Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

Tribunal grants request to substitute organizational respondent for 15 individual respondents and temporarily anonymizes parties.

The applicant filed a request to have C.W. named as litigation guardian, which was permitted under the Tribunal's rules.

The applicant also requested to remove 15 individually named respondents and add the organizational respondent, C.C.S.S., in their place.

With the consent of the individual respondents and no opposition from the proposed organizational respondent, the Tribunal granted the request.

The Tribunal also temporarily anonymized the parties' names pending a final ruling on the issue.

M.W. v. C.C.S.S., 2015 HRTO 43

Jordana K. Joseph

5 cases2012–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 12, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend summary hearing.

The applicant filed a human rights application but failed to attend the scheduled summary hearing by teleconference.

The Tribunal waited 30 minutes before proceeding.

As the applicant did not appear and there was no further communication, the application was dismissed as abandoned.

Thomas Medhurst v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2015 HRTO 35

Gregory Roberts

7 cases2002–2023

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 5, 2015

Request to defer human rights application pending Court of Appeal leave application denied.

The respondent requested to defer the human rights application pending the applicant's leave to appeal application to the Court of Appeal regarding a Landlord Tenant Board (LTB) decision.

The applicant opposed the request.

The Tribunal noted that deferral is discretionary and aimed at avoiding concurrent and potentially conflicting decisions.

Since neither the LTB nor the Divisional Court addressed the discrimination issues, the Tribunal found no significant danger of conflicting decisions.

The request for deferral was denied.

Eldorse Mliscogen v. Deanna Durfy, 2015 HRTO 5

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 31, 2014

Application against union dismissed as failure to pursue grievance is not inherently discriminatory.

The applicant filed a human rights application against his employer and his union, alleging discrimination based on disability, race, colour, and ethnic origin.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss regarding the union, noting that the only allegation against it was a failure to act on a reported incident and a refusal to pursue a grievance.

The applicant failed to provide written submissions establishing that the union's inaction was based on discriminatory factors.

The Tribunal dismissed the application against the union, holding that a union's failure to represent an employee on a human rights claim is not, in and of itself, a breach of the Code.

Smith v. Canpar Ltd., 2014 HRTO 1844

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 31, 2014

Application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction, directing the applicant to respond by a specific date.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID.

As a result, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Cheryl Obermuller v. Wind Mobile and Anthony Lacavera, 2014 HRTO 1843

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 30, 2014

Human rights application dismissed for delay as applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in services on the basis of creed.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for delay, as the application was filed more than one year after the last alleged incident of discrimination.

The applicant argued that the delay was due to illness and ongoing proceedings at the Licensing Appeals Tribunal.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay, noting his ability to pursue other legal avenues during the same period.

The application was dismissed for delay.

Qureshi v. Tarion Warranty Corporation, 2014 HRTO 1840

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 22, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) on the basis that the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Michael Witt v. Bank of Nova Scotia/Scotiabank, 2014 HRTO 1816

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 19, 2014

Tribunal grants unopposed request to amend application to add reprisal ground.

The applicant filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings to amend her Application to include the ground of reprisal, specifically concerning the termination of the doctor/patient relationship by the respondent.

The respondent did not file a response.

The Tribunal granted the request to amend, noting the timely nature of the request, the early stage of the proceedings, and the respondent's lack of objection.

Dawna Lynn Morrison-George v. Norma Krupa Medicine Professional Corporation, 2014 HRTO 1809

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 19, 2014

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as alleged harassment was not linked to a Code ground.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of reprisal, claiming he was subjected to escalating harassment after complaining to the owner.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application did not link the alleged harassment to any ground under the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal found it had no jurisdiction over general claims of unfairness and dismissed the application, as the applicant failed to establish he was claiming or enforcing a right under the Code.

Jack Kelly v. Doughty Masonry Center, 2014 HRTO 1808

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 18, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant was directed to respond by a specific date but failed to do so.

As a result, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Davies v. Cleto, 2014 HRTO 1800

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 18, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notices of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued two Notices of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) on the basis that the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to either NOID by the specified deadlines.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Jon Elligson v. Brick Brewing Co. Ltd., 2014 HRTO 1801

Robert Choi

2 cases2014–2015

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 5, 2014

Tribunal finds pregnancy was a factor in housekeeper's termination; remedy deferred.

The applicant, a housekeeper, alleged she was terminated from her employment because of her pregnancy, contrary to the Human Rights Code.

The respondents claimed she was fired during her probationary period for failing to provide notice of three absences.

The Tribunal found the applicant's evidence regarding her absences credible and concluded that her pregnancy was a factor in the organizational respondent's decision to terminate her employment.

The application against the individual respondent was dismissed as she did not make the termination decision.

The issue of remedy was deferred.

Marne v. Aptco Capital Corporation, 2014 HRTO 1756

Lisa D. Belcourt

7 cases2009–2026

Angela E. Rae

11 cases1994–2015

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 4, 2014

Tribunal granted respondent's request to amend Response and deferred applicant's request for workplace inspection.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability.

The respondent brought a Request for an Order During Proceedings (RFOP) to amend its Response, which the Tribunal granted as unopposed and reasonable.

The applicant also brought an RFOP seeking production of documents regarding the physical demands of a subway operator position and an order permitting an occupational therapist to enter the respondent's premises to assess those demands.

The Tribunal deferred the applicant's request, scheduling a preliminary teleconference to address the scope of the hearing and the order of evidence.

Michelle Kungl v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2014 HRTO 1750

Terry Hill

8 cases1998–2021

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 2, 2014

Last-minute adjournment granted due to applicant's medical condition preventing participation.

The applicant requested a last-minute adjournment of the hearing due to health issues, supported by a medical note.

The respondents objected to the request.

The Tribunal granted the adjournment, noting that a medical condition preventing participation constitutes an exceptional circumstance under its Practice Direction.

The applicant was directed to provide updates on his medical status and whether he has retained counsel.

Eric Mattison v. Town of Pelham and Sarah Thomson, 2014 HRTO 1740

Paulette Haynes

5 cases2009–2015

Greg Bullen

47 cases2009–2017

Gavin Leeb

23 cases1996–2018

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 24, 2014

Human rights application dismissed under s. 45.1 as a prior grievance arbitration dealt with its substance.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal on the basis of disability.

The respondents requested that the application be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing that a prior Grievance Settlement Board (GSB) arbitration had already dealt with the substance of the allegations.

The Tribunal found that the GSB arbitrator had addressed the core human rights issues, including the failure to accommodate and discriminatory termination, and had awarded reinstatement and lost wages.

Concluding that the substance of the application was appropriately dealt with in the other proceeding, the Tribunal dismissed the application.

Lubinovic v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2014 HRTO 1694

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 6, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal communications.

The applicant filed a human rights application which was previously deferred pending the conclusion of a civil action in the Superior Court.

The Tribunal subsequently contacted the applicant to inquire about the status of the civil action, warning that failure to respond could result in the application being deemed abandoned.

The applicant failed to respond to the Tribunal's letter and follow-up email.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Elkhouli v. Ecuhome Corporation, 2014 HRTO 1632

Mark Mendi

1 case2014–2014

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 27, 2014

Request to defer human rights application pending WSIAT appeal denied due to lack of overlapping issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, claiming he was improperly terminated for job abandonment after a workplace injury.

The respondent requested that the Tribunal defer the application pending the outcome of the applicant's appeal to the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (WSIAT) regarding whether his injury was work-related.

The Tribunal denied the deferral request, finding no significant danger of conflicting decisions because the Tribunal has jurisdiction over the discrimination claim regardless of where the injury occurred.

Mariusz Szewczyk v. McMaster University, 2014 HRTO 1583

Rishi Bandhu

Not Practising Law - Employed9 cases2008–2014

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 23, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend summary hearing.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

A summary hearing was scheduled by teleconference to determine whether the application should be dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant failed to attend the hearing.

The Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Antonio Rowe v. SteriPro Canada LP, 2014 HRTO 1566

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 21, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant failed to attend a scheduled mediation session and did not respond to a subsequent Tribunal direction inquiring about her intentions.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Elizabeth Sahoye-Shury v. DBA Property Management and The Board of Toronto Condominium 1491, 2014 HRTO 1560

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 17, 2014

Human rights application dismissed at preliminary stage for failing to connect allegations to a Code ground.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination with respect to services on the basis of reprisal, claiming her gas service was unfairly cut off for seven months.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application failed to identify specific acts of discrimination or explain how the respondents' behaviour constituted reprisal.

The applicant's response did not address the lack of connection to a Code ground.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding it plain and obvious that the allegations did not fall within its jurisdiction.

Obermuller v. Enbridge Gas Distribution, 2014 HRTO 1549

Page 12 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 12 of 49 (975 cases)

Sean Jackson

Maija Laitinen

Naomi Overend

M.W. v. C.C.S.S., 2015 HRTO 43

Jordana K. Joseph

Naomi Overend

Thomas Medhurst v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2015 HRTO 35

Gregory Roberts

Naomi Overend

Eldorse Mliscogen v. Deanna Durfy, 2015 HRTO 5

Naomi Overend

Smith v. Canpar Ltd., 2014 HRTO 1844

Naomi Overend

Cheryl Obermuller v. Wind Mobile and Anthony Lacavera, 2014 HRTO 1843

Naomi Overend

Qureshi v. Tarion Warranty Corporation, 2014 HRTO 1840

Naomi Overend

Michael Witt v. Bank of Nova Scotia/Scotiabank, 2014 HRTO 1816

Naomi Overend

Dawna Lynn Morrison-George v. Norma Krupa Medicine Professional Corporation, 2014 HRTO 1809

Naomi Overend

Jack Kelly v. Doughty Masonry Center, 2014 HRTO 1808

Naomi Overend

Davies v. Cleto, 2014 HRTO 1800

Naomi Overend

Jon Elligson v. Brick Brewing Co. Ltd., 2014 HRTO 1801

Robert Choi

Naomi Overend

Marne v. Aptco Capital Corporation, 2014 HRTO 1756

Lisa D. Belcourt

Angela E. Rae

Naomi Overend

Michelle Kungl v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2014 HRTO 1750

Terry Hill

Naomi Overend

Eric Mattison v. Town of Pelham and Sarah Thomson, 2014 HRTO 1740

Paulette Haynes

Greg Bullen

Gavin Leeb

Naomi Overend

Lubinovic v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2014 HRTO 1694

Naomi Overend

Elkhouli v. Ecuhome Corporation, 2014 HRTO 1632

Mark Mendi

Naomi Overend

Mariusz Szewczyk v. McMaster University, 2014 HRTO 1583

Rishi Bandhu

Naomi Overend

Antonio Rowe v. SteriPro Canada LP, 2014 HRTO 1566

Naomi Overend

Elizabeth Sahoye-Shury v. DBA Property Management and The Board of Toronto Condominium 1491, 2014 HRTO 1560

Naomi Overend

Obermuller v. Enbridge Gas Distribution, 2014 HRTO 1549

Applicant

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

for Academic Women for Justice

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

for herself

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

for himself

for Kinark Child and Family Services

for Kingston Access Services

for Loblaw Inc.

for Lorna Jack

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

for Michael Burns