Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 15, 2010

Early dismissal denied as EI proceeding did not address human rights issues; personal respondents removed.

The applicant alleged discrimination in employment on the basis of disability (gambling addiction).

The respondents requested early dismissal under section 45.1 of the Code, arguing that a Board of Referees decision denying regular Employment Insurance benefits due to misconduct appropriately dealt with the substance of the application.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding the EI proceeding did not assess the human rights issues, such as the duty to accommodate.

The Tribunal granted the respondents' request to remove the six personal respondents, as the organizational respondent assumed liability and no compelling reason existed to continue against the individuals.

Ramadan Mustafa v. Corporation of the City of Mississauga, 2010 HRTO 2477

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 15, 2010

Tribunal declined to dismiss human rights application at preliminary stage despite applicant's failure to respond.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in services on the basis of race and sex.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because it appeared the application failed to identify specific acts of discrimination connected to Code grounds.

The applicant did not respond to the Notice.

The Tribunal held that it was not plain and obvious that the application fell outside its jurisdiction, and directed that the application be served on the respondent.

Lérus v. Community Recreation North Toronto, 2010 HRTO 2490

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 15, 2010

Respondent granted 10-day extension to file response before Tribunal proceeds without notice.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent failed to file a response by the deadline, though counsel for its insurer sought clarification on the respondent's identity.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondent of the consequences of failing to participate under Rule 5.5 of the Rules of Procedure.

The respondent was granted 10 days to file a response and explain the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice.

Aidarov v. Swansea Village Cooperative Inc., 2010 HRTO 2484

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 14, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond to correspondence.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant failed to attend a scheduled mediation session and did not communicate with the Tribunal to explain the absence.

The Tribunal subsequently wrote to the applicant advising that failure to respond would be deemed an abandonment of the application.

The applicant did not respond.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Simon Kent v. Totem Lodge of Sioux Narrows Ltd. and Dustin Brown, 2010 HRTO 2475

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 14, 2010

Applicant directed to provide current address for unreachable individual respondent or request disclosure from former employer.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination and reprisal against an organizational respondent and an individual respondent.

The notice of application mailed to the individual respondent at the organization's address was returned, and the organization confirmed he was no longer employed there.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the applicant to provide a current address for the individual respondent within 20 days, or to request an order requiring the organizational respondent to provide his last known address, failing which the Tribunal would not deal with the application in respect of him.

Laura Mayer v. Nepean Rideau & Osgoode Community Resource Centre and Howard Kravitz, 2010 HRTO 2472

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 14, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond to correspondence.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant failed to attend a scheduled mediation session and did not communicate with the Tribunal to explain the absence.

The Tribunal subsequently wrote to the applicant warning that failure to respond would result in the application being deemed abandoned.

The applicant did not respond.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

James (Jessica) DeMerchant v. Toronto Transit Commission and Ayana Hazel, 2010 HRTO 2470

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 13, 2010

Request to defer human rights application denied after grievance withdrawn; union granted intervener status.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondents.

The organizational respondent requested that the Tribunal defer the application pending the conclusion of the applicant's grievance.

The applicant subsequently withdrew the grievance.

The Tribunal denied the request to defer because the grievance had been withdrawn.

The Tribunal also granted the Brockville Professional Firefighters' Association's request to intervene, as it was the applicant's exclusive bargaining agent.

Elise Runions v. The Corporation of the City of Brockville and Brockville Fire Department, and Craig Mason, 2010 HRTO 2453

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 10, 2010

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as the respondent flour mill is federally regulated.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability against his employer, a flour mill.

The respondent submitted that the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction because flour mills are federally regulated works under the Canadian Wheat Board Act and the Constitution Act, 1867.

The Tribunal agreed, finding that the respondent falls under federal jurisdiction and the Ontario Human Rights Code does not apply.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Barry Niece v. Archer Daniels Midland Company, 2010 HRTO 2450

Erin R. Kuzz

17 cases1998–2023

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 9, 2010

Two personal respondents removed from human rights application; third remains due to specific conduct allegations.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment on the basis of disability and sex, including allegations of sexual harassment and a poisoned work environment.

The corporate respondent and three personal respondents requested an order removing the personal respondents from the proceeding.

Applying the Persaud factors, the Tribunal removed two personal respondents against whom there were no specific allegations of personal conduct.

However, the Tribunal declined to remove the third personal respondent, finding that her alleged individual conduct was a central issue in the applicant's claim.

Parker v. Mississauga (City), 2010 HRTO 2446

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 8, 2010

Human rights application stayed due to respondent's corporate receivership.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code.

The respondent subsequently went into receivership, and the Superior Court of Justice issued an order staying all proceedings against the respondent.

The Tribunal determined that the application could not proceed and directed the applicant to advise whether she intends to seek leave from the court or consent from the receiver to lift the stay.

Patricia Borean v. Talhin/T Corporation – Plastics Division, 2010 HRTO 2441

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 8, 2010

Tribunal denies deferral request as WSIB appeal will not determine human rights issues.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal defer the human rights application pending the resolution of the applicant's WSIB appeal, arguing the WSIB would determine whether the applicant was an employee.

The Tribunal denied the deferral request, finding that the WSIB process would not address the human rights issues of discrimination, accommodation, and reprisal, nor determine employment status under the Code.

The Tribunal also granted the applicant's request to amend her application to avoid duplication of remedial compensation.

Turcotte v. Osprey Media Group, 2010 HRTO 2442

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 8, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent Employment Standards Act claim on identical facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of sex (pregnancy) and family status, claiming she was terminated when seeking to return from pregnancy leave.

The applicant had also filed a concurrent claim under the Employment Standards Act, 2000 based on identical facts.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application pending the resolution of the ESA claim.

Finding that the legal issues and factual circumstances were identical and raised the possibility of overlapping remedies, the Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application.

Nicholson v. Herbal Magic Inc., 2010 HRTO 2440

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 7, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent Employment Standards Act claim.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability related to pregnancy.

The respondent requested that the Tribunal defer the application pending the conclusion of an ongoing Employment Standards Act (ESA) claim filed by the applicant regarding the same factual circumstances.

The Tribunal found that the facts, allegations, and legal issues overlapped significantly and deferred the application to avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent decisions.

Ebinehita Okoduwa v. Husky Injection Molding Systems Ltd., 2010 HRTO 2437

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 7, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to jurisdictional inquiry.

The applicant filed a human rights application against federal government departments and a law chambers.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, noting that the federal respondents were outside its jurisdiction and the application failed to identify specific acts of discrimination by the provincial respondent.

The applicant was directed to provide written submissions on jurisdiction but failed to respond.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Richard West v. Health Canada, 2010 HRTO 2429

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 3, 2010

Tribunal allows human rights application to proceed but removes individual respondent acting within employment capacity.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of perceived disability after being refused service at a library.

The respondents requested that the application be dismissed for delay and that the individual respondent be removed.

The Tribunal found that the application was not time-barred because the applicant alleged a continuing series of discriminatory incidents.

However, the Tribunal removed the individual respondent as a party, noting that he was acting within the course of his employment and the organizational respondent had assumed responsibility for his conduct.

King v. Toronto Public Library Board, 2010 HRTO 2417

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 3, 2010

Human rights application dismissed for being filed outside the one-year limitation period without good faith delay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination by the respondent police board during an arrest that occurred more than a year prior.

The respondent requested dismissal on the basis that the application was out of time.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay that would establish it was incurred in good faith under section 34(2) of the Human Rights Code.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Jallad v. Ottawa Police Services Board, 2010 HRTO 2408

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 2, 2010

Applicant directed to provide updated contact information within 10 days or face dismissal for abandonment.

The applicant filed a human rights application but failed to provide updated contact information to the Tribunal.

Mail sent to the applicant was returned as moved/unknown.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to provide his current address and telephone number within 10 days, failing which the application would be deemed abandoned and dismissed.

Stojan Slavujevic v. K-W Cornerstone Paving Ltd., 2010 HRTO 2403

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 2, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending the conclusion of a related unjust dismissal grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability and age, claiming the employer failed to accommodate his workplace injury and the union failed to support him.

The union requested that the Tribunal defer the application because an unjust dismissal grievance had been filed and referred to arbitration, which would include the accommodation issues.

The Tribunal found a clear factual overlap between the application and the ongoing grievance.

The Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the final determination of the grievance process.

Ascenzi v. BFI Canada, 2010 HRTO 2406

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 2, 2010

Preliminary request to dismiss reprisal application denied as factual assessment required.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging that her employment was terminated as a reprisal for reporting a male co-worker's use of profanities and derogatory remarks.

The respondents requested that the application be dismissed on a preliminary basis, arguing it did not suggest reprisal for claiming Code rights.

The Tribunal denied the preliminary request, finding that the allegations, if accepted, may raise concerns with respect to reprisal and require an assessment of facts and evidence.

Trish-Ann Tremblay v. 1168531 Ontario Inc. o/a Subway and Amy Sue Lalonde, 2010 HRTO 2394

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 1, 2010

Personal respondent removed from human rights application on consent.

The corporate respondent filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to remove the personal respondent from the human rights application, noting that the personal respondent was acting in her employment capacity and the corporate respondent would be liable for her conduct.

The applicant consented to the removal.

The Tribunal granted the request, removed the personal respondent, and directed the matter to mediation.

Champagne v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada, 2010 HRTO 2386

Page 32 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 32 of 44 (867 cases)