Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 1, 2010

Request for early dismissal denied; WSIB benefits denial did not appropriately deal with accommodation duty.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, claiming the respondent failed to accommodate his noise-induced hearing loss.

The respondent requested early dismissal under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing the matter was appropriately dealt with by the WSIB, which had denied the applicant's claim for health care benefits.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the WSIB decision only assessed eligibility for benefits based on decibel thresholds and did not consider the procedural and substantive components of the duty to accommodate under the Code.

Kevin Murphy v. Quiktemp Inc., 2010 HRTO 2393

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 1, 2010

Human rights application alleging discrimination in court decisions dismissed for abandonment and lack of jurisdiction.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination and reprisal on the basis of sex and age, claiming his testimony was not accepted in family and criminal court proceedings.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss on the basis that court decisions do not constitute a 'service' under the Code.

The applicant failed to file submissions in response.

The Tribunal dismissed the application for abandonment and lack of jurisdiction.

Vasarhelyi v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2010 HRTO 2383

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 26, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant repeatedly failed to attend scheduled mediations.

The applicant filed a human rights application but failed to attend two scheduled mediations without notifying the Tribunal.

The respondent filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking to dismiss the application for abuse of process.

The applicant subsequently indicated she wished to cancel the application and did not respond to the respondent's request.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Alexandra Falcioni v. Arvato Digital Services Canada Inc./Bertelsmann, 2010 HRTO 2353

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 25, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending the resolution of concurrent union grievances on the same facts.

The applicant filed an application alleging employment discrimination on the basis of place of origin and disability.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer because the applicant had also filed union grievances based on the same facts.

The respondents supported the deferral.

The Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the grievances to avoid concurrent proceedings and the possibility of inconsistent decisions.

Paula Cabral v. Consent and Capacity Board and Lorissa Sciarra, 2010 HRTO 2342

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 24, 2010

Tribunal directs parties to provide submissions on consolidation and deferral pending related criminal proceedings.

The applicant filed two human rights applications against the respondent fitness club, alleging discrimination on various grounds.

The Tribunal noted that the applications involved the same corporate respondent but different owners and timeframes.

As there was an ongoing criminal proceeding related to the events, and the applicant was subject to bail conditions prohibiting contact with the former owner, the Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the parties to provide submissions on whether the applications should be consolidated and whether the Tribunal proceedings should be deferred pending the resolution of the criminal matter.

Rahim Hadani v. Kingwest Fitness, 2010 HRTO 2334

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 24, 2010

Tribunal strikes out-of-time allegations and removes personal respondent, but allows recent discrimination claims to proceed.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal after being denied admission to three PhD programs.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed based on a previous settlement, that allegations outside the one-year limitation period be struck, and that the personal respondent be removed.

The Tribunal found the previous settlement did not bar the current application.

However, the Tribunal struck allegations relating to events prior to November 2009 as the applicant failed to justify the delay.

The Tribunal also removed the personal respondent, finding no compelling reason to include him as he was acting within the scope of his employment.

Way v. University of Toronto, 2010 HRTO 2337

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 23, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending completion of outstanding union grievance on same issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and failure to accommodate on the basis of disability.

The respondent requested that the application be deferred pending the completion of an outstanding union grievance regarding the applicant's termination.

The applicant's union also requested to intervene.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene and ordered the deferral of the application, finding that the grievance and the application overlapped with respect to facts and remedies sought.

McKinney v. Metro Ontario, 2010 HRTO 2331

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 23, 2010

Human rights application dismissed because Transit Windsor falls under federal jurisdiction.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability by Transit Windsor.

The respondent requested early dismissal, arguing that Transit Windsor falls under federal jurisdiction.

The Tribunal agreed, finding that Transit Windsor provides extra-provincial bus transportation services and is therefore federally regulated.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

James McMullin v. The Corporation of the City of Windsor, 2010 HRTO 2326

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 18, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to jurisdictional concerns.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of record of offences.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, noting that the respondent appeared to be a federally regulated business and that the application failed to describe how the behaviour related to the ground of record of offences.

The applicant was directed to provide written submissions but failed to respond.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

McMahon v. Wolseley Barracks Warrant Officers’ and Sergeants’ Mess, 2010 HRTO 2301

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 18, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination and reprisal on the basis of record of offences and association with a person identified by a Code ground.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, noting the application failed to describe how the respondent's behaviour related to the protected grounds.

The applicant was directed to provide written submissions on jurisdiction but failed to respond.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Carolyn Farrington v. Arif Enterprises Inc. and Florence Hughes, 2010 HRTO 2302

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 18, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of record of offences.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, directing the applicant to provide written submissions on how the respondent's behaviour related to the ground of record of offences.

The applicant failed to respond within the specified timeline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Shelly Ann McCloskey v. MeadowBrook Construction Inc., 2010 HRTO 2294

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 17, 2010

Tribunal declined to defer application after criminal charges withdrawn; scheduled hearing for section 45.1 dismissal request.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in housing.

The respondents requested that the application be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing the allegations were already dealt with in multiple Landlord and Tenant Board proceedings.

The Tribunal initially considered deferring the matter due to pending criminal charges against the applicant, but declined to do so after the charges were withdrawn.

The Tribunal ordered the applicant to comply with rules regarding delivery of documents before scheduling a conference call to hear submissions on the respondents' request to dismiss.

Millien v. 1474367 Ontario, 2010 HRTO 2288

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 16, 2010

Respondents deemed to have accepted human rights allegations after failing to file a Response.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging sex discrimination in employment.

The respondents failed to file a Response despite receiving a Notice of Application and a subsequent Interim Decision extending the deadline.

The Tribunal applied Rule 5.5 of its Rules of Procedure, deeming the respondents to have waived all rights to notice or participation and to have accepted all allegations in the Application.

The applicant was given an opportunity to submit additional materials or request a teleconference before a final determination.

Whale v. Keele North Recycling, 2010 HRTO 2269

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 16, 2010

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as no Human Rights Code ground was alleged.

The applicant filed an Application alleging reprisal, unfair accusations of monetary shortages, and wrongful dismissal.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the Application failed to identify any specific acts of discrimination or a protected ground under the Human Rights Code.

After reviewing the applicant's submissions, the Tribunal found that the allegations related to general workplace unfairness rather than discrimination based on a protected ground.

The Application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Charlena Traux v. Mac’s Convenience Store and Barb Elwell, 2010 HRTO 2277

Colin Youngman

13 cases2010–2022

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 16, 2010

Application for breach of settlement dismissed; employer's inquiries to medical examiner were reasonable.

The applicant filed an application alleging that the respondents breached the Minutes of Settlement arising from a previous human rights application regarding workplace accommodation for a mental health disability.

The settlement required the parties to agree on an independent medical assessment to explore alternative treatments that would allow the applicant to work rotating shifts.

The applicant alleged breaches related to proposing psychiatrists, delaying reports, denying paid leave for appointments, and failing to immediately implement the resulting medical recommendations.

The Tribunal found that while both parties breached the timeline for proposing psychiatrists, no remedial order was necessary.

The Tribunal dismissed the remaining allegations, finding that the delays were largely attributable to the applicant's own actions, the conditions for short-term disability benefits were not met, and the respondents' supplemental inquiries to the medical examiner were a reasonable part of the accommodation process.

Oakley v. Lanark (County), 2010 HRTO 2274

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 16, 2010

Human rights application stayed due to corporate respondent's bankruptcy; applicant directed to lift stay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The corporate respondent subsequently went into bankruptcy.

The Tribunal noted that proceedings against a bankrupt respondent are stayed pursuant to section 69 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to either bring a motion in the Superior Court to lift the stay or reach an agreement with the Trustee within 60 days, failing which the application may be deemed abandoned.

Michael Kemper v. Allprint Ainsworth Associates Inc., 2010 HRTO 2271

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 12, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond to correspondence.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The applicant failed to attend a scheduled mediation and subsequently failed to respond to a Tribunal notice warning that the application would be deemed abandoned.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Shawn Richards v. Simcoe Parts Service Inc., 2010 HRTO 2218

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 12, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond to Tribunal.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code but failed to attend a scheduled mediation.

The Tribunal attempted to contact the applicant by mail and email, warning that failure to respond would result in the application being deemed abandoned.

The applicant did not respond and failed to update his contact information as required by Rule 1.13 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Martin Rivet v. Rexall Drug Stores Ltd., 2010 HRTO 2254

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 9, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent union grievance on same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The respondents requested that the application be deferred because the applicant's union had filed a grievance regarding the same events.

The union requested to intervene in the application and supported the deferral request.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene, noting its significant interest as the applicant's exclusive bargaining agent.

The Tribunal also ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the grievance process, finding significant overlap in the subject matter and remedies sought.

Vesely v. Zehmart, 2010 HRTO 2242

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 8, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending the conclusion of a related Police Services Act disciplinary proceeding.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal by the Toronto Police Services Board and an individual officer.

The respondents requested early dismissal under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing the substance of the application was being dealt with through a Police Services Act (PSA) complaint.

The Tribunal declined to dismiss the application because the PSA disciplinary hearing was still pending.

However, the Tribunal deferred the application until the conclusion of the PSA proceeding to avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent decisions.

Red v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2010 HRTO 2227

Page 33 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 33 of 44 (867 cases)