42 total
Stay of Human Rights Tribunal proceedings granted pending judicial review due to procedural fairness concerns.
The applicant, Toronto Police Services Board, brought a motion for a stay of proceedings before the Human Rights Tribunal pending its application for judicial review.
The applicant argued it was denied procedural fairness when the Ontario Human Rights Commission referred the complaint to the Tribunal without providing an amended complaint or addressing the complainant's delay.
The Divisional Court found the applicant satisfied the three-part test for a stay, noting serious issues regarding procedural fairness and jurisdiction, and that proceeding before the Tribunal would render the judicial review moot.
The motion for a stay was granted and an expedited hearing for the judicial review was directed.
Appeal allowed; university election guideline requiring constituency membership throughout election period does not conflict with statutory eligibility.
The Governing Council of the University of Toronto appealed a Superior Court decision that quashed the Chief Returning Officer's rejection of the respondent's nomination for a student position on the Governing Council.
The lower court found a conflict between the Election Guidelines, which required a candidate to be a member of their constituency throughout the election period, and the University of Toronto Act, which stated every student is eligible for election.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, finding no conflict.
The Court held that 'eligible' does not mean 'entitled,' and the guideline was a valid procedural rule establishing a connection with a constituency.