Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 8, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent union grievance on same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging employment discrimination on the basis of disability.

The respondents requested that the application be deferred pending the resolution of an ongoing union grievance dealing with the same facts and issues.

The applicant's union also requested intervenor status.

The Tribunal granted the deferral to avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent decisions, and granted the union's request to intervene.

Reid v. Revera Long Term Care Inc., 2010 HRTO 2058

Applicant permitted to amend human rights application to add particulars, reprisal claim, and additional remedies.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability following a layoff.

After retaining counsel, the applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to amend the application to add further particulars, cite a reprisal violation, and request additional monetary relief.

The respondent objected, arguing the request was too late and prejudicial.

The Tribunal granted the request to amend, finding that the additional particulars clarified the factual background, the reprisal allegation related to the original narrative, and the three-month delay after retaining counsel did not cause prejudice to the respondent.

Mugdim Kadic v. AXYZ Automation Inc., 2010 HRTO 2041

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 7, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination on multiple grounds in the area of services, goods, and facilities.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the narrative failed to identify specific acts of discrimination within the meaning of the Code.

The applicant was directed to provide written submissions on jurisdiction but failed to respond.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Cakmakci v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2010 HRTO 2047

Ann Burke

13 cases1990–2017

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 7, 2010

Human rights application dismissed under section 45.1 as allegations were appropriately dealt with in prior arbitration.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging workplace discrimination and harassment on the basis of disability, ancestry, place of origin, ethnic origin, and race.

The respondents requested that the application be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing that the allegations had already been addressed and dismissed in a prior grievance arbitration.

The Tribunal found that the arbitration was a proceeding that appropriately dealt with the substance of the human rights allegations.

Consequently, the Tribunal granted the respondents' request and dismissed the application to avoid duplication of proceedings.

Benqi Wei v. Seneca College of Applied Arts and Technology and Don Forster, 2010 HRTO 2046

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 30, 2010

Tribunal strikes duplicative portions of reprisal application and requests submissions on delay and transitional bars.

The applicant filed two applications alleging the respondent reprised against him by denying cost of living indexing on his benefits and withholding a payment, following earlier complaints to the Human Rights Commission.

The Tribunal considered whether the second application should be dismissed as a duplicate.

Finding discrete allegations in the second application, the Tribunal struck only the overlapping portions.

The Tribunal further directed the parties to provide written submissions on whether the first application is barred by section 53(8) of the Human Rights Code due to the prior Commission complaints, and whether allegations predating 2009 are barred by delay.

Achille Ruffolo v. Sun Life Financial, 2010 HRTO 2009

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 30, 2010

Human rights application deferred on consent pending outcome of related WSIB proceeding.

The applicant filed an application alleging employment discrimination on the basis of disability and failure to accommodate.

The applicant requested that the application be deferred pending the outcome of a related Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) proceeding dealing with the same facts.

The respondents consented to the deferral.

The Tribunal deferred the application, noting the overlap in issues and the WSIB's expertise in addressing disability matters.

Plant v. Shantine Ltd. (No. 1), 2010 HRTO 2010

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 29, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending completion of concurrent union grievances; union granted intervener status.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging employment discrimination on the basis of disability.

The respondent requested that the Tribunal defer the application pending the completion of two outstanding union grievances based on the same facts.

The applicant's union also requested to intervene.

The Tribunal granted the request to defer, finding significant overlap between the application and the grievances, and granted the union intervener status as the applicant's exclusive bargaining agent.

Bailey v. Community Living Toronto, 2010 HRTO 1988

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 28, 2010

Respondent granted final 14-day extension to file Response after missing initial extended deadline.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability.

The respondent was granted an extension of time to file a Response but failed to do so by the extended deadline.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondent that failure to participate could lead to the matter proceeding without them, and granted a final 14-day period to file a Response along with an explanation for the delay.

C.L. v. Town of Cochrane, 2010 HRTO 1975

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 28, 2010

Respondents' request to dismiss human rights application denied due to lack of evidence of previous complaint.

The applicant filed an application alleging she was terminated as a reprisal for complaining about gender discrimination.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed, arguing it was substantially the same as a previous complaint filed with the Ontario Human Rights Commission.

The Tribunal refused the request to dismiss, finding no evidence of any previous OHRC complaint, and directed the respondents to file a complete response.

Mary Traversy v. Holtom’s Bakery Ltd., 2010 HRTO 1985

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 28, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as out of time; ignorance of rights did not excuse seven-year delay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal with respect to his employment termination in 2003.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application was filed more than one year after the last incident of discrimination.

The applicant conceded he was defeated on the timeline issue and explained the delay was due to stress and ignorance of his rights.

The Tribunal found the applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay that would establish it was incurred in good faith under section 34(2) of the Human Rights Code.

The application was dismissed as out of time.

André King v. Toronto District School Board, 2010 HRTO 1984

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 28, 2010

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction over federally-regulated international trucking business.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment as a truck driver for the respondent.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss on the basis that the respondent may be a federally-regulated business.

The Tribunal found that the respondent's business involves transportation between countries and the applicant's work involved trucking outside of Ontario.

As such, the respondent is a federally-regulated business under the Constitution Act, 1867, and the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction.

The application was dismissed.

Marek Rokicki v. Schneider National Carriers Inc., 2010 HRTO 1983

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 28, 2010

Request to dismiss human rights application due to concurrent civil claim denied.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability and age.

The respondents requested early dismissal under section 34(11) of the Human Rights Code, arguing that the applicant had filed a concurrent civil claim for wrongful dismissal and unpaid overtime.

The Tribunal found that the civil claim did not explicitly or implicitly raise the Code or seek remedies for alleged breaches of the Code.

The request for early dismissal was refused, and the respondents were directed to file a full Response.

Pollard v. 748161 Ontario, 2010 HRTO 1982

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 28, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending outcome of parallel HPARB appeal regarding identical allegations.

The respondent psychiatrist brought a request to defer the human rights application pending the outcome of an appeal before the Health Professions Appeal and Review Board (HPARB).

The applicant had alleged discrimination and failure to accommodate regarding a missed appointment, which was also the subject of a College of Physicians and Surgeons review.

The Tribunal granted the deferral, finding it appropriate to avoid concurrent proceedings dealing with identical allegations and issues.

Hall v. Sharma, 2010 HRTO 1951

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 27, 2010

Respondents given 14 days to file a response to human rights application or face default proceedings.

The applicant filed an application alleging sex discrimination in employment.

The respondents failed to file a response within the required 35-day period.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the respondents to file a response within 14 days, along with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice and deem the respondents to have accepted the allegations.

Whale v. Keele North Recycling, 2010 HRTO 1947

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 24, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond to correspondence.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

A mediation was scheduled, but the applicant failed to attend.

The Tribunal subsequently sent correspondence requiring the applicant to confirm their intentions, warning that failure to respond would result in the application being deemed abandoned.

The applicant did not respond within the specified time.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Delano Brown v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2010 HRTO 1950

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 24, 2010

Tribunal scheduled a preliminary hearing to determine if human rights application is barred by mediation privilege.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal arising from comments and settlement exchanges during an OLRB mediation meeting.

The respondents requested dismissal under section 45.1 of the Code, arguing the OLRB had already dealt with the substance and raising concerns about mediation privilege.

The Tribunal scheduled a preliminary hearing by teleconference to address the mediation privilege issue and granted the applicant's union intervener status.

Johnson v. Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario, 2010 HRTO 1948

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 24, 2010

Respondent ordered to file response within 14 days or face proceedings without further notice.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in services, goods, and facilities based on disability.

The respondent failed to file a response within the required 35-day period.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the respondent to file a response within 14 days, along with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice and deem the respondent to have accepted the allegations.

Michael Wahba v. Redcliff Realty Management Inc. (Woodside Square Mall), 2010 HRTO 1946

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 23, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond to correspondence.

The applicant filed a human rights application but failed to attend a scheduled mediation.

The Tribunal subsequently sent correspondence requiring the applicant to advise of her intentions, warning that failure to respond would result in the application being deemed abandoned.

The applicant did not respond.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Stephanie Oliver v. Hampton Inn by Hilton, 2010 HRTO 1940

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 23, 2010

Respondent given final 14-day extension to file response before Tribunal proceeds without them.

The applicant filed a human rights application.

The respondent failed to file a response despite being served with the Notice of Application twice.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the respondent to file a response within 14 days, warning that failure to do so may result in the Tribunal proceeding without further notice and deeming the respondent to have accepted the allegations.

Karin Beach v. Sandra Pereira, 2010 HRTO 1924

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 21, 2010

Request to reactivate deferred human rights application dismissed as premature pending official closure of civil claim.

The applicant filed a Request for Order to reactivate her human rights application, which had been deferred pending the conclusion of a Small Claims Court wrongful dismissal claim against the corporate respondent.

The applicant indicated the civil claim was settled but acknowledged that final documents to officially close the case had not yet been filed.

The Tribunal dismissed the request to reactivate as premature, noting it cannot consider the request until the Small Claims Court matter is officially concluded.

Baker v. Sears Canada, 2010 HRTO 1918

Page 35 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 35 of 44 (867 cases)

Ena Chadha

Reid v. Revera Long Term Care Inc., 2010 HRTO 2058

Voula Michaelidis

John Evans

Ena Chadha

Mugdim Kadic v. AXYZ Automation Inc., 2010 HRTO 2041

Ena Chadha

Cakmakci v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2010 HRTO 2047

Ann Burke

Ena Chadha

Benqi Wei v. Seneca College of Applied Arts and Technology and Don Forster, 2010 HRTO 2046

Ena Chadha

Achille Ruffolo v. Sun Life Financial, 2010 HRTO 2009

Ena Chadha

Plant v. Shantine Ltd. (No. 1), 2010 HRTO 2010

Ena Chadha

Bailey v. Community Living Toronto, 2010 HRTO 1988

Ena Chadha

C.L. v. Town of Cochrane, 2010 HRTO 1975

Ena Chadha

Mary Traversy v. Holtom’s Bakery Ltd., 2010 HRTO 1985

Ena Chadha

André King v. Toronto District School Board, 2010 HRTO 1984

Ena Chadha

Marek Rokicki v. Schneider National Carriers Inc., 2010 HRTO 1983

Ena Chadha

Pollard v. 748161 Ontario, 2010 HRTO 1982

Ena Chadha

Hall v. Sharma, 2010 HRTO 1951

Ena Chadha

Whale v. Keele North Recycling, 2010 HRTO 1947

Ena Chadha

Delano Brown v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2010 HRTO 1950

Ena Chadha

Johnson v. Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario, 2010 HRTO 1948

Ena Chadha

Michael Wahba v. Redcliff Realty Management Inc. (Woodside Square Mall), 2010 HRTO 1946

Ena Chadha

Stephanie Oliver v. Hampton Inn by Hilton, 2010 HRTO 1940

Ena Chadha

Karin Beach v. Sandra Pereira, 2010 HRTO 1924

Ena Chadha

Baker v. Sears Canada, 2010 HRTO 1918

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

for himself

for Jennette Frost

for Manulife Financial

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

for Michael Watson

for Mohammed Manjra

for OPSEU

for Paul Cohn

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

for Stanley Klimitz

for Stan Mei

for the Affected Party

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

for the Applicant

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

for the Applicants