The parties, parents to an eight-year-old boy, separated in 2022 following an incident of family violence.
The father sought increased parenting time and a corresponding reduction in child support, while the mother sought retroactive child support and proportionate sharing of various extracurricular activities as section 7 expenses.
The court found that increasing the father's parenting time was not in the child's best interests given the child's distress from the parents' conflict and need for stability.
The court ordered the father to pay child support arrears and determined which extracurricular activities qualified as extraordinary expenses to be shared proportionately.
