Cheryl Obermuller v. Wind Mobile and Anthony Lacavera, 2014 HRTO 1843

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Cheryl Obermuller

Applicant

-and-

Wind Mobile and Anthony Lacavera

Respondents

DECISION

Adjudicator: Naomi Overend

Date: December 31, 2014

Citation: 2014 HRTO 1843

Indexed as: Obermuller v. Wind Mobile

Introduction

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on September 17, 2014.

2On November 3, 2014 the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than December 3, 2014. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to that NOID and the time for doing so has now passed.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.