Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 4, 2010

Deferred human rights application reactivated after related grievance was withdrawn.

The applicant filed a request to reactivate his human rights application, which had been deferred pending a related grievance proceeding.

The applicant provided evidence that the grievance was withdrawn, and the respondent did not contest the request.

The Tribunal granted the request and reactivated the application.

Mike Borba v. Jungbunzlauer Canada, 2010 HRTO 2189

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 1, 2010

Human rights application reactivated after related grievance proceeding was withdrawn.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of sex.

The application was previously deferred pending the completion of a related grievance proceeding.

The applicant subsequently filed a request to reactivate the application, providing evidence that the grievance had been withdrawn.

As the respondent did not contest the request and the grievance was withdrawn, the Tribunal granted the request and reactivated the application.

Mike Borba v. Jungbunzlauer Canada, 2010 HRTO 2182

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 29, 2010

Tribunal issued directions for written submissions on preliminary issues including conflict of interest and jurisdiction.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability and sex after the Law Society suspended her licence to practise law following a capacity hearing.

The respondents requested dismissal on various preliminary grounds, including delay, statutory immunity, and that the matter was dealt with in another proceeding.

The applicant also raised a conflict of interest regarding counsel for one of the respondents.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the parties to provide written submissions on the alleged conflict of interest, clarification of the timeline of events, and the Tribunal's jurisdiction over the personal respondent who acted as counsel for the Law Society.

Tracey Foster v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2010 HRTO 2176

Human rights application dismissed; employer fulfilled duty to accommodate by extensively searching for alternate work.

The applicant, a radiation therapist, took a leave of absence due to breast cancer and subsequent physical and psychological complications.

She alleged that her employer, Hamilton Health Sciences, discriminated against her by denying her health benefits and failing to accommodate her disability by providing alternate work outside of the cancer care environment.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario found that the applicant's conditions constituted a disability under the Code.

However, the Tribunal dismissed the application, concluding that the employer had fulfilled both its procedural and substantive duties to accommodate up to the point of undue hardship by extensively searching for suitable alternate positions over several years, which were ultimately unsuccessful due to the applicant's specific restrictions and lack of transferable skills.

Gourley v. Hamilton Health Sciences, 2010 HRTO 2168

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 27, 2010

Human rights applications consolidated on consent and held in abeyance pending related transition proceeding.

The applicant filed two human rights applications with overlapping facts and issues.

On consent of the parties, the Tribunal ordered the applications consolidated.

The Tribunal further ordered that the consolidated proceedings be held in abeyance pending the resolution of a related Transition Application involving the same parties.

Peikang Dai v. Presbytery of East Toronto, 2010 HRTO 2120

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 27, 2010

Human rights applications dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to file required written submissions.

The applicant filed two applications against the respondent.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss and an Interim Decision directing the applicant to file written submissions regarding delay and previous human rights complaints.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice and did not file submissions by the deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the applications abandoned and dismissed them.

Achille Ruffolo v. Sun Life Financial, 2010 HRTO 2167

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 27, 2010

Motions to amend application and remove personal respondent dismissed in workplace discrimination case.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment.

The applicant sought to amend the application to add further examples of reprisal, while the respondents sought to remove the personal respondent from the proceeding.

The Tribunal dismissed the applicant's request to amend, finding the new allegations were a continuation of the original narrative and did not require an amendment.

The Tribunal also dismissed the respondents' request to remove the personal respondent, finding that the personal respondent's individual conduct was a central issue in the case.

Shah v. LOFT Community Services, 2010 HRTO 2165

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 27, 2010

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction over federally regulated respondents.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code against First Nations and Inuit Health – Health Canada and individual respondents.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the respondents appeared to be federally regulated.

The applicant subsequently confirmed that the Canadian Human Rights Commission had accepted jurisdiction over the matter.

The Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction.

Jo-Anna Ravelo v. First Nations and Inuit Health – Health Canada, 2010 HRTO 2160

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 22, 2010

Union granted intervenor status; respondent granted extension to file response pending receipt of medical records.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The respondent requested access to the applicant's Occupational Health file and an extension of time to file its Response.

The applicant's union requested intervenor status.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene.

Given the applicant's agreement to provide arguably relevant portions of the file, the Tribunal granted the respondent an extension of time to file its Response after receiving the materials from the applicant.

Stillo v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2010 HRTO 2133

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 22, 2010

Tribunal adds purchaser of business as respondent in age discrimination application regarding refusal to rehire.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging age discrimination after her employment was terminated when her employer sold its McDonald's locations to Dendres Corporation.

The Tribunal considered whether to add Dendres Corporation as a respondent and whether the application could proceed against the specific McDonald's location.

Applying the test for adding a party, the Tribunal found that the applicant's allegations of discriminatory refusal to rehire and negative references could support a finding of a Code violation against Dendres.

The Tribunal ordered Dendres Corporation added as a respondent and removed the McDonald's location as a party.

Chedore v. McBoyco, 2010 HRTO 2131

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 21, 2010

Notice of Intent to Dismiss withdrawn; application alleging disability and family status discrimination allowed to proceed.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment on the basis of disability and family status.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss on the basis that the narrative appeared to fail to identify specific acts of discrimination.

After receiving submissions from the applicant, the Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the application fell outside its jurisdiction, as the allegations related to disability, family status, and reprisal.

The Tribunal directed that the application be processed and served on the respondent.

Mirco Buth v. City of Ottawa, 2010 HRTO 2109

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 18, 2010

Request for early dismissal of human rights application denied as premature.

The respondents requested an early dismissal of the applicant's human rights application, arguing it did not raise a prima facie breach of the Code and that the subject-matter had been dealt with in family and landlord-tenant proceedings.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding it premature to determine whether the employment-related discrimination allegations fell outside the Code without a hearing.

The Tribunal also found no evidence that the other proceedings had appropriately dealt with the substance of the human rights concerns.

Brenda Lant v. Collingwood Nursing Home Limited, Peter Zober and Robert Zober, 2010 HRTO 2103

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 18, 2010

Human rights application dismissed for delay as applicant failed to establish good faith reason.

The applicant filed a human rights application more than one year after an altercation with police.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed for delay.

The applicant argued the delay was due to lack of awareness of her rights, limited English, and depression.

The Tribunal found the applicant had actively pursued other legal avenues, including a civil claim and a public complaint, and had been explicitly advised of the one-year limitation period by the Human Rights Legal Support Centre.

The Tribunal concluded the delay was not incurred in good faith and dismissed the application.

Garaad v. Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board, 2010 HRTO 2101

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 14, 2010

Request to add employer as respondent granted; applicant alleged sufficient facts to support potential liability.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment by a co-worker.

The applicant subsequently requested to add the employer as a respondent.

The employer opposed the request, arguing prejudice and lack of factual allegations.

The Tribunal applied the test for adding a respondent and found that the applicant had alleged facts which, if proven, could support a finding of liability against the employer.

The Tribunal also found no substantial prejudice to the employer, as the application was in its early stages.

The request to add the employer as a respondent was granted.

Abdulle v. National Car Rental and Alamo Rent-A-Car, 2010 HRTO 2085

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 14, 2010

Request to dismiss denied; WSIB return to work specialist's actions may constitute 'services' under the Code.

The respondent, a WSIB Return to Work Specialist, requested that the human rights application against her be dismissed on the basis that her actions fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the WSIB and were not 'services' under the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the respondent's role in facilitating and implementing a return to work plan did not appear to impugn any adjudicative functions and could potentially constitute 'services' under the Code.

The Tribunal concluded it was premature to dismiss the application without a full evidentiary hearing.

Rogers v. Surex Community Services, 2010 HRTO 2086

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 14, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of related grievance before the Grievance Settlement Board.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment and vocational association membership on the basis of race and colour, citing a poisoned work environment and racist letters.

The respondent Ministry requested the Tribunal defer the application pending the resolution of an ongoing grievance before the Grievance Settlement Board.

The Tribunal found that the grievance and the application shared overlapping concerns, similar allegations, and sought similar remedies.

To avoid inconsistent findings and promote efficiency, the Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the grievance.

Cox v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2010 HRTO 2081

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 13, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as workplace suspension for medication error did not engage Code grounds.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the grounds of record of offences and reprisal, claiming she was suspended from work due to a medication error.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the allegations did not appear to engage the Code.

After reviewing the applicant's submissions, the Tribunal dismissed the application, finding that the applicant failed to explain how the alleged mistreatment related to a record of offences or a reprisal for claiming Code rights.

May Schell v. County of Simco, 2010 HRTO 2074

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 12, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent grievance and WSIAT appeal on identical facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, specifically regarding her return to work program and a failure to accommodate.

The respondent and the applicant's union requested that the Tribunal defer the application because the allegations were identical to those in an ongoing grievance and a Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (WSIAT) appeal.

The Tribunal found significant overlap in the subject matter and ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the grievance and WSIAT appeal.

Daniela Nemes v. Pano Cap Canada Limited, 2010 HRTO 2065

Donna Petri

7 cases2010–2013

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 12, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent grievance process based on same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and harassment on the basis of a mental disability by her employer.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer because the applicant had an ongoing grievance based on the same facts.

The respondent supported deferral, while the applicant opposed it due to financial hardship.

The Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the grievance process, noting that the Grievance Settlement Board has the authority to interpret and apply the Code.

Paplinskie v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2010 HRTO 2070

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 12, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent union grievances based on the same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging employment discrimination.

The applicant's union requested to intervene, noting it had filed several grievances on behalf of the applicant arising from the same facts.

The respondents requested the application be deferred pending the resolution of the grievances.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene and ordered the deferral of the application, finding significant overlap in the subject matter and remedies sought between the application and the outstanding grievances.

McKenzie v. Villa Forum, 2010 HRTO 2068

Page 34 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 34 of 44 (867 cases)

Ena Chadha

Mike Borba v. Jungbunzlauer Canada, 2010 HRTO 2189

Ena Chadha

Mike Borba v. Jungbunzlauer Canada, 2010 HRTO 2182

Ena Chadha

Tracey Foster v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2010 HRTO 2176

John Legge

Frank Angeletti

Ena Chadha

Gourley v. Hamilton Health Sciences, 2010 HRTO 2168

Ena Chadha

Peikang Dai v. Presbytery of East Toronto, 2010 HRTO 2120

Ena Chadha

Achille Ruffolo v. Sun Life Financial, 2010 HRTO 2167

Ena Chadha

Shah v. LOFT Community Services, 2010 HRTO 2165

Ena Chadha

Jo-Anna Ravelo v. First Nations and Inuit Health – Health Canada, 2010 HRTO 2160

Ena Chadha

Stillo v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2010 HRTO 2133

Ena Chadha

Chedore v. McBoyco, 2010 HRTO 2131

Ena Chadha

Mirco Buth v. City of Ottawa, 2010 HRTO 2109

Ena Chadha

Brenda Lant v. Collingwood Nursing Home Limited, Peter Zober and Robert Zober, 2010 HRTO 2103

Ena Chadha

Garaad v. Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board, 2010 HRTO 2101

Ena Chadha

Abdulle v. National Car Rental and Alamo Rent-A-Car, 2010 HRTO 2085

Ena Chadha

Rogers v. Surex Community Services, 2010 HRTO 2086

Ena Chadha

Cox v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2010 HRTO 2081

Ena Chadha

May Schell v. County of Simco, 2010 HRTO 2074

Ena Chadha

Daniela Nemes v. Pano Cap Canada Limited, 2010 HRTO 2065

Donna Petri

Ena Chadha

Paplinskie v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2010 HRTO 2070

Ena Chadha

McKenzie v. Villa Forum, 2010 HRTO 2068

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

for himself

for Jennette Frost

for Manulife Financial

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

for Michael Watson

for Mohammed Manjra

for OPSEU

for Paul Cohn

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

for Stanley Klimitz

for Stan Mei

for the Affected Party

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

for the Applicant

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

for the Applicants