Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 5, 2011

Ministry of Community and Social Services removed as a party on consent.

The respondent Ministry of Community and Social Services requested to be removed as a party from the Application.

The applicant consented to the request, and the respondent Board took no position.

The Tribunal granted the request, amended the style of cause, and directed the Registrar to schedule mediation.

Hall v. Thunder Bay Social Services Administration Board (District), 2011 HRTO 650

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 4, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned and out of time after applicant failed to respond.

The applicant filed a human rights application more than one year after the last alleged incident of discrimination.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, directing the applicant to provide written submissions explaining the delay.

The applicant failed to file any submissions.

The Tribunal found that ignorance of the law is not a sufficient explanation for delay, deemed the application abandoned, and dismissed it.

The Estate of Ursula Boehme v. Affordable Property Management Inc., 2011 HRTO 638

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 31, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent union grievance regarding employment termination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging employment discrimination on the basis of race, colour, and place of origin.

The respondents requested that the application be deferred because the applicant had an ongoing union grievance regarding the termination of his employment, which was in the mediation-arbitration process.

The Tribunal deferred the application to avoid concurrent proceedings and the possibility of inconsistent decisions, pending the conclusion of the grievance.

Yohanathan Kanapathipillai v. Specialty Care and Venus Inocencio, 2011 HRTO 633

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 31, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment on the basis of disability and record of offences.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer because the applicant had an ongoing grievance regarding the termination of his employment.

The respondents supported deferral, while the applicant opposed it due to the potential length of the arbitration process.

The Tribunal deferred the application to avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent findings.

The Tribunal also granted the respondents' request to remove the respondent Program as a party, as it is not a separate legal entity.

Miller v. North Bay General Hospital, 2011 HRTO 632

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 30, 2011

Human rights application dismissed for delay as applicant failed to establish good faith explanation.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, more than one year after her employment was terminated.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed for delay.

The applicant argued that she only discovered the discriminatory nature of her termination upon receiving her Record of Employment months later.

The Tribunal rejected the discoverability argument, finding that the applicant's concurrent grievance application demonstrated she was aware of the alleged discrimination within the limitation period.

The application was dismissed as out of time under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

Marian Jones v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, as represented by the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, 2011 HRTO 624

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 30, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent union grievances based on same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment on the basis of disability.

The respondent requested that the application be deferred because the applicant had three ongoing union grievances arising from the same facts.

The Tribunal found that deferral was appropriate to avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent findings, despite the applicant's concerns about the delay in the arbitration process.

The application was deferred pending the conclusion of the grievances.

Lundy v. St. Joseph’s Health Care, 2011 HRTO 623

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 28, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to jurisdictional notice.

The applicant, a baggage handler, filed an application alleging unfair treatment in employment due to a workplace injury.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the respondent appeared to be a federally regulated business.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice within the required timeframe.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Kabir Bedi v. Swissport Canada Handling Inc. and George Forrest, 2011 HRTO 607

Sarah A. Eves

9 cases1994–2017

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 28, 2011

Union granted intervenor status; submissions ordered on whether application should be dismissed for delay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The facts of the application were also the subject of an outstanding union grievance.

The union requested intervenor status, which the Tribunal granted.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed for delay, as it was allegedly filed more than one year after the last incident of discrimination.

The Tribunal directed the applicant and the union to file written submissions regarding the delay issue before making a determination.

Sharon Goldthorpe v. Markham Stouffville Hospital, 2011 HRTO 596

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 25, 2011

Human rights application dismissed at preliminary stage for failing to allege a Code-protected ground.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of record of offences and reprisal.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application did not describe any specific acts of discrimination related to a Code-protected ground.

The applicant failed to provide written submissions regarding the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding it plain and obvious that the allegations did not fall within its jurisdiction and deeming the application abandoned due to the applicant's failure to respond.

Mitchell v. Associate Tube, 2011 HRTO 599

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 24, 2011

Application reinstated on reconsideration after dismissal for abandonment was found to result from administrative oversight.

The Tribunal reconsidered its previous decision dismissing the application as abandoned.

The applicant's representative provided evidence that they had responded to the Tribunal's notification, but the correspondence was not brought to the adjudicator's attention due to an administrative oversight.

The Tribunal reinstated the application and directed that it be scheduled for mediation.

Buchanan v. San Romanoway Revitalization Association, 2011 HRTO 588

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 24, 2011

Request to dismiss human rights application for delay denied as alleged incidents were ongoing.

The respondent requested that the human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of place of origin be dismissed for delay.

The respondent argued the application pertained to events from 2008.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's concerns regarding an unfair reduction of work hours were ongoing and that the last alleged incident occurred in July 2010.

As the application was filed in September 2010, it satisfied the one-year limitation period under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The request to dismiss for delay was denied.

Tatiana Ovtchinnikova v. Para Med Home Health Care, 2011 HRTO 587

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 23, 2011

Employer granted conditional access to applicant's medical files and extension of time to file Response.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal based on disability regarding workplace accommodation.

Prior to filing its Response, the respondent employer requested an order permitting access to the applicant's occupational health and WSIB files, citing the need to review them to respond to the allegations, and requested an extension of time.

The applicant opposed, arguing access was unnecessary unless the employer disputed his disability.

The Tribunal ordered the employer to clarify its position on the disability, after which the applicant must consent to the disclosure of the files.

The respondents were granted an extension of time to file their Responses.

Ahmed Akash v. Toronto Transit Commission and Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113, 2011 HRTO 583

Human rights application against independent medical examiners dismissed; evaluative functions protected by expert witness immunity.

The applicant filed a human rights complaint against two doctors who conducted an independent medical examination (IME) for her workplace grievance, alleging discrimination and failure to accommodate her physical disability during the assessment.

The Tribunal found that while the IME process engaged the Code's protections for services and facilities, the doctors' evaluative functions and resulting report were protected by expert witness immunity.

The only actionable claim was the alleged failure to accommodate the applicant's physical disability with appropriate seating during psychological testing.

The Tribunal dismissed this claim, finding insufficient evidence that the applicant notified the doctor of her needs or that he failed to address them.

Bajouco v. McMaster, 2011 HRTO 569

Michael Klug

28 cases1992–2024

John W.T. Judson

3 cases1989–2011

David C. Moore

72 cases1985–2026

Christopher Taucar

5 cases2011–2015

Barry J. Brown

2 cases2010–2011

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 18, 2011

Human rights applications consolidated and deferred pending related Judicial Review.

The applicant filed two human rights applications alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment.

The Tribunal considered whether to consolidate the applications and whether to defer them pending a related Judicial Review.

Finding significant overlap in facts, issues, and parties, the Tribunal ordered the applications consolidated.

Given the pending Judicial Review seeking similar remedies and raising identical facts, the Tribunal deferred the consolidated applications to avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent results.

Taucar v. The University of Western Ontario, 2011 HRTO 550

Sie-Wing Khow

Practising Law - Employed22 cases2009–2018

Melany Franklin

12 cases1991–2013

Mandy Eason

8 cases2008–2011

Kimberly R. Murray

12 cases2002–2011

Glenn Chu

14 cases2008–2016

Antonella Ceddia

Practising Law - Employed42 cases2008–2017

Amanda Driscoll

7 cases2011–2013

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 17, 2011

Police officer's hasty arrest and heightened suspicion of Aboriginal man found to be racial profiling.

The complainant, an Aboriginal man, alleged he was subjected to racially biased policing when he was stopped, investigated, and arrested for possession of stolen property (his own bicycle) by a Toronto police officer.

The Tribunal found that the officer's heightened suspicions, closed-minded investigation, hasty arrest based on flawed information, and post-release demands were influenced by negative stereotypes about Aboriginal people lacking credibility and being prone to criminality.

The Tribunal concluded that the complainant's race was a factor in his treatment, establishing a case of racial discrimination in the provision of policing services.

The hearing was bifurcated, with liability and remedies to be determined subsequently.

McKay v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2011 HRTO 499

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 17, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

After failing to attend a scheduled mediation on time, the Tribunal directed the applicant to advise of her intentions regarding the application.

The applicant failed to respond to multiple communications from the Tribunal.

Consequently, the application was deemed abandoned and dismissed.

Buchanan v. San Romanoway Revitalization Association, 2011 HRTO 537

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 16, 2011

Respondent given 10 days to file late Response to human rights application before proceeding undefended.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on sexual solicitation and advance.

The respondent failed to file a Response by the required deadline.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the respondent to file a Response within 10 days, along with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice and deem the respondent to have accepted the allegations.

Patricia Perrault v. NYS Steak Co., 2011 HRTO 530

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 16, 2011

Request to dismiss human rights applications denied; parties directed to provide submissions on consolidation.

The respondents requested the early dismissal of two human rights applications alleging sex discrimination, arguing that a previous employment reprisal application had appropriately dealt with their substance under section 45.1 of the Code.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding no evidence that the employment case resolved the substance of the current applications regarding goods and services.

The Tribunal also directed the parties to provide submissions on consolidating the two applications and on the applicants' allegation that the respondents' law firm was in a conflict of interest.

Traversy v. Erin District Lions Club, 2011 HRTO 525

Julian Falconer

6 cases2008–2026

Ed Holmes

280 cases2000–2026

Cathy Phan

73 cases2009–2018

Asha James

34 cases2009–2024

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 14, 2011

Tribunal grants leave to withdraw 2009 application and allows amendment of 2010 application on consent.

The applicant sought to withdraw his 2009 human rights application against the Ministry and proceed with his amended 2010 application against both the Ministry and his union.

The respondents consented to the amendment of the 2010 application without prejudice to their positions on the merits.

The Tribunal granted leave to withdraw the 2009 application, allowed the amendment of the 2010 application, and set a schedule for the respondents to file amended responses addressing their preliminary objections.

Cox v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2011 HRTO 514

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 11, 2011

Union granted intervenor status and applicant permitted to amend human rights application to add reprisal allegation.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging employment discrimination and reprisal.

The union filed a request to intervene, and the applicant filed a request to amend the application to add a new reprisal allegation involving police contact.

As there were no objections, the Tribunal granted the union intervenor status and permitted the applicant to amend the application.

Wallance Lim v. Lorraine Siu, Luviminda Pangasanhan and Yuen-Yee Chow, 2011 HRTO 501

Page 29 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 29 of 44 (867 cases)

Ena Chadha

Hall v. Thunder Bay Social Services Administration Board (District), 2011 HRTO 650

Ena Chadha

The Estate of Ursula Boehme v. Affordable Property Management Inc., 2011 HRTO 638

Ena Chadha

Yohanathan Kanapathipillai v. Specialty Care and Venus Inocencio, 2011 HRTO 633

Ena Chadha

Miller v. North Bay General Hospital, 2011 HRTO 632

Ena Chadha

Marian Jones v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, as represented by the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, 2011 HRTO 624

Ena Chadha

Lundy v. St. Joseph’s Health Care, 2011 HRTO 623

Ena Chadha

Kabir Bedi v. Swissport Canada Handling Inc. and George Forrest, 2011 HRTO 607

Sarah A. Eves

Ena Chadha

Sharon Goldthorpe v. Markham Stouffville Hospital, 2011 HRTO 596

Ena Chadha

Mitchell v. Associate Tube, 2011 HRTO 599

Ena Chadha

Buchanan v. San Romanoway Revitalization Association, 2011 HRTO 588

Ena Chadha

Tatiana Ovtchinnikova v. Para Med Home Health Care, 2011 HRTO 587

Ena Chadha

Ahmed Akash v. Toronto Transit Commission and Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113, 2011 HRTO 583

Elizabeth K.P. Grace

Ann Mitchell

Ena Chadha

Bajouco v. McMaster, 2011 HRTO 569

Michael Klug

John W.T. Judson

David C. Moore

Christopher Taucar

Barry J. Brown

Ena Chadha

Taucar v. The University of Western Ontario, 2011 HRTO 550

Sie-Wing Khow

Melany Franklin

Mandy Eason

Kimberly R. Murray

Glenn Chu

Antonella Ceddia

Amanda Driscoll

Ena Chadha

McKay v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2011 HRTO 499

Ena Chadha

Buchanan v. San Romanoway Revitalization Association, 2011 HRTO 537

Ena Chadha

Patricia Perrault v. NYS Steak Co., 2011 HRTO 530

Ena Chadha

Traversy v. Erin District Lions Club, 2011 HRTO 525

Julian Falconer

Ed Holmes

Cathy Phan

Asha James

Ena Chadha

Cox v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2011 HRTO 514

Ena Chadha

Wallance Lim v. Lorraine Siu, Luviminda Pangasanhan and Yuen-Yee Chow, 2011 HRTO 501

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

for himself

for Jennette Frost

for Manulife Financial

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen