to add the individual respondent's company as a corporate respondent, noting she was unrepresented when she filed the initial application.

The Tribunal applied the factors for adding a party and found it would be fair to add the corporate respondent, as the allegations could support a finding that the company violated the Code.

The request to add the corporate respondent was granted.

Melika Rahimi v. Sales Dynamic Inc. and Lorne Ordel, 2011 HRTO 88

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 12, 2011

Individual respondent removed from human rights application after applicant failed to provide contact information.

The applicant failed to provide a current and accurate address for the individual respondent, Howard Kravitz, as directed by a previous interim decision.

Consequently, the Tribunal ordered that the Application proceed only against the corporate respondent, Nepean Rideau & Osgoode Community Resource Centre, and amended the style of cause accordingly.

The matter was scheduled for mediation.

Mayer v. Nepean Rideau & Osgoode Community Resource Centre, 2011 HRTO 94

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 7, 2011

Respondent granted 14 days to file correct response form before Tribunal proceeds without notice.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code.

The respondent submitted a response on the incorrect form and failed to correct the error after being notified by the Tribunal.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondent of the consequences of failing to respond under Rule 5.5 of the Rules of Procedure, and granted the respondent a final 14 days to file a proper Form 2 Response before proceeding without further notice.

Bradley Parks v. Mighty Bargain Store, 2011 HRTO 60

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 6, 2011

Individual respondent removed and corporate employer substituted on consent.

The respondent filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to remove the individual respondent and substitute the corporate employer, arguing the allegations fell within the scope of employment.

The applicant consented to the substitution.

The Tribunal granted the request on consent, amended the style of cause, and directed the matter to mediation.

James Abram v. Pink Elephant Inc., 2011 HRTO 46

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 6, 2011

Human rights application dismissed for failing to identify discrimination based on protected Code grounds.

The applicant filed an Application alleging harassment and discrimination by teachers and students at the respondent college.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the Application failed to identify specific acts of discrimination under the Human Rights Code.

After reviewing the applicant's written submissions, the Tribunal found that the applicant did not identify any protected grounds upon which the Code was violated.

The Application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Gibson v. Sheridan College, 2011 HRTO 49

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 5, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or contact Tribunal.

The applicant filed a human rights application but subsequently lost contact with the Tribunal after her counsel withdrew.

She failed to attend a scheduled mediation and did not respond to the Tribunal's written directions to confirm her contact information and intentions.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Hutchison v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2011 HRTO 43

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 4, 2011

Request to defer human rights application denied as parallel employment standards proceeding appeared concluded.

The respondent requested that the Tribunal defer consideration of the applicant's human rights application alleging disability discrimination in employment, pending the conclusion of proceedings under the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA).

The Tribunal found that the respondent failed to provide information showing the ESA proceeding was ongoing, as an ESA decision ordering termination and severance compensation had already been rendered.

The request for deferral was denied and the matter was directed to mediation.

Nicole Thompson v. Keiper Limited, 2011 HRTO 11

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 4, 2011

Request for reconsideration of interim decision removing personal respondent and narrowing temporal scope denied.

The applicant requested reconsideration of an interim decision that removed a personal respondent (a Registrar) and narrowed the temporal scope of her human rights application against the university and a coalition.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the applicant merely disagreed with the previous findings and failed to establish any of the criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26.5, such as new evidence or a conflict with established jurisprudence.

Way v. University of Toronto, 2011 HRTO 19

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 4, 2011

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and applicant declared a vexatious litigant.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on various grounds, making incomprehensible allegations about neighbourhood girls planting micro-chips and spying on him.

The Tribunal found the allegations did not relate to any protected grounds under the Human Rights Code and were outside its jurisdiction.

Given the applicant's history of filing similar unmeritorious applications containing lewd language and naming minors, the Tribunal dismissed the application and declared the applicant a vexatious litigant, requiring him to seek leave before filing future applications.

Bingham v. Roach Schwartz Law Office, 2011 HRTO 15

Sari Springer

31 cases1993–2017

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 20, 2010

Human rights application partially dismissed for delay; pre-2009 allegations out of time, 2009 allegations proceed.

The applicant, a university student, filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal by the university and its campus police over a seven-year period, including specific events on June 2, 2009.

In an interim decision, the Tribunal addressed preliminary issues of delay, concurrent proceedings, and disclosure requests.

The Tribunal found no concurrent proceedings to warrant deferral.

However, it ruled that allegations relating to events prior to 2009 were out of time and did not constitute a series of incidents, dismissing that portion of the application.

The allegations regarding the June 2009 events were allowed to proceed.

The applicant's requests for early disclosure were dismissed as premature.

Nepthys Aberdeen v. University of Toronto, 2010 HRTO 2514

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 16, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of parallel OHSA reprisal claim before the OLRB.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging disability-related discrimination and failure to accommodate, claiming he was laid off after reporting a workplace accident to the Ministry of Labour.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal defer the application because the applicant had already commenced an Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) reprisal claim before the Ontario Labour Relations Board based on the same facts.

The Tribunal found that the OHSA claim and the human rights application raised similar issues, arose from the same factual circumstances, and sought overlapping remedies.

To avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent decisions, the Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the OHSA process.

MacDougall v. Caldwell Enterprises, 2010 HRTO 2504

Page 31 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 31 of 44 (867 cases)

Ena Chadha

Kevin Killby v. Kappeler Masonry Corporation, 2011 HRTO 164

Patrick Brode

Ena Chadha

Christianson v. Windsor Police Service, 2011 HRTO 168

Ena Chadha

Michelin v. Nishnawbe Gamik Friendship Centre, 2011 HRTO 162

Ena Chadha

Kenneth Gaetano v. HSBC Bank of Canada and Carol Kennedy, 2011 HRTO 159

Ena Chadha

Ken Willard v. City of Toronto and Raymond Kessler, 2011 HRTO 150

Ena Chadha

White v. Transport V.A., 2011 HRTO 138

Ena Chadha

Pierce v. Lower Lakes Towing Ltd., 2011 HRTO 134

Simon Blackstone

Leonard Marvy

Ena Chadha

William Thomson v. Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation and Ontario Labour Relations Board, 2011 HRTO 116

Ena Chadha

Indrama Ramcharran v. 3PD Inc., Alan Hamill and Rory Kitchen, 2011 HRTO 100

Ena Chadha

Melika Rahimi v. Sales Dynamic Inc. and Lorne Ordel, 2011 HRTO 88

Ena Chadha

Mayer v. Nepean Rideau & Osgoode Community Resource Centre, 2011 HRTO 94

Ena Chadha

Bradley Parks v. Mighty Bargain Store, 2011 HRTO 60

Ena Chadha

James Abram v. Pink Elephant Inc., 2011 HRTO 46

Ena Chadha

Gibson v. Sheridan College, 2011 HRTO 49

Ena Chadha

Hutchison v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2011 HRTO 43

Ena Chadha

Nicole Thompson v. Keiper Limited, 2011 HRTO 11

Ena Chadha

Way v. University of Toronto, 2011 HRTO 19

Ena Chadha

Bingham v. Roach Schwartz Law Office, 2011 HRTO 15

Sari Springer

Ena Chadha

Nepthys Aberdeen v. University of Toronto, 2010 HRTO 2514

Ena Chadha

MacDougall v. Caldwell Enterprises, 2010 HRTO 2504

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

for himself

for Jennette Frost

for Manulife Financial

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

for Michael Watson

for Mohammed Manjra

for OPSEU

for Paul Cohn

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

for Stanley Klimitz

for Stan Mei

for the Affected Party

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

for the Applicant

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

for the Applicant Karina Vilner