Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 10, 2011

Human rights application reactivated and amended on consent following conclusion of related college proceeding.

The applicant requested to reactivate her human rights application alleging sex discrimination, following the conclusion of a related proceeding before the College of Midwives of Ontario.

She also sought to amend the application to add reprisal allegations and additional remedies.

The respondents consented or did not object to the reactivation and amendments.

The Tribunal granted the requests to reactivate and amend the application, and directed the parties to provide submissions regarding the removal of one of the respondents.

Cloutier Holtz v. Midwives of Sudbury, 2011 HRTO 491

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 10, 2011

Tribunal allows human rights application to proceed but seeks submissions on deferral due to concurrent grievance.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of race, colour, and place of origin.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application appeared to lack specific acts of discrimination.

After reviewing the applicant's submissions, the Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the application fell outside its jurisdiction and allowed it to proceed.

However, noting a concurrent union grievance regarding the applicant's termination, the Tribunal directed the parties to provide submissions on whether the application should be deferred.

Yohanathan Kanapathipillai v. Specialty Care and Venus Inocencio, 2011 HRTO 492

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 7, 2011

Request to dismiss human rights application for delay denied as last incident occurred within limitation period.

The respondent requested an order to dismiss the human rights application, alleging it was filed out of time because it pertained to events surrounding the applicant's pregnancy in July 2008.

The applicant argued the application also addressed her treatment upon returning from pregnancy leave, a request for accommodation, and her termination in April 2010.

The Tribunal found that the last alleged event occurred in April 2010, well within the one-year limitation period prior to the application's filing in November 2010.

The respondent's request to dismiss for delay was denied.

Hariharen v. Highland Creek Pharmacy, 2011 HRTO 478

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 3, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent OLRB unfair labour practice proceeding.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of ethnicity, claiming he was terminated due to his ethnicity and union activities.

The respondents requested early dismissal for delay and because a concurrent unfair labour practice application before the OLRB dealt with the same substance, or alternatively, deferral.

The Tribunal denied the request to dismiss for delay, finding the application was filed within one year of the last alleged event.

The Tribunal also denied the request to dismiss under section 45.1 as premature since the OLRB proceeding was ongoing.

However, the Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the OLRB proceeding to avoid inconsistent decisions.

Mohammad Bhatti v. Oakville United Taxi Ltd., 2011 HRTO 450

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 1, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent union grievance regarding employment termination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability following her termination.

The respondent requested that the application be deferred pending the resolution of a union grievance concerning the same termination.

The applicant's union also requested to intervene.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene and ordered the deferral of the application, finding that the grievance and the application dealt with the same factual and legal subject matter.

Courtney Kencher v. No Frills Grocery Store, 2011 HRTO 434

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 28, 2011

Human rights application dismissed for being out of time and failing to allege a Code-protected ground.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal regarding housing and services, stemming from an arrest for uttering a death threat to her landlord and alleged unfair treatment by her probation officer.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application was filed more than one year after the last incident and did not appear to allege a Code-protected ground.

The Tribunal found that pursuing other legal avenues was not a good faith reason for the delay and that the allegations against the probation officer did not relate to a Code-protected ground.

The application was dismissed.

Maria Rots v. Her Majesty in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services and Brian Grobben, 2011 HRTO 422

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 28, 2011

Respondent deemed to have accepted human rights allegations after failing to file a Response.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging employment discrimination on the basis of disability.

The respondent failed to file a Response despite receiving notice and a subsequent Interim Decision providing an extension.

The Tribunal ordered that the respondent is deemed to have waived all rights to notice or participation and accepted all allegations in the Application pursuant to Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The applicant was directed to submit any additional materials before a final determination.

Lynn Coscina v. 2253308 Ontario Inc. c.o.b. as Halton School of Equitation, 2011 HRTO 430

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 25, 2011

Human rights application dismissed for abandonment and lack of jurisdiction over federally regulated aviation employer.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination during training as a ground service agent at Pearson International Airport.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, noting the respondent appeared to be a federally regulated business outside provincial jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding it was both abandoned and outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction because aeronautics and related ground services fall under federal jurisdiction.

Satanaporn Ruangsakulrach v. Servisair Co. Ltd. and Ken Won, 2011 HRTO 389

Brian D. Mulroney

20 cases1995–2017

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 25, 2011

Human rights application dismissed under section 34(11) due to identical concurrent civil action.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and constructive dismissal.

The respondents requested dismissal under section 34(11) of the Human Rights Code, arguing the applicant had commenced a civil action based on identical facts and seeking identical relief.

The Tribunal found that the civil Statement of Claim and the Application were identical in all respects.

As section 34(11) creates a mandatory bar against duplicative proceedings, the Tribunal concluded it had no jurisdiction and dismissed the Application.

Ahmed v. St. Joseph’s Health Centre, 2011 HRTO 418

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 25, 2011

Application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to provide requested status update on deferred proceeding.

The applicant filed a human rights application which was previously deferred pending the completion of a related proceeding under the Canadian Human Rights Act.

The Tribunal later directed the applicant to provide a status update on the federal proceeding within 30 days, warning that failure to do so could result in the application being dismissed as abandoned.

The applicant did not respond to the Tribunal's direction.

As a result, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

David Davies v. Compton Cable T.V. Limited and Edward Olsen, 2011 HRTO 409

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 25, 2011

Human rights application dismissed for abandonment after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of sex (pregnancy).

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer pending a Ministry of Labour proceeding.

The respondent subsequently requested dismissal, noting the Ministry of Labour had already dismissed the applicant's claim.

After the applicant failed to respond to the respondent's request or the Tribunal's Case Assessment Direction, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Cynthia Langenegger v. National Importers Canada Ltd., 2011 HRTO 407

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 23, 2011

Human rights application dismissed against personal respondents due to corporate respondent's bankruptcy stay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The corporate respondent subsequently declared bankruptcy.

The applicant sought to continue the application against the personal respondents only.

The Tribunal held that because the allegations against the personal respondents related solely to their roles as supervisory employees of the corporate respondent, proceeding against them would constitute a proceeding in respect of the bankrupt entity's business.

As no leave of the Court or consent of the Receiver had been obtained, the application was dismissed pursuant to the stay provisions of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.

Kemper v. Allprint Ainsworth Associates, 2011 HRTO 371

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 23, 2011

Union granted intervener status in employee's human rights application alleging employment discrimination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment.

The applicant's union, the United Steelworkers, filed a Request to Intervene, which the applicant opposed.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene, noting that a bargaining agent nearly always has an interest in a human rights application brought by an employee in its bargaining unit.

Mohammed Wazid v. Dairy Products In Motion and Many Valadao, 2011 HRTO 397

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 22, 2011

Human rights application dismissed at preliminary stage for failing to allege a Code-protected ground.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging reprisal by a collection agency pursuing him for credit card debt because he had assets.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss as the application did not allege discrimination based on a Code-protected ground.

The applicant failed to provide submissions on jurisdiction.

The Tribunal dismissed the application at a preliminary stage, finding it plain and obvious that the allegations did not relate to a Code-protected ground and fell outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

Cornelius Von Blyderveen v. Preferred Credit Resource Limited, 2011 HRTO 392

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 22, 2011

Reconsideration of interim decision dismissing untimely human rights allegations denied.

The applicant requested reconsideration of an interim decision that dismissed her pre-2009 allegations of discrimination against the university for delay.

The applicant argued that the earlier events were necessary to show a continuous pattern of discrimination culminating in a 2009 incident with campus police.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the applicant was merely attempting to reargue matters already decided and had not established any new facts, conflict with jurisprudence, or other grounds for reconsideration under the Tribunal's Rules.

Nepthys Aberdeen v. University of Toronto, 2011 HRTO 386

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 22, 2011

Reconsideration request denied as untimely and failing to meet threshold criteria.

The applicant filed a request for reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application for being filed outside the one-year limitation period.

The reconsideration request was filed more than four months after the original decision, well beyond the 30-day time limit under Rule 26.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding it was untimely and that the applicant failed to establish any new facts, evidence, or other threshold criteria to justify reconsideration.

King v. Toronto District School Board, 2011 HRTO 382

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 17, 2011

Deferred human rights application reactivated following conclusion of related Grievance Settlement Board proceedings.

The applicant filed human rights applications in 2009 and 2010 alleging discrimination and a poisoned work environment, which were deferred pending the conclusion of related grievances before the Grievance Settlement Board.

Following a GSB decision awarding damages, the applicant requested to reactivate the 2010 application and amend it to include a new allegation.

The Tribunal granted the request to reactivate as it was filed within the 60-day time limit under Rule 14.4, and directed the respondents to file submissions on the request to amend.

Cox v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2011 HRTO 347

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 16, 2011

Application dismissed against one respondent due to applicant's failure to provide correct contact information.

The applicant failed to provide correct contact information for a personal respondent, and neither party complied with a previous Tribunal order to provide his last known address.

In accordance with the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal dismissed the application against the personal respondent and amended the style of cause.

The matter was directed to mediation for the remaining parties.

Indrama Ramcharran v. 3PD, Inc., and Alan Hamill, 2011 HRTO 341

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 16, 2011

Tribunal declined to defer human rights application pending WSIB claim as WSIB proceeding did not address discriminatory dismissal.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, claiming he was dismissed for reporting a workplace injury.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer pending the resolution of a related WSIB claim.

The respondent agreed to the deferral, but the applicant argued the WSIB claim did not address his termination or right to reinstatement.

The Tribunal declined to defer the application, finding that the allegations of discriminatory dismissal were not the subject of the WSIB proceeding, and ordered the respondent to file a Response.

Greg Kirk v. Convoy Supply Ltd, 2011 HRTO 346

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 16, 2011

Corporate respondent ordered to provide last known address of former employee named as personal respondent.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging age discrimination and reprisal against her former employer and a personal respondent.

The corporate respondent filed a response indicating the personal respondent was no longer employed there and it did not represent her.

As the personal respondent had not received the application, the Tribunal ordered the corporate respondent to provide the personal respondent's last known address so the Tribunal could deliver the application.

Colleen Letourneau v. Jenny Craig Canada Inc. and Catherine Muto, 2011 HRTO 342

Page 30 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 30 of 44 (867 cases)