Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 17, 2015

Reconsideration request denied; applicant failed to establish grounds to overturn dismissal based on concurrent civil action.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed her application under section 34(11) of the Human Rights Code because she had filed a civil action based on the same facts.

The applicant argued the Tribunal was the only organization equipped to judge the alleged human rights violations and sought to defer the application rather than dismiss it.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding the applicant failed to establish any of the criteria under Rule 26 or circumstances outweighing the public interest in finality.

Elizabeth Xynnis v. 1196197 Ontario Limited, 2015 HRTO 335

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 17, 2015

Leave to proceed with new applications and request for reconsideration denied for vexatious litigant.

The applicant, previously declared a vexatious litigant, sought leave to proceed with two applications regarding the cancellation of group life and long-term disability insurance, and requested reconsideration of a prior decision denying leave for a related application.

The Tribunal denied leave for the new applications, finding no connection between the respondent's conduct and the cited grounds.

The Tribunal also denied the reconsideration request, noting that without an accepted application, there is no final decision to reconsider, and rejected allegations of bias and evidence tampering.

Papouchine v. Named Respondent, 2015 HRTO 337

Clara Matheson

16 cases2009–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 16, 2015

Motion to add security company as a respondent to human rights application granted.

The applicant filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings to amend her human rights application to add Garda World Security Corporation as a respondent.

The original respondent, Oxford Properties Group, noted in its response that the security guards involved in the alleged incident were employed by Garda, not Oxford.

As Garda did not file a response to the request and the applicant alleged joint liability, the Tribunal granted the request to add Garda as a respondent.

Bark v. Oxford Properties Group, 2015 HRTO 328

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 13, 2015

Request for reconsideration denied as applicant failed to establish new evidence or other criteria.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application following a summary hearing.

The applicant argued that there were new facts or evidence and other factors outweighing the public interest in finality.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's submissions largely repeated arguments made at the summary hearing and that the additional details provided were available to him at that time.

The request for reconsideration was denied as the applicant failed to establish any of the criteria under Rule 26.

Simon Malek v. Mountain City Housing Co-operative Inc., 2015 HRTO 313

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 13, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal correspondence.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

Both parties agreed to mediation, but the applicant subsequently failed to provide available dates or respond to Tribunal correspondence.

After being warned that failure to respond would result in the application being deemed abandoned, the applicant still did not reply.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Holding v. Chaudhari, 2015 HRTO 314

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 13, 2015

Human rights application deferred pending completion of concurrent union grievance process.

The respondent requested that the human rights application be deferred pending the completion of a related grievance proceeding.

The applicant's union had filed a grievance alleging workplace assault, harassment, and bullying based on the same events.

The Tribunal found that the central issues would be addressed in the grievance process and that concurrent proceedings could lead to conflicting factual conclusions.

The Tribunal exercised its discretion under Rule 14.1 to defer the application pending the outcome of the grievance process.

Ulanie Fabre v. Grand Toronto Venture L.P., 2015 HRTO 319

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 11, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal correspondence.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

After indicating an intention to withdraw the application, the applicant failed to file a formal withdrawal form or respond to the Tribunal's correspondence requesting confirmation of his intent to proceed or participate in mediation.

As the deadline passed without any communication from the applicant, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Tanweer Khawaja v. Silfab Solar Inc. and Toronto Personnel Inc. o/a Winters Technical Staffing, 2015 HRTO 296

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 11, 2015

Applicant permitted to withdraw human rights application over respondent's objections regarding abuse of process and costs.

The applicant sought to withdraw her human rights application after a summary hearing.

The respondent opposed the withdrawal, arguing the application was an abuse of process and seeking costs, noting the time and resources spent responding.

The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal, finding insufficient basis to refuse the request.

The Tribunal noted it lacks jurisdiction to award costs and that abuse of process arguments could be raised if the applicant attempts to re-file.

Gricken v. Macera, 2015 HRTO 295

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 10, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal correspondence.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

Both parties agreed to mediation, but the applicant failed to provide available dates or otherwise contact the Tribunal.

After the applicant failed to respond to a notice of intent to dismiss, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Parent v. Arbor Memorial Inc., 2015 HRTO 287

Indira Sawh

23 cases2010–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 9, 2015

Request for interim remedy to order administration of medication in prison denied.

The applicant, an inmate, filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in services regarding prison conditions and the denial of previously prescribed medication.

He requested an interim remedy ordering the respondents to provide him with the medication.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that it would be inappropriate to order the administration of medication without a physician's determination, and noting that the applicant failed to provide a signed declaration or demonstrate why the extraordinary remedy was necessary.

Charette v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2015 HRTO 273

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 6, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal correspondence.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code, which was deferred pending the conclusion of ongoing criminal proceedings.

The Tribunal subsequently sent two letters requesting an update on the status of the criminal proceedings, warning that failure to respond could result in the application being dismissed as abandoned.

The applicant failed to respond to either letter.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Victoria Mahoney v. Dentistry at Riverglen, 2015 HRTO 272

Richard Campbell

56 cases2000–2026

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 4, 2015

Human rights application dismissed at summary hearing for lacking a link to a prohibited ground.

The applicant alleged discrimination on the basis of family status after the respondent housing co-operative denied his membership application and allegedly forced his wife to move to a smaller unit.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing and dismissed the application, finding that the applicant lacked standing to bring claims on behalf of his wife and that his allegations of unfairness and favouritism were not linked to any prohibited ground of discrimination under the Human Rights Code.

Malek v. Mountain City Housing Co-operative Inc., 2015 HRTO 161

Marie-France Chartrand

Practising Law - Employed5 cases2007–2015

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 26, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend summary hearing.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

A summary hearing was scheduled by teleconference to determine whether the application should be dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant failed to attend the hearing.

The Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Colin Barnard v. McDonald's Canada Corporation, 2015 HRTO 111

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 23, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal correspondence.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

After failing to attend a scheduled mediation, the applicant initially indicated a desire to pursue the matter but subsequently failed to respond to multiple communications from the Tribunal, including requests for a mailing address, hearing dates, and confirmation of intentions.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Rivers v. Woodward Meat Purveyors Inc., 2015 HRTO 103

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 23, 2015

Human rights application dismissed at preliminary stage as allegations sounded in negligence, not discrimination.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination with respect to services on the basis of disability, claiming the respondent was negligent and caused an injury that aggravated a pre-existing condition.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application failed to identify any specific acts of discrimination.

Finding that the allegations sounded in negligence rather than discrimination, the Tribunal concluded it was plain and obvious that the subject matter did not fall within its jurisdiction under the Human Rights Code and dismissed the application.

Mahase v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2015 HRTO 100

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 20, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code which was deferred on consent.

After inquiring about the status, the applicant was directed to file a Request for an Order During Proceedings to reactivate the application.

The applicant failed to do so and failed to respond to a subsequent Case Assessment Direction.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Antonia Balloi v. Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, 2015 HRTO 80

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 16, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the application on the basis that it appeared to be outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice and a subsequent follow-up email.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Leahy v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2015 HRTO 68

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 16, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal notices.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID and a subsequent follow-up email.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Patrick Porzuczek v. Keizer Investment Ltd., 2015 HRTO 65

Ryan Hanna

1 case2015–2015

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 15, 2015

Human rights application dismissed for no reasonable prospect of success as allegations lacked Code nexus.

The applicant, a former employee and union chairperson, alleged reprisal and age discrimination against the respondent credit union following her termination.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's allegations related to union activities and collective agreement rights, not rights protected under the Human Rights Code.

Furthermore, the applicant provided no evidence linking her treatment to her age.

The application was dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

Wilk v. St. Stanislaus – St. Casimir’s Polish Credit Union, 2015 HRTO 61

Kent Elson

In Private Practice18 cases2011–2026

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 13, 2015

Interim remedy request denied due to lack of supporting declarations and absence of actual eviction threat.

The applicants filed human rights applications alleging discrimination in housing on the basis of disability, family status, and receipt of public assistance.

They requested an interim remedy, alleging the respondent was threatening to evict them.

The Tribunal denied the request because it was not supported by signed declarations as required by Rule 23.3(b) of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, and the respondent established that no eviction had been threatened or initiated.

The applicants also failed to demonstrate that an interim remedy was necessary to ensure an effective remedy at the end of the hearing.

C.R. v. Peregrine Co-op, 2015 HRTO 46

Page 11 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 11 of 49 (975 cases)