The appellant appealed a trial judgment denying her spousal support following a 32-year marriage.
The trial judge found that after equalization, the appellant had a net worth of approximately $1.4 million and that the parties' ability to maintain their pre-divorce lifestyle had diminished due to the respondent's job loss, not the divorce.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no error in the trial judge's application of the Divorce Act and his conclusion that spousal support was not warranted given the appellant's assets, earning capacity, and remarriage.
